| Literature DB >> 35310146 |
Moumita Dutta1, Kris M Weigel1, Kelley T Patten2, Anthony E Valenzuela2, Christopher Wallis3, Keith J Bein3,4, Anthony S Wexler3,5, Pamela J Lein2, Julia Yue Cui1.
Abstract
Background: Traffic-related air pollution (TRAP) is linked to increased risk for age-related dementia, including Alzheimer's disease (AD). The gut microbiome is posited to influence AD risk, and an increase in microbial-derived secondary bile acids (BAs) is observed in AD patients. We recently reported that chronic exposure to ambient TRAP modified AD risk in a sex-dependent manner in the TgF344 AD (TG) rat.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; Bile acid; Gut microbiome; Rat; Traffic-related air pollution (TRAP)
Year: 2022 PMID: 35310146 PMCID: PMC8927974 DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2022.03.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxicol Rep ISSN: 2214-7500
Fig. 1A diagram illustrating the main hypothesis and experimental design of the study. Male and female rats in WT or TgF344-AD background were exposed to either filtered air (FA) or traffic related air pollution (TRAP) starting from postnatal day (PND) 28. Tissues were collected after 9 and 14 months of exposure while the age of those animals were 10 months and 15 months respectively. Microbial DNA from the large intestinal content (LIC) was quantified using 16 S rDNA sequencing. Bile acids (BAs) in serum, LIC, and liver were quantified using LC-MS/MS. Messenger RNA expression of host BA processing genes in liver and ileum was quantified using RT-qPCR.
Fig. 2(A) Alpha diversity of gut microbiota in LIC of male and female WT and TgF344-TG rats exposed to FA and TRAP for 9 months (n = 5–6 per group). The 16 S rDNA data were analyzed using QIIME. (B) Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes (F/B) ratio in male (left) and female (right) WT and TgF344-TG rats after 9 months exposure to FA and TRAP. Pounds (#) represent statistically significant differences between WT and TG of the same sex and exposure (two-way analysis of variance [ANOVA] followed by Tukey’s post hoc test, p < 0.05). (C) Differentially regulated bacterial species (L7) after 9 months exposure to TRAP. Asterisks (*) represent statistically significant differences between FA and TRAP in rats of the same sex and genotype; pounds (#) represent statistically significant differences between WT and TRAP of the same sex and exposure (two-way analysis of variance [ANOVA] followed by Tukey’s post hoc test, p < 0.05).
Fig. 3(A) F/B ratio in male (left) and female (right) WT and TgF344-TG rats after 14 months exposure to FA or TRAP (n = 5–6 per group). (B) Differentially regulated bacterial phyla (L2) by TRAP after 14 months exposure (asterisks [*] represent statistically significant differences as compared to the FA-exposed group of the same sex and genotype, p < 0.05). Statistical significance was determined using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. (C) Proportion of bacterial species (L7) observed in FA and TRAP exposed male and female rats. (D) Differentially regulated bacterial species (L7) in female and male rats after 14 months exposure to TRAP. Asterisks (*) represent statistically significant differences when compared with different exposure of similar sex and genotype (p < 0.05) whereas pound (#) symbolize statistically significant differences among different genotypes of similar sex and exposure (p < 0.05). Data was analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test.
Fig. 4LC-MS quantification of individual BAs from serum (A) and LIC (B) of 9 months FA and TRAP-exposed rats. The differentially regulated BAs are shown. Asterisks (*) represent statistically significant differences between exposure groups (FA vs TRAP) and pounds (#) represent statistically significant differences between genotypes (p < 0.05). Data is represented as means ± SE. All data has been analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test.
Fig. 5LC-MS quantification of individual BAs from serum (A) LIC (B) of 14 months FA and TRAP exposed rats. The differentially regulated BAs are shown. Asterisks (*) represent statistically significant differences between exposure groups (FA vs TRAP) (p < 0.05). Data has been represented as means ± SE. All data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test.
Fig. 6Summary of major findings in the current study and comparison with the AD-related phenotypes in the same cohort as observed by [91].