| Literature DB >> 35313504 |
Li-Hsin Li1, Laurens Liesenborghs1,2, Lanjiao Wang3, Marleen Lox4, Michael Bright Yakass1,5, Sander Jansen1, Ana Lucia Rosales Rosas3, Xin Zhang1, Hendrik Jan Thibaut6, Dirk Teuwen1, Johan Neyts1, Leen Delang3, Kai Dallmeier1.
Abstract
New platforms are needed for the design of novel prophylactic vaccines and advanced immune therapies. Live-attenuated yellow fever vaccine YF17D serves as a vector for several licensed vaccines and platform for novel candidates. On the basis of YF17D, we developed an exceptionally potent COVID-19 vaccine candidate called YF-S0. However, use of such live RNA viruses raises safety concerns, such as adverse events linked to original YF17D (yellow fever vaccine-associated neurotropic disease [YEL-AND] and yellow fever vaccine-associated viscerotropic disease [YEL-AVD]). In this study, we investigated the biodistribution and shedding of YF-S0 in hamsters. Likewise, we introduced hamsters deficient in signal transducer and activator of transcription 2 (STAT2) signaling as a new preclinical model of YEL-AND/AVD. Compared with YF17D, YF-S0 showed improved safety with limited dissemination to brain and visceral tissues, absent or low viremia, and no shedding of infectious virus. Considering that yellow fever virus is transmitted by Aedes mosquitoes, any inadvertent exposure to the live recombinant vector via mosquito bites is to be excluded. The transmission risk of YF-S0 was hence compared with readily transmitting YF-Asibi strain and non-transmitting YF17D vaccine, with no evidence for productive infection of mosquitoes. The overall favorable safety profile of YF-S0 is expected to translate to other vaccines based on the same YF17D platform.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; RNA virus vector; YF17D; environmental safety; mosquito transmission; recombinant live-attenuated vaccine; vaccine biodistribution; vaccine safety; virus shedding
Year: 2022 PMID: 35313504 PMCID: PMC8925082 DOI: 10.1016/j.omtm.2022.03.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev ISSN: 2329-0501 Impact factor: 6.698
Figure 1Biodistribution of YF-S0 in hamsters
(A) Schematic of hamster vaccination and organ collection. Hamsters were inoculated i.p. with 104 PFU/mL of either YF17D or YF-S0 and sacrificed 7 days later. Organs from 4 different experimental groups, including sham-vaccinated wild-type (WT) hamsters and YF17D-vaccinated STAT2−/− (knockout [KO]) hamsters as respective negative and positive controls, were collected and divided for RNA extraction and virus isolation. (B) Viral RNA load by RT-qPCR. (C) Virus isolation by TCID50 assay. For sham and STAT2 KO, only PCR-positive samples were analyzed. (D and E) Heatmap representing positivity rates by organ and experimental group on the basis of the results of RT-qPCR (D) or TCID50 assay (E). Bars in (B) and (C) represent median values. N/A, not applicable.
Figure 2Shedding of YF-S0 by vaccinated hamsters
(A) Schematic of vaccination and specimen collection. Hamsters were inoculated as in Figure 1A, and serum, urine, feces, and buccal swabs were serially sampled at indicated time points. (B–E) Viral RNA load by RT-qPCR. (F–I) Area under curve (AUC; copies × day) calculated in GraphPad Prism 8; the Mann-Whitney test was used for the statistical analysis, with p > 0.05 marked as non-significant (ns); and ∗∗p ≤ 0.01. Serum RNA data for YF17D and YF-S0-vaccinated WT hamsters as previously published. LoQ, limit of quantification; LoD, limit of detection; dpi, days post-inoculation.
Figure 3Assessment of YF-S0 transmission potential by Aedes mosquitoes
(A) Schematic of virus feeding of mosquitoes and specimen collection. Mosquitoes were fed with infectious blood meal containing YF17D, YF-S0, YF-Asibi, or mock. Five mosquitoes were collected each for ingestion assessment. At 14 days post-feeding (dpf), remaining mosquitoes were dissected into two parts, midgut (infection assessment) and head, legs, and wings (dissemination assessment). (B) Viral RNA load by RT-qPCR. (C) Virus isolation by TCID50 assay. For assessment of ingestion and infection, RT-qPCR and TCID50 were performed on all samples. For assessment of dissemination, only a selection of PCR-positive specimens from the YF17D and YF-Asibi groups (n = 6 each) were further analyzed using TCID50 assay, plus 6 randomly chosen from the YF-S0 group. (D and E) Heatmap representing positivity rates per experiment group as scored by RT-qPCR (D) and TCID50 assay (E). Bars in (B) and (C) represent median values. N/A, not applicable. Mosquito icons were adapted from BioRender.com.