Literature DB >> 35314020

A Comparison of Blood Collection Techniques in Mice and their Effects on Welfare.

Amanda P Ahrens Kress1, Yudi Zhang2, Adrianne R Kaiser-Vry3, Mary B Sauer3.   

Abstract

Multiple methods are used to collect blood from mice; these methods have different effects on animal welfare. This study compared blood collection from facial, chin, and saphenous locations with regard to various parameters, including the time needed to collect blood, the number of attempts needed, success at completing the blood collection, volume of blood loss, weight changes in the mouse, presence of external lesions after blood collection and gross lesions at necropsy, physical signs during blood collection (vocalization, urination, and defecation), fecal corticosterone after blood collection, and blood chemistry values. While no one technique was clearly better for animal welfare, each technique had benefits and drawbacks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35314020      PMCID: PMC9137285          DOI: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-21-000129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci        ISSN: 1559-6109            Impact factor:   1.706


  22 in total

1.  Sublingual and submandibular blood collection in mice: a comparison of effects on body weight, food consumption and tissue damage.

Authors:  Maike Heimann; Daniel Robert Roth; David Ledieu; Rudolf Pfister; Werner Classen
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 2.471

2.  A rapid, simple, and humane method for submandibular bleeding of mice using a lancet.

Authors:  William T Golde; Peter Gollobin; Luis L Rodriguez
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 12.625

3.  Time-dependent Pathologic and Inflammatory Consequences of Various Blood Sampling Techniques in Mice.

Authors:  Dorte B Sørensen; Stine B Metzdorff; Louise K Jensen; Kamilla H Andersen; Anne C Teilmann; Henrik E Jensen; Hanne Frøkiaer
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 1.232

4.  Blood sampling from the retro-orbital plexus, the saphenous vein and the tail vein in rats: comparative effects on selected behavioural and blood variables.

Authors:  H Van Herck; V Baumans; C J Brandt; H A Boere; A P Hesp; H A van Lith; M Schurink; A C Beynen
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.471

5.  Comparison of Submental Blood Collection with the Retroorbital and Submandibular Methods in Mice (Mus musculus).

Authors:  Gheorghe M Constantinescu; Nicole E Duffee
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 1.232

6.  Evaluation of saphenous venipuncture and modified tail-clip blood collection in mice.

Authors:  Omorodola I Abatan; Kathleen B Welch; Jean A Nemzek
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.232

7.  Comparison of Submental Blood Collection with the Retroorbital and Submandibular Methods in Mice (Mus musculus).

Authors:  Rainy D Regan; Judy E Fenyk-Melody; Sam M Tran; Guang Chen; Kim L Stocking
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.232

8.  Blood sample collection in small laboratory animals.

Authors:  S Parasuraman; R Raveendran; R Kesavan
Journal:  J Pharmacol Pharmacother       Date:  2010-07

Review 9.  The Impact of Common Recovery Blood Sampling Methods, in Mice (Mus Musculus), on Well-Being and Sample Quality: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alexandra L Whittaker; Timothy H Barker
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.