| Literature DB >> 35308874 |
Zhenli Guo1, Shansi Li1, Jialing Wu1, Xiongzhao Zhu1,2,3, Yi Zhang1,2,3.
Abstract
Objective: Early life adversity is a risk factor for depression in adulthood; however, the underlying mechanisms are not well understood. This study aims to investigate the effect of DNA methylation of DRD2 gene on early life stress-induced depression in adult rats.Entities:
Keywords: DNA methylation; DRD2; depression; maternal deprivation; ventral tegmental area
Year: 2022 PMID: 35308874 PMCID: PMC8924051 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.827667
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychiatry ISSN: 1664-0640 Impact factor: 4.157
Figure 1Effect of maternal deprivation on rats' behaviors in adulthood. (A) Total distance in the open field test. (B) The percentage of central distance in the open field test (the percentage of central distance = central distance/total distance). (C) The number of fecal pellets in the open field test. (D) Vertical counts in the open field test. (E) Sucrose preference rate in the sucrose preference test. (F) Immobility time in the forced swimming test. NOR: normal control (n = 10); CUS: chronic unpredictable stress (n = 10); MD: maternal deprivation (n = 10); MD/CUS: maternal deprivation plus chronic unpredictable stress (n = 10). *p < 0.05 compared with NOR group. Δp < 0.05 compared with CUS group. ♢p < 0.05 compared with MD group.
Figure 2Effect of maternal deprivation on biomarker of rats in adulthood. (A) CORT concentration in feces. (B) The DRD2 protein level in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) tissues. (C) The DRD2 mRNA level in the VTA tissues. (D) The DRD2 promoter methylation level in the VTA tissues. NOR: normal control (n = 10); CUS: chronic unpredictable stress (n = 10); MD: maternal deprivation (n = 10); MD/CUS: maternal deprivation plus chronic unpredictable stress (n = 10). *p < 0.05 compared with NOR group. Δ p < 0.05 compared with CUS group. ♢p < 0.05 compared with MD group.
Figure 3The correlations between CORT level in feces and behavioral indexes. (A) The correlation between CORT level in feces and the total distance in the open field test. (B) The correlation between CORT level in feces and the percentage of central distance in the open field test. (C) The correlation between CORT level in feces and the number of fecal pellets in the open field test. (D) The correlation between CORT level in feces and sucrose preference rate in the sucrose preference test. (E) The correlation between CORT level in feces and immobility time in the forced swimming test. Correlations were performed in all animals (N = 40). *p < 0.05. **p < 0.01. ***p < 0.001.
Figure 4The correlations between DRD2 protein level in the VTA and behavioral indexes. (A) The correlation between DRD2 protein level in the VTA and the total distance in the open field test. (B) The correlation between DRD2 protein level in the VTA and the percentage of central distance in the open field test. (C) The correlation between DRD2 protein level in the VTA and the number of fecal pellets in the open field test. (D) The correlation between DRD2 protein level in the VTA and sucrose preference rate in the sucrose preference test. (E) The correlation between DRD2 protein level in the VTA and immobility time in the forced swimming test. Correlations were performed in all animals (N = 40). *p < 0.05. **p < 0.01. ***p < 0.001.
Figure 5The correlations between DRD2 mRNA level in the VTA and behavioral indexes. (A) The correlation between DRD2 mRNA level in the VTA and the total distance in the open field test. (B) The correlation between DRD2 mRNA level in the VTA and the percentage of central distance in the open field test. (C) The correlation between DRD2 mRNA level in the VTA and the number of fecal pellets in the open field test. (D) The correlation between DRD2 mRNA level in the VTA and sucrose preference rate in the sucrose preference test. (E) The correlation between DRD2 mRNA level in the VTA and immobility time in the forced swimming test. Correlations were performed in all animals (N = 40). *p < 0.05. **p < 0.01. ***p < 0.001.
Figure 6The correlations between DRD2 promoter methylation level in VTA and behavioral indexes. (A) The correlation between DRD2 promoter methylation level in VTA and the total distance in the open field test. (B) The correlation between DRD2 promoter methylation level in VTA and the percentage of central distance in the open field test. (C) The correlation between DRD2 promoter methylation level in VTA and the number of fecal pellets in the open field test. (D) The correlation between DRD2 promoter methylation level in VTA and sucrose preference rate in the sucrose preference test. (E) The correlation between DRD2 promoter methylation level in VTA and immobility time in the forced swimming test. Correlations were performed included all animals (N = 40). *p < 0.05. **p < 0.01. ***p < 0.001.