Literature DB >> 35313451

Reduced pathogenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant in hamsters.

Katherine McMahan1, Victoria Giffin1, Lisa H Tostanoski1, Benjamin Chung1, Mazuba Siamatu1, Mehul S Suthar2, Peter Halfmann3, Yoshihiro Kawaoka3, Cesar Piedra-Mora4, Neharika Jain4, Sarah Ducat4, Swagata Kar5, Hanne Andersen5, Mark G Lewis5, Amanda J Martinot4, Dan H Barouch1,6.   

Abstract

Background: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant has proven to be highly transmissible and has outcompeted the Delta variant in many regions of the world. Early reports have also suggested that Omicron may result in less severe clinical disease in humans. Here, we show that Omicron is less pathogenic than prior SARS-CoV-2 variants in Syrian golden hamsters.
Methods: Hamsters were inoculated with either SARS-CoV-2 Omicron or other SARS-CoV-2 variants. Animals were followed for weight loss, and upper and lower respiratory tract tissues were assessed for viral loads and histopathology. Findings: Infection of hamsters with the SARS-CoV-2 WA1/2020, Alpha, Beta, or Delta strains led to 4%-10% weight loss by day 4 and 10%-17% weight loss by day 6. In contrast, infection of hamsters with two different Omicron challenge stocks did not result in any detectable weight loss, even at high challenge doses. Omicron infection led to substantial viral replication in both the upper and lower respiratory tracts but demonstrated lower viral loads in lung parenchyma and reduced pulmonary pathology compared with WA1/2020 infection. Conclusions: These data suggest that the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant may result in robust upper respiratory tract infection, but less severe lower respiratory tract clinical disease, compared with prior SARS-CoV-2 variants. Funding: Funding for this study was provided by NIH grant CA260476, the Massachusetts Consortium for Pathogen Readiness, the Ragon Institute, and the Musk Foundation.
© 2022 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; hamster; omicron; pathogenicity

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35313451      PMCID: PMC8926874          DOI: 10.1016/j.medj.2022.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med (N Y)        ISSN: 2666-6340


Introduction

The highly mutated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron variant has led to rapid global spread, including in individuals who have been fully vaccinated. However, early reports from South Africa and the United Kingdom suggest that the severity of clinical disease with Omicron may be lower than for prior variants. It is unclear whether this lower clinical severity is due to the Omicron virus itself or if it reflects population immunity due to prior vaccination and/or infection. Syrian golden hamsters provide a robust model to study SARS-CoV-2 disease, with reproducible weight loss and pneumonia following SARS-CoV-2 infection. , We developed two SARS-CoV-2 Omicron challenge stocks and assessed clinical disease, viral loads, and histopathology in hamsters.

Omicron infection leads to less severe clinical disease

We generated two independent SARS-CoV-2 Omicron stocks in VeroE6-TMPRSS2 cells (see STAR Methods). Syrian golden hamsters (n = 6/group) were inoculated by the intranasal route with 100 μL virus containing 5 × 104 PFU WA1/2020, Alpha (B.1.1.7), Beta (B.1.351), and Delta (B.1.617.2) stocks, essentially as we previously reported. , Infected hamsters showed a mean reduction of 4%–10% of body weight by day 4 (Figure 1 A) and 10%–17% of body weight by day 6 (Figure 1B), while uninfected hamsters showed a mean increase of 1% body weight. , One animal infected with WA1/2020 reached the 20% weight loss criteria for humane euthanization, but the rest of the hamsters recovered their body weights by approximately day 10.
Figure 1

Weight loss in hamsters infected with SARS-CoV-2 variants

(A and B) Mean body-weight change following infection of hamsters with SARS-CoV-2 WA1/2020, Alpha, Beta, and Delta variants, along with weight change in uninfected control hamsters.

(C and D) Mean body-weight change following infection of hamsters with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron stocks 1 and 2. Mean body-weight changes with standard errors are shown.

Weight loss in hamsters infected with SARS-CoV-2 variants (A and B) Mean body-weight change following infection of hamsters with SARS-CoV-2 WA1/2020, Alpha, Beta, and Delta variants, along with weight change in uninfected control hamsters. (C and D) Mean body-weight change following infection of hamsters with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron stocks 1 and 2. Mean body-weight changes with standard errors are shown. Additional groups of hamsters (n = 4/group) were inoculated by the intranasal route with 100 μL of 2.5 × 106, 2.5 × 105, or 2.5 × 104 PFU of Omicron stock 1 or 2.5 × 105, 2.5 × 104, or 2.5 × 103 PFU of stock 2. Hamsters inoculated with Omicron stock 1 showed a mean reduction of -1%, -2%, and 1% of body weight by day 4 for these challenge doses, respectively (Figure 1C). Hamsters inoculated with Omicron stock 2 showed a mean reduction of 0%, 0%, and 1% of body weight by day 4 for these challenge doses, respectively (Figure 1D). These data demonstrate that two SARS-CoV-2 Omicron stocks did not lead to clinical weight loss in hamsters, even when inoculated at high doses.

