Laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) was attempted here to additively manufacture a new generation orthopedic β titanium alloy Ti-35Nb-7Zr-5Ta toward engineering patient-specific implants. Parts were fabricated using four different values of energy density (ED) input ranging from 46.6 to 54.8 J/mm3 through predefined laser beam parameters from prealloyed powders. All the conditions yielded parts of >98.5% of theoretical density. X-ray microcomputed tomography analyses of the fabricated parts revealed minimal imperfections with enhanced densification at a higher ED input. X-ray diffraction analysis indicated a marginally larger d-spacing and tensile residual stress at the highest ED input that is ascribed to the steeper temperature gradients. Cellular to columnar dendritic transformation was observed at the highest ED along with an increase in the size of the solidified features indicating the synergetic effects of the temperature gradient and solidification growth rate. Density measurements indicated ≈99.5% theoretical density achieved for an ED of 50.0 J/mm3. The maximum tensile strength of ≈660 MPa was obtained at an ED of 54.8 J/mm3 through the formation of the columnar dendritic substructure. High ductility ranging from 25 to 30% was observed in all the fabricated parts irrespective of ED. The assessment of cytocompatibility in vitro indicated good attachment and proliferation of osteoblasts on the fabricated samples that were similar to the cell response on commercially pure titanium, confirming the potential of the additively manufactured Ti-35Nb-7Zr-5Ta as a suitable material for biomedical applications. Taken together, these results demonstrate the feasibility of L-PBF of Ti-35Nb-7Zr-5Ta for potentially engineering patient-specific orthopedic implants.
Laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) was attempted here to additively manufacture a new generation orthopedic β titanium alloy Ti-35Nb-7Zr-5Ta toward engineering patient-specific implants. Parts were fabricated using four different values of energy density (ED) input ranging from 46.6 to 54.8 J/mm3 through predefined laser beam parameters from prealloyed powders. All the conditions yielded parts of >98.5% of theoretical density. X-ray microcomputed tomography analyses of the fabricated parts revealed minimal imperfections with enhanced densification at a higher ED input. X-ray diffraction analysis indicated a marginally larger d-spacing and tensile residual stress at the highest ED input that is ascribed to the steeper temperature gradients. Cellular to columnar dendritic transformation was observed at the highest ED along with an increase in the size of the solidified features indicating the synergetic effects of the temperature gradient and solidification growth rate. Density measurements indicated ≈99.5% theoretical density achieved for an ED of 50.0 J/mm3. The maximum tensile strength of ≈660 MPa was obtained at an ED of 54.8 J/mm3 through the formation of the columnar dendritic substructure. High ductility ranging from 25 to 30% was observed in all the fabricated parts irrespective of ED. The assessment of cytocompatibility in vitro indicated good attachment and proliferation of osteoblasts on the fabricated samples that were similar to the cell response on commercially pure titanium, confirming the potential of the additively manufactured Ti-35Nb-7Zr-5Ta as a suitable material for biomedical applications. Taken together, these results demonstrate the feasibility of L-PBF of Ti-35Nb-7Zr-5Ta for potentially engineering patient-specific orthopedic implants.
Laser
powder bed fusion (L-PBF) additive manufacturing (AM) methods
offer flexibility and convenience for the rapid production of small-sized
engineering components used in critical applications such as aerospace
and healthcare industries.[1−5] Rapid developments in laser technologies have established L-PBF
technology as the most mature technology in the AM industry.[6,7] In medical technology, the production of implants by L-PBF has emerged
as an attractive strategy that could fully leverage the advantages
offered by AM. AM technologies can be used for fabricating customized
parts to meet the needs of individual patients and implants with complex
geometry that are otherwise difficult to achieve using traditional
manufacturing routes. Significant interest has been focused on the
development of orthopedic implants from novel materials that could
eliminate the limitations associated with the current generation of
biomaterials.[8−10]The current generation of metallic orthopedic
implant materials
essentially includes stainless steel, Ti–6Al–4V, and
cobalt–chromium alloys.[11−13] Even though these materials are
still the preferred choice in many applications, the mismatch in the
elastic modulus of the biomaterial with that of human cortical bone
persists as a concern. The elastic modulus is an important mechanical
property that dictates the transfer of stress from the metallic implant
to the adjacent bone. A metallic material with an elastic modulus
close to that of human cortical bone can avoid stress shielding that
can otherwise lead to bone atrophy, poor osseointegration, and aseptic
loosening of the implant as the high-modulus biomaterial primarily
bears the load.[14,15] As a result, together with good
strength and fatigue properties, implant materials with a low elastic
modulus are of significant interest in orthopedic devices.Titanium
and its alloys are widely preferred in orthopedic and
dental implants compared to other metallic biomaterials due to their
relatively lower stiffness, good cytocompatibility, high corrosion
resistance, and high strength-to-modulus ratio.[16,17] Titanium is an allotropic material with a high-temperature body-centered
cubic (BCC) β phase displaying a lower strength and stiffness
compared to the room-temperature α phase.[18] The need for Ti alloys with an elastic modulus closer to
that of human cortical bone has motivated the development of β-titanium
alloys. These alloys usually contain nontoxic refractory elements
such as niobium, zirconium, and tantalum as the constituent elements.
