Literature DB >> 3531519

The effect of feedback in learning clinical diagnosis.

R S Wigton, K D Patil, V L Hoellerich.   

Abstract

There is evidence that students who are given information about how they appear to weight information in reaching a judgment can learn to make judgments more accurately. In teaching medical diagnosis, the present authors used a microcomputer system to generate simulated cases and then calculate the relationship between the data presented and the student's diagnosis. Students who were given feedback comparing their apparent weighting of clinical information with the correct weighting learned to diagnose urinary tract infection more accurately than control students who received feedback only on the outcome of their diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3531519     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-198610000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Educ        ISSN: 0022-2577


  16 in total

1.  Impact of feedback and peer review on prescribing.

Authors:  F M Haaijer-Ruskamp; P Denig
Journal:  Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1995-02

2.  Improving Feedback for Medical Students in a Family Medicine Clerkship: Evaluating medical student performance using frequent feedback.

Authors:  D G White; R Tiberius; Y Talbot; V Schiralli; M Rickett
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Teaching consultation psychiatry through computerized case simulation.

Authors:  J S Jachna; S M Powsner; P J McIntyre; R Byck
Journal:  Acad Psychiatry       Date:  1993-03

4.  Physician characteristics associated with proficiency in feedback skills.

Authors:  Elizabeth P Menachery; Amy M Knight; Ken Kolodner; Scott M Wright
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Findings from an evaluation of PlanAlyzer's double cross-over trials of computer-based, self-paced, case-based programs in anemia and chest pain diagnosis.

Authors:  H C Lyon; J C Healy; J R Bell; J F O'Donnell; E K Shultz; R S Wigton; F Hirai; J R Beck
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1991

6.  Significant efficiency findings while controlling for the frequent confounders of CAI research in the PlanAlyzer project's computer-based, self-paced, case-based programs in anemia and chest pain diagnosis.

Authors:  H C Lyon; J C Healy; J R Bell; J F O'Donnell; E K Shultz; R S Wigton; F Hirai; J R Beck
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  Feedback in clinical education, part I: Characteristics of feedback provided by approved clinical instructors.

Authors:  Sara Nottingham; Jolene Henning
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Decision making in asthma exacerbation: a clinical judgement analysis.

Authors:  John Jenkins; Mike Shields; Chris Patterson; Frank Kee
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 3.791

9.  Feedback in the emergency medicine clerkship.

Authors:  Aaron W Bernard; Nicholas E Kman; Sorabh Khandelwal
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2011-11

10.  Learning physical examination skills outside timetabled training sessions: what happens and why?

Authors:  Robbert J Duvivier; Koos van Geel; Jan van Dalen; Albert J J A Scherpbier; Cees P M van der Vleuten
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.