Literature DB >> 35311217

Introducing CARESSER: A framework for in situ learning robot social assistance from expert knowledge and demonstrations.

Antonio Andriella1, Carme Torras1, Carla Abdelnour2, Guillem Alenyà1.   

Abstract

Socially assistive robots have the potential to augment and enhance therapist's effectiveness in repetitive tasks such as cognitive therapies. However, their contribution has generally been limited as domain experts have not been fully involved in the entire pipeline of the design process as well as in the automatisation of the robots' behaviour. In this article, we present aCtive leARning agEnt aSsiStive bEhaviouR (CARESSER), a novel framework that actively learns robotic assistive behaviour by leveraging the therapist's expertise (knowledge-driven approach) and their demonstrations (data-driven approach). By exploiting that hybrid approach, the presented method enables in situ fast learning, in a fully autonomous fashion, of personalised patient-specific policies. With the purpose of evaluating our framework, we conducted two user studies in a daily care centre in which older adults affected by mild dementia and mild cognitive impairment (N = 22) were requested to solve cognitive exercises with the support of a therapist and later on of a robot endowed with CARESSER. Results showed that: (i) the robot managed to keep the patients' performance stable during the sessions even more so than the therapist; (ii) the assistance offered by the robot during the sessions eventually matched the therapist's preferences. We conclude that CARESSER, with its stakeholder-centric design, can pave the way to new AI approaches that learn by leveraging human-human interactions along with human expertise, which has the benefits of speeding up the learning process, eliminating the need for the design of complex reward functions, and finally avoiding undesired states.
© The Author(s) 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Human–robot interaction; In situ learning; Robot adaptivity; Robot personalisation; Robot-assisted cognitive training; Socially assistive robotics

Year:  2022        PMID: 35311217      PMCID: PMC8916953          DOI: 10.1007/s11257-021-09316-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  User Model User-adapt Interact        ISSN: 0924-1868            Impact factor:   4.412


  16 in total

1.  Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome.

Authors:  R C Petersen; G E Smith; S C Waring; R J Ivnik; E G Tangalos; E Kokmen
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1999-03

2.  The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Guy M McKhann; David S Knopman; Howard Chertkow; Bradley T Hyman; Clifford R Jack; Claudia H Kawas; William E Klunk; Walter J Koroshetz; Jennifer J Manly; Richard Mayeux; Richard C Mohs; John C Morris; Martin N Rossor; Philip Scheltens; Maria C Carrillo; Bill Thies; Sandra Weintraub; Creighton H Phelps
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 21.566

3.  Challenge point: a framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning.

Authors:  Mark A Guadagnoli; Timothy D Lee
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.328

Review 4.  Socially assistive robotics: Human augmentation versus automation.

Authors:  Maja J Matarić
Journal:  Sci Robot       Date:  2017-03-15

5.  Robots to assist daily activities: views of older adults with Alzheimer's disease and their caregivers.

Authors:  Rosalie H Wang; Aishwarya Sudhama; Momotaz Begum; Rajibul Huq; Alex Mihailidis
Journal:  Int Psychogeriatr       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 3.878

Review 6.  Memory deficits in Alzheimer's patients: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  G A Carlesimo; M Oscar-Berman
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 7.444

Review 7.  Scoping review on the use of socially assistive robot technology in elderly care.

Authors:  Jordan Abdi; Ahmed Al-Hindawi; Tiffany Ng; Marcela P Vizcaychipi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Developing assistive robots for people with mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia: a qualitative study with older adults and experts in aged care.

Authors:  Mikaela Law; Craig Sutherland; Ho Seok Ahn; Bruce A MacDonald; Kathy Peri; Deborah L Johanson; Dina-Sara Vajsakovic; Ngaire Kerse; Elizabeth Broadbent
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Long-Term Personalization of an In-Home Socially Assistive Robot for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders.

Authors:  Caitlyn Clabaugh; Kartik Mahajan; Shomik Jain; Roxanna Pakkar; David Becerra; Zhonghao Shi; Eric Deng; Rhianna Lee; Gisele Ragusa; Maja Matarić
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2019-11-06

10.  Thinking-While-Moving Exercises May Improve Cognition in Elderly with Mild Cognitive Deficits: A Proof-of-Principle Study.

Authors:  Casper de Boer; Holly V Echlin; Alica Rogojin; Bianca R Baltaretu; Lauren E Sergio
Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra       Date:  2018-07-11
View more
  1 in total

1.  Personalizing Care Through Robotic Assistance and Clinical Supervision.

Authors:  Alessandra Sorrentino; Laura Fiorini; Gianmaria Mancioppi; Filippo Cavallo; Alessandro Umbrico; Amedeo Cesta; Andrea Orlandini
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2022-07-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.