Reduced virus in lung following Omicron infection

We next assessed tissue viral loads on day 4 following infection of additional groups of hamsters with 5 × 104 PFU WA1/2020 (n = 13), Beta (n = 11), and Omicron stock 1 (n = 12). We selected Omicron stock 1 for this experiment because of its higher titer. Levels of E subgenomic RNA (sgRNA) and N genomic RNA (gRNA) were assessed by RT-PCR in lungs and nasal turbinates. , In lung tissue, hamsters infected with WA1/2020, Beta, and Omicron had a median of 9.07, 9.55, and 8.33 log sgRNA copies/g tissue, respectively. Median levels of lung sgRNA were 0.74 log lower in Omicron-infected hamsters compared with WA1/2020-infected hamsters (p = 0.004, two-tailed Mann-Whitney test; Figure 2 A), and sgRNA levels correlated with mean tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50) titers (data not shown). In nasal turbinates, hamsters infected with WA1/2020, Beta, and Omicron had a median of 6.35, 7.34, and 8.25 log sgRNA copies/g tissue, respectively. Median levels of nasal turbinate sgRNA were 1.90 log higher in Omicron-infected hamsters compared with WA1/2020-infected hamsters (p = 0.05, two-tailed Mann-Whitney test; Figure 2A). Similarly, median levels of lung gRNA were 0.84 log lower in Omicron-infected hamsters compared with WA1/2020-infected hamsters (p = 0.005, two-tailed Mann-Whitney test; Figure 2B), but median levels of nasal turbinate sgRNA were 1.49 log higher in Omicron-infected hamsters (p = 0.01, two-tailed Mann-Whitney test; Figure 2B). Body weights were reduced in the WA1/2020- and Beta-infected animals, as expected, but not the Omicron-infected animals on day 4 (Figure 2C). These data suggest that Omicron infection in hamsters leads to lower levels of virus in the lower respiratory tract compared with WA1/2020 infection.
Figure 2

Tissue viral loads in hamsters on day 4 following SARS-CoV-2 infection

(A) E subgenomic RNA (sgRNA) levels in lung and nasal turbinates following infection of hamsters with SARS-CoV-2 WA1/2020, Beta, and Omicron variants (limit of detection 100 viral copies/g tissue).

(B) N genomic RNA (gRNA) levels in lung and nasal turbinates following infection of hamsters with SARS-CoV-2 WA1/2020, Beta, and Omicron variants (limit of detection 100 viral copies/g tissue).

(C) Weight loss at time of necropsy of hamsters in (A) and (B).

Data for WA1/2020 reflect N = 13 hamsters pooled from four different challenge experiments, data for Beta reflect N = 11 hamsters pooled from three different challenge experiments, and data for Omicron reflect N = 12 hamsters pooled from one experiment. Log sgRNA copies per gram tissue are shown. Medians (red bars) are depicted. p values represent two-sided Mann-Whitney tests.

Tissue viral loads in hamsters on day 4 following SARS-CoV-2 infection (A) E subgenomic RNA (sgRNA) levels in lung and nasal turbinates following infection of hamsters with SARS-CoV-2 WA1/2020, Beta, and Omicron variants (limit of detection 100 viral copies/g tissue). (B) N genomic RNA (gRNA) levels in lung and nasal turbinates following infection of hamsters with SARS-CoV-2 WA1/2020, Beta, and Omicron variants (limit of detection 100 viral copies/g tissue). (C) Weight loss at time of necropsy of hamsters in (A) and (B). Data for WA1/2020 reflect N = 13 hamsters pooled from four different challenge experiments, data for Beta reflect N = 11 hamsters pooled from three different challenge experiments, and data for Omicron reflect N = 12 hamsters pooled from one experiment. Log sgRNA copies per gram tissue are shown. Medians (red bars) are depicted. p values represent two-sided Mann-Whitney tests.

Reduced lung pathology following Omicron challenge

Omicron-infected hamsters demonstrated reduced bronchiolar epithelial changes, interstitial inflammation and consolidation, and endothelialitis as compared with WA1/2020 infected hamsters on day 4 following infection (Figures 3A–3O and S1), with lower lung pathology scores in animals infected with Omicron at doses of 2.5 × 105 PFU as compared with animals infected with WA1/2020 at a dose of 5 × 104 PFU (Figure 3P). Despite significantly reduced overall pathology, however, Omicron-infected hamsters had similar numbers of SARS nucleocapsid (SARS-N)-positive cells in lung as compared with WA1/2020-infected hamsters (Figure 3Q) but showed a trend toward fewer Iba-1-positive cells (macrophages) and myeloperoxidase-positive cells (neutrophils) per unit area of lung (Figures 3R, 3S, and S1). Both WA1/2020- and Omicron-infected animals had SARS-N-positive bronchiolar epithelium and pneumocytes (Figure 4 ). Nasal turbinate pathology was pronounced in Omicron-infected animals but did not differ in distribution, severity, or viral positivity compared with WA1/2020-infected hamsters (Figure S1).
Figure 3

Histopathology in hamsters on day 4 following SARS-CoV-2 infection

Lung tissue from hamsters infected with 5 × 104 PFU SARS-CoV-2 WA1/2020 (top) and 2.5 × 105 PFU Omicron (middle) compared with uninfected hamsters (bottom) was stained with H&E.

