| Literature DB >> 35310932 |
Yoshiyuki Yoshikawa1, Noriaki Maeshige2, Mikiko Uemura3, Masayuki Tanaka4, Nobuhide Kawabe5, Atomu Yamaguchi2, Hidemi Fujino2, Hiroto Terashi6.
Abstract
Objectives: Tuning fork vibration sensation testing is widely used as a diagnostic test to detect diabetic neuropathy. However, evidence-based literature indicates that reliability between examiners is low. Attaching isosceles triangle diagrams on tuning forks lowers the discrepancy between examiners. This study aimed to analyze the relationship between vibration sensation measurement using an improved tuning fork and the presence of callus and wound development in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy.Entities:
Keywords: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy; calluses; improved tuning fork; lower extremity wounds
Year: 2022 PMID: 35310932 PMCID: PMC8928360 DOI: 10.1177/20503121221085097
Source DB: PubMed Journal: SAGE Open Med ISSN: 2050-3121
Figure 1.A tuning fork (C-128 Hz aluminum tuning fork manufactured by Nichion) was used for the test. The tuning fork was modified using an isosceles triangle diagram, because the strength of the vibration varied depending on the intensity of the tapping when used as is. The modified tuning fork forms an isosceles triangle that gradually becomes larger in the center as the vibration becomes smaller. The measurement was started when the vertex of the isosceles triangle formed by the afterimage reached the third horizontal line from the bottom, and the vibration sensing time was measured with a digital stopwatch.
Comparison in characteristics between general older adults and patients with DPN.
| Variables | General older adults ( | Patients with DPN ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (male/female) | 26/30 | 21/31 | NS |
| Age | 74.1 ± 4.4 | 74.4 ± 3.5 | NS |
| Height (cm) | 154.6 ± 9.1 | 153.7 ± 8.0 | NS |
| Weight (kg) | 55.7 ± 8.5 | 58.0 ± 9.7 | NS |
| BMI | 23.3 ± 3.0 | 24.5 ± 3.6 | NS |
| DM morbidity (years) | – | 11.9 ± 3.1 | – |
| Callus (present/absent) | 8/48 | 27/25 | <0.01 |
| Touch-pressure sensitivity | 7/49 | 23/29 | <0.01 |
| Vibration sensitivity on medial malleolus | 8.0 ± 1.5 | 4.9 ± 1.4 | <0.01 |
| Vibration sensitivity on the first distal phalanx | 8.4 ± 1.5 | 3.8 ± 1.8 | <0.01 |
| ROM of the ankle dorsiflexion | 15.5 ± 3.5 | 12.3 ± 6.3 | <0.01 |
| ROM of the first MTP extension | 46.9 ± 5.3 | 35.1 ± 11.4 | <0.01 |
BMI: body mass index; ROM: range of motion; MTP: metatarsophalangeal; NS: not significant.
Comparison of vibration sensation on the medial malleolus and the first distal phalanx between the general older adults and the patients with DPN.
| Variables | Vibration sensitivity on the medial malleolus | Vibration sensitivity on the first distal phalanx | |
|---|---|---|---|
| General older adults | 8.0 ± 1.5 | 8.4 ± 1.5 | NS |
| Patients with DPN | 4.9 ± 1.4 | 3.8 ± 1.8 | <0.01 |
DPN: diabetic peripheral neuropathy; NS: not significant.
p < 0.01 versus general older adults.
Comparison of vibration sensation between the medial malleolus and the first distal phalanx using ROC curve.
| Variables | Area under the curve | Cutoff value | Sensitivity | Specificity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vibration sensitivity on the medial malleolus | 0.93 | 6.6 s | 78.6% | 88.5% | <0.01 |
| Vibration sensitivity on the first distal phalanx | 0.96 | 6.3 s | 87.5% | 94.2% | <0.01 |
Likelihood-ratio test p < 0.0001.
Figure 2.ROC curve of vibration sensation on medial malleolus.
ROC: receiver operating characteristic.
Figure 3.ROC curve of vibration sensation on dorsal aspect of the first distal phalanx.
ROC: receiver operating characteristic.
Independent factors for the presence or absence of callus in the patient with DPN.
| Variables | Odds ratio | 95% confidence interval | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Diabetes duration | 3.51 | 1.38–8.92 | <0.01 |
| Vibration sensitivity on the first distal phalanx | 0.11 | 0.02–0.54 | <0.01 |
| BMI | 0.52 | 0.31–0.88 | <0.05 |
BMI: body mass index.
Likelihood-ratio test p < 0.001.
Figure 4.Incidence of lower extremity wounds in subjects followed for 3 years.
DPN: diabetic peripheral neuropathy; MTH; metatarsal head.
Cox proportional hazard comparison in lower extremity wound development.
| Variables | Hazard ratio | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vibration sensitivity on the first distal phalanx | 0.11 | 0.01–0.84 | <0.05 |
| Diabetes duration | 1.11 | 0.66–1.87 | 0.43 |
| BMI | 1.11 | 0.86–1.44 | 0.24 |
| Presence or absence of callus | 0.05 | 0.00–6.97 | 0.70 |
BMI: body mass index.
Likelihood-ratio test p < 0.001.