The β-stabilizing elements such as niobium and tantalum facilitate
the β phase formation at a lower temperature.[19] Zirconium is believed to have a neutral effect on the phase
transformation in titanium; however, it has been reported that in
the presence of other β-stabilizing elements, Zr can also serve
as the β stabilizer.[20] There has
been unprecedented interest, in recent years, in the development of
β titanium alloys for next-generation implants with better clinical
outcomes.[21,22] The widespread adoption of β titanium
alloys for preparing implants has been limited by the poor fatigue
resistance of these alloys. Besides, AM has emerged as a disruptive
technology in the field of manufacturing, particularly in the field
of medical devices, offering a viable route to prepare customized
component fabrication.[23−25] β-Ti alloys have attracted enormous interest
in the biomaterial field, but AM of these alloys is still in its infancy.[18]As L-PBF is an emerging manufacturing
strategy for novel materials
such as the β-Ti alloy Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta
(TNZT), the determination of optimal parameters to manufacture dense
parts for this alloy is highly desirable. This is further required
to fabricate parts that offer the best combination of properties for
engineering implants. There are several process parameters involved
in L-PBF that must be optimized for the manufacturing of defect-free
parts.[26,27] Nondimensional numbers, which are widely
used in conventional mechanical engineering, have been recommended
by many researchers[28,29] as a successful tool in optimizing
the process parameters for L-PBF by considering a global parameter
set. The energy density (ED), defined as the ratio of laser power
to the product of laser beam scan speed, thickness of the layers,
and the spacing between consecutive hatches, is now widely recognized
to be an effective global parameter.[30,31]The
aim of the present study was the fabrication of dense components
of a β titanium alloy Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta using
L-PBF AM toward the broader objective of engineering medical implants.
ED was systematically varied to study its effect on the prepared parts.
The parts prepared at four different values of ED were characterized
to assess their density and presence of defects due to AM. The microstructure,
tensile properties, corrosion resistance, and cytocompatibility were
systematically evaluated.
Results
Microstructural
Features
The composition
(wt %) of the alloy powder used here was determined to be Ti 55.5,
Zr 6.95, Nb 34.0, and Ta 4.64. The elemental compositions of the samples
fabricated at different EDs were measured using wavelength dispersive
spectroscopy (WDS) in an electron probe microanalyzer (EPMA) system
and are tabulated in Table . The compiled results indicate that the elemental compositions
were nearly identical independent of the changes in ED used here.
Table 1
EPMA WDS Analysis of the Elemental
Composition of Fabricated Samples
ED (J/mm3)
Ti (wt %)
Nb (wt %)
Zr (wt %)
Ta (wt %)
46.6
54.44
34.60
6.45
4.51
48.9
54.72
34.56
6.36
4.36
50.0
54.51
34.56
6.45
4.48
54.8
54.53
34.51
6.49
4.47
Alloy samples were manufactured by L-PBF of the alloy
powder using
a range of processing parameters determined from proprietary software.
Parameters such as density, thermal conductivity, specific heat, latent
heat, and laser absorptivity of the material were considered for calculating
the ED. Four different ED values (46.6, 48.9, 50.0, and 54.8 J/mm3) were used within the range recommended by the software.
The average surface roughness value (Ra) of the additively manufactured
alloys was determined to be ≈6 μm. After polishing and
etching, the Ra values were reduced to ≈108 and ≈100
nm, respectively.Representative optical micrographs along the
build direction (BD)
of the TNZT alloy for the different EDs are presented in Figure . The microstructures
reveal the arrangement of the melt pools in the successive layers.
The micrographs also confirm the 67° rotational strategy utilized
during the fabrication of the samples.[32] Within the individual melt pools, columnar grains can be observed,
which formed perpendicular to the melt pool boundary. The grains in
the middle of an individual melt pool grew nearly parallel to the
BD as a narrow columnar grain, which is shown (marked as 1 and 2)
within the boxes in Figure a,b. One of the narrow columnar grains in the middle of the
melt pool is seen extended across multiple layers through strong epitaxial
growth, as depicted by the region shown within box 1. Another grain,
which is shown inside box 2, appears to have grown within two melt
pools. It can be noted that the grains seen inside boxes 3 and 4 reveal
a different morphology. These grains appear to have different morphological
orientations while growing from the bottom to the top layer with the
deposition of successive layers to match the direction of maximum
heat flow. From the optical micrographs, it can be noted that the
variation in ED within the range of 46 to 55 J/mm3 did
not significantly affect the microstructural evolution along BD.
Figure 1
Optical
micrographs representing the build direction (transverse)
of the samples fabricated using different ED (J/mm3) values
(a) 46.6, (b) 48.9, (c) 50.0, and (d) 54.8.
Optical
micrographs representing the build direction (transverse)
of the samples fabricated using different ED (J/mm3) values
(a) 46.6, (b) 48.9, (c) 50.0, and (d) 54.8.Figure includes
representative back-scattered electron (BSE) and secondary electron
(SE) images taken from the same location of the alloy for the different
ED values in order to identify the regions with and without defects.
In contrast to other parameters, samples processed with an ED of 50.0
J/mm3 reveal fewer defects. For identifying the types of
defects, two high magnification micrographs are also shown within
the inset for two intermediate ED values. The combination of SE and
BSE images provides insight into the different defects in the various
samples. The defects identified as A and B in Figure b,d,e,g lie close to the bottom of the melt
pools, and their morphologies are nearly identical. From the morphology
and the location, these defects conform to the lack of fusion defects[33] caused by the insufficient penetration of a
molten pool into a previously deposited layer, causing void formation.
