| Literature DB >> 35314505 |
Niklas Schwarz1, Simone Seiffert1, Manuela Pendziwiat1, Annika Verena Rademacher1, Tobias Brünger1, Ulrike B S Hedrich1, Paul B Augustijn1, Hartmut Baier1, Allan Bayat1, Francesca Bisulli1, Russell J Buono1, Ben Zeev Bruria1, Michael G Doyle1, Renzo Guerrini1, Gali Heimer1, Michele Iacomino1, Hugh Kearney1, Karl Martin Klein1, Ioanna Kousiappa1, Wolfram S Kunz1, Holger Lerche1, Laura Licchetta1, Ebba Lohmann1, Raffaella Minardi1, Marie McDonald1, Sarah Montgomery1, Lejla Mulahasanovic1, Renske Oegema1, Barel Ortal1, Savvas S Papacostas1, Francesca Ragona1, Tiziana Granata1, Phillip S Reif1, Felix Rosenow1, Annick Rothschild1, Paolo Scudieri1, Pasquale Striano1, Paolo Tinuper1, George A Tanteles1, Annalisa Vetro1, Felix Zahnert1, Ethan M Goldberg1, Federico Zara1, Dennis Lal1, Patrick May1, Hiltrud Muhle1, Ingo Helbig1, Yvonne Weber1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: KCNC2 encodes Kv3.2, a member of the Shaw-related (Kv3) voltage-gated potassium channel subfamily, which is important for sustained high-frequency firing and optimized energy efficiency of action potentials in the brain. The objective of this study was to analyze the clinical phenotype, genetic background, and biophysical function of disease-associated Kv3.2 variants.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35314505 PMCID: PMC9162046 DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200660
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurology ISSN: 0028-3878 Impact factor: 11.800
Clinical and Genetic Information on the Analyzed Cohort
Figure 1Structure of KV3.2 Encoded by KCNC2
A) Schematic structure of the KV3.2 subunit. The subunit consists of 6 transmembrane segments (1–6) with long C- and N-terminal regions. The N-terminal plays a crucial role for the tetramerization of the channel. The 4th transmembrane segment works as the voltage sensor and the extracellular loop between the 5th and the 6th transmembrane segment forms the selectivity filter for K+ ions. Variants are color-coded according to the phenotype of the patient: red = developmental and epileptic encephalopathy, yellow = early-onset absence epilepsy, blue = genetic generalized epilepsy, green = myoclonic-atonic epilepsy, and brown = focal epilepsy. (B) The 3D structure of KV3.2 predicted by RaptorX with KCNC2 variants and phenotypes included. The golden areas within the structure are highly conserved regions characterized by paralog conservation (Paraz score) and depletion of population variants (missense tolerance ratio [MTR] score). Extracellular loops are shown above the dotted line; the intracellular N- and C-terminal regions are shown below the line. The splice variant and E608K are not shown within the structure. E608K is only expressed in transcript number NM_139136 and not on NM_139137. which was used to create the structure. Red-rimmed variants were selected for functional analysis either measured here or previously described by us.[17]
Figure 2Electrophysiologic Analysis of the p.F219S KCNC2 Variant
Functional analysis for the F219S variant compared with wild-type (WT). The figures show that the milder phenotype F219S-GGE has a dramatically dominant negative effect in a sense of a loss of function. (A) Representative traces of KV3.2 currents in Xenopus laevis oocytes expressing WT, F219S, or a 1:1 mixture of both in response to the voltage steps from −70 mV to +30 mV. (B) Immunoblot analysis for lysates of X laevis oocytes injected with cRNA for KV3.2 WT, F219S, equal amounts of WT + F219S, or water. All channels showed a band at about 90 kDa. (C) Mean current amplitudes of analyzed oocytes injected with WT (n = 101), F219S (n = 39), equal amounts of WT + F219S (n = 29), or water (n = 44). (D) Resting membrane potentials of oocytes injected with WT (n = 101), F219S (n = 39), equal amounts of WT + F219S (n = 29), or water (n = 44). Shown are means ± SEM. Statistically significant differences between WT channels and the tested groups were verified by analysis of variance on ranks (indicated by asterisks).
Figure 3Electrophysiologic Analysis of Selected KCNC2 Variants
Functional analysis of the variants C125W, E135G, and T437A compared with wild-type (WT). The more severe phenotypes C125W-EOAE (increased current amplitude/activation at more hyperpolarized potentials/slow deactivation), E135G-DEE (normal current/activation at more hyperpolarized potentials/slow deactivation), and T437A-EOAE (reduced current amplitude/activation at more hyperpolarized potentials/slow deactivation) demonstrate gain of function. (A) Representative traces of KV3.2 currents recorded in Xenopus laevis oocytes expressing wild-type (WT) or the different variants (C125W, E135G, T437A) in response to voltage steps from −70 mV to +30 mV (with an increment of 10 mV). (B) Mean current amplitudes of oocytes injected with WT (n = 101) and equal amounts of WT + C125W (n = 40), WT + E135G (n = 31), WT + T437A (n = 41), or water (1.0, n = 44). (C) Resting membrane potentials of oocytes injected with WT (n = 101) and equal amounts of WT + C125W (n = 40), WT + E135G (n = 31), WT + F219S (n = 29), WT + T437A (n = 41), or water (n = 44). Shown are means ± SEM. Statistically significant differences between WT channels and the tested groups were verified by analysis of variance on ranks (indicated by asterisks). (D) Immunoblot analysis for lysates of X laevis oocytes injected with cRNA for KV3.2 WT and equal amounts of WT + C125W, WT + E135G, WT + T437A, or water. All channels showed a band at about 90 kDa. E. Mean voltage-dependent activation of KV3.2 channel for WT (n = 101), equal amounts of WT + C125W (n = 40), WT + E135G (n = 31), and WT + T437A (n = 42). Lines illustrate Boltzmann function fit to the data points. All activation curves showed a significant shift to more hyperpolarized potentials in comparison with WT channel alone. All data are shown as means ± SEM. (F) Mean voltage-dependent deactivation time constant of KV3.2 channel WT (n = 72), WT + C125W (n = 40), WT + E135G (n = 12), and WT + T437A (n = 20). All deactivation curves showed a significantly slower deactivation in comparison with channels only containing WT subunit. All data are shown as means ± SEM.