Pranjali Yadav1, Shubhra Chaturvedi2, Samir Kumar Biswas3, Rohit Srivastava4, Kamalakannan Kailasam1, Anil Kumar Mishra2, Asifkhan Shanavas1. 1. Institute of Nano Science and Technology, Sector-81, Knowledge City, SAS Nagar, Punjab 140306, India. 2. Division of Cyclotron and Radiopharmaceutical Sciences, Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Allied Sciences, DRDO, Delhi 110054, India. 3. Department of Physical Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education & Research Mohali, Knowledge city, Sector 81, SAS Nagar, Manauli 140306, India. 4. Department of Biosciences & Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400076, India.
Abstract
Inorganic nanomaterials require optimal engineering to retain their functionality yet can also biodegrade within physiological conditions to avoid chronic accumulation in their native form. In this work, we have developed gelatin-stabilized iron oxide nanoclusters having a primary crystallite size of ∼10 nm and surface-functionalized with indocyanine green (ICG)-bound albumin-stabilized gold nanoclusters (Prot-IONs). The Prot-IONs are designed to undergo disintegration in an acidic microenvironment of tumor in the presence of proteolytic enzymes within 72 h. These nanoassemblies demonstrate bio- and hemocompatibility and show significant photothermal efficiency due to strong near infrared absorption contributed by ICG. The surface gold nanoclusters could efficiently sensitize hepatoma cells to γ-irradiation with substantial cytoskeletal and nuclear damage. Sequential irradiation of Prot-ION-treated cancer cells with near infrared (NIR) laser (λ = 750 nm) and γ-irradiation could cause ∼90% cell death compared to single treatment groups at a lower dose of nanoparticles. The superparamagnetic nature of Prot-IONs imparted significant relaxivity (∼225 mM-1 s-1) for T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Additionally, they could also be engaged as photoacoustic and NIR imaging contrast agents. This work demonstrates bioeliminable inorganic nanoassemblies with significant theranostic potential.
Inorganic nanomaterials require optimal engineering to retain their functionality yet can also biodegrade within physiological conditions to avoid chronic accumulation in their native form. In this work, we have developed gelatin-stabilized iron oxide nanoclusters having a primary crystallite size of ∼10 nm and surface-functionalized with indocyanine green (ICG)-bound albumin-stabilized gold nanoclusters (Prot-IONs). The Prot-IONs are designed to undergo disintegration in an acidic microenvironment of tumor in the presence of proteolytic enzymes within 72 h. These nanoassemblies demonstrate bio- and hemocompatibility and show significant photothermal efficiency due to strong near infrared absorption contributed by ICG. The surface gold nanoclusters could efficiently sensitize hepatoma cells to γ-irradiation with substantial cytoskeletal and nuclear damage. Sequential irradiation of Prot-ION-treated cancer cells with near infrared (NIR) laser (λ = 750 nm) and γ-irradiation could cause ∼90% cell death compared to single treatment groups at a lower dose of nanoparticles. The superparamagnetic nature of Prot-IONs imparted significant relaxivity (∼225 mM-1 s-1) for T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Additionally, they could also be engaged as photoacoustic and NIR imaging contrast agents. This work demonstrates bioeliminable inorganic nanoassemblies with significant theranostic potential.
Inorganic nanoparticles
(INPs) have shown great potential in biomedical
applications as drug delivery systems, imaging contrast agents, photothermal
conversion agents due to their unique physicochemical characteristics,
and so forth.[1−10] NP size, shape, and surface chemistry play an important role in
the biodistribution, clearance, and in vivo toxicity.
