| Literature DB >> 35317141 |
Ying-Ying Lu1, Xiao-Min Lu1, Chun-Yan Shao2, Chen-Chen Wang1, Ting-Ting Xu1, Bei-Lei Zhang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Leukemia is a broad term for blood cell cancer. Leukemia is divided into acute or chronic, depending on cell differentiation. Leukemia patients are prone to adverse reactions during chemotherapy, such as anxiety, depression, and even suicide, affecting prognosis. As a nursing model developed by three well-known cognitive psychologists, empathetic nursing with mindfulness cognitive therapy (ENMCT) can effectively reduce anxiety and depression and improve the quality of life in patients with chronic disease. AIM: To explore the effect of ENMCT on cancer-induced fatigue, hope level, and negative emotions in patients with long-term leukemia chemotherapy.Entities:
Keywords: Cancer-induced fatigue; Chemotherapy; Empathetic nursing; Hope level; Leukemia; Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy; Negative emotions
Year: 2022 PMID: 35317141 PMCID: PMC8891779 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i6.1826
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Clin Cases ISSN: 2307-8960 Impact factor: 1.337
Comparison of Piper Fatigue Scale scores of the two groups (mean ± SD, points)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Observation group ( | Before intervention | 5.15 ± 1.49 | 4.09 ± 1.38 | 5.37 ± 1.48 | 4.19 ± 1.35 | 18.80 ± 2.74 |
| After intervention | 2.60 ± 0.82 | 2.44 ± 1.01 | 3.46 ± 1.13 | 2.25 ± 0.77 | 18.55 ± 2.85 | |
| Control group ( | Before intervention | 5.06 ± 1.42 | 4.03 ± 1.24 | 5.34 ± 1.41 | 4.12 ± 1.38 | 10.75 ± 1.76 |
| After intervention | 4.63 ± 1.37 | 3.78 ± 1.13 | 4.47 ± 1.26 | 3.03 ± 0.95 | 15.92 ± 2.45 | |
|
| - | 9.190 | 6.348 | 4.285 | 4.582 | 12.304 |
|
| - | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Group comparison before treatment.
PFS: Piper Fatigue Scale.
Comparison of Herth hope Index scores of the two groups (mean ± SD, points)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Observation group ( | Before intervention | 9.14 ± 2.28 | 9.53 ± 2.72 | 10.93 ± 2.43 | 29.61 ± 4.57 |
| After intervention | 14.06 ± 1.78 | 14.28 ± 1.89 | 14.52 ± 1.76 | 42.86 ± 3.52 | |
| Control group ( | Before intervention | 9.33 ± 2.64 | 9.48 ± 2.66 | 10.85 ± 3.16 | 29.69 ± 5.24 |
| After intervention | 10.67 ± 1.69 | 11.08 ± 1.46 | 12.03 ± 1.39 | 33.78 ± 2.58 | |
|
| - | 9.909 | 9.603 | 7.958 | 14.894 |
|
| - | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Group comparison before treatment.
HHI: Herth hope Index.
Comparison of Hamilton Anxiety Scale and Hamilton Depression Scale scores of the two groups (mean ± SD, points)
|
|
|
|
|
| Observation group ( | Before intervention | 20.22 ± 2.55 | 22.07 ± 4.57 |
| After intervention | 9.11 ± 3.12 | 9.98 ± 3.21 | |
| Control group ( | Before intervention | 20.06 ± 3.12 | 22.25 ± 4.22 |
| After intervention | 13.97 ± 3.32 | 16.88 ± 3.55 | |
|
| - | 7.657 | 10.351 |
|
| - | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Group comparison before treatment.
HAMA: Hamilton Anxiety Scale; HAMD: Hamilton Depression Scale.
Comparison of Chinese Strategies Used by People to Promote Health scores between the two groups (mean ± SD, points)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Observation group ( | Before intervention | 39.48 ± 9.19 | 8.33 ± 2.35 | 29.57 ± 6.71 |
| After intervention | 52.87 ± 7.72 | 11.29 ± 2.49 | 35.46 ± 6.42 | |
| Control group ( | Before intervention | 40.40 ± 9.54 | 7.82 ± 1.83 | 28.78 ± 5.92 |
| After intervention | 47.80 ± 9.18 | 9.04 ± 2.65 | 31.42 ± 5.98 | |
|
| - | 3.036 | 4.442 | 3.303 |
|
| - | 0.003 | < 0.001 | 0.001 |
Group comparison before treatment.
C-SUPPH: Chinese Strategies Used by People to Promote Health.