| Literature DB >> 35308710 |
Febe Renjitha Suman1, Ravi Teja2, Jesu Magdalene2, Tejaswita Bisht2, Suresh Varadharajan2, Uma Lakshmi2, Jayalakshmi Balasubramanian2.
Abstract
Aim This study was carried out to detect beta (β) thalassemia heterozygous state in antenatal women and to create a validated flag in the software utilizing the screening indices to filter the samples to be subjected to high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and to define a model for the prevention of thalassemia. Methods This cross-sectional study was carried out for a period of two years on women attending the antenatal clinic. Complete blood count (CBC) and peripheral smear were done during their first visit. Serum iron and total iron-binding capacity were done for women who had microcytic hypochromic anemia. The samples of women without iron deficiency were processed by HPLC for hemoglobinopathies. The spouses of women who were found to have beta thalassemia trait were counseled to undergo screening, and those who consented were tested. Results A total of 183 antenatal women were screened for hemoglobinopathies. Βeta thalassemia trait was detected in 23.5% of them. Among the 16 red blood cell (RBC) indices analyzed, Sehgal index and Mentzer index, both with sensitivities of 97.67%, were found to be suitable. Alert flag incorporated in the software of the analyzer to detect these indices helps not to miss samples to carry out HPLC. The spouses of women with β thalassemia trait who underwent HPLC testing were 55.81%. A model screening program was designed. Conclusion Antenatal testing by HPLC should be done on all mothers having microcytic hypochromic anemia without iron deficiency. Spouse testing of the woman who was carriers denotes the success of the antenatal screening program.Entities:
Keywords: hemoglobinopathy; high performance liquid chromatography; mentzer index; microcytic hypochromic anemia; thalassemia
Year: 2022 PMID: 35308710 PMCID: PMC8926295 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.22209
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cureus ISSN: 2168-8184
Comparison of threshold, sensitivity and specificity of the original studies with the present study
| Index | Original threshold | Sensitivity | Specificity | Present threshold | Sensitivity | Specificity |
| Menzter [ | <13 | 76.74 | 95.68 | <14.1 | 97.67 | 87.93 |
| Red cell volume distribution width index (RDWI) [ | <220 | 79.069 | 96.55 | <255.9 | 93.023 | 93.10 |
| Shine & Lal [ | <1530 | 97.67 | 47.41 | <1142.41 | 95.34 | 66.37 |
| Srivastava [ | <3.8 | 37.20930 | 96.55 | <4.69 | 95.34 | 79.3 |
| Green & King [ | <65 | 46.51 | 97.41 | <84.9 | 97.6 | 90.5 |
| Sirdah [ | <27 | 39.53 | 99.13 | <33.74 | 97.67 | 88.79 |
| Ehasani [ | <15 | 74.41 | 93.1 | <20.1 | 97.67 | 85.34 |
| England & Fraser [ | <0 | 16.27 | 99.13 | <10.98 | 97.6 | 91.3 |
| Ricera [ | <4.4 | 93.02 | 67.241 | <3.65 | 88.37 | 87.06 |
| Mean density of Hb/liter of blood (MDHL) [ | >1.63 | 60.46 | 98.27 | >1.48 | 88.37 | 96.55 |
| Mean cell Hb density (MCHD) [ | >0.3045 | 76.74 | 27.58 | >0.3436 | 18.60 | 98.2 |
| Sehgal [ | <972 | 97.67 | 82.75 | <971.55 | 97.67 | 82.75 |
| Red blood cell (RBC) Count | >4.81 | 86.04 | 95.6 | >4.78 | 88.37 | 95.68 |
| Mean corpuscular volume (MCV) | <80 | 97.67 | 39.65 | <70.45 | 97.67 | 68.1 |
| Mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH) | <27 | 36.2 | 95.34 | <23.7 | 93.02 | 56.03 |
| Red cell volume distribution width (RDW) | <18 | 86.04 | 48.27 | <17.35 | 83.72 | 53.44 |
Figure 1ROCs for Mentzer Index (A) and Sehgal Index (B)
Figure 2Model screening program
CBC - complete blood count; PS - peripheral smear; MCV - mean corpuscular volume; MCH - mean corpuscular hemoglobin; HPLC - high-performance liquid chromatography