Modifying these physicochemical parameters would decide the fate of
nondegradable INPs inside the body, as they are more stable compared
to their organic counterparts.[11] Long-term
accumulation of these INPs in the body may induce several irreversible
changes in the body due to oxidative stress and impairment in the
mononuclear phagocytic system.[12] Hence,
bioelimination of INPs is essential for the clinical translation to
prohibit any chronic toxicity risks.Gold-based INPs have been
widely used for photothermal cancer therapy
and cancer theranostics.[13−15] Gold NPs having sizes larger
than 50 nm have better accumulation in the tumor tissues due to the
electron paramagnetic resonance effect, but they could not be excreted
from the glomerulus filtration. For instance, the intravenous injection
of PEGylated hollow gold nanospheres having size 50 nm had an excretion
of only ∼4% of the injected dose within 1 month. The proteomic
profiling of liver depicted an irreversible change in the liver after
3 months.[16] In another study, PEGylated
gold nanoshells decorated on silica NPs of size ∼150 nm injected
intravenously in Beagle dogs showed no chronic toxicity over a period
of 10 months but with considerable accumulation in the liver and spleen.[17] All these studies indicate that to overcome
long-term side effects, INPs should be sized less than 6 nm for rapid
clearance via the renal route. However, at this ultrasmall size regime,
a standalone isotropic structure has limited room for tuning application-oriented
functional properties.Metal nanoclusters having ultrasmall
size with a core size between
0.5 and 3 nm, and versatile photoluminescent properties have gained
attention in the biomedical field in the past decade.[18−23] Gold nanoclusters have been shown to undergo renal clearance, especially
depending upon the ligand type and density.[24,25] Considering their unique optical and radiosensitization properties,
their potential in cancer therapy is constantly being explored.[26,27] Glutathione-stabilized AuNC conjugated with Indocyanine green (ICG)
served as an effective near infrared (NIR) light-responsive photothermal
agents. This study showcases the complete tumor ablation followed
by bioelimination of these AuNCs from the body.[28] In another study by Zhang et al., GSH- and bovine serum
albumin (BSA)-capped AuNCs were evaluated for cancer radiation therapy.
GSH-capped AuNCs demonstrate a significant decrease in the tumor volume
as compared to the radiation-alone group.[29]Gelatin is a polypeptide obtained from denatured collagen,
which
exhibits excellent biocompatibility and nonimmunogenicity. It has
been approved by USFDA for extravascular administration and has been
used for numerous biomedical applications.[30−32] Gelatin can
easily disintegrate inside the body by matrix metallo proteinases
(MMPs) expressed in many tissues. MMPs are a family of proteases that
are upregulated in tumor tissues and have been extensively studied
as a cancer biomarker.[33] For instance,
size-controllable supramolecular gelatin NPs decorated with quantum
dot (QD) payload have been utilized for cancer cell imaging. These
NPs disassemble in the presence of MMPs and release QDs toward tumor
detection.[34] In another study, doxorubicin
and dendritic poly-l-lysine were fabricated on gelatin NPs
that could be degraded by MMP-2 to smaller size NPs, improving the
tumor penetration and therapeutic efficiency in vivo.[30]Considering size requirements
for in vivo utilization,
a multifunctional protein-stabilized inorganic nanoassembly (Prot-ION)
has been synthesized. The Prot-IONs consist of a core made of gelatin-stabilized
iron oxide nanoassemblies (IONs) having a primary crystallite size
of ∼10 nm and an albumin-stabilized AuNC shell. The gelatin-based
core is enriched with numerous amino acids that offer sites for adsorption
of albumin-based AuNCs without additional surface modification. The
AuNCs were also bound with ICG dye for incorporating optical imaging
and photothermal transduction functionalities due to its strong NIR
absorption. The rationale to use proteins, gelatin and albumin, as
a stabilizer for both IONs and AuNCs, respectively, is to have the
ability to degrade in the local microenvironment of the tumor with
acidic pH and enzymes, collapsing into small particles that qualify
for effective renal and hepatobiliary clearance from the body.
Materials
and Methods
Materials Used
Iron(III) chloride hexahydrate (FeCl3·6H2O), chloroauric acid trihydrate, N,N′-diethyl-p-phenylenediamine
(DPD), BSA, and ICG (Cardiogeen) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.
Ethylene glycol (EG) and sodium acetate (NaAc) were obtained from
TCI Chemicals. Gelatine powder 240 Bloom (Bacto) was procured from
S.D. Fine-chem limited. Double distilled water was used for all synthetic
experiments. All the chemicals were of analytical grade and used as
received. MTT, bisbenzimide (Hoechst 33342), and phalloidin-TRITC
conjugate were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. PLC/PRF/5 cell lines
were purchased from the National Center of Cell Science (NCCS, Pune,
India). Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) was purchased
from Lonza (Cat. no. 2517A) and maintained in endothelial growth medium
from Lonza (Cat. no. 3162). Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium
(DMEM, HiMedia) was used in supplementation with 10% fetal bovine
serum (FBS, HiMedia) and 1% antibiotic/antimycotic solution (HiMedia).