Another defect is identified and shown in Figure e,g) marked as C. The BSE micrograph shows
a melted and separated region nearly spherical in shape. Such defects
occur through the balling phenomenon[34] in
response to the capillary instability within a melt pool.
Figure 2
(a,b,e,f) Low-magnification
back-scattered electron (BSE) and (c,d,g,h)
secondary electron (SE) micrographs captured using an SEM indicating
the defect population within the samples fabricated using different
Eds; enlarged views shown in the insets reveal the types of defects
(A,B—lack of fusion and C—balling).
(a,b,e,f) Low-magnification
back-scattered electron (BSE) and (c,d,g,h)
secondary electron (SE) micrographs captured using an SEM indicating
the defect population within the samples fabricated using different
Eds; enlarged views shown in the insets reveal the types of defects
(A,B—lack of fusion and C—balling).Microstructural features at a higher magnification are shown in Figure . It can be noted
that, on a finer scale, all four EDs led to similar microstructure
evolution. The microstructures reveal solidification features consisting
of columnar and cellular dendrites. This observation is attributed
to an effect of the rotational scan strategy utilized, which is attributed
to different combinations of the temperature gradient (G) and the solidification growth rate (R) values
at different locations within the samples. The development of solidification
microstructure is dependent on the ratio G/R and the product G × R experienced at the different locations within the samples.[35]
Figure 3
Microstructure evolution for the different EDs: (a) 46.6
J/mm3, (b) 48.9 J/mm3, (c) 50.0 J/mm3, and
(d) 54.8 J/mm3) at a higher magnification.
Microstructure evolution for the different EDs: (a) 46.6
J/mm3, (b) 48.9 J/mm3, (c) 50.0 J/mm3, and
(d) 54.8 J/mm3) at a higher magnification.The boundaries of the melt pool consist of coarser features
compared
to the interior regions. Figure d reveals that the sample fabricated with the highest
ED value displays more columnar dendrites compared to the lower ED
sample. However, cellular dendrites are in abundance for the lowest
ED values. Cellular growth of dendrites occurs at higher values of G/R ratios in comparison with the columnar
dendrites. Finer cellular dendritic features indicate that the cooling
rate, the product G × R (cooling
rate), increases with the increase in ED. For the highest ED input
(Figure d), columnar
dendrites had grown significantly (as shown within a white box), indicating
a reverse trend. The size increase of the columnar dendrites occurs
due to a decrease in the cooling rate. Such microstructural transformations
can occur at high ED values owing to the increased amount of heat
contained during fabrication aided by the poor thermal conductivity
of Ti alloys. Effectively, the change occurs from a high G/R and G × R value to a low G/R and G × R value with the increase in ED.
Such a morphological and size change of the solidification features
with the changes in ED occurs as a synergetic effect from the variations
in G and R values.
Structure and Defects
The analysis
of X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns revealed the characteristic peaks
of the BCC β phase of titanium for all the samples. The full
width at half-maximum (FWHM) for the first four peaks was calculated
using a reference Si sample, as compiled in Table S1. The Scherrer equation was used to calculate the size of
the crystallite (D in nm). Dislocation density and
the microstrain present in the samples were calculated from the values
of D and FWHM. It may be noted that a uniform crystallite
size irrespective of the peak position was only observed at the highest
ED.Faster and slower XRD scans confirmed the presence of only
the β phase in the as-fabricated samples. The variations of
the 2θ position, FWHM, microstrain, and crystallite size with
respect to the change in ED for the BCC-110 peak are given in Figure . Except at the highest
ED input, other conditions displayed similar values for FWHM, microstrain,
and crystallite size. For the specific diffraction peak, the 2θ
for the (110) peak followed an increasing trend up to an ED of 48.9
J/mm3. With the further increase in ED, a decrease in 2θ
was observed. The decrease in the value of 2θ correlates with
an increase in d-spacing, which in turn indicates
the presence of residual stresses in the sample processed at the highest
ED. The high ED input might correspond to high temperatures and, hence,
steep temperature gradients. Further confirmation about this trend
reversal at the highest ED can be observed as an increase in the value
of microstrain. The shift in the 2θ for the peak was accompanied
by a change in FWHM. For the sample processed under the highest ED
condition, the FWHM increased significantly; hence, the crystallite
size was reduced.
Figure 4
XRD results depicting the variation of (a) 2θ position
and
FWHM and (b) microstrain and crystallite size with the ED for the
BCC-110 peak.
XRD results depicting the variation of (a) 2θ position
and
FWHM and (b) microstrain and crystallite size with the ED for the
BCC-110 peak.The results from X-ray μCT
characterization are depicted
in Figure as an extracted
subvolume and a projection from this volume. It can be observed that
the defect density is the highest when the ED values are the lowest.
With the increase in ED, defect density reduced significantly. Samples
fabricated with the highest EDs of 50.0 and 54.8 J/mm3 revealed
the least number of defects. It can also be noted that the types of
defects (as inferred from the shape of the defects) are different
at the lowest and highest EDs.
Figure 5
(a–d) μCT characterization
results from an extracted
3D subvolume and (e–h) representative projection from this
subvolume, for the samples fabricated using different EDs. All 3D
subvolumes have the same volume size as indicated in (a).
