Literature DB >> 35313372

A Delphi study to identify relevant scenarios as the first step toward an international hyperbaric medicine simulation curriculum.

Sylvain Boet1,2,3,4,5,6,7, Joseph K Burns1,4, Eric Jenisset8,9, Mélanie Papp1, Sylvie Bourbonnais1, Rodrigue Pignel8.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Evidence across healthcare specialties suggests that simulation-based education improves practices and patient outcomes. However, simulation has yet to be widely used in hyperbaric medicine education. We aimed to identify the most relevant clinical scenarios for inclusion in a simulation-based curriculum for hyperbaric medicine.
METHODS: After ethics approval, we used a modified Delphi consensus method. We assembled an initial questionnaire and distributed it online in English and French to an international group of hyperbaric physicians and operators using a snowball recruitment technique. Participants rated the list of scenarios using a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (least relevant) to 5 (most relevant). Scenarios judged by at least 80% of participants to be relevant (score 4 or 5) were automatically included. Scenarios that did not meet this threshold and new scenarios suggested by participants during the first round were included in a second round.
RESULTS: Seventy-one participants from nine countries, including both physicians and non-physicians, completed the first round and 34 completed the second. Five scenarios were identified as relevant: seizure, fire, cardiac arrest, pneumothorax, and technical deficiency such as power loss while operating the chamber.
CONCLUSIONS: Five scenarios relevant for inclusion in the simulation-based curriculum in hyperbaric medicine were identified by expert consensus. Copyright: This article is the copyright of the authors who grant Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine a non-exclusive licence to publish the article in electronic and other forms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Education; Hyperbaric oxygen; Safety; Training

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35313372      PMCID: PMC9177440          DOI: 10.28920/dhm52.1.44-48

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diving Hyperb Med        ISSN: 1833-3516            Impact factor:   1.228


  19 in total

1.  Stability of response characteristics of a Delphi panel: application of bootstrap data expansion.

Authors:  Ralitsa B Akins; Homer Tolson; Bryan R Cole
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 2.  Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy: Side Effects Defined and Quantified.

Authors:  Marvin Heyboer; Deepali Sharma; William Santiago; Norman McCulloch
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 3.  The role of simulation in continuing medical education for acute care physicians: a systematic review.

Authors:  P Kristina Khanduja; M Dylan Bould; Viren N Naik; Emily Hladkowicz; Sylvain Boet
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in the Treatment of Acute Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Samuel Daly; Maxwell Thorpe; Sarah Rockswold; Molly Hubbard; Thomas Bergman; Uzma Samadani; Gaylan Rockswold
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 5.  Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in acute ischemic stroke: a review.

Authors:  Zheng Ding; Wesley C Tong; Xiao-Xin Lu; Hui-Ping Peng
Journal:  Interv Neurol       Date:  2014-08

6.  The future vision of simulation in health care.

Authors:  D M Gaba
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-10

7.  [Implementation of regularly performed resuscitation training at a hyperbaric treatment center].

Authors:  F Dieterich; A Kanstinger; M Erdmann; J Knebel; B Ott; H Schöppenthau
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 8.  The neuroprotection effect of oxygen therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Z Deng; W Chen; J Jin; J Zhao; H Xu
Journal:  Niger J Clin Pract       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 0.968

Review 9.  Systematic review of skills transfer after surgical simulation-based training.

Authors:  S R Dawe; G N Pena; J A Windsor; J A J L Broeders; P C Cregan; P J Hewett; G J Maddern
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 10.  Double-blind trials in hyperbaric medicine: A narrative review on past experiences and considerations in designing sham hyperbaric treatment.

Authors:  C A Lansdorp; Rob A van Hulst
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 2.486

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.