Proteinase K was purchased from Ambion RNA by Life Technologies.
Synthesis of Iron Oxide Nanocluster
Gelatin-coated
iron oxide nanoclusters (IOCs) were synthesized according to a previous
report with some modification.[35] Gelatin
(300 mg) was dissolved in 20 mL of EG at 80 °C until it formed
a transparent solution. Next, FeCl3·6H2O (1.2 mmol) was added to the mixture to form a clear solution, followed
by the addition of NaAc (900 mg). The mixture was stirred vigorously
for 60 min and sealed in a Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave.
The reaction was kept at 200 °C for 6 h and allowed to cool to
room temperature (RT). A dark brown colored product was obtained by
centrifugation. The product was washed three times with water by magnetic
separation and finally dispersed in water at a concentration of 10
mg/mL and stored at 4 °C.
Synthesis of AuNCs
BSA-mediated gold nanoclusters (AuNCs)
were synthesized by a previously reported method with some modifications.
5 mL aqueous solution of HAuCl4 solution (10 mM) was added
to 5 mL of BSA solution (50 mg/mL) under vigorous stirring. After
10 min, 1 M NaOH solution was added into the solution and kept under
stirring at 60 °C for 6 h until the color of the solution changed
from light yellow to deep brown. The synthesis was carried out under
dark conditions.
Preparation of Prot-IONs
The preparation
of Prot-IONs
(protein stabilized inorganic nanoassemblies) was done in two parts.
First, to optimize the coating of AuNCs on IOC, a fixed concentration
of 1 mL IOC (0.5 mg/mL) was incubated with different volumes of AuNCs.
The samples were incubated overnight at 180 rpm at 37 °C in an
incubator. Next day, the samples were washed magnetically two times
with water and redispersed in water. The fluorescence spectra of all
the redispersed samples were recorded. In the second part, ICG was
loaded onto AuNCs by the noncovalent binding process. AuNC–ICG
was prepared by the addition of 2 mL ICG solution (2 mg/mL) to 1 mL
AuNC under vigorous magnetic stirring at RT for 1 h. After that, to
remove the excess ICG, the solution was dialyzed by ultrapure water
using a dialysis membrane (7000 MW) for 3 h. The as-synthesized AuNC–ICG
was stored at 4 °C with light proof package.AuNC–ICG
suspension (3 mL) was incubated with 0.5 mg/mL IOC and kept for shaking
overnight at RT. Next day, the samples were washed two times with
deionized water magnetically to remove unbound AuNC–ICG particles.
The pellet was redispersed in water and stored at 4 °C under
dark conditions until further use.
Characterization
The structural morphology, size, and
shape of IOC and Prot-ION were visualized using the transmission electron
microscope (JEOL JEM-2100) at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. The
transmission electron microscopy (TEM) samples were drop-cast on a
400 mesh copper grid coated with a perforated carbon film after dispersing
them in water. A Cary series UV–Vis–NIR spectrophotometer
(Agilent Technologies) was used to optimize the coating of AuNC–ICG
on IOC using a quartz cuvette (1 cm path length). Photoluminescence
spectra were recorded at RT using a FS5 steady state fluorescence
spectrometer (Edinburg instruments). A Zetasizer Nano ZSP (Malvern)
instrument was used for the surface charge measurements. To determine
the elemental composition and oxidation states of Au, Fe, and O, X-ray
photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was carried out using an ESCALAB
250xi Thermo scientific spectrometer using monochromatic Al Kα
radiation (1486.6 eV).The magnetic properties were measured using
a vibrating sample magnetometer (model 7410, Lake Shore) at 300 K.