(A–C) Low power-representative images of lung. There are multifocal to locally extensive areas of interstitial inflammation and consolidation associated with bronchioles in WA1/2020-infected animals that are reduced in Omicron-infected animals.

(D–L) Medium power-representative images of bronchioles and lumina showing presence of intraluminal necrotic epithelium in both WA1/2020- and Omicron-infected animals (J–L) and perivascular edema and marginating inflammatory cells along the endothelium of medium-sized arterioles (arrowheads).

(M–O) High magnification images of bronchiolar epithelium showing cellular atypia, hypertrophy, and loss of basal nuclear polarity in degenerative bronchiolar epithelium that is more pronounced in WA1/2020-infected hamsters compared with Omicron-infected hamsters.

(P) Cumulative pathology scoring of (1) airways (bronchi, bronchioles), (2) interstitium, (3) alveoli, (4) vessels, (5) edema, and (6) regeneration. Each feature received a score of 0–3 with a maximum possible score of 18 per animal.

(Q–S) Quantitative image analysis of immunohistochemistry using HALO (Indicalabs)-optimized algorithms to enumerate (Q) SARS-N-positive (R), Iba-1-positive (macrophages), and (S) myeloperixade-positive (neutrophils) cells per unit area. ∗p = 0.0048, two-tailed Mann-Whitney test. Scale bars: 2 mm (A–C), 200 μm (D–F), 100 μm (G–I), and 50 μM (J–O).

Figure 4

SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant distribution in lung

(A–H) Immunohistochemistry for nucleocapsid protein (brown) and RNAscope in situ hybridization for viral RNA (red) in hamsters infected with SARS-CoV2 WA1/2020 (A–D) and Omicron (E–H). Scale bars: 200 μm (A and E) and 50 μm (B–D and F–H).

Histopathology in hamsters on day 4 following SARS-CoV-2 infection Lung tissue from hamsters infected with 5 × 104 PFU SARS-CoV-2 WA1/2020 (top) and 2.5 × 105 PFU Omicron (middle) compared with uninfected hamsters (bottom) was stained with H&E. (A–C) Low power-representative images of lung. There are multifocal to locally extensive areas of interstitial inflammation and consolidation associated with bronchioles in WA1/2020-infected animals that are reduced in Omicron-infected animals. (D–L) Medium power-representative images of bronchioles and lumina showing presence of intraluminal necrotic epithelium in both WA1/2020- and Omicron-infected animals (J–L) and perivascular edema and marginating inflammatory cells along the endothelium of medium-sized arterioles (arrowheads). (M–O) High magnification images of bronchiolar epithelium showing cellular atypia, hypertrophy, and loss of basal nuclear polarity in degenerative bronchiolar epithelium that is more pronounced in WA1/2020-infected hamsters compared with Omicron-infected hamsters. (P) Cumulative pathology scoring of (1) airways (bronchi, bronchioles), (2) interstitium, (3) alveoli, (4) vessels, (5) edema, and (6) regeneration. Each feature received a score of 0–3 with a maximum possible score of 18 per animal. (Q–S) Quantitative image analysis of immunohistochemistry using HALO (Indicalabs)-optimized algorithms to enumerate (Q) SARS-N-positive (R), Iba-1-positive (macrophages), and (S) myeloperixade-positive (neutrophils) cells per unit area. ∗p = 0.0048, two-tailed Mann-Whitney test. Scale bars: 2 mm (A–C), 200 μm (D–F), 100 μm (G–I), and 50 μM (J–O). SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant distribution in lung (A–H) Immunohistochemistry for nucleocapsid protein (brown) and RNAscope in situ hybridization for viral RNA (red) in hamsters infected with SARS-CoV2 WA1/2020 (A–D) and Omicron (E–H). Scale bars: 200 μm (A and E) and 50 μm (B–D and F–H).

Discussion

Our data demonstrate that the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant infected Syrian golden hamsters but did not result in detectable weight loss, even at doses that were 50 times higher than the doses of WA1/2020, Alpha, Beta, and Delta that led to substantial weight loss. The consistency of these findings with two independent Omicron challenge stocks suggests the generalizability of these conclusions. , Omicron infection led to robust viral replication in both the upper and lower respiratory tracts, with higher viral loads in nasal turbinates and lower viral loads in the lung compared with WA1/2020. Moreover, Omicron led to reduced lung histopathology compared with WA1/2020, suggesting that Omicron infection leads to reduced lower respiratory tract disease in hamsters. Future studies could compare tissue viral loads of Omicron with Delta and additional variants. Our findings in hamsters are consistent with emerging reports suggesting that Omicron is highly transmissible but induces less severe clinical pneumonia in humans compared with prior SARS-CoV-2 variants. Future studies could further define the pathogenesis of infection with the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant and the mechanisms associated with its reduced pathogenicity.

