AIM: To determine whether the prevalence of treated hypertension is higher among males or females with early/intermediate (e/i) age-related macular degeneration (AMD) with and without bilateral reticular pseudodrusen (RPD). METHODS: Retrospective review of the records of patients with e/iAMD who were recruited into the University of Colorado AMD registry between July 2014 and November 2019. Images were classified using the Beckman Initiative criteria and presence/absence of RPD. Patients were categorized into three groups: 1) e/iAMD with RPD; 2) e/iAMD without RPD; 3) control patients who did not have AMD. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was used for adjusted analysis with odds ratios (OR) and confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: There were 260 patients with e/iAMD of which 101 had bilateral RPD and 159 had no RPD, and 221 controls. Overall, 62% of patients were female and the three groups did not differ by gender. When stratified by gender, the female e/iAMD/RPD group had a higher prevalence of hypertension, 64.1% vs 45.2% for controls, OR=2.2 (95%CI: 1.2-4.0). The frequency of hypertension in the e/iAMD/no RPD group was 54.1% and did not significantly differ from the control group. Among males, prevalence rates of treated hypertension did not differ. There is a significant interaction of hypertension and gender for the e/iAMD/RPD group such that women with e/iAMD who had RPD were significantly more likely to have hypertension (P=0.042). This relationship was not significant in the e/iAMD/no RPD group (P=0.269). CONCLUSION: Among females treated hypertension is significantly higher among e/iAMD/RPD patients, whereas for males there is no significant association. International Journal of Ophthalmology Press.
AIM: To determine whether the prevalence of treated hypertension is higher among males or females with early/intermediate (e/i) age-related macular degeneration (AMD) with and without bilateral reticular pseudodrusen (RPD). METHODS: Retrospective review of the records of patients with e/iAMD who were recruited into the University of Colorado AMD registry between July 2014 and November 2019. Images were classified using the Beckman Initiative criteria and presence/absence of RPD. Patients were categorized into three groups: 1) e/iAMD with RPD; 2) e/iAMD without RPD; 3) control patients who did not have AMD. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was used for adjusted analysis with odds ratios (OR) and confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: There were 260 patients with e/iAMD of which 101 had bilateral RPD and 159 had no RPD, and 221 controls. Overall, 62% of patients were female and the three groups did not differ by gender. When stratified by gender, the female e/iAMD/RPD group had a higher prevalence of hypertension, 64.1% vs 45.2% for controls, OR=2.2 (95%CI: 1.2-4.0). The frequency of hypertension in the e/iAMD/no RPD group was 54.1% and did not significantly differ from the control group. Among males, prevalence rates of treated hypertension did not differ. There is a significant interaction of hypertension and gender for the e/iAMD/RPD group such that women with e/iAMD who had RPD were significantly more likely to have hypertension (P=0.042). This relationship was not significant in the e/iAMD/no RPD group (P=0.269). CONCLUSION: Among females treated hypertension is significantly higher among e/iAMD/RPD patients, whereas for males there is no significant association. International Journal of Ophthalmology Press.
Authors: Véronique L Roger; Alan S Go; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Emelia J Benjamin; Jarett D Berry; William B Borden; Dawn M Bravata; Shifan Dai; Earl S Ford; Caroline S Fox; Heather J Fullerton; Cathleen Gillespie; Susan M Hailpern; John A Heit; Virginia J Howard; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Diane M Makuc; Gregory M Marcus; Ariane Marelli; David B Matchar; Claudia S Moy; Dariush Mozaffarian; Michael E Mussolino; Graham Nichol; Nina P Paynter; Elsayed Z Soliman; Paul D Sorlie; Nona Sotoodehnia; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Nathan D Wong; Daniel Woo; Melanie B Turner Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-12-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Ronald Klein; Stacy M Meuer; Michael D Knudtson; Sudha K Iyengar; Barbara E K Klein Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2007-11-28 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Wan Ling Wong; Xinyi Su; Xiang Li; Chui Ming G Cheung; Ronald Klein; Ching-Yu Cheng; Tien Yin Wong Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2014-01-03 Impact factor: 26.763
Authors: Anne M Lynch; Naresh Mandava; Jennifer L Patnaik; Ashley A Frazer-Abel; Brandie D Wagner; Alan G Palestine; Marc T Mathias; Frank S Siringo; Jennifer N Cathcart; V Michael Holers Journal: Eur J Ophthalmol Date: 2019-06-17 Impact factor: 2.597
Authors: Anne M Lynch; Alan G Palestine; Brandie D Wagner; Jennifer L Patnaik; Ashley A Frazier-Abel; Marc T Mathias; Frank S Siringo; Vernon Michael Holers; Naresh Mandava Journal: BMJ Open Ophthalmol Date: 2020-01-14