Hydroxyl Ion (•OH) Generation by Fenton Reaction
N,N′-diethyl-p-phenylene
diamine (DPD) was employed as a detecting probe to examine the •OH ion generation by the Fenton mechanism. 100 μg/mL
Prot-ION and 10 mM DPD were mixed in a solution containing 100 μM
H2O2 under the acidic condition (pH 5.2). The •OH ion generation was monitored up to 60 min by recording
the absorbance spectra from 400–700 nm at regular intervals
of 10 min. The same set of experiments repeated in the absence of
Prot-ION served as the control.[36]
Biodegradation
Studies
Prot-IONs were incubated with
acetate buffer (pH = 5.2) to mimic the tumor microenvironment. Proteinase-K
(10 μg/mL) was introduced to stimulate the enzyme-containing
microenvironment. The samples were incubated up to 3 days at 37 °C
under uniform shaking conditions (150 rpm/min).The particles were
observed under TEM at different time intervals to observe the biodegradation
of Prot-IONs.[37]
Photothermal Transduction
Experiments
Photothermal
transduction studies were performed using a 750 nm near-infrared laser
(Shanghai MR Trade International Co. Ltd) with a maximum power output
of 650 mW. Prot-ION was well dispersed in water at a concentration
of 500 μg/mL and illuminated with the laser for 4 min. The heating
and cooling cycles were carried out to record the temperature using
the FLIR One pro thermal imager.
In Vitro Biocompatibility
The biocompatibility
of Prot-ION was evaluated against HuVEC cells using an MTT assay.
Briefly, 200 μL of cells was seeded in a 96-well flat culture
plate at a density of 2.5 × 104 cells per well and
cultured for 24 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2. The cells were
incubated with varying concentrations of Prot-ION for 48 h. Subsequently,
the cells were washed with prewarmed 1× PBS thrice to remove
traces of the sample. 20 μL of MTT solutions (5 mg/mL in PBS)
diluted with 180 μL media was added to the wells and incubated
for 4 h. After 4 h, the plates were centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 5
min at RT. 150 μL of dimethyl sulfoxide was added to each well
to dissolve the formazan crystals, and all the wells were aspirated
well before taking absorbance. The absorbance of the suspension was
measured at 570 nm on an ELISA reader. Cell viability was calculated
by the following formula
Hemolysis Assay
The blood compatibility
of Prot-ION
was studied by Harboe’s method. With ethical approval from
IIT Bombay institute ethics committee (IITB-IEC/2019/031), 5 mL of
blood was withdrawn from healthy volunteers and collected in trisodium
citrate-coated tubes. Different concentrations of Prot-ION resuspended
in 0.9% saline were incubated with blood for 3 h at 37 °C under
mild shaking conditions. 0.9% saline and 1% Triton X100 served as
negative and positive controls, respectively. The treated blood was
centrifuged at 4500 rpm for 10 min, and the absorbance for collected
plasma was recorded at 380, 415, and 450 nm. The amount of hemoglobin
was calculated by the following formulawhere A380, A415, and A450 are
the absorbance values at 380, 415, and 450 nm, respectively. D.f.
is the dilution factor used for taking the absorbance. The percentage
of hemolysis was calculated by the following equationwhere plasma Hbtest and plasma
Hbblood correspond to the plasma hemoglobin value of test
samples and the whole blood, respectively.
Localization of Prot-ION
in PLC/PRF/5 Cells
For the
intracellular localization of Prot-ION, the cells were seeded on a
coverslip and allowed to grow overnight. Next day, the cells were
treated with Prot-ION for 6 h and fixed with 4% PFA. After fixation,
the nuclei and cytoskeleton were stained using Hoechst 33342 and Ph-TRITC,
respectively. The cells were mounted on a glass slide and taken for
imaging under a LSM 880 confocal microscope.
In Vitro Photothermal Therapy
The in vitro cytotoxicity
of different concentrations of Prot-ION
was assessed on PLC/PRF/5 cells, using the MTT assay. Specifically,
200 μL of cells was seeded in a 96-well flat culture plate at
a density of 5 × 103 cells per well and incubated
for 24 h at 37 °C under 5% CO2. After overnight incubation,
samples with different concentrations (all the dilutions were made
in media) were added to each group. After 6 h incubation at 37 °C
and 5% CO2, the cells were exposed to 750 nm (650 mW) laser
for 4 min. The plates were further incubated for 24 h at 37 °C
and 5% CO2. The cell viability was measured using the MTT
assay.
In Vitro Radiation Therapy
Cell viability
of PLC/PRL/5 cells was tested against Prot-ION and AuNC–ICG
with and without exposure to radiation doses (5 Gy). Briefly, 1 ×
104 cells were seeded in a 96 well plate and allowed to
grow overnight. Next day, the cells were treated with different concentrations
(i.e. 62.5, 125, 250, and 500 μg/mL) of Prot-ION, BSA-AuNC,
and Au NCs–ICG, respectively. After 24 h, the NP-treated cells
were exposed to different radiation doses of 0, 1.25, 2.5, and 5 Gy
followed by MTT assay.