Limitations of study

It is not known whether the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron model in hamsters is predictive for humans. It is also not known whether weight loss or viral loads in the lower respiratory tract is more predictive of severe clinical disease.

STAR★Methods

Key resources table

Resource availability

Lead contact

Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the Lead Contact Dan Barouch (dbarouch@bidmc.harvard.edu).

Materials availability

This study did not generate new unique reagents.

Experimental model and subject details

Animals and study design

Eight week old inbred female and male golden Syrian hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) (Envigo) were randomly allocated to groups and infected with SARS-CoV-2 variants in a volume of 100 μL (50 μL/nostril) by the intranasal route. Hamsters were healthy and drug-naïve with no history of previous procedures. All hamsters were housed at Bioqual, Inc. (Rockville, MD). Following challenge, body weights were assessed daily. Body weight loss that exceeded 20% of the weight on the day of challenge was established as a humane endpoint euthanasia criteria. A subset of animals were necropsied on day 4 for tissue viral loads and histopathology. All animal studies were conducted in compliance with all relevant local, state, and federal regulations and were approved by the BIOQUAL Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).

Method details

SARS-CoV-2 viral stocks. Seed stock information is as follows: WA1/2020 stock (USA-WA1/2020; BEI Resources NR-5228; 2.34 × 109 TCID50/mL), Alpha (B.1.1.7; USA/CA_CDC_5574/2020; BEI Resources NR-54011; 1.58 × 107 TCID50/mL), Beta (B.1.351; South Africa/KRISP-K005325/2020; BEI Resources NR-54974; 1.99 × 108 TCID50/mL), and Delta (B.1.617.2; USA/PHC658/2021; BEI Resources NR-55612; 5.00 × 108 TCID50/mL) challenge stocks have been previously described. We generated two independent SARS-CoV-2 Omicron stocks in VeroE6-TMPRSS2 cells inoculated with nasal swabs from Omicron-infected individuals. Omicron Stock one had a titer of 2.3 × 109 TCID50/mL and 2.5 × 107 PFU/mL in VeroE6-TMPRSS2 cells (EPI_ISL_7171744; Mehul Suthar, Emory University). Omicron Stock 2 had a titer of 2.3 × 108 TCID50/mL and 3.8 × 106 PFU/mL in VeroE6-TMPRSS2 cells (EPI_ISL_7263803; Yoshihiro Kawaoka, University of Wisconsin). All SARS-CoV-2 stocks were fully sequenced. All TCID50 and PFU assays were in VeroE6-TMPRSS2 cells. Note that TCID50 titers in VeroE6-TMPRSS2 cells are approximately 100-fold higher than TCID50 titers in VeroE6 cells.

Genomic and subgenomic viral load assays

SARS-CoV-2 N gene genomic RNA (gRNA) and E gene subgenomic RNA (sgRNA) was assessed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reactions (RT-PCR) using primers and probes as previously described. , , Standards were generated by first synthesizing a gene fragment of the genomic N gene or subgenomic E gene. The gene fragments were subsequently cloned into a pcDNA3.1+ expression plasmid using restriction site cloning (Integrated DNA Technologies). The inserts were in vitro transcribed to RNA using the AmpliCap-Max T7 High Yield Message Maker Kit (CellScript). Log dilutions of the standard were prepared for RT-PCR assays ranging from 1 × 1010 copies to 1 × 10−1 copies. Viral loads were quantified from lung tissue as follows; total RNA was extracted on a QIAcube HT instrument using the RNeasy 96 QIAcube HT Kit according to manufacturer’s specifications (Qiagen). Standard dilutions and extracted total RNA from samples were reverse transcribed using SuperScript VILO Master Mix (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer’s specifications. A Taqman custom gene expression assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was designed using the sequences targeting the E gene sgRNA. The sequences for the custom assay were as follows, forward primer, sgLeadCoV2.Fwd: CGATCTCTTGTAGATCTGTTCTC, E_Sarbeco_R: ATATTGCAGCAGTACGCACACA, E_Sarbeco_P1 (probe): VIC-ACACTAGCCATCCTTACTGCGCTTCG-MGB. For the genomic N assays, the sequences for the forward (F) and reverse (R) primes and probe (P) were: 2019-nCoV_N1-F :5′-GACCCCAAAATCAGCGAAAT-3′; 2019-nCoV_N1-R: 5′-TCTGGTTACTGCCAGTTGAATCTG-3′; 2019-nCoV_N1-P: 5′-FAM-ACCCCGCATTACGTTTGGTGGACC-BHQ1-3’. Reactions were carried out in duplicate for samples and standards on the QuantStudio 6 and 7 Flex Real-Time PCR Systems (Applied Biosystems). The following thermal cycling conditions were used; initial denaturation at 95°C for 20 seconds, then 45 cycles of 95°C for 1 second and 60°C for 20 seconds. Standard curves were used to calculate subgenomic RNA copies and copy number was normalized to the input weight of lung tissue (copies/g); the quantitative assay sensitivity was 100 copies per gram.

