Literature DB >> 3531313

A comparison of two different doses of omeprazole versus ranitidine in treatment of duodenal ulcers.

K D Bardhan, G Bianchi Porro, K Bose, M Daly, R F Hinchliffe, E Jonsson, M Lazzaroni, J Naesdal, L Rikner, A Walan.   

Abstract

In a study involving three centers, 105 patients with duodenal ulcer proven by endoscopy were randomly assigned to treatment with either the H+, K+, ATPase inhibitor omeprazole (20 mg or 40 mg taken as a single morning dose), or ranitidine (150 mg morning and night). It was a double-blind study using a double-dummy technique. Clinical assessment and laboratory investigations were carried out at 2, 4, and 8 weeks; endoscopy was done at 2 weeks, and if not healed, at 4 and 8 weeks. The patients in the three treatment groups were well matched. Significantly more patients treated with omeprazole healed compared with ranitidine at 2 weeks (p = 0.007) and at 4 weeks (p = 0.007), but there was no statistically significant difference between the two omeprazole groups. Pain was of similar severity at the start in all groups, but patients treated with omeprazole had fewer days with pain (median values being omeprazole 20 mg: 2 days; omeprazole 40 mg: 1 day; ranitidine: 7 days). The difference between the combined omeprazole groups and ranitidine was significant (p less than 0.02). There was also a tendency towards less severe daytime pain on omeprazole during the first week. The difference was statistically significant between omeprazole (40 mg) and ranitidine for days 2-7 (p less than 0.01). No change in laboratory screen attributable to drug treatment occurred. After healing, 79 patients entered a 6-month follow-up study with endoscopy at 3 and 6 months or whenever symptoms occurred. After 6 months relapses occurred in 14/24, 19/23, and 15/25 after 20 mg omeprazole, 40 mg omeprazole, and ranitidine, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3531313     DOI: 10.1097/00004836-198608000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0192-0790            Impact factor:   3.062


  31 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetic study of omeprazole in elderly healthy volunteers.

Authors:  S Landahl; T Andersson; M Larsson; B Lernfeldt; P Lundborg; C G Regårdh; E Sixt; I Skånberg
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Influence of acid secretory status on absorption of omeprazole from enteric coated granules.

Authors:  T Andersson; R Bergstrand; C Cederberg
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Lack of effect of omeprazole treatment on steady-state plasma levels of metoprolol.

Authors:  T Andersson; P Lundborg; C G Regårdh
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Omeprazole.

Authors:  M J Langman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-08-31

Review 5.  Treatment of duodenal ulceration: reflections, recollections, and reminiscences.

Authors:  K D Bardhan
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Double blind comparative study of omeprazole and ranitidine in patients with duodenal or gastric ulcer: a multicentre trial. Cooperative study group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 7.  Formulary management of antiulcer drugs: clinical considerations.

Authors:  S L Sankey; L S Friedman
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Ranitidine: a pharmacoeconomic evaluation of its use in acid-related disorders.

Authors:  J E Frampton; D McTavish
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of omeprazole after single and repeated oral administration in healthy subjects.

Authors:  T Andersson; K Andrén; C Cederberg; P O Lagerström; P Lundborg; I Skånberg
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 10.  Ranitidine. An updated review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use in peptic ulcer disease and other allied diseases.

Authors:  S M Grant; H D Langtry; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.