(a–d) μCT characterization
results from an extracted
3D subvolume and (e–h) representative projection from this
subvolume, for the samples fabricated using different EDs. All 3D
subvolumes have the same volume size as indicated in (a).μCT analysis was performed under similar experimental
conditions
on a single location in the samples, and the results were extracted
from a subvolume of approximately 1.2 mm3. For the L-PBF-fabricated
TNZT alloy with refractive elements as the alloying constituents,
better bonding between the layers was expected with an increase in
ED. However, the process parameters need to be limited within the
constraints of laser fusion. The general trend was a decrease in the
defect density with increased ED. To compare the part density evaluation
using μCT analysis, results obtained from the density measurement
using the Archimedes principle are compiled in Table . In agreement with the corresponding SE/BSE
micrographs, the sample fabricated using an ED of 50.0 J/mm3 revealed the maximum part density of ≈99.5% of theoretical
density.
Table 2
Density Calculated Using the Archimedes
Method and Comparison of the Elastic Modulus Obtained from Nanoindentation
and Tensile Testing
ED (J/mm3)
part density (% of theoretical density)
elastic modulus from nanoindentation (GPa) (mean
± SD) for n = 6
elastic
modulus from stress–strain curve
(GPa) (mean ± SD) for n = 3
46.6
98.93
77 ±
2
81 ± 2.85
48.9
98.94
75 ± 2
80 ± 3.3
50.0
99.52
77 ±
2
83 ± 1.4
54.8
98.78
78 ± 4
85 ± 0.26
A detailed quantitative
analysis of the defects was performed.
Sphericity[36] was utilized to assess the
types of defects present in the samples. A plot representing the equivalent
diameter of a defect and sphericity is depicted in Figure . Threshold values of 0.5 and
0.8 were set for sphericity to separate the types of defects caused
due to lack of fusion (nonspherical) and porosity (spherical). For
a threshold value of 0.8, nonspherical defects dominate in the samples
fabricated using the lowest ED inputs in comparison with the spherical
defects. However, the equivalent diameter of the nonspherical defects
is lower. By applying a low threshold of 0.5, the nonspherical defects
are dominant at lower ED inputs. At the same time, the ratio of the
number of spherical to nonspherical defects increases for the highest
ED. Different types of porosities are the dominant spherical defects
during AM.[37,38] Porous defects include the inherent
porosities arising from the powder preparation process and the gas-induced
porosities during the melting and solidification. Relative dominance
of spherical defect formation with the increase in ED indirectly indicates
that the defects due to the lack of fusion reduced as the energy input
increased. Some of these inherent spherical pores are difficult to
avoid during component fabrication. Hence, postprocessing techniques
such as hot isostatic processing[39] are
typically applied after manufacturing.
Figure 6
Defect distribution in
the samples fabricated using different EDs:
(a) 46.6 J/mm3, (b) 48.9 J/mm3, (c) 50.0 J/mm3, and (d) 54.8 J/mm3, plotted as sphericity vs
equivalent diameter; horizontal (0.5 and 0.8) and vertical lines (50
μm) in the plots depict the threshold values used in the analysis.
Defect distribution in
the samples fabricated using different EDs:
(a) 46.6 J/mm3, (b) 48.9 J/mm3, (c) 50.0 J/mm3, and (d) 54.8 J/mm3, plotted as sphericity vs
equivalent diameter; horizontal (0.5 and 0.8) and vertical lines (50
μm) in the plots depict the threshold values used in the analysis.
Mechanical Properties
The elastic
moduli determined from the slope of stress–strain curves and
the nanoindentation tests are compiled in Table . The values determined from the two tests
are similar. All the elastic modulus values were in the range of 75
to 85 GPa. Results of the other relevant mechanical properties obtained
from the tensile tests are presented in Figure . The values of yield strength (YS) and ultimate
tensile strengths (UTS) for the different EDs are compiled in Figure e, and % elongation
at fracture is plotted in Figure f. The alloy exhibited close values of UTS and YS for
all the processing conditions, indicating low work hardening. The
alloy at an ED of 54.8 J/mm3 showed a significantly high
YS (605 ± 12.2 MPa) and UTS (603 ± 12.81 MPa) in comparison
to the other ED conditions (46.6 J/mm3 (p < 0.01), 48.9 J/mm3 (p < 0.001),
and 50.0 J/mm3 (p < 0.01)). All the
samples showed good ductility prior to the fracture (Figure f). Figure e reveals a marginal increase in the YS and
UTS at the highest ED compared to the other samples. Elongation to
break was more than 25% for all the EDs, with the highest ductility
observed at the lowest ED. Figure reveals that the fracture surface of the samples showed
dimples of different sizes, confirming the ductile fracture with a
good amount of ductility prior to the fracture.
Figure 7
Results from the tensile
tests: (a–d) plots of three replicates
for each ED, (e) plot of the variation of 0.2% yield strength and
ultimate tensile stress with ED, and (f) plot of the variation of
percentage elongation with ED.
Figure 8
Fractographs
(secondary electron images) depicting the ductile
fracture for the samples processed at ED of (a) 50.0 J/mm3 and (b) 54.8 J/mm3.
Results from the tensile
tests: (a–d) plots of three replicates
for each ED, (e) plot of the variation of 0.2% yield strength and
ultimate tensile stress with ED, and (f) plot of the variation of
percentage elongation with ED.Fractographs
(secondary electron images) depicting the ductile
fracture for the samples processed at ED of (a) 50.0 J/mm3 and (b) 54.8 J/mm3.
