Shiny Thomas1, Kristin M Conway2, Olushola Fapo1, Natalie Street3, Katherine D Mathews4, Joshua R Mann5, Paul A Romitti2, Aida Soim1, Christina Westfield1, Deborah J Fox1, Emma Ciafaloni6. 1. New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, USA. 2. Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa, College of Public Health, Iowa City, Iowa, USA. 3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 4. Stead Family Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA. 5. University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA. 6. Department of Neurology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/AIMS: With current and anticipated disease-modifying treatments, including gene therapy, an early diagnosis for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is crucial to assure maximum benefit. In 2009, a study from the Muscular Dystrophy Surveillance, Tracking, and Research Network (MD STARnet) showed an average diagnosis age of 5 years among males with DMD born from January 1, 1982 to December 31, 2000. Initiatives were implemented by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and patient organizations to reduce time to diagnosis. We conducted a follow-up study in a surveillance cohort born after January 1, 2000 to determine whether there has been an improvement in time to diagnosis. METHODS: We assessed the age of diagnosis among males with DMD born from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2015 using data collected by six US MD STARnet surveillance sites (Colorado, Iowa, western New York State, the Piedmont region of North Carolina, South Carolina, and Utah). The analytic cohort included 221 males with definite or probable DMD diagnosis without a documented family history. We computed frequency count and percentage for categorical variables, and mean, median, and standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables. RESULTS: The mean [median] ages in years of diagnostic milestones were: first signs, 2.7 [2.0]; first creatine kinase (CK), 4.6 [4.6]; DNA/muscle biopsy testing, 4.9 [4.8]; and time from first signs to diagnostic confirmation, 2.2 [1.4]. DISCUSSION: The time interval between first signs of DMD and diagnosis remains unchanged at 2.2 years. This results in lost opportunities for timely genetic counseling, implementation of standards of care, initiation of glucocorticoids, and participation in clinical trials.
INTRODUCTION/AIMS: With current and anticipated disease-modifying treatments, including gene therapy, an early diagnosis for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is crucial to assure maximum benefit. In 2009, a study from the Muscular Dystrophy Surveillance, Tracking, and Research Network (MD STARnet) showed an average diagnosis age of 5 years among males with DMD born from January 1, 1982 to December 31, 2000. Initiatives were implemented by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and patient organizations to reduce time to diagnosis. We conducted a follow-up study in a surveillance cohort born after January 1, 2000 to determine whether there has been an improvement in time to diagnosis. METHODS: We assessed the age of diagnosis among males with DMD born from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2015 using data collected by six US MD STARnet surveillance sites (Colorado, Iowa, western New York State, the Piedmont region of North Carolina, South Carolina, and Utah). The analytic cohort included 221 males with definite or probable DMD diagnosis without a documented family history. We computed frequency count and percentage for categorical variables, and mean, median, and standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables. RESULTS: The mean [median] ages in years of diagnostic milestones were: first signs, 2.7 [2.0]; first creatine kinase (CK), 4.6 [4.6]; DNA/muscle biopsy testing, 4.9 [4.8]; and time from first signs to diagnostic confirmation, 2.2 [1.4]. DISCUSSION: The time interval between first signs of DMD and diagnosis remains unchanged at 2.2 years. This results in lost opportunities for timely genetic counseling, implementation of standards of care, initiation of glucocorticoids, and participation in clinical trials.
Authors: Lisa A Miller; Paul A Romitti; Christopher Cunniff; Charlotte Druschel; Katherine D Mathews; F John Meaney; Dennis Matthews; Jiji Kantamneni; Zhen-Fang Feng; Nancy Zemblidge; Timothy M Miller; Jennifer Andrews; Deborah Fox; Emma Ciafaloni; Shree Pandya; April Montgomery; Aileen Kenneson Journal: Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol Date: 2006-11
Authors: David J Birnkrant; Katharine Bushby; Carla M Bann; Benjamin A Alman; Susan D Apkon; Angela Blackwell; Laura E Case; Linda Cripe; Stasia Hadjiyannakis; Aaron K Olson; Daniel W Sheehan; Julie Bolen; David R Weber; Leanne M Ward Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2018-02-03 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: David J Birnkrant; Katharine Bushby; Carla M Bann; Susan D Apkon; Angela Blackwell; Mary K Colvin; Linda Cripe; Adrienne R Herron; Annie Kennedy; Kathi Kinnett; James Naprawa; Garey Noritz; James Poysky; Natalie Street; Christina J Trout; David R Weber; Leanne M Ward Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2018-02-02 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Peggy P Ho; Lauren J Lahey; Foteini Mourkioti; Peggy E Kraft; Antonio Filareto; Moritz Brandt; Klas E G Magnusson; Eric E Finn; Jeffrey S Chamberlain; William H Robinson; Helen M Blau; Lawrence Steinman Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-09-04 Impact factor: 12.779
Authors: Jerry R Mendell; Nathalie Goemans; Linda P Lowes; Lindsay N Alfano; Katherine Berry; James Shao; Edward M Kaye; Eugenio Mercuri Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2016-01-08 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Jerry R Mendell; Zarife Sahenk; Kelly Lehman; Carrie Nease; Linda P Lowes; Natalie F Miller; Megan A Iammarino; Lindsay N Alfano; Amanda Nicholl; Samiah Al-Zaidy; Sarah Lewis; Kathleen Church; Richard Shell; Linda H Cripe; Rachael A Potter; Danielle A Griffin; Eric Pozsgai; Ashish Dugar; Mark Hogan; Louise R Rodino-Klapac Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 18.302