Literature DB >> 35308915

Comparing Deep Learning and Conventional Machine Learning Models for Predicting Mental Illness from History of Present Illness Notations.

Ingroj Shrestha1, Padmini Srinivasan1.   

Abstract

Mental illness, a serious problem across the globe, requires multi-pronged solutions including effective computational models to predict illness. Mental illness diagnosis is complicated by the pronounced sharing of symptoms and mutual pre-dispositions. Set in this context we offer a systematic comparison of seven deep learning and two conventional machine learning models for predicting mental illness from the history of present illness free-text descriptions in patient records. The models tested include a new architecture CB-MH which ranks best for F1 (0.62) while another attention model is best for F2 (0.71). We also explore model decisions using Integrated Gradients interpretability method which we use to identify key influential features. Overall, the majority of true positives have key features appearing in meaningful contexts. False negatives are most challenging with most key features appearing in unclear contexts. False positives are mostly true positives in actuality as supported by a small-scale clinician-based user judgement study. ©2021 AMIA - All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35308915      PMCID: PMC8861709     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  16 in total

1.  Rationale-Augmented Convolutional Neural Networks for Text Classification.

Authors:  Ye Zhang; Iain Marshall; Byron C Wallace
Journal:  Proc Conf Empir Methods Nat Lang Process       Date:  2016-11

2.  Long short-term memory.

Authors:  S Hochreiter; J Schmidhuber
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1997-11-15       Impact factor: 2.026

3.  Ordinal convolutional neural networks for predicting RDoC positive valence psychiatric symptom severity scores.

Authors:  Anthony Rios; Ramakanth Kavuluru
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 4.  Deep learning in clinical natural language processing: a methodical review.

Authors:  Stephen Wu; Kirk Roberts; Surabhi Datta; Jingcheng Du; Zongcheng Ji; Yuqi Si; Sarvesh Soni; Qiong Wang; Qiang Wei; Yang Xiang; Bo Zhao; Hua Xu
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  The hidden links between mental disorders.

Authors:  Michael Marshall
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  The use of electronic health records for psychiatric phenotyping and genomics.

Authors:  Jordan W Smoller
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 3.568

7.  Predicting mental conditions based on "history of present illness" in psychiatric notes with deep neural networks.

Authors:  Tung Tran; Ramakanth Kavuluru
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 6.317

8.  Applying deep neural networks to unstructured text notes in electronic medical records for phenotyping youth depression.

Authors:  Joseph Geraci; Pamela Wilansky; Vincenzo de Luca; Anvesh Roy; James L Kennedy; John Strauss
Journal:  Evid Based Ment Health       Date:  2017-07-24

Review 9.  Deep learning in mental health outcome research: a scoping review.

Authors:  Chang Su; Zhenxing Xu; Jyotishman Pathak; Fei Wang
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 6.222

10.  BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining.

Authors:  Jinhyuk Lee; Wonjin Yoon; Sungdong Kim; Donghyeon Kim; Sunkyu Kim; Chan Ho So; Jaewoo Kang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.