Electrochemical Response
Electrochemical
test results are compiled in Table and Figure . Figure shows
the Tafel extrapolation plots for the fabricated materials and their
performance in comparison with the commercial pure (CP) titanium.
CP-Ti is widely used as a biomaterial and was used as a reference
here. The corrosion potential (Ecorr)
and corrosion current density (Icorr)
are given in Table . There were marginal differences in the open circuit potential (OCP)
values of the samples (Figure ). The ED conditions of 46.6 J/mm3 (p < 0.001), 48.9 J/mm3 (p < 0.05),
and 50.0 J/mm3 (p < 0.01) showed significant
differences in comparison to CP-Ti, whereas 54.8 J/mm3 showed
no statistically significant difference with respect to CP-Ti. However,
the OCP values were ∼−0.2 V for CP-Ti and TNZT. TNZT
samples exhibit passivation behavior similar to CP-Ti in simulated
body fluid (SBF). Corrosion potential values are comparable for the
CP-Ti and TNZT. The corrosion currents of the TNZT alloys at all the
ED values are higher than those of CP-Ti but not statistically significantly
different from that of CP-Ti. However, the values are low, indicating
good corrosion resistance, and these additively manufactured alloys
are promising materials for use in biomedical applications.
Table 3
Electrochemical Properties
ED (J/mm3)
Ecorr (V)a
Icorr (μA/cm2)a
46.6
–0.16
± 0.005
0.25 ± 0.02
48.9
–0.19 ± 0.004
0.12 ±
0.03
50.0
–0.19 ±
0.01
0.43 ± 0.3
54.8
–0.22 ± 0.01
0.67 ± 0.57
CP-Ti
–0.25 ± 0.003
0.033 ± 0.02
All data are shown
as mean ±
SD for n = 3.
Figure 9
Electrochemical
corrosion results shown as Tafel plots for different
EDs and comparison with CP-Ti as the reference.
Electrochemical
corrosion results shown as Tafel plots for different
EDs and comparison with CP-Ti as the reference.All data are shown
as mean ±
SD for n = 3.
Biological Response
An important
consideration for the use of materials for biomedical applications
is their biocompatibility when implanted. Owing to their excellent
corrosion resistance, many of the titanium alloys do not exhibit toxicity
or adverse inflammatory response. The cytotoxicity of the alloys prepared
by L-PBF herein was evaluated in vitro using MC3T3-E1 cells, which
are mouse calvarial preosteoblasts. Cell toxicity was assessed qualitatively
and quantitatively by live–dead assay (LDA) and 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl
tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay, respectively. Figure compiles the MTT results on all five metal
samples wherein CP-Ti was used as the control. All five metallic samples
showed statistically similar attachment of MC3T3-E1 cells on day 1
after seeding. All the samples supported the growth of the cells from
day1 to day 4 with marginal differences; 48.9 J/mm3 showed
significantly higher values (p < 0.05) followed
by 50.0 J/mm3 in comparison to CP-Ti and other ED conditions.
On day 7, an ED of 50.0 J/mm3 showed the highest value
among all the samples. The results indicated that all the metallic
samples were able to support the growth of cells without any toxicity;
however, the ED condition 50.0 J/mm3 appears to be the
best in supporting the proliferation of cells.
Figure 10
Cell adhesion and proliferation
of MC3T3-E1 cells on the samples
at days 1, 4, and 7. All data are shown as mean ± SD for n = 3, and statistically significant differences are marked
by symbols (ANOVA multiple comparison test showing a significant difference p < 0.05 (*) between CP-Ti and 48.9 J/mm3 (α)
and 46.6 and 50.0 J/mm3 (δ); p <
0.01 between 46.6 and 48.9 J/mm3 (β) and 50.0 and
54.8 J/mm3 (γ); p < 0.001 between
48.9 and 54.8 J/mm3 (θ) at day 4; and p < 0.01 between CP-Ti and 50.0 J/mm3 at day 7).
Cell adhesion and proliferation
of MC3T3-E1 cells on the samples
at days 1, 4, and 7. All data are shown as mean ± SD for n = 3, and statistically significant differences are marked
by symbols (ANOVA multiple comparison test showing a significant difference p < 0.05 (*) between CP-Ti and 48.9 J/mm3 (α)
and 46.6 and 50.0 J/mm3 (δ); p <
0.01 between 46.6 and 48.9 J/mm3 (β) and 50.0 and
54.8 J/mm3 (γ); p < 0.001 between
48.9 and 54.8 J/mm3 (θ) at day 4; and p < 0.01 between CP-Ti and 50.0 J/mm3 at day 7).Figure compiles
the fluorescence micrographs assessed by LDA up to 7 days and corroborates
the MTT data above in Figure . The control CP-Ti and the L-PBF manufactured samples showed
the abundance of a large fraction of live cells (revealed by the green
fluorescence) in comparison to a few dead cells (revealed by the red
color). The results from the MTT assay and LDA indicated that the
TNZT samples of different ED conditions are cytocompatible and their
cytocompatibility is comparable to that of CP-Ti.
Figure 11
Fluorescence micrographs
showing the toxicity of MC3T3-E1 cells
on the metal samples: (a,f,k) Cp-titanium, (b,g,l) 46.6 J/mm3, (c,h,m) 48.9 J/mm3 , (d,i,n) 50.0 J/mm3,
and (e,j,o) 54.8 J/mm3 revealed by the live (green)–dead
(red) assay at days 1, 4, and 7 on CP-Ti and TNZT prepared by L-PBF
at different EDs (scale bar = 100 μm).