Histopathology

Tissues were fixed in freshly prepared 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 hours, transferred to 70% ethanol, paraffin embedded within 7 to 10 days, and blocks sectioned at 5 μm. Slides were baked for 30 to 60 min at 65 °C and then deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated through a series of graded ethanol to distilled water. Slides were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Blinded assessment of tissue pathology was performed by two boarded veterinary pathologist (AJM, CPM). The following six features were evaluated as previously detailed: 1)bronchi and bronchioles 2) interstitium 3) endothelial changes/endothelialitis 4) alveolar spaces/syncytia 5) edema 6) regeneration, with scores 0–3 (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe).

Immunohistochemistry

Paraffin blocks were sectioned at 5 μm. Slides were baked for 30–60 min at 65° then deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated through a series of graded ethanol to distilled water. Heat induced epitope retrieval (HIER) was performed using a pressure cooker on steam setting for 25 minutes in citrate buffer (Thermo: AP-9003-500) followed by treatment with 3% hydrogen peroxide. Slides were then rinsed in distilled water and protein blocked (BioCare, BE965H) for 15 min followed by rinses in 1× phosphate buffer saline. The following primary antibodies were used in DaVinci Green Diluent (BioCare, PD900 M): Rabbit anti-Iba-1 (Wako:019-19741) diluted 1:4000; rabbit anti-Myeloperoxidase antibody (DAKO, A0398) diluted 1:1500; rabbit anti-SARS-Nucleocapsid protein antibody (Sino Biological clone R040, 40143-R040) diluted 1:1500. All antibodies were incubated for 60 min at room temperature, followed by rabbit Mach-2 HRP-Polymer (BioCare; RHRP520L) for 30 minutes, then counterstained with hematoxylin followed by bluing using 0.25% ammonia water. Labeling was performed on a Biocare InterlliPATH autostainer.

RNAscope in situ hybridization

RNAscope in situ hybridization was performed as directed with the following modifications using a probe for SARS-CoV-2, S gene encoding the spike protein (ACD Cat. No. 848561; V-CoV2019-S) and DapB (ACD Cat.No 310043) as a negative control. In brief, after slides were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated through a series of graded ethanol to distilled water, retrieval was performed for 30 min in ACD P2 retrieval buffer (ACD Cat. No. 322000) at 95–98°C, followed by treatment with protease plus (ACD Cat. No. 322331) diluted 1:10 in PBS for 20 min at 40°C. All washes were performed in 0.5× kit provided SSC. Slides were developed using the RNAscope® 2.5 HD Detection Reagents-RED (ACD Cat. No.322360).

Quantitative image analysis

Quantitative image analysis was performed using HALO software (v3.0.311.405; Indica Labs) on at least one lung lobe cross-section from each animal. In cases where more than one cross-section was available, all lung lobes were quantified as an individual data point. For SARS-N, Iba-1, MPO, and CD3 IHC positivity, the Indica Labs - Multiplex IHC algorithm (v3.1.4) was used for quantitation. In all instances, manual inspection of all images was performed on each sample to ensure that the annotations were accurate.

Quantification and statistical analysis

Analysis of virologic and body weight data was performed using GraphPad Prism 9.1.2 (GraphPad Software). Comparison of data between groups was performed using two-sided Mann–Whitney tests. p values of less than 0.05 were considered significant. Graphical Abstract was generated using BioRender.
REAGENT or RESOURCESOURCEIDENTIFIER
Antibodies

Human SARS Coronavirus Nucleoprotein/NP Monoclonal Antibody, Clone R040 1:1500Sino BiologicalREF 40143-R040 Lot MA14AP2104; RRID:AB_2827976
Anti-Iba1 Rabbit Polyclonal 1:4000Wako Pure Chemical CorporationREF 019-19741 Lot CAE1308; RRID:AB_839504
Anti-Human Myeloperoxidase, Polyclonal 1:1500DakoREF A0398 Lot 41321498; RRID:AB_2335676

Bacterial and virus strains

SARS-CoV-2BEI RepositoryIsolate: USA-WA1/2020
SARS-CoV-2BEI RepositoryIsolate: B.1.351
SARS-CoV-2BEI RepositoryIsolate: B.1.1.529
SARS-CoV-2BEI RepositoryIsolate: B.1.617.2
SARS-CoV-2BEI RepositoryB.1.1.7

Biological samples

Hamster SARS-CoV2 infected lung tissue, fixed, embeddedBioqual, Inc.N/A
Hamster SARS-CoV2 infected nasal turbinate, fixed, embeddedBioqual, Inc.N/A
Oral swabs from HamsterBioqual, Inc.N/A

Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins

Citrate buffer antigen retrievalThermoAP-9003-500
Protein blockBiocareBE965H
DaVinci Green Antibody diluentBiocarePD900M
Rabbit Mach-2 HRP-PolymerBiocareRHRP520L

Critical commercial assays

RNAscope® 2.5 HD Detection Reagents-REDAdvanced Cell DiagnosticsCat. No.322360
SARS-CoV-2, S gene probeAdvanced Cell Diagnostics848561; V-CoV2019-S
DapB Negative control probeAdvanced Cell Diagnostics310043

