| Literature DB >> 35308615 |
Peter F Liddle1, Elizabeth B Liddle1.
Abstract
Current diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia place emphasis on delusions and hallucinations, whereas the classical descriptions of schizophrenia by Kraepelin and Bleuler emphasized disorganization and impoverishment of mental activity. Despite the availability of antipsychotic medication for treating delusions and hallucinations, many patients continue to experience persisting disability. Improving treatment requires a better understanding of the processes leading to persisting disability. We recently introduced the term classical schizophrenia to describe cases with disorganized and impoverished mental activity, cognitive impairment and predisposition to persisting disability. Recent evidence reveals that a polygenic score indicating risk for schizophrenia predicts severity of the features of classical schizophrenia: disorganization, and to a lesser extent, impoverishment of mental activity and cognitive impairment. Current understanding of brain function attributes a cardinal role to predictive coding: the process of generating models of the world that are successively updated in light of confirmation or contradiction by subsequent sensory information. It has been proposed that abnormalities of these predictive processes account for delusions and hallucinations. Here we examine the evidence provided by electrophysiology and fMRI indicating that imprecise predictive coding is the core pathological process in classical schizophrenia, accounting for disorganization, psychomotor poverty and cognitive impairment. Functional imaging reveals aberrant brain activity at network hubs engaged during encoding of predictions. We discuss the possibility that frequent prediction errors might promote excess release of the neurotransmitter, dopamine, thereby accounting for the occurrence of episodes of florid psychotic symptoms including delusions and hallucinations in classical schizophrenia. While the predictive coding hypotheses partially accounts for the time-course of classical schizophrenia, the overall body of evidence indicates that environmental factors also contribute. We discuss the evidence that chronic inflammation is a mechanism that might link diverse genetic and environmental etiological factors, and contribute to the proposed imprecision of predictive coding.Entities:
Keywords: classical schizophrenia; disorganization; inflammation; negative symptoms; polygenic risk score; prediction error; predictive coding; psychomotor poverty
Year: 2022 PMID: 35308615 PMCID: PMC8928728 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.818711
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Hum Neurosci ISSN: 1662-5161 Impact factor: 3.169
Clinical Features of classical schizophrenia (based on Liddle, 2019).
| Core features | Persistent disorganization | Disorganized thought |
| Disorganized affect | ||
| Disorganized behavior | ||
|
| ||
| Persistent impoverished mental activity | Poverty of speech | |
| Flat affect | ||
| Diminished spontaneous movement | ||
|
| ||
| Cognitive impairment | Slow speed of processing | |
| Impaired executive function | ||
| Impaired working memory | ||
|
| ||
| Secondary features | Persistent impairment of role function | Impaired occupational function |
|
| ||
| Reality distortion (typically episodic) | Delusions | |
Terminology relevant to predictive coding.
| Predictive coding | The mechanisms by which the brain makes predictions about the world, and successively updates them in light of further sensory information. |
| Forward model | The predictive model of the sensory consequences of an action. As the action is executed, the predicted sensory consequences are compared with actual sensory input. In the case of a mismatch, the motor command is updated, and a revised prediction generated. |
| Prediction error | The mismatch between predicted and actual brain-state. For instance, when the sensory consequences of an action are accurately predicted, the sensory input is down-weighted. Unpredicted sensory consequences constitute a “prediction error” and are likely to be more salient. |
| Salience of prediction errors | A prediction error means that the actual sensory input was unpredicted and therefore salient, in the sense of being more noticeable or “surprising.” The sensory input is also behaviorally salient as it indicates the need to adjust the internally generated prediction. A “salience network,” including insula and anterior cingulate cortex, plays a role in detecting and responding to salient information in general. |
| Teaching signal | The neural signal that indicates a prediction error and the need to adjust strategy and generate an updated prediction. The teaching signal is associated with release of dopamine from midbrain dopaminergic neurons, particularly when the error is in the value of a reward. It is likely that the teaching signal also produces enduring changes in expectations that guide prediction in similar circumstances in future. |
FIGURE 1Comparison of regions of aberrant increase of brain activity in patients with schizophrenia during tasks likely to involve endogenous coding of predictions, with the regions in which local gyrification index is diminished in patients relative to healthy controls. Red spheres depict the loci of local maxima in clusters of voxels exhibiting greater activity in patients with schizophrenia relative to healthy controls during processing of non-target stimuli in a target detection task (Liddle et al., 2013); yellow spheres depict local maxima of aberrant activity in patients during processing of word sounds relative to non-word sounds (Ngan et al., 2003). The black spheres depict the local maxima in clusters of reduced local gyrification in schizophrenia compared with healthy controls (Palaniyappan and Liddle, 2012). Note that the clusters were irregular is shape and many extended beyond the sphere depicting the local maximum. In particular, the region of diminished gyrification with peak difference between patients and controls in the left middle frontal gyrus extended into superior frontal gyrus. The brain loci were visualized using Brain Net Viewer (Xia et al., 2013).