Fluorescence micrographs
showing the toxicity of MC3T3-E1 cells
on the metal samples: (a,f,k) Cp-titanium, (b,g,l) 46.6 J/mm3, (c,h,m) 48.9 J/mm3 , (d,i,n) 50.0 J/mm3,
and (e,j,o) 54.8 J/mm3 revealed by the live (green)–dead
(red) assay at days 1, 4, and 7 on CP-Ti and TNZT prepared by L-PBF
at different EDs (scale bar = 100 μm).The morphology of the cell on a substrate is widely taken as a
measure of the cell response to the material. The cell morphology
and cytoskeleton reorganization of the cells on the L-PBF-fabricated
TNZT samples was assessed by fluorescence microscopy, and the representative
fluorescence micrographs of the samples at days 1, 4, and 7 are compiled
in Figure . The
cells showed well-spread morphology on all the samples, and there
seem to be no observable differences in the cell morphology or their
density, indicating that all the substrates are equally efficient
in supporting the attachment and growth of cells. The cell numbers
appeared to increase from day 1 to day 7 on all samples. Initially,
at days 1 and 4, few cells exhibited spread and stretched morphology,
whereas some cells were elongated. However, the cells showed elongated
morphology on all samples with full confluency by day 7. Thus, these
results indicate that the TNZT samples are as cytocompatible as CP-Ti
and are also efficient in supporting the attachment of cells. Thus,
the TNZT manufactured by L-PBF is a promising candidate material for
orthopedic implants.
Figure 12
Fluorescence micrograph at 10× showing the morphology
of MC3T3-E1
cells on the metal samples: (a,f,k) Cp-titanium, (b,g,l) 46.6 J/mm3, (c,h,m) 48.9 J/mm3, (d,i,n) 50.0 J/mm3, and (e,j,o) 54.8 J/mm3 stained for F-actin (green) and
nuclei (blue) at days 1, 4, and 7 (scale bar = 100 μm).
Fluorescence micrograph at 10× showing the morphology
of MC3T3-E1
cells on the metal samples: (a,f,k) Cp-titanium, (b,g,l) 46.6 J/mm3, (c,h,m) 48.9 J/mm3, (d,i,n) 50.0 J/mm3, and (e,j,o) 54.8 J/mm3 stained for F-actin (green) and
nuclei (blue) at days 1, 4, and 7 (scale bar = 100 μm).
Discussion
In this
work, ED was systematically varied to determine the optimal
conditions for manufacturing a β-Ti by L-PBF. The analysis of
elemental compositions by WDS clearly revealed that the chemical composition
is unaffected by the variation in ED, thereby revealing the adequacy
of the parameters used during L-PBF of TNZT. The results of XRD corroborated
the same as the fabricated material at all the ED values is in the
fully β phase. However, the porosity level, as indicated by
the results of μCT, was varied with ED, with a higher ED resulting
in fewer pores. Batalha[40] used a relatively
higher ED of 58.3 J/mm3 than values in the present study
to fabricate parts with a density of 99.0% relative to an as-cast
reference sample of TNZT alloy. In the present study, densification
of 99.5% of the theoretical density was achieved at a relatively lesser
ED of 50.0 J/mm3.Modulus measurements confirmed
that the alloy exhibits an elastic
modulus that is lower than that of conventional alloys such as Ti–6Al–4V
and is comparable to that of many other orthopedic β alloys
that have been developed to minimize stress shielding.[18] Tensile testing revealed an increasing trend
for the tensile strength with an increase in ED with high elongation
that marginally decreased with an increase in the ED. The maximum
observed tensile strength is ≈660 MPa, and the values reported
here are comparable to those reported for the single β phase.[41] We and others have observed higher strength
values in the range of 800 to 1200 MPa, or even higher values occasionally,
in some β alloys, were reported earlier.[42−45] However, the high strengths are
attributed to the presence of fine precipitates of harder phases,
such as α or ω within the β matrix.The combination
of microstructural investigation, microtomography,
and density measurement clearly revealed the fewest defects and the
highest part density for samples prepared using an ED of 50.0 J/mm3, whereas the highest strength was obtained at an ED of 54.8
J/mm3. This has been attributed to the microstructural
differences arising from changes in the ED. In the former case, cellular
dendrites dominated the microstructure of the sample. In the case
of the highest ED (54.8 J/mm3) sample, columnar dendrites
and a network of these dendrites are observed in abundance, with some
of them grown significantly by forming tertiary arms. The presence
of columnar dendrites or cellular dendrites will likely offer different
barriers to the dislocation movement, thereby affecting the strength
and ductility in the alloy.As discussed above, the strength
of the alloy fabricated here is
low compared to several other alloys. In the TNZT alloy processed
through conventional wrought processing, the specially designed thermo-mechanical
processing strategy has been reported to impart higher strength.[41,46] In additively manufactured materials, suitably designed postprocessing
heat treatments and surface treatments have been found effective in
enhancing the strength and ductility. Unique heat treatment cycles
for optimization of mechanical properties could be developed for L-PBF-manufactured
TNZT in a manner similar to that proposed by Sabban et al. for Ti–6Al–4V.[47] In a recent study, Batalha et al.[48] fabricated thin-walled tubes with oligocrystalline
microstructures in the biocompatible TNZT alloy by combining AM and
heat treatment. Thus, there is significant scope for microstructural
engineering of the additively manufactured TNZT alloys for engineering
high-performance patient-specific implants. Surface engineering strategies,
such as dealloying,[49] nanocrystallization,[50,51] etc., can also be utilized to enhance the biomechanical and biological
performances of these alloys but remain largely unexplored for additively
