| Literature DB >> 35311135 |
Fei Gao1, Bin Shi1, Peipei Wang1, Chuanbin Wang1, Xin Fang1, Jiangning Dong1, Tingting Lin1.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the value of 3.0T MRI Intravoxel Incoherent motion diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (IVIM-DWI) combined with texture analysis (TA) for evaluating extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) of rectal adenocarcinoma.Entities:
Keywords: diffusion-weighted imaging; extramural vascular invasion; intravoxel incoherent motion; magnetic resonance imagine; rectal Carcinoma; texture analysis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35311135 PMCID: PMC8927647 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.813138
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Figure 1A 45-year-old male patient with rectal adenocarcinoma. (A) The right lateral wall of the rectum was invaded, and the origin of the vessels was changed (white arrow). (B–E) After selecting the ROI on the DWI image, the IVIM-DWI parameters ADC,D,D* and f value were obtained. (F) Texture analysis, The radiologist mapped the ROI on the maximum size of the lesion. (G) The postoperative specimen of this patient is confirmed by pathology to be differentiated Adenocarcinoma of Rectum and EMVI positive, ulcerated, and the red circle shows intravascular cancer embolus (HE 400).
Statistical results of IVIM-DWI parameters between the EMVI positive group and the EMVI negative group of rectal adenocarcinoma.
| n | ADC (10-3mm2/s) | D (10-3mm2/s) | D* (10-3mm2/s) | f(%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| positive | 39 | 0.91 (0.15) | 0.67 (0.35) | 13.5 (27.62) | 36.86 ± 16.01 |
| negative | 57 | 0.78 (0.27) | 0.53 (0.23) | 5.33 (4.43) | 37.34 ± 16.07 |
| t(Z) | -2.436 | -2.163 | -3.831 | -0.141 | |
|
| 0.015 | 0.031 | 0 | 0.612 |
The f values of two groups were normal distribution and analyzed by independent sample t test, P < 0.05 was statistically significant, and t was the non-parametric rank sum-test. The ADC, D and D* values of the two groups did not conform to normal distribution and were analyzed by non-parametric test (Mann-Whitney U rank-sum test). P < 0.05 was statistically significant, and Z was the statistic obtained by non-parametric rank-sum test.
ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient; D, pure diffusion coefficient; D*, pseudodiffusion coefficient; f, perfusion fraction.
Figure 2The ROC analysis for the IVIM-DWI parameters of the EMVI positive group and the EMVI negative group.
Statistical results of TA between the EMVI positive group and the EMVI negative group of rectal adenocarcinoma.
| n | Histogram Energy | Mean Deviation | uniformity | Correlation_AllDirection_offset4_SD | GLCMEntropy_AllDirection_offset4_SD | GLCMEntropy_AllDirection_offset7_SD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| positive | 39 | 0.0114193(0.00283) | -0.00000000163(0.000000369) | 0.838177(0.0444) | 0.0000000136(0.000000022) | 0.0066762(0.01291) | 0.030205(0.06736) |
| negative | 57 | 0.0105037(0.00221722) | 0.000000094(0.0000004) | 0.819747(0.0365765) | 0.00000001(0) | 0.00427244(0.0072046) | 0.0175849(0.0281982) |
| Z | -2.719 | -2.081 | -2.533 | -2.779 | -2.719 | -3.174 | |
|
| 0.007 | 0.037 | 0.011 | 0.005 | 0.007 | 0.002 |
All texture parameters in the two groups did not conform to normal distribution, and non-parametric test (Mann-Whitney U rank-sum test) was used for analysis. Median(quartile) was expressed, P <0.05 was statistically significant, and Z was the statistic obtained by non-parametric rank-sum test.
The ROC analysis for each individual feature, and IVIM-DWI combined with TA.
| parameters | AUC(95% ci) | Sensitivity(%) | Specificity(%) | Yoden index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADC(10-3mm2/s) | 0.649(0.545~0.743) | 70.18 | 66.67 | 0.3684 |
| D(10-3mm2/s) | 0.634(0.529~0.730) | 73.68 | 58.97 | 0.3266 |
| D*(10-3mm2/s) | 0.731(0.631~0.816) | 87.72 | 56.41 | 0.4413 |
| histogramEnergy | 0.664(0.560~0.757) | 66.67 | 66.67 | 0.3333 |
| MeanDeviation | 0.626(0.521~0.722) | 40.35 | 87.18 | 0.2753 |
| Uniformity | 0.653(0.549~0.747) | 63.16 | 64.10 | 0.2726 |
| Correlation_AllDirection_offset4_SD | 0.674(0.571~0.766) | 52.63 | 79.49 | 0.3212 |
| GLCMEntropy_AllDirection_offset4_SD | 0.664(0.560~0.757) | 52.63 | 79.36 | 0.2699 |
| GLCMEntropy_AllDirection_offset7_SD | 0.691(0.589~0.782) | 96.49 | 35.90 | 0.3239 |
| D* combined with TA | 0.821(0.730~0.892) | 92.98 | 61.54 | 0.5452 |
Figure 3The ROC analysis for the TA parameters of the EMVI positive group and the EMVI negative group.
Figure 4The ROC analysis for the Logistic regression prediction model of the EMVI positive group and the EMVI negative group.