| Literature DB >> 35315421 |
Eda Üreyen Özdemir1, Pınar Yalçın Bahat2, Nura Fitnat Topbaş Selçuki3, Kübra Çakmak4, Fatih Çakmak5, Salim Neşelioğlu6, Özcan Erel7.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of the study is to show the relationship between oxidative stress and ectopic pregnancy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35315421 PMCID: PMC8972882 DOI: 10.23750/abm.v93i1.11097
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Biomed ISSN: 0392-4203
Comparison of demographic and laboratory measurements between the control and the study group.
| Control group (n=31) | Study group (n=31) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 29.4±6.5 | 28.5±4.7 | 0.507† |
| 427.4±81.9 | 379.4±90.8 | ||
| 467.4±81.2 | 422.5±98.6 | 0.055† | |
| 0.93 (0.84-0.97) | 0.95 (0.89-1.08) | ||
| 3.6 (2.8-3.9) | 3.4 (3.0-3.7) | 0.464‡ | |
| 19.9 (15.2-24.1) | 20.6 (14.7-23.9) | 0.657‡ | |
| 4.9±2.0 | 5.8±2.5 | 0.107† | |
| 4.4±1.6 | 5.1±1.8 | 0.100† | |
| 91.2±3.2 | 89.7±3.7 | 0.100† |
* Descriptive statistics were shown as mean ± SD, ** Data were expressed as median (25th – 75th) percentiles, † Student’s t test, ‡ Mann Whitney U test.
The results of ROC analyses
| AUC | 95% CI | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.657 | 0.521-0.793 |
|
|
| 0.634 | 0.496-0.773 | 0.069 |
|
| 0.649 | 0.511-0.788 |
|
|
| 0.554 | 0.404-0.704 | 0.464 |
|
| 0.533 | 0.386-0.679 | 0.657 |
|
| 0.626 | 0.484-0.768 | 0.088 |
|
| 0.626 | 0.484-0.768 | 0.087 |
|
| 0.626 | 0.484-0.769 | 0.087 |
AUC: Area Under the Curve, CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 1.Graphical representation of the area under the curve for native thiol levels in the study group
Figure 2.Graphical representation of the area under the curve for IMA levels in the study group
Diagnostic performance indicators for native thiol and IMA in terms for detection of ectopic pregnancy
| Definitions | Native thiol | IMA | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| <433.9 | >1.0235 | |
|
| TP/(TP+FN) | 23/31 (74.2%) | 11/31 (35.5%) |
|
| TN/(TN+FP) | 18/31 (58.1%) | 30/31 (96.8%) |
|
| TP/(TP+FP) | 23/36 (63.9%) | 11/12 (91.7%) |
|
| TN/(FN+TN) | 18/26 (69.2%) | 30/50 (60.0%) |
|
| (TP+TN)/(N) | 41/62 (66.1%) | 41/62 (66.1%) |
PPV: Positive predictive value, NPV: Negative predictive value, TP: True positive, FN: False negative, TN: True negative, FP: False positive, N: No. of total cases.