manufactured β-Ti alloys.Electrochemical tests revealed
good corrosion resistance in SBF
of the additively manufactured TNZT parts. The Icorr values are similar to those we observed for wrought Ti–Nb–Ta–Zr–O
and Ti–Nb–Ta–O alloys tested in a similar manner.[52,53] Rao et al.[54] reported on the corrosion
behavior of the TNZT samples in Hank’s solution and observed
stable passive polarization behavior, as observed here. The corrosion
rate of the hot-rolled TNZT alloy samples in Hanks’s solution
reported by Rao et al.[54] was lower than
that of hot-rolled CP-Ti, which they attributed to the ability of
Nb in stabilizing the surface films. The different corrosion behavior
observed in the present study could be due to the different manufacturing
processes, hot rolling, and L-PBF. Layer by layer manufacturing through
repeated melting and solidification can retain high tensile residual
stresses comparable to the YS of the material during L-PBF.[55] The presence of residual stresses on the surface
has been reported to enhance the corrosion resistance of the metallic
samples.[56] Thus, the development of tensile
residual stresses in L-PBF-manufactured samples, as revealed from
the XRD analysis above, can enhance the corrosion rate compared to
hot-rolled samples.Cell studies confirmed that the TNZT samples
manufactured by L-PBF
were nontoxic and were as efficient as CP-Ti in supporting the attachment
and proliferation of the cells in vitro. Donato et al.[57] reported good in vitro biocompatibility of the
as-cast and heat-treated TNZT alloy. Excellent biocompatibility of
the TNZT alloys in terms of effective osteoblast adhesion with no
significant impact on cell differentiation, apoptosis, inflammatory
response, and biomineralization was also reported by Sun et al.[58] We have also observed that wrought Ti–Nb–Ta–Zr–O
and Ti–Nb–Ta–O alloys exhibit cytocompatibility
that is comparable to that of CP-Ti.[51−53]
Conclusions
L-PBF was attempted on a novel β titanium alloy Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta
from alloy powder. Specimens were fabricated using four different
ED values and were found to contain the β phase alone. L-PBF
at a lower ED resulted in poor fusion between the successive layers
in the BD, and fewer defects were observed at the higher ED values
of 50.0 and 54.8 J/mm3. Cellular to columnar dendritic
morphology transformation was observed at the highest ED with an increase
in the size of the columnar dendrites depicting the simultaneous effects
from the temperature gradient and solidification growth rate. A tensile
strength of up to 660 MPa and good ductility (elongation to break
>23%) were observed. A higher ED resulted in a higher strength
with
a marginal decrease of ductility. All the samples exhibited good corrosion
resistance and supported the attachment and growth of preosteoblasts
similar to that reported for the wrought alloy of similar composition.
Taken together, this work demonstrates the feasibility of preparing
dense parts of TNZT by L-PBF that may be further developed for engineering
patient-specific medical devices.
Experimental
Section
Fabrication Using L-PBF
Raw powder
of the Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta alloy was prepared at
Tosoh SMD, Inc. (OH, United States) by an atomization method. Particle
size distribution analysis revealed particle sizes between 8 and 300
μm with a mean size of 90 μm. Tosoh has developed a new
technology for the successful production of powders from the TNZT
alloy with the cast ingots as the starting material, and the details
are available elsewhere.[59] Solid rectangular
blocks were fabricated with an EOS M280 L-PBF machine at Intech Additive
Solutions (Bangalore, India). The AMOptoMet proprietary software developed
at Intech Additive Solutions was used to predetermine and optimize
the laser beam parameters for AM. The 67° rotational scan strategy
was utilized for the fabrication of all the samples that are, hereafter,
identified by the ED utilized. Four different ED values, 46.6, 48.9,
50.0, and 54.8 J/mm3, were used, where ED is defined as
follows,Samples of dimensions of 25 mm ×
25 mm × 15 mm (length × width × height) were fabricated
on a steel support plate and later removed by electro-discharge machining.
Preliminary investigation revealed that the build planes were free
of detrimental defects such as porosity and lack of fusion, which
are common in L-PBF AM. Hence, the focus of characterization in the
present study is focused on the sample BD in the transverse cross-section.
Materials Characterization
Specimens
for microstructural characterization were prepared by the conventional
metallographic procedure followed by final polishing using a colloidal
silica suspension of 0.05 μm particle size. Polished samples
were characterized before and after etching. Kroll’s reagent
containing 10 mL of nitric acid and 5 mL of hydrofluoric acid in 85
mL of distilled water was used as the etchant. Roughness measurements
were performed with a noncontact optical profilometer (WYKO NT1100).
Optical images were taken with a Metallovert optical microscope (Carl
Zeiss). SE and BSE micrographs were recorded on a scanning electron
microscope (SEM) with an EPMA, JEOL JXA-8530F. Energy-dispersive spectroscopy
and WDS facilities available in the same microscope were used for
analyzing the elemental composition.The phases present in the
samples were determined using XRD with an XPERTPro, PANalytical X-ray
diffractometer. The sample was scanned in the 2θ range of 30°
to 90° (175 s per step) for indexing of the processed state of
the alloy. Slower scans (350 s per step) were carried out to determine
the crystallite size and microstrain present in the samples. Analysis
of the XRD data was carried out using X-Pert Hi-Score plus software.
