| Literature DB >> 35310728 |
Yusuke Tomita1, Hideyuki Seki1, Emi Matsuzono1, Yoshimitsu Kobayashi1, Susumu Sogabe1, Nozomu Sugai1, Jun Fujita1, Akira Suzuki2.
Abstract
Early gastric mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) are rare diseases, with no data on their incidence and prognosis. We report the case of intramucosal gastric MiNENs for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) treatment. An 80-year-old male underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy for screening and was suspected of early gastric cancer type 0-IIa+IIc on the lesser curvature of the antrum, for which ESD treatment was performed. Histopathologically, the diagnosis was MiNENs. Synaptophysin-positive adenoductal structures were observed in the adenocarcinoma component, suggesting that adenocarcinoma had dedifferentiated into neuroendocrine carcinoma. The tumor was located within the mucosal layer, with lympho-vascular invasion. The patient was kept under observation; however, 6 months after the ESD, computed tomography scan revealed prominent ascites, enlarged lymph nodes, and liver metastases, and MiNENs were suspected to have poor prognosis. If MiNENs diagnosis is made preoperatively or postoperatively, surgical resection may be considered as treatment regardless of the tumor depth or lympho-vascular invasion.Entities:
Keywords: ESD; MANEC; MiNENs; cancerization; early gastric cancer
Year: 2021 PMID: 35310728 PMCID: PMC8828207 DOI: 10.1002/deo2.10
Source DB: PubMed Journal: DEN open ISSN: 2692-4609
FIGURE 1EGD findings. (A) An irregular depressed lesion with a protuberance area was found on the lesser curvature of the antrum. (B) Depressed lesion is divided into two parts. The oral depression had erosive changes and the surrounding elevated area showed SMT‐like elevation. The anal‐side depression was slightly flatter than the oral depression and had irregular margins and regional characteristics. Magnifying endoscopy with narrow‐band imaging. (C) In oral‐side depressed area, the surface structure had disappeared. (D) Anal‐side depressed area showed irregular microvascular architecture and microsurface structure with well‐demarcated line
FIGURE 2(A) The macroscopic finding of the specimens resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection. (B) Histopathological findings of the #1. (C) The pathological diagnosis was early gastric mixed neuroendocrine‐non‐neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs). (D) The mapping indicates the relation between an endoscopic image and histology
FIGURE 3Loupe images of red line of the specimen. (A) Histopathological findings showed a well‐to‐moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma on the left side of the specimen and a substantial growth of tumor cells with granular chromatin, densely stained atypical nuclei, and small cytoplasm on the right side. The tumor shows no invasion into the submucosa. (B) Immunostaining showed that the tumor on the right side of the specimen was positive for synaptophysin and diagnosed as neuroendocrine cell carcinoma. The neuroendocrine cell carcinoma also showed lympho‐vascular invasion within the lamina muscularis mucosae. (C) The neuroendocrine cell carcinoma showed lympho‐vascular invasion within the lamina muscularis mucosae. (D) There were synaptophysin‐positive adenoductal formations in the adenocarcinoma component, suggesting that the adenocarcinoma had dedifferentiated into the neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC)
Cases that reported early gastric MiNENs (including MANEC)
| No. | Year | Author | Age | Sex | Size (mm) | Type | Depth | Component | Invasion | Treatment | Surface*1 | Vascular*2 | Preoperative biopsy | Clinical course | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | Higuchi | 80s | M | 31 × 29 | IIa | SM1 | tub1‐muc | NEC | ly1v1 | ESD | ‐ | ‐ | tub1 | Recurrence in 2 weeks |
| 2 | 2013 | Lee | 70 | F | 14 × 13 | IIc | SM1 | tub1 | NEC | ‐ | ESD | ‐ | ‐ | tub1 | No recurrence for 12 months |
| 3 | 2014 | Fukuba | 80s | M | 10 × 9 | IIa | SM2 | tub2 | NEC | ly1v1 | ESD surgery | ‐ | ‐ | tub2 | No recurrence for 3 years |
| 4 | 2015 | Yamasaki | 77 | M | 10 × 6 | IIc | M | tub2 | NEC | 0 | ESD | I | I | tub2 | No recurrence for 7 months |
| 5 | 2015 | Yamauchi | 76 | M | 22 × 22 | IIc | SM | sig | NET | ‐ | surgery | ‐ | ‐ | por‐sig | ‐ |
| 6 | 2016 | Taguchi | 63 | M | 23 × 20 | IIc | SM2 | tub2‐por | NEC | ly1v0 | surgery | ‐ | ‐ | tub2 | No recurrence for 16 months |
| 7 | 2016 | Sakatani | 60s | F | 8 × 7 | IIc | SM1 | tub12 | NEC | ‐ | ESD surgery | A | I | tub2>tub1 | No recurrence for 18 months |
| 8 | 2017 | Pastorello | 61 | M | 20 × 15 | ‐ | SM | tub‐por | NEC | ly1v0 | surgery | ‐ | ‐ | NET | Recurrence in 6 years |
| 9 | 2018 | Kubo | 80 | M | 25 × 22 | IIa | M | tub1 | NETG1 | ‐ | ESD | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | No recurrence for 6 months |
| 10 | 2019 | Jeong | 66 | M | 20 × 8 | IIa | SM? | tub2 | NEC | ‐ | surgery | ‐ | ‐ | NET | ‐ |
| 11 | 2019 | Koseki | 80s | M | 9 × 8 | IIc | SM2 | tub1 | NEC | ly0v1 | ESD | A | I | tub2 | No recurrence for 20 months |
| 12 | 2019 | Fujita | 67 | M | 12 × 8 | IIc | SM2 | tub | NEC | ly1v0 | ESD surgery | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | No recurrence for 15 months |
| 13 | 2020 | Tanaka | 80s | F | 25 × 20 | IIc | SM2 | tub2 | NEC | ly0v1 | surgery | I | I | NEC | No recurrence for 6 months |
| Our case | 85 | M | 14 × 8 | IIa+IIc | M | tub12 | NEC | ly1v0 | ESD | I/A | I | Group 4 | Recurrence in 7 months | ||
Abbreviations: A, absent; I, irregular; MANEC, mixed adeno‐neuroendocrine carcinomas; MiNENs, mixed neuroendocrine‐non‐neuroendocrine neoplasms.
*1: Surface pattern in ME‐NBI; *2: vascular pattern in ME‐NBI.