Experimental models: Organisms/strains

Syrian golden hamstersEnvigoHsdHan:AURA https://www.envigo.com/model/hsdhan-aura

Oligonucleotides

Primer:sgLeadSARSCoV2-F Forward: CGATCTCTTGTAGATCTGTTCTCWolfel et al., 2020ThermoFisher Scientific:4448510
Primer: E_Sarbeco_R Reverse: ATATTGCAGCAGTACGCACACAWolfel et al., 2020ThermoFisher Scientific:4448510
Probe:E_Sarbeco_P1 : VIC-ACACTAGCCATCCTTACTGCGCTTCG-MGBNFQWolfel et al., 2020ThermoFisher Scientific:4448510
Primer:2019-nCoV_N1 Forward: GACCCCAAAATCAGCGAAATCDC Research Use Only 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-time RT-PCR Primers and ProbesThermoFisher Scientific:4448510
Primer:2019-nCoV_N1 Reverse: TCTGGTTACTGCCAGTTGAATCTGCDC Research Use Only 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-time RT-PCR Primers and ProbesThermoFisher Scientific:4448510
Probe:2019-nCoV_N1 FAM- ACCCCGCATTACGTTTGGTGGACC-BHQ1CDC Research Use Only 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-time RT-PCR Primers and ProbesThermoFisher Scientific:4448510

Recombinant DNA

Plasmid: pcDNA3.1+. SARS-CoV-2 E gene subgenomic RNA (sgRNA)This paperN/A

Software and algorithms

QuantStudio Real-Time PCR Software v1.7.1Life Technologieshttps://www.thermofisher.com/us/en/home/global/forms/life-science/quantstudio-6-7-flex-software.html
GraphPad Prism 8.4.2GraphPad softwarehttps://www.graphpad.com/scientific-software/prism/
BioRenderBioRenderhttps://biorender.com/

Other

RNA Standard: SARS-CoV-2 E gene subgenomic RNA (sgRNA)This paperN/A
RNA Standard: SARS-CoV-2 N gene genomic RNA (gRNA)This paperN/A
AmpliCap-Max T7 High Yield Message Maker KitCellscriptC-ACM04037
RNeasy 96 QIAcube HT KitQiagen74182
SuperScript VILO Master MixInvitrogenLife Technologies: 11755500
  9 in total

1.  Immunity elicited by natural infection or Ad26.COV2.S vaccination protects hamsters against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern.

Authors:  Lisa H Tostanoski; Jingyou Yu; Noe B Mercado; Katherine McMahan; Catherine Jacob-Dolan; Amanda J Martinot; Cesar Piedra-Mora; Tochi Anioke; Aiquan Chang; Victoria M Giffin; David L Hope; Huahua Wan; Esther A Bondzie; Shant H Mahrokhian; Linda M Wrijil; Katherine Bauer; Laurent Pessaint; Maciel Porto; Joseph Piegols; Andrew Faudree; Brittany Spence; Swagata Kar; Fatima Amanat; Florian Krammer; Hanne Andersen; Mark G Lewis; Frank Wegmann; Roland Zahn; Hanneke Schuitemaker; Dan H Barouch
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 17.956

2.  Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019.

Authors:  Roman Wölfel; Victor M Corman; Wolfgang Guggemos; Michael Seilmaier; Sabine Zange; Marcel A Müller; Daniela Niemeyer; Terry C Jones; Patrick Vollmar; Camilla Rothe; Michael Hoelscher; Tobias Bleicker; Sebastian Brünink; Julia Schneider; Rosina Ehmann; Katrin Zwirglmaier; Christian Drosten; Clemens Wendtner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Comparison of Subgenomic and Total RNA in SARS-CoV-2 Challenged Rhesus Macaques.

Authors:  Gabriel Dagotto; Noe B Mercado; David R Martinez; Yixuan J Hou; Joseph P Nkolola; Robert H Carnahan; James E Crowe; Ralph S Baric; Dan H Barouch
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  Attenuated replication and pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 Omicron.

Authors:  Huiping Shuai; Jasper Fuk-Woo Chan; Bingjie Hu; Yue Chai; Terrence Tsz-Tai Yuen; Feifei Yin; Xiner Huang; Chaemin Yoon; Jing-Chu Hu; Huan Liu; Jialu Shi; Yuanchen Liu; Tianrenzheng Zhu; Jinjin Zhang; Yuxin Hou; Yixin Wang; Lu Lu; Jian-Piao Cai; Anna Jinxia Zhang; Jie Zhou; Shuofeng Yuan; Melinda A Brindley; Bao-Zhong Zhang; Jian-Dong Huang; Kelvin Kai-Wang To; Kwok-Yung Yuen; Hin Chu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 69.504

