Literature DB >> 35314822

Deep learning-enabled assessment of cardiac allograft rejection from endomyocardial biopsies.

Jana Lipkova1,2,3, Tiffany Y Chen1,2,3, Ming Y Lu1,2,3,4, Richard J Chen1,2,3,5, Maha Shady1,2,3,5, Mane Williams1,2,3,5, Jingwen Wang1,6, Zahra Noor1, Richard N Mitchell1,7, Mehmet Turan8, Gulfize Coskun8, Funda Yilmaz9, Derya Demir9, Deniz Nart9, Kayhan Basak10, Nesrin Turhan10, Selvinaz Ozkara10, Yara Banz11, Katja E Odening12,13, Faisal Mahmood14,15,16,17,18.   

Abstract

Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) screening represents the standard of care for detecting allograft rejections after heart transplant. Manual interpretation of EMBs is affected by substantial interobserver and intraobserver variability, which often leads to inappropriate treatment with immunosuppressive drugs, unnecessary follow-up biopsies and poor transplant outcomes. Here we present a deep learning-based artificial intelligence (AI) system for automated assessment of gigapixel whole-slide images obtained from EMBs, which simultaneously addresses detection, subtyping and grading of allograft rejection. To assess model performance, we curated a large dataset from the United States, as well as independent test cohorts from Turkey and Switzerland, which includes large-scale variability across populations, sample preparations and slide scanning instrumentation. The model detects allograft rejection with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.962; assesses the cellular and antibody-mediated rejection type with AUCs of 0.958 and 0.874, respectively; detects Quilty B lesions, benign mimics of rejection, with an AUC of 0.939; and differentiates between low-grade and high-grade rejections with an AUC of 0.833. In a human reader study, the AI system showed non-inferior performance to conventional assessment and reduced interobserver variability and assessment time. This robust evaluation of cardiac allograft rejection paves the way for clinical trials to establish the efficacy of AI-assisted EMB assessment and its potential for improving heart transplant outcomes.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35314822      PMCID: PMC9353336          DOI: 10.1038/s41591-022-01709-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Med        ISSN: 1078-8956            Impact factor:   87.241


  46 in total

Review 1.  Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2018 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Emelia J Benjamin; Salim S Virani; Clifton W Callaway; Alanna M Chamberlain; Alexander R Chang; Susan Cheng; Stephanie E Chiuve; Mary Cushman; Francesca N Delling; Rajat Deo; Sarah D de Ferranti; Jane F Ferguson; Myriam Fornage; Cathleen Gillespie; Carmen R Isasi; Monik C Jiménez; Lori Chaffin Jordan; Suzanne E Judd; Daniel Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda Lisabeth; Simin Liu; Chris T Longenecker; Pamela L Lutsey; Jason S Mackey; David B Matchar; Kunihiro Matsushita; Michael E Mussolino; Khurram Nasir; Martin O'Flaherty; Latha P Palaniappan; Ambarish Pandey; Dilip K Pandey; Mathew J Reeves; Matthew D Ritchey; Carlos J Rodriguez; Gregory A Roth; Wayne D Rosamond; Uchechukwu K A Sampson; Gary M Satou; Svati H Shah; Nicole L Spartano; David L Tirschwell; Connie W Tsao; Jenifer H Voeks; Joshua Z Willey; John T Wilkins; Jason Hy Wu; Heather M Alger; Sally S Wong; Paul Muntner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Serum exosomal protein profiling for the non-invasive detection of cardiac allograft rejection.

Authors:  Peter J Kennel; Amit Saha; Dawn A Maldonado; Raymond Givens; Danielle L Brunjes; Estibaliz Castillero; Xiaokan Zhang; Ruiping Ji; Alexandre Yahi; Isaac George; Donna M Mancini; Antonius Koller; Barry Fine; Emmanuel Zorn; Paolo C Colombo; Nicholas Tatonetti; Emily I Chen; P Christian Schulze
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 10.247