The Scherrer equation[60] was used to quantify
the crystallite size and the associated microstrain.
Density Measurement Using Micro-CT
To assess the density
of fabricated samples, X-ray microcomputed
tomography (μCT) was performed with a transmission X-ray microscope
(Versa XRM-500, XRADIA). Imaging was performed at 4× magnification
on cylindrical samples of 6 mm diameter and 10 mm height with a total
of 1601 projections per sample. The reconstructed images were analyzed
using Avizo 9.5 software (Thermofischer Scientific). The first sample
fabricated with a lower ED was taken as the reference, and a systematic
procedure was followed for the digital image processing of reconstructed
3D volume for visualizing and quantifying the imperfections.
Modulus Measurement
The elastic modulus
of the alloys was measured using a nanoindentation tester (CSM) with
a Berkovich indenter. The maximum applied load was fixed at 200 mN
and held for 2 s. These measurements were performed on the plane perpendicular
to the BD. The samples were electropolished prior to the measurement.
Unloading curves were analyzed using the Oliver and Pharr method to
calculate the elastic modulus values. Six measurements were done for
each sample.
Tensile and Corrosion Testing
Tensile
testing was carried out with an Instron 5567 screw-driven universal
testing machine. For a gauge length of 6 mm, a crosshead speed of
0.006 mm/s was used, corresponding to a strain rate of 10–3 s–1. Three replicates were tested for each ED.
Fractography of the samples after the tensile test was performed with
an ESEM Quanta (FEI) SEM.The corrosion behavior of the additively
manufactured samples in the SBF medium was investigated by the Tafel
extrapolation method of electrochemical corrosion testing.[52,61] Metallographic sample preparation prior to the corrosion testing
consisted of final polishing with P2000 grit-sized SiC paper. A three-electrode
potentiostat system was used for the testing with platinum as the
counter electrode and a saturated calomel electrode as the reference
electrode. Prior to the start of every test, samples were immersed
in SBF for 3 h to obtain a stable OCP. A scan rate of 12 mV/min in
a voltage range −600 to +400 mV, with respect to OCP, was chosen
for the Tafel extrapolation plot. Corrosion potential (Ecorr) and current density (Icorr) were calculated using these plots.
In Vitro
Cytocompatibility Evaluation
Cell Culture
MC3T3-E1 mouse calvarial
preosteoblasts (ATCC) were cultured in the α-minimum essential
medium (α-MEM) containing 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS,
Gibco, Life Technologies). Antibiotic penicillin–streptomycin
(Sigma) was added at 1% (v/v) concentration. Cells were passaged with
trypsin–EDTA (Sigma) and subsequently subcultured. Cells of
passage 43 were used for all the reported studies.
Cytocompatibility
The cytocompatibility
of the TNZT samples fabricated with different ED values was determined
by culturing the MC3T3-E1 cells on the samples where commercially
pure titanium (CP-Ti) was used as the control. Then, 5 mm × 5
mm square samples of 1 mm thickness were polished and prepared up
to P2000 grade of SiC prior to the biological analysis. Subsequently,
all the samples were presterilized in 70% ethanol for 30 min under
ultraviolet radiation in a laminar hood and conditioned in the complete
culture medium for 1 h prior to the cell seeding. Finally, 1 ×
103 cells per well were seeded in each well of a 96-well
plate and incubated at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere.Cell adhesion and proliferation of MC3T3-E1 cells
on metal samples were studied by the 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl
tetrazolium bromide (MTT) colorimetric assay (Sigma). MC3T3-E1 cells
were seeded directly onto the alloy, as described above. To evaluate
cell viability, samples were washed with PBS and incubated in media
containing 4 mg/mL MTT for 4 h. Formazan crystals formed by viable
cells were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide. The absorbance of purple-colored
formazan was recorded with a spectrophotometer (Biotek) at 570 nm.
The experiments were done in triplicate for each condition.Furthermore, LDA was also performed to analyze the cell toxicity
of metal samples qualitatively. MC3T3-E1 cells were seeded and cultured
on all the metallic samples, as above. After 1, 4, and 7 days of incubation,
cells were washed with PBS and incubated with Calcein-AM and ethidium
homodimer-1 (live–dead cell staining kit, Invitrogen) by following
the instructions from the manufacturer and imaged using an epi-fluorescence
microscope (Olympus).
Assessment of Cellular
Morphology and Cytoskeleton
Structure
The cells were seeded and cultured for 1, 4, and
7 days onto the metallic samples, as above. The cells were washed
with PBS and fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde in PBS (pH 7.4) at room
temperature for 15 min. Then, 0.1% Triton X-100 (Sigma) in PBS was
added for 10 min to permeabilize the cells. Finally, the samples were
incubated in 1 μg/mL of 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI,
Sigma) and 10 μg/mL fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated
phalloidin (ThermoFisher) for 30 min at room temperature. DAPI and
FITC-conjugated phalloidin dyes were used for visualization of the
nuclei and F-actin, respectively, using an inverted epi-fluorescence
microscope.
Authors: Xiaojian Wang; Shanqing Xu; Shiwei Zhou; Wei Xu; Martin Leary; Peter Choong; M Qian; Milan Brandt; Yi Min Xie Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2016-01-06 Impact factor: 12.479