Reactive Oxygen Species Assay
Reactive
oxygen species
(ROS) levels were measured by reaction with 2,7-dichlorofluorescein
diacetate (DCFDA). DCFDA is a nonfluorescent dye, which can readily
diffuse into the cells and is cleaved by intracellular esterases to
form DCF by reaction with the ROS generated in cells. The quantity
of ROS generated is directly proportional to green fluorescence emitted
by DCF. Following radiation treatment, the ROS levels in media were
determined by incubating cells with 500 μg/mL Prot-IONs, followed
by exposure to radiation (5 Gy). The cells were washed with Hank’s
buffer and incubated with DCFDA (25 μg/mL in serum free media).
The fluorescence intensity was recorded at 0 and 240 min (exc: 485
nm and em: 535 nm) and plotted with respect to control.
Cellular Damage
Analysis
PLC/PRF/5 cells were seeded
in a 6 well plate on cover slips with a density of 5 × 104 cells/well in DMEM supplemented with 5% FBS and were allowed
to adhere for 24 h. The cells were incubated with Prot-ION for 24
h. The treated cells were then irradiated with a radiation dose of
5 Gy, washed three times with PBS, and fixed using 4% paraformaldehyde
for 15–20 min at RT. Following incubation, they were irradiated
with 5 Gy of γ-rays, washed twice in PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde.
Fixed cells were stained with Hoechst (2 μg/mL) for 15 min,
followed by counterstaining with Phalloidin-TRITC for 20 min. The
cells were washed several times to remove any excess dye and mounted
with antifade mounting media as per manufacturer’s protocol.
The cellular and DNA damage was investigated using a confocal laser
scanning microscope (Carl Zeiss LSM 880, Germany).
Photothermal
Radiotherapy Study
To demonstrate the in vitro efficiency of combined photothermal therapy (PTT)
and radiotherapy, PLC/PRL/5 cells were seeded at a density of 1 ×
104 cells in a 96 well plate and allowed to attach overnight.
The following day, cells were incubated with 250 μg/mL of Prot-ION
and equivalent concentration of AuNC–ICG. After 6 h of incubation,
the cells were exposed to a 750 nm laser for 4 min and placed back
in the incubator for 18 h. Subsequently, the cells were exposed to
a radiation of 5 Gy at a dose rate of 0.742 Gy/min. The MTT assay
was performed to measure cell viability.
MR, Optical, and Photoacoustic
Imaging
Phantom magnetic
resonance (MR) images were acquired using a 7T BrukerBiospec MRI scanner
(BrukerBioSpin MRI GmbH, Germany). Different concentrations of Prot-ION
containing 1.5% agar gel were prepared in MilliQ water (in 1.5 mL
micro centrifuge tubes). Images for quantifying T2 relaxation time were acquired using the rapid acquisition with
the relaxation enhancement pulse sequence. Parameters for T2 quantification were effective echo time TE = 8, 24, 40,
56, 72, 88, 104, and 120 ms and repetition time TR = 5500 ms. Slice
thickness and field of view for all acquisition were 1 mm and 6 ×
4 cm, respectively. Origin 8.6 software was used to calculate the T2 values for each sample by exponential decay curve fitting.
The r2 relaxivities were calculated as
the proportionality constants of the linear relation between the reciprocal
relaxation time versus Fe concentration. For optical imaging, a three-dimensional
imaging system was used to acquire the fluorescent images.Different
concentrations of Prot-ION were prepared in a 1% solidified agarose
gel and loaded in 0.1 mm capillary voids for photoacoustic (PA) imaging.
Pulsed array-light-emitting diode (LED) light (energy of each array
LED = 200 μJ per pulse) was used to generate photoacoustic signals
from samples. Two units of the array-LED-based pulsed excitation laser
source (λ = 850 nm) were placed on both sides of a linear array
transducer and had a central frequency of 7 MHz with 80% bandwidth.
The photoacoustic and ultrasound signals were acquired using a 128-element
linear array-based ultrasound detector. A high-speed 128-channel data
acquisition system having 14 bit resolution (PreXion Corporation,
Japan) was used to acquire the signals where the sampling rates for
the photoacoustic signal and ultrasound signal acquisition were 40
and 20 MSPS, respectively. The normal delay sum algorithm was used
to reconstruct the images.
