| Literature DB >> 35317194 |
Jiamin Zhou1,2, Tong Wen1,2, Qing Li1,2, Zhixin Chen1,2, Xiaoping Peng1,2, Chunying Wei1,2, Yunfeng Wei1,2, Jingtian Peng1,2, Wei Zhang3.
Abstract
Objectives: Myocardial infarction (MI) is a common cardiovascular disease. Histopathology is a main molecular characteristic of MI, but often, differences between various cell subsets have been neglected. Under this premise, MI-related molecular biomarkers were screened using single-cell sequencing.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35317194 PMCID: PMC8934393 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6534126
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Math Methods Med ISSN: 1748-670X Impact factor: 2.238
Figure 1Screening of modules associated with immune cells. (a) Wilcoxon's test compared the abundance of 22 types of immune cells between normal and myocardial infarction samples. (b) Average connectivity of selected β and different β values when R2 reaches 0.7 for the first time. (c) Clustering dendrogram of comethylation modules from GSE109048. (d) Correlation analysis of 13 modules with resting mast cells, activated mast cells, and activated CD4 memory T cells.
Figure 2The function of the turquoise module and the interaction of hub gene. (a) The GO analysis of genes in the turquoise module includes three aspects: molecular function, cellular component, and biological process. (b) The KEGG pathway enrichment analysis on the turquoise module genes. (c) Scatter plot of turquoise-GS-MM distribution. (d) The turquoise module gene-gene interaction network diagram. (e) The differential expression of 10 hub genes in normal and myocardial infarction samples was analyzed. (f) Pearson's correlation analysis among 10 hub genes.
Figure 3scRNA-seq data analysis of human myocardial infarction. (a) The cell samples were divided into 8 subgroups by the t-SNE algorithm. (b) Eight cell subpopulations were annotated according to the marker. (c) The violin picture showed the expression patterns of specific genes in two kinds of smooth muscle cells. (d) The cell development trajectories of 8 subpopulations were predicted by the monocle. Each point represents a cell and is marked with pseudotime (right) and the cell state (left).
Figure 4Expression heat maps of the first five marker genes in each cell subpopulation in different cell clusters.
Figure 5Expression distribution of Hub gene and chemokines in 8 cell subpopulations. (a) Bubble map of 7 hub genes expressed in 8 cell subpopulations. (b) The expression level of chemokines and their receptors in each cell cluster. The dot color demonstrates the average intensity of expression, and the dot size shows the quantity of cells expressing the gene.
Figure 6Characteristics of enrichment pathways in different cell subpopulations. (a) Enrichment activity of each cell subpopulation in the first 10 pathways. (b) Specific enrichment scores of 8 kinds of cell subpopulations on the 10 pathways with the greatest difference.