| Literature DB >> 35308037 |
Akira Morita1, Aya Murakami2, Keigo Noguchi3, Yuki Watanabe1, Toshiya Nakaguchi4, Sadayuki Ochi2, Kazuho Okudaira2, Yoshiro Hirasaki1, Takao Namiki1.
Abstract
Aim: In tongue diagnosis, a dark purple tongue and enlarged sublingual vein are important findings of Oketsu (blood stasis). However, the association between the tongue color and the sublingual vein has not been reported. This study investigated the association between the tongue color values and the sublingual vein width using tongue image analyzing system (TIAS) for the objective assessment of blood stasis.Entities:
Keywords: Kampo medicine; Oketsu (blood stasis); sublingual vein; tongue color; tongue diagnosis; tongue image analyzing system
Year: 2022 PMID: 35308037 PMCID: PMC8928869 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.790542
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) ISSN: 2296-858X
Figure 1Definition of the four measurement points of the tongue color values.
Diagnostic criteria for blood stasis.
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
| Dark-rimmed eyes | 10 | 10 |
| Areas of dark-pigmentation of facial skin | 2 | 2 |
| Rough skin | 2 | 5 |
| Livid lips | 2 | 2 |
| Livid gingiva | 10 | 5 |
| Livid tongue | 10 | 10 |
| Telangiectasis/Vascular spiders | 5 | 5 |
| Subcutaneous hemorrhage | 2 | 10 |
| Palmar erythema | 2 | 5 |
| Resistance and tenderness on pressure of the left para-umbilical region | 5 | 5 |
| Resistance and tenderness on pressure of the right para-umbilical region | 10 | 10 |
| Resistance and tenderness on pressure of the umbilical region | 5 | 5 |
| Resistance and/or tenderness on pressure of the ileocecal region | 5 | 2 |
| Resistance and/or tenderness on pressure of the sigmoidal region | 5 | 5 |
| Resistance and/or tenderness on pressure of the subcostal region | 5 | 5 |
| Hemorrhoids | 10 | 5 |
| Dysmenorrhea | – | 10 |
Regardless of sex, patients with total scores <21 were classified into the non-blood stasis, and those with total scores ≥21 were classified into the blood stasis syndrome. Mild symptoms are designated by half points.
Characteristics of patients.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Sex (M/F) | 6/14 | 8/10 | 0.501 |
| Age (year) | 64.9, 13.9 | 73.1, 8.9 | 0.104 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.7, 4.1 | 24.6, 3.5 | 0.133 |
| Blood stasis score | 22.1, 11.8 | 33.9, 14.4 | 0.047 |
|
| |||
| TG (mg/dL) | 118.8, 61.2 | 119.5, 67.0 | 0.589 |
| HDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) | 62.9, 20.8 | 58.7, 13.1 | 0.619 |
| LDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) | 115.8, 41.7 | 126.2, 31.1 | 0.049 |
| HbA1c (NGSP, %) | 6.4, 1.0 | 6.4, 0.8 | 0.965 |
| FPG (mg/dl) | 120.1, 34.3 | 120.3, 24.2 | 0.770 |
BMI, body mass index; TG, triglyceride; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; FPG, fasting plasma glucose. Data are presented as the mean ± SD.
p > 0.05, Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
Association between the tongue color values and sublingual vein width.
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
| P1-L | 53.93, 4.28 | 49.32, 5.83 | 1.22 | 1.04–1.42 | 0.004 |
| P2-L | 43.04, 16.94 | 37.98, 15.26 | 1.02 | 0.98–1.06 | 0.405 |
| P3-L | 58.16, 5.34 | 55.63, 5.68 | 1.12 | 0.98–1.28 | 0.069 |
| P4-L | 53.14, 4.64 | 49.30, 5.83 | 1.18 | 1.02–1.37 | 0.014 |
| P1-a | 25.03, 4.30 | 24.14, 3.90 | 1.03 | 0.88–1.21 | 0.687 |
| P2-a | 20.81, 6.92 | 20.77, 6.58 | 1.00 | 0.91–1.10 | 0.959 |
| P3-a | 23.47, 5.07 | 21.14, 5.61 | 1.08 | 0.95–1.24 | 0.239 |
| P4-a | 29.75, 5.70 | 28.49, 5.34 | 1.03 | 0.91–1.16 | 0.635 |
| P1-b | 6.43, 2.51 | 4.83, 1.85 | 1.44 | 1.03–2.03 | 0.019 |
| P2-b | 7.98, 3.43 | 5.27, 3.58 | 1.30 | 1.04–1.63 | 0.009 |
| P3-b | 6.13, 2.40 | 5.83, 2.78 | 1.09 | 0.84–1.41 | 0.499 |
| P4-b | 6.97, 2.51 | 5.92, 2.05 | 1.19 | 0.89–1.59 | 0.224 |
P1 (tongue edge), P2 (tongue posterior), P3 (tongue middle), P4 (tongue apex). L* for lightness (brightness to darkness), a* for chromaticity (redness [+a] to greenness [–a], and b* chromaticity) (yellowness [+b] to blueness [–b]). Data are presented as the mean ± SD.
p < 0.05, logistic regression analysis.
Figure 2(A) Tongue Image Analyzing System: TIAS. (B) Tongue images of two clinical cases. Top: The tongue color values. Bottom: The sublingual vein width. Case 1. Blood stasis score 20, Case 2. Blood stasis score 39. P1 (tongue edge), P4 (tongue apex). L* for lightness (brightness to darkness), a* for chromaticity (redness [+a] to greenness [–a]), and b* chromaticity (yellowness [+b] to blueness [–b]).
Figure 3Indicator to differentiate blood stasis by ROC analysis. (A) Only the tongue color values (P1-L*, P1-b*). (B) Only the sublingual vein width. (C) Both the tongue color values (P1-L*, P1-b*) and the sublingual width P1 (tongue edge). L* for lightness (brightness to darkness), b* chromaticity (yellowness [+b] to blueness [–b]).