Results and Discussion
Synthesis
and Characterization of Prot-IONs
IOCs were
synthesized in a one-step hydrothermal method according to a previously
reported protocol.[32] They showed uniform
size distribution and a spherical morphology with a diameter of ∼220
nm. The TEM images of Prot-ION show a thick and uniform coating of
albumin-stabilized AuNCs on the surface of IOC (Figure A–C). IOCs possess a subtle broad
scattering cross section from the visible to the infrared region.
However, after the AuNC–ICG coating, Prot-ION possessed strong
absorbance at 730 and 790 nm that substantiated the presence of ICG
(Figure E). The positive
zeta potential of IOC (∼6 mV) facilitated coating of AuNC–ICG
via electrostatic adsorption, changing the overall zeta potential
of Prot-ION to −10.3 mV (Figure F). The magnetization moments of IOC and Prot-ION were
72 and 49 emu/g, respectively, confirming superparamagnetic behavior
(Figure D). The observed
decrease in magnetization of Prot-ION is due to the presence of the
albumin layer on their surface.
Figure 1
TEM image of (A,B) IOC and (C) Prot-ION;
(D) magnetization moment
and (E) visible–NIR spectra and (F) zeta potential of BSA,
AuNC, IOC, and Prot-ION.
TEM image of (A,B) IOC and (C) Prot-ION;
(D) magnetization moment
and (E) visible–NIR spectra and (F) zeta potential of BSA,
AuNC, IOC, and Prot-ION.XPS was used to elucidate
the elemental composition and oxidation
states of all the elements present within Prot-IONs. A wide-range
XPS spectrum indicated the presence of Au 4f, C 1s, O 1s, and Fe 2p,
as shown in Figure . The deconvoluted peaks of Fe 2p spectra show binding energies corresponding
to 2p3/2 and 2p1/2 at 710 and 724 eV, respectively.
The spectra also point out two spin–orbit doublets that are
characteristic of Fe2+ and Fe3+. The O 1s spectrum
could be deconvoluted into three peaks where 528.61 eV is a signature
peak of Fe–O species, confirming the formation of Fe3O4, while the other two peaks could be attributed to the
presence of residual groups such as C–O and O–H. The
abovementioned results are in coherence with the reported values of
Fe3O4. The Au 4f narrow spectrum with the characteristic
doublet peak of Au 4f7/2 and Au 4f5/2 centered
at 83.28 and 87.29 eV was observed, satisfying the separation of the
Au 4f level of 3.6 eV. However, an additional peak was observed at
92.26 eV, which may be attributed to the presence of gold in the ground
state.[38,39]
Figure 2
(A) XPS spectrum of Prot-ION, showing high-resolution
plots corresponding
to (B) Fe 2p, (C) Au 4f, and (D) O 1s.
(A) XPS spectrum of Prot-ION, showing high-resolution
plots corresponding
to (B) Fe 2p, (C) Au 4f, and (D) O 1s.
Biocompatibility, Hemocompatibility, and Biodegradation Studies
The biocompatibility of Prot-ION was determined against endotoxin-sensitive
human umbilical cord vein endothelial cells. More than 85% cells remained
viable up to a concentration of 1 mg/mL without showing any significant
reduction (Figure A). As inferred from the bright-field images of cells, Prot-ION NPs
showed concentration-dependent cytoplasmic localization within the
cells (Figure S3). Hemocompatibility plays
a critical role for assessing safety aspects of a nanomaterial. Prot-IONs
did not inflict any hemoglobin leakage from RBCs for up to a concentration
of 700 μg/mL[40] (Figure B). On the contrary, the positive
control (1% Triton X-100) caused complete hemolysis of RBCs, showing
a high amount of hemoglobin release in the supernatant. The abovementioned
results confirm the nontoxic, biocompatible, and hemocompatible nature
of Prot-IONs.
Figure 3
(A) Biocompatibility against HUVEC and (B) hemocompatibility
of
Prot-ION. TEM images revealing degradation of Prot-ION in the presence
of proteinase K and acidic pH-5.2 after (C) 24, (D) 48, and (E) 72
h.
