Literature DB >> 35307317

Age Differences in Clinical Trial Understanding in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients.

Danny Luan1, Peter Martin1, John P Leonard1, Kelly M Trevino2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials are often an important component of cancer care but are misunderstood by many patients. Few studies have examined age differences in clinical trial understanding in older versus younger adults, especially among patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), a slowly progressive and not typically curable cancer diagnosed primarily in older adults. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants aged ≥21 years with a diagnosis of NHL were recruited from a single academic medical center in an urban setting. Age was dichotomized as <65 and ≥65 years. Clinical trial understanding was assessed using a four-item survey of potential goals of a clinical trial, with responses including "yes," "no," and "I don't know." Survey responses were examined by age using Chi-square tests.
RESULTS: The sample was comprised of 74 patients who were predominantly non-Latino White, with a mean age of 60.4 years (SD = 12.27). Compared to younger patients, older patients were more likely to respond "I don't know" to the clinical trial goals of reducing the lymphoma (41.4% vs. 13.3%; P = .023) and keeping the lymphoma from worsening (41.4% vs. 13.3%; P = .017). Age differences for the remaining goals were not statistically significant. Similar findings emerged when the sample was restricted to patients under active surveillance.
CONCLUSION: Relative to younger adults, older adults may have a less nuanced understanding of clinical trial goals. Therefore, older adults may benefit from developmentally-tailored interventions to improve clinical trial understanding. Future research should examine the relationship between clinical trial understanding and enrollment by age using validated measures in diverse samples.
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age; Clinical trials; Non-Hodgkin lymphoma; Patient understanding

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35307317      PMCID: PMC9232921          DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2022.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk        ISSN: 2152-2669


  22 in total

1.  Impact of a multi-disciplinary patient education session on accrual to a difficult clinical trial: the Toronto experience with the surgical prostatectomy versus interstitial radiation intervention trial.

Authors:  Kris Wallace; Neil Fleshner; Michael Jewett; Joan Basiuk; Juanita Crook
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  End points and trial design in geriatric oncology research: a joint European organisation for research and treatment of cancer--Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology--International Society Of Geriatric Oncology position article.

Authors:  Hans Wildiers; Murielle Mauer; Athanasios Pallis; Arti Hurria; Supriya G Mohile; Andrea Luciani; Giuseppe Curigliano; Martine Extermann; Stuart M Lichtman; Karla Ballman; Harvey Jay Cohen; Hyman Muss; Ulrich Wedding
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Informed consent: how much and what do patients understand?

Authors:  Matthew E Falagas; Ioanna P Korbila; Konstantina P Giannopoulou; Barbara K Kondilis; George Peppas
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 4.  Follicular lymphoma: evolving therapeutic strategies.

Authors:  Brad S Kahl; David T Yang
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Improving accrual of older persons to cancer treatment trials: a randomized trial comparing an educational intervention with standard information: CALGB 360001.

Authors:  Gretchen G Kimmick; Bercedis L Peterson; Alice B Kornblith; Jeanne Mandelblatt; Jeffrey L Johnson; Judith Wheeler; Robin Heinze; Harvey J Cohen; Hyman B Muss
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Randomized clinical trials in oncology: understanding and attitudes predict willingness to participate.

Authors:  P M Ellis; P N Butow; M H Tattersall; S M Dunn; N Houssami
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Improving the Evidence Base for Treating Older Adults With Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement.

Authors:  Arti Hurria; Laura A Levit; William Dale; Supriya G Mohile; Hyman B Muss; Louis Fehrenbacher; Allison Magnuson; Stuart M Lichtman; Suanna S Bruinooge; Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis; William P Tew; Michael A Postow; Harvey J Cohen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Barriers to clinical trial participation as perceived by oncologists and patients.

Authors:  Neal J Meropol; Joanne S Buzaglo; Jennifer Millard; Nevena Damjanov; Suzanne M Miller; Caroline Ridgway; Eric A Ross; John D Sprandio; Perry Watts
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 11.908

9.  Barriers to clinical trial participation by older women with breast cancer.

Authors:  M Margaret Kemeny; Bercedis L Peterson; Alice B Kornblith; Hyman B Muss; Judith Wheeler; Ellis Levine; Nancy Bartlett; Gini Fleming; Harvey J Cohen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-06-15       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Association of Age at Cancer Diagnosis and Clinical Trial Participation.

Authors:  Jessica Keim-Malpass; Héctor E Alcalá
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-02-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.