5.  DNA vaccine protection against SARS-CoV-2 in rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Jingyou Yu; Lisa H Tostanoski; Lauren Peter; Noe B Mercado; Katherine McMahan; Shant H Mahrokhian; Joseph P Nkolola; Jinyan Liu; Zhenfeng Li; Abishek Chandrashekar; David R Martinez; Carolin Loos; Caroline Atyeo; Stephanie Fischinger; John S Burke; Matthew D Slein; Yuezhou Chen; Adam Zuiani; Felipe J N Lelis; Meghan Travers; Shaghayegh Habibi; Laurent Pessaint; Alex Van Ry; Kelvin Blade; Renita Brown; Anthony Cook; Brad Finneyfrock; Alan Dodson; Elyse Teow; Jason Velasco; Roland Zahn; Frank Wegmann; Esther A Bondzie; Gabriel Dagotto; Makda S Gebre; Xuan He; Catherine Jacob-Dolan; Marinela Kirilova; Nicole Kordana; Zijin Lin; Lori F Maxfield; Felix Nampanya; Ramya Nityanandam; John D Ventura; Huahua Wan; Yongfei Cai; Bing Chen; Aaron G Schmidt; Duane R Wesemann; Ralph S Baric; Galit Alter; Hanne Andersen; Mark G Lewis; Dan H Barouch
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Ad26 vaccine protects against SARS-CoV-2 severe clinical disease in hamsters.

Authors:  Lisa H Tostanoski; Frank Wegmann; Amanda J Martinot; Carolin Loos; Katherine McMahan; Noe B Mercado; Jingyou Yu; Chi N Chan; Stephen Bondoc; Carly E Starke; Michael Nekorchuk; Kathleen Busman-Sahay; Cesar Piedra-Mora; Linda M Wrijil; Sarah Ducat; Jerome Custers; Caroline Atyeo; Stephanie Fischinger; John S Burke; Jared Feldman; Blake M Hauser; Timothy M Caradonna; Esther A Bondzie; Gabriel Dagotto; Makda S Gebre; Catherine Jacob-Dolan; Zijin Lin; Shant H Mahrokhian; Felix Nampanya; Ramya Nityanandam; Laurent Pessaint; Maciel Porto; Vaneesha Ali; Dalia Benetiene; Komlan Tevi; Hanne Andersen; Mark G Lewis; Aaron G Schmidt; Douglas A Lauffenburger; Galit Alter; Jacob D Estes; Hanneke Schuitemaker; Roland Zahn; Dan H Barouch
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 53.440

7.  Omicron extensively but incompletely escapes Pfizer BNT162b2 neutralization.

Authors:  Sandile Cele; Laurelle Jackson; David S Khoury; Khadija Khan; Thandeka Moyo-Gwete; Houriiyah Tegally; James Emmanuel San; Deborah Cromer; Cathrine Scheepers; Daniel G Amoako; Farina Karim; Mallory Bernstein; Gila Lustig; Derseree Archary; Muneerah Smith; Yashica Ganga; Zesuliwe Jule; Kajal Reedoy; Shi-Hsia Hwa; Jennifer Giandhari; Jonathan M Blackburn; Bernadett I Gosnell; Salim S Abdool Karim; Willem Hanekom; Anne von Gottberg; Jinal N Bhiman; Richard J Lessells; Mahomed-Yunus S Moosa; Miles P Davenport; Tulio de Oliveira; Penny L Moore; Alex Sigal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Simulation of the Clinical and Pathological Manifestations of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a Golden Syrian Hamster Model: Implications for Disease Pathogenesis and Transmissibility.

Authors:  Jasper Fuk-Woo Chan; Anna Jinxia Zhang; Shuofeng Yuan; Vincent Kwok-Man Poon; Chris Chung-Sing Chan; Andrew Chak-Yiu Lee; Wan-Mui Chan; Zhimeng Fan; Hoi-Wah Tsoi; Lei Wen; Ronghui Liang; Jianli Cao; Yanxia Chen; Kaiming Tang; Cuiting Luo; Jian-Piao Cai; Kin-Hang Kok; Hin Chu; Kwok-Hung Chan; Siddharth Sridhar; Zhiwei Chen; Honglin Chen; Kelvin Kai-Wang To; Kwok-Yung Yuen
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  SARS-CoV-2 Omicron virus causes attenuated disease in mice and hamsters.

Authors:  Peter J Halfmann; Shun Iida; Kiyoko Iwatsuki-Horimoto; Tadashi Maemura; Maki Kiso; Suzanne M Scheaffer; Tamarand L Darling; Astha Joshi; Samantha Loeber; Gagandeep Singh; Stephanie L Foster; Baoling Ying; James Brett Case; Zhenlu Chong; Bradley Whitener; Juan Moliva; Katharine Floyd; Michiko Ujie; Noriko Nakajima; Mutsumi Ito; Ryan Wright; Ryuta Uraki; Prajakta Warang; Matthew Gagne; Rong Li; Yuko Sakai-Tagawa; Yanan Liu; Deanna Larson; Jorge E Osorio; Juan P Hernandez-Ortiz; Amy R Henry; Karl Ciuoderis; Kelsey R Florek; Mit Patel; Abby Odle; Lok-Yin Roy Wong; Allen C Bateman; Zhongde Wang; Venkata-Viswanadh Edara; Zhenlu Chong; John Franks; Trushar Jeevan; Thomas Fabrizio; Jennifer DeBeauchamp; Lisa Kercher; Patrick Seiler; Ana Silvia Gonzalez-Reiche; Emilia Mia Sordillo; Lauren A Chang; Harm van Bakel; Viviana Simon; Daniel C Douek; Nancy J Sullivan; Larissa B Thackray; Hiroshi Ueki; Seiya Yamayoshi; Masaki Imai; Stanley Perlman; Richard J Webby; Robert A Seder; Mehul S Suthar; Adolfo García-Sastre; Michael Schotsaert; Tadaki Suzuki; Adrianus C M Boon; Michael S Diamond; Yoshihiro Kawaoka
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 69.504