(A) Biocompatibility against HUVEC and (B) hemocompatibility
of
Prot-ION. TEM images revealing degradation of Prot-ION in the presence
of proteinase K and acidic pH-5.2 after (C) 24, (D) 48, and (E) 72
h.The biodegradability of Prot-ION
was studied for 72 h in acidic
buffer (5.2) in the presence of Proteinase-K to mimic intracellular
and tumor microenvironment.[41] The structural
disintegration of Prot-ION started in the first 24 h with the degradation
of the outer protein layer consisting of the AuNCs, which was absent,
as seen in Figure C. After 48 h, destabilization of the core IOC due to the action
of proteinase-K on gelatine was evident from the loss of the three-dimensional
structure and distribution of crystallites of size less than 10 nm
on the same plane of the focus (Figure D). When the time of incubation was prolonged to 72
h, the IOCs had completely degraded with the complete absence of any
remnants of the original nanostructure (Figure E). This confirms that low pH and presence
of the enzymes could accelerate the breakdown of these nanoassemblies,
confirming their ability to degrade in tumor microenvironment. The
rate of degradation would depend upon the amount of hydroxyl ions
and proteolytic enzymes present in both intracellular and extracellular
compartments of the tumor. Previous reports have confirmed that Fe3O4 NPs can seamlessly disintegrate in vivo and Fe ion gets translocated through different pathways contributing
to their critical role in iron homeostasis.[42]
In Vitro PTT
Due to the presence of
strong NIR absorption between 700 and 800 nm contributed by ICG, Prot-IONs
could act as a photothermal transducer. While no obvious PLC/PRF/5
cell death was observed upon exposure to the 750 nm laser alone, photothermal
killing was more pronounced in Prot-ION (500 μg/mL)-treated
cells. The viability of PP5 cancer cells decreased drastically from
∼90 to ∼35% after the NIR light irradiation (Figure A,B).[43]
Figure 4
(A) Concentration-dependent photothermal response of Prot-IONs
and (B) in vitro photothermal response of IOC and
Prot-ION against PLC/PRF/5 with 5 min of laser treatment (*P < 0.05).
(A) Concentration-dependent photothermal response of Prot-IONs
and (B) in vitro photothermal response of IOC and
Prot-ION against PLC/PRF/5 with 5 min of laser treatment (*P < 0.05).
Radiotherapy and Fenton-Mediated
Induction of Oxidative Stress
with Prot-ION
High energy ionizing radiation stimulates the
generation of ROS that potentially cause physical damages to macromolecular
structures such as DNA, protein, and membrane lipids, eventually leading
to cell death. These effects can be exponentiated with radiosensitizers
such as AuNCs. Hypothesizing that Prot-Ion could expound the detrimental
effects of radiotherapy, the PLC/PRF/5 hepatoma cells were treated
with the nanoassemblies for 24 h, followed by exposure to 5 Gy γ-irradiation.
Prot-IONs were localized in the cytoplasm of the cancer carcinoma
cells with intact nuclei and cytoskeleton, corroborating its compatibility
at 500 μg/mL (Figure A). As can be observed in Figure B(ii), the cells treated with radiation alone
demonstrated trivial nuclear and cytoskeletal damage in comparison
to the control. Treatment with Prot-ION ameliorated with a decrease
in cell density with damage to the nuclear and cytoskeletal structures
[Figure B(iii)]. These
results affirm the radiosensitization effect of Prot-IONs against
hepatoma cells.[44−46]
Figure 5
Confocal images of (A) nonirradiated PP5 cells with Prot-IONs
localized
around the nucleus and (B) confocal images of (i) untreated control,
(ii) radiation-treated, and (iii) Prot-ION (500 μg/mL) + radiation
(5 Gy)-treated PP5 cells stained with Hoechst (DNA) and phalloidin–TRITC
(Actin).
Confocal images of (A) nonirradiated PP5 cells with Prot-IONs
localized
around the nucleus and (B) confocal images of (i) untreated control,
(ii) radiation-treated, and (iii) Prot-ION (500 μg/mL) + radiation
(5 Gy)-treated PP5 cells stained with Hoechst (DNA) and phalloidin–TRITC
(Actin).Excessive intracellular ROS in
the cells could perturb the equilibrium
of the oxidation reduction potential and lead to intracellular peroxide
production followed by a series of adverse biological effects. ROS
usually refers to superoxide anion (•O2–), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), hydroxyl radical (•OH), and singlet oxygen (1O2). In vitro ROS generation following
γ-irradiation was assessed using DCF-DA as an intracellular
probe. Radiation dose of 5 Gy over cells treated with IOC or AuNC–ICG
showed an increase in the probe fluorescence, which is attributed
to the production of ROS. However, Prot-ION-treated cells showed a
twofold increase in fluorescence within 4 h of γ-irradiation
(Figure C). As a consequence,
there was a significant decrease in the viability (∼80%) of
hepatoma cells treated with Prot-ION and exposed to 5 Gy radiation
as compared to equivalent concentration of IOC or AuNC–ICG.