3.  Diagnostic Assessment of Deep Learning Algorithms for Detection of Lymph Node Metastases in Women With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Babak Ehteshami Bejnordi; Mitko Veta; Paul Johannes van Diest; Bram van Ginneken; Nico Karssemeijer; Geert Litjens; Jeroen A W M van der Laak; Meyke Hermsen; Quirine F Manson; Maschenka Balkenhol; Oscar Geessink; Nikolaos Stathonikos; Marcory Crf van Dijk; Peter Bult; Francisco Beca; Andrew H Beck; Dayong Wang; Aditya Khosla; Rishab Gargeya; Humayun Irshad; Aoxiao Zhong; Qi Dou; Quanzheng Li; Hao Chen; Huang-Jing Lin; Pheng-Ann Heng; Christian Haß; Elia Bruni; Quincy Wong; Ugur Halici; Mustafa Ümit Öner; Rengul Cetin-Atalay; Matt Berseth; Vitali Khvatkov; Alexei Vylegzhanin; Oren Kraus; Muhammad Shaban; Nasir Rajpoot; Ruqayya Awan; Korsuk Sirinukunwattana; Talha Qaiser; Yee-Wah Tsang; David Tellez; Jonas Annuscheit; Peter Hufnagl; Mira Valkonen; Kimmo Kartasalo; Leena Latonen; Pekka Ruusuvuori; Kaisa Liimatainen; Shadi Albarqouni; Bharti Mungal; Ami George; Stefanie Demirci; Nassir Navab; Seiryo Watanabe; Shigeto Seno; Yoichi Takenaka; Hideo Matsuda; Hady Ahmady Phoulady; Vassili Kovalev; Alexander Kalinovsky; Vitali Liauchuk; Gloria Bueno; M Milagro Fernandez-Carrobles; Ismael Serrano; Oscar Deniz; Daniel Racoceanu; Rui Venâncio
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  AI-based pathology predicts origins for cancers of unknown primary.

Authors:  Tiffany Y Chen; Drew F K Williamson; Ming Y Lu; Melissa Zhao; Maha Shady; Jana Lipkova; Faisal Mahmood
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Epidemiology and aetiology of heart failure.

Authors:  Boback Ziaeian; Gregg C Fonarow
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 32.419

6.  Circulating cell-free DNA enables noninvasive diagnosis of heart transplant rejection.

Authors:  Iwijn De Vlaminck; Hannah A Valantine; Thomas M Snyder; Calvin Strehl; Garrett Cohen; Helen Luikart; Norma F Neff; Jennifer Okamoto; Daniel Bernstein; Dana Weisshaar; Stephen R Quake; Kiran K Khush
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 17.956

7.  Pan-cancer image-based detection of clinically actionable genetic alterations.

Authors:  Alexander T Pearson; Tom Luedde; Jakob Nikolas Kather; Lara R Heij; Heike I Grabsch; Chiara Loeffler; Amelie Echle; Hannah Sophie Muti; Jeremias Krause; Jan M Niehues; Kai A J Sommer; Peter Bankhead; Loes F S Kooreman; Jefree J Schulte; Nicole A Cipriani; Roman D Buelow; Peter Boor; Nadi-Na Ortiz-Brüchle; Andrew M Hanby; Valerie Speirs; Sara Kochanny; Akash Patnaik; Andrew Srisuwananukorn; Hermann Brenner; Michael Hoffmeister; Piet A van den Brandt; Dirk Jäger; Christian Trautwein
Journal:  Nat Cancer       Date:  2020-07-27

Review 8.  Advanced Morphologic Analysis for Diagnosing Allograft Rejection: The Case of Cardiac Transplant Rejection.

Authors:  Eliot G Peyster; Anant Madabhushi; Kenneth B Margulies
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 9.  A Changing Paradigm in Heart Transplantation: An Integrative Approach for Invasive and Non-Invasive Allograft Rejection Monitoring.

Authors:  Alessia Giarraputo; Ilaria Barison; Marny Fedrigo; Jacopo Burrello; Chiara Castellani; Francesco Tona; Tomaso Bottio; Gino Gerosa; Lucio Barile; Annalisa Angelini
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-02-01

10.  Yet Another Automated Gleason Grading System (YAAGGS) by weakly supervised deep learning.

Authors:  Yechan Mun; Inyoung Paik; Su-Jin Shin; Tae-Yeong Kwak; Hyeyoon Chang
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2021-06-14
View more
  2 in total

1.  Fast and scalable search of whole-slide images via self-supervised deep learning.

Authors:  Ming Y Lu; Drew F K Williamson; Chengkuan Chen; Tiffany Y Chen; Andrew J Schaumberg; Faisal Mahmood
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 29.234

Review 2.  The evolving role of morphology in endometrial cancer diagnostics: From histopathology and molecular testing towards integrative data analysis by deep learning.

Authors:  Sarah Fremond; Viktor Hendrik Koelzer; Nanda Horeweg; Tjalling Bosse
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 5.738

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.