  9 in total
  36 in total

1.  Efficacy of Parainfluenza Virus 5 (PIV5)-vectored Intranasal COVID-19 Vaccine as a Single Dose Vaccine and as a Booster against SARS-CoV-2 Variants.

Authors:  Ashley C Beavis; Zhuo Li; Kelsey Briggs; María Cristina Huertas-Díaz; Elizabeth R Wrobel; Maria Najera; Dong An; Nichole Orr-Burks; Jackelyn Murray; Preetish Patil; Jiachen Huang; Jarrod Mousa; Linhui Hao; Tien-Ying Hsiang; Michael Gale; Stephen B Harvey; S Mark Tompkins; Robert Jeffrey Hogan; Eric R Lafontaine; Hong Jin; Biao He
Journal:  bioRxiv       Date:  2022-06-08

2.  COVID-19 Variants in Critically Ill Patients: A Comparison of the Delta and Omicron Variant Profiles.

Authors:  Alberto Corriero; Mario Ribezzi; Federica Mele; Carmelinda Angrisani; Fabio Romaniello; Antonio Daleno; Daniela Loconsole; Francesca Centrone; Maria Chironna; Nicola Brienza
Journal:  Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2022-06-17

Review 3.  SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant: Epidemiological Features, Biological Characteristics, and Clinical Significance.

Authors:  Yifei Guo; Jiajia Han; Yao Zhang; Jingjing He; Weien Yu; Xueyun Zhang; Jingwen Wu; Shenyan Zhang; Yide Kong; Yue Guo; Yanxue Lin; Jiming Zhang
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 8.786

4.  SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant causes mild pathology in the upper and lower respiratory tract of hamsters.

Authors:  Federico Armando; Georg Beythien; Franziska K Kaiser; Malgorzata Ciurkiewicz; Albert D M E Osterhaus; Wolfgang Baumgärtner; Lisa Allnoch; Laura Heydemann; Malgorzata Rosiak; Svenja Becker; Mariana Gonzalez-Hernandez; Mart M Lamers; Bart L Haagmans; Kate Guilfoyle; Geert van Amerongen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 17.694

Review 5.  COVID-19 vaccine development: milestones, lessons and prospects.

Authors:  Maochen Li; Han Wang; Lili Tian; Zehan Pang; Qingkun Yang; Tianqi Huang; Junfen Fan; Lihua Song; Yigang Tong; Huahao Fan
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2022-05-03

Review 6.  SARS-CoV-2 Virology.

Authors:  Yijia Li; Jonathan Z Li
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 5.905

7.  Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 in Nasopharyngeal Samples from Patients with COVID-19 Illustrates Population Variation and Diverse Phenotypes, Placing the Growth Properties of Variants of Concern in Context with Other Lineages.

Authors:  Tessa Prince; Xiaofeng Dong; Rebekah Penrice-Randal; Nadine Randle; Catherine Hartley; Hannah Goldswain; Benjamin Jones; Malcolm G Semple; J Kenneth Baillie; Peter J M Openshaw; Lance Turtle; Grant L Hughes; Enyia R Anderson; Edward I Patterson; Julian Druce; Gavin Screaton; Miles W Carroll; James P Stewart; Julian A Hiscox
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 5.029

Review 8.  Emergence of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant, salient features, high global health concerns and strategies to counter it amid ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Rekha Khandia; Shailja Singhal; Taha Alqahtani; Mohammad Amjad Kamal; Nahed A El-Shall; Firzan Nainu; Perumal Arumugam Desingu; Kuldeep Dhama
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 8.431

9.  Signals of Significantly Increased Vaccine Breakthrough, Decreased Hospitalization Rates, and Less Severe Disease in Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 Caused by the Omicron Variant of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 in Houston, Texas.

Authors:  Paul A Christensen; Randall J Olsen; S Wesley Long; Richard Snehal; James J Davis; Matthew Ojeda Saavedra; Kristina Reppond; Madison N Shyer; Jessica Cambric; Ryan Gadd; Rashi M Thakur; Akanksha Batajoo; Regan Mangham; Sindy Pena; Trina Trinh; Jacob C Kinskey; Guy Williams; Robert Olson; Jimmy Gollihar; James M Musser
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 10.  Omicron: What Makes the Latest SARS-CoV-2 Variant of Concern So Concerning?

Authors:  Christoph Jung; Dorota Kmiec; Lennart Koepke; Fabian Zech; Timo Jacob; Konstantin M J Sparrer; Frank Kirchhoff
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 5.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.