Figure 6
Percentage
of viable cells treated with different concentrations
of IOC, AuNC–ICG, and Prot-ION in the (A) absence and (B) presence
of 5 Gy irradiation. (C) Intracellular ROS percentage recorded at
two different time intervals. (D) Combinatorial effect of PTT and
RT on PP5 cells treated with different radiation doses (**P ≤ 0.0065).
Percentage
of viable cells treated with different concentrations
of IOC, AuNC–ICG, and Prot-ION in the (A) absence and (B) presence
of 5 Gy irradiation. (C) Intracellular ROS percentage recorded at
two different time intervals. (D) Combinatorial effect of PTT and
RT on PP5 cells treated with different radiation doses (**P ≤ 0.0065).After the intracellular uptake of Prot-ION, in the lysosomal acidic
pH 5.2, the IOCs are converted to Fe+2/Fe+3 ions.[47,48] Ferrous/ferric ions persuade the generation of free hydroxyl species
due to the Fenton reaction, which was investigated by using DPD as
a sensor molecule. As shown in Figure S4, there was a 10-fold increase in the amount of •OH ions within 20 min at pH 5.2. These results substantiate the potential
of Prot-IONs to activate the production of hydroxyl ions by Fenton
reaction. Pronounced oxidative stress could be induced through Fenton
reaction and mediated synergistically augmented ROS generation.
Combined Photothermal Radiotherapy with Prot-IONs
As
radiosensitization with Prot-ION caused more than 50% cancer cell
death at a concentration of 250 μg/mL (Figure B), sequential NIR laser exposure for 4 min
and different radiation doses (0.625 to 5 Gy) at this concentration
yielded up to ∼30% more cell death compared to cells exposed
to radiation alone (Figure D).[49,50]
MR and Optical (NIR and
Photoacoustic) Imaging
Furthermore,
the ability of Prot-IONs to act as MR and optical contrast agents
was evaluated. Figure A,C shows MR phantom images and the corresponding relaxivity (R2) plot of Prot-IONs at a concentration range
0–0.08 mM of Fe. The R2 value (∼225
mM–1 s–1) of Prot-ION is significantly
high compared to a commercial iron oxide-based contrast agent (85
mM–1 s–1).[51,52] NIR optical images showed a concentration-dependent increase in
fluorescence from Prot-IONs. As shown in Figure A,B, Prot-IONs also demonstrated concentration-dependent
enhanced photoacoustic contrast in a simulated microvessel of 100
μm diameter.[53,54] These results indicate that Prot-IONs
can serve as a versatile imaging contrast agent.
Figure 7
(A) Phantom T2-weighted
MR images and optical images of varying
concentrations of Prot-ION and (C) relaxivity plot of Prot-ION corresponding
to varying iron concentrations; (B) phantom photoacoustic (PA) imaging
of 100 μm wide capillary void inside 1% agarose.
(A) Phantom T2-weighted
MR images and optical images of varying
concentrations of Prot-ION and (C) relaxivity plot of Prot-ION corresponding
to varying iron concentrations; (B) phantom photoacoustic (PA) imaging
of 100 μm wide capillary void inside 1% agarose.
Conclusions
Recently, there is significant interest
in how to utilize nondegradable
inorganic nanomaterials for biomedical applications and also clear
them out of the body after their intended in vivo utilization. In this work, biodegradable magnetic and NIR active
nanoassemblies functionalized with gold nanoclusters are showcased
as potential theranostic agents. While they could sensitize cancer
cells for photothermal radiation therapy and possess magnetic and
optical properties for trimodal imaging (MRI, NIR, and PA) applications,
they also collapsed into small NPs within 72 h in acidic pH and proteolytic
conditions. Such engineered approaches to derive biodegradable inorganic
nanomaterials would make them more suitable for in vivo applications.