| Literature DB >> 35310194 |
Abstract
To investigate the important index of maximum oxygen uptake in evaluating cardiopulmonary function and to provide a basis for the evaluation of cardiopulmonary function for adolescents, a total of 200 healthy adolescents aged 12-14 were selected, and these 200 subjects were randomly assigned to the modeling group and the test group. In the first stage, data of 150 subjects were randomly selected, and the regression equation for VO2max was established by adding independent variables such as gender, age, height, weight, body mass index, and resting heart rate. In the second stage, the remaining 50 subjects were selected as the test group to test and evaluate the prediction effect of the prediction model. The results showed that the correlation coefficient between the measured value of maximal oxygen uptake and the predicted value was 0.983, and the significance level was 0.000, which was significantly lower than 0.01 correlation, indicating that there was an obvious concomitant relationship between the two values. The maximum oxygen uptake calculated by this equation is good and has a good application prospect.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35310194 PMCID: PMC8930205 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5961197
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Correlation coefficients between each index tested by the subjects and maximal oxygen uptake.
| Indicators | Maximum oxygen uptake (L/min) |
|
| |
| Gender | 0.492 |
| Age (years) | 0.211 |
| Height (cm) | 0.591 |
| Weight (kg) | 0.662 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0.488 |
| Quiet heart rate (sub/min) | 0.013 |
| The heart rate (sub/min) | 0.198 |
| Maximum heart rate (sub/min) | 0.240 |
| Peak load | 0.754 |
, significant correlation at 0.01 level (bilateral); , significant correlation at 0.05 level (bilateral).
Regression model summary.
| Model |
|
| Adjust | Standard error | Durbin–Watson |
|
| |||||
| 1 | 0.754a | 0.568 | 0.565 | 0.285 | |
| 2 | 0.829b | 0.687 | 0.683 | 0.243 | |
| 3 | 0.87c | 0.756 | 0.751 | 0.215 | |
| 4 | 0.878d | 0.771 | 0.765 | 0.209 | |
| 5 | 0.884c | 0.781 | 0.774 | 0.205 | 1.604 |
Coefficient.
| Model | Nonstandardized coefficient | The standard coefficient |
| Sig | ||
| B | Standard error | A trial version | ||||
|
| ||||||
| 1 | (Constant) | −0.131 | 0.14 | −0.935 | 0.351 | |
| The largest load | 0.016 | 0.001 | 0.754 | 13.957 | 0 | |
| (Constant) | 0.399 | 0.125 | −3.202 | 0.002 | ||
| The largest load | 0.012 | 0.001 | 0.567 | 10.821 | 0 | |
|
| ||||||
| 2 | Weight | 0.013 | 0.002 | 0.392 | 7.479 | 0 |
| (Constant) | −0.322 | 0.111 | −2.993 | 0.003 | ||
| The largest load | 0.011 | 0.001 | 0.526 | 11.222 | 0 | |
| Weight | 0.011 | 0.002 | 0.339 | 7.179 | 0 | |
|
| ||||||
| 3 | Gender | 0.239 | 0.037 | 0.275 | 6.419 | 0 |
| (Constant) | −0.937 | 0.222 | −4.212 | 0 | ||
| The largest load | 0.01 | 0.001 | 0.48 | 9.993 | 0 | |
| Weight | 0.012 | 0.002 | 0.37 | 7.883 | 0 | |
| Gender | 0.237 | 0.036 | 0.272 | 6.531 | 0 | |
|
| ||||||
| 4 | Maximum heart rate | 0.004 | 0.001 | 0.131 | 3.109 | 0.002 |
| (Constant) | −0.784 | 0.226 | −3.467 | 0.001 | ||
| The largest load | 0.009 | 0.001 | 0.435 | 8.665 | 0 | |
| Weight | 0.021 | 0.004 | 0.632 | 5.658 | 0 | |
|
| ||||||
| 5 | Gender | 0.229 | 0.036 | 0.262 | 6.408 | 0 |
| Maximum heart rate | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.14 | 3.377 | 0.001 | |
| BMI | −0.027 | 0.011 | −0.261 | −2.574 | 0.011 | |
Figure 1Scatter diagram between the predicted maximal oxygen uptake and the measured maximal oxygen uptake (n = 50).
Comparison of difference between measured and predicted values.
| Maximum oxygen uptake measured value (L/min) | Estimated value of equation (L/min) |
|
|
| ||
| 1.7722 ± 0.374 | 1.714 ± 0.393 | 0.983 |
, P < 0.01
Figure 2Error analysis of the predicted value and the measured value.