Literature DB >> 35309159

The vital need for action against the social determinants of frailty.

Timothy Daly1.   

Abstract

Dementia outcomes will increasingly reflect inequalities unless vital action is taken against the social determinants of frailty.
© 2022 The Authors. Aging Medicine published by Beijing Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35309159      PMCID: PMC8917259          DOI: 10.1002/agm2.12195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging Med (Milton)        ISSN: 2475-0360


In Aging Medicine, Wallace and colleagues recently reported “a strong link” between a frailty index based on 41 variables of overall health and the worsening of dementia. They also found “that longitudinal changes in frailty were not significantly associated with neuropathology after controlling for possible confounders” and their results “suggest frailty is an important and modifiable risk factor for dementia” (p. 4). The authors argue that individual interventions targeting “various factors including diet, exercise, sleep, and comorbidities … may be useful” for taking action against frailty, but consider it “likely that population‐level public health approaches that target environmental drivers of health will be the most effective” (pp. 4–5). Existing public health campaigns for dementia risk reduction continue to focus on the individual rather than the environment, which does not address differences in exposure to environmental drivers of frailty across the lifetime. The focus on individuals and their motivation to make lifestyle changes is a reflection of our age of “moralisation of health promotion” characterised by “emphasising individual responsibility for making healthier choices [and] incorporating the neoliberal values of individual choice and empowerment into policy”, which researchers would do well to resist. It is particularly important at present not to ignore the social determinants of health and health disparities because the Covid‐19 pandemic has created a perfect storm for them getting worse. In conclusion, Wallace and colleagues’ call for a shift from individualistic interventions to public health measures against environmental drivers of frailty is both empirically supported and morally necessary. In a society with diminishing social contact, growing wealth disparities, and an overly individualistic view of responsibility for one's health, dementia outcomes will increasingly reflect inequalities unless vital action is taken against the social determinants of frailty.
  3 in total

1.  Giving a fairer face to urban space: Progress on the long road to dementia prevention.

Authors:  Timothy Daly
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 3.485

2.  Resisting Moralisation in Health Promotion.

Authors:  Rebecca C H Brown
Journal:  Ethical Theory Moral Pract       Date:  2018-11-08

3.  10-year frailty trajectory is associated with Alzheimer's dementia after considering neuropathological burden.

Authors:  Lindsay M K Wallace; Olga Theou; Judith Godin; David D Ward; Melissa K Andrew; David A Bennett; Kenneth Rockwood
Journal:  Aging Med (Milton)       Date:  2021-12-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.