Literature DB >> 35306890

Some sexual consequences of being a plant.

Quentin Cronk1.   

Abstract

Plants have characteristic features that affect the expression of sexual function, notably the existence of a haploid organism in the life cycle, and in their development, which is modular, iterative and environmentally reactive. For instance, primary selection (the first filtering of the products of meiosis) is via gametes in diplontic animals, but via gametophyte organisms in plants. Intragametophytic selfing produces double haploid sporophytes which is in effect a form of clonal reproduction mediated by sexual mechanisms. In homosporous plants, the diploid sporophyte is sexless, sex being only expressed in the haploid gametophyte. However, in seed plants, the timing and location of gamete production is determined by the sporophyte, which therefore has a sexual role, and in dioecious plants has genetic sex, while the seed plant gametophyte has lost genetic sex. This evolutionary transition is one that E.J.H. Corner called 'the transference of sexuality'. The iterative development characteristic of plants can lead to a wide variety of patterns in the distribution of sexual function, and in dioecious plants poor canalization of reproductive development can lead to intrasexual mating and the production of YY supermales or WW superfemales. Finally, plant modes of asexual reproduction (agamospermy/apogamy) are also distinctive by subverting gametophytic processes. This article is part of the theme issue 'Sex determination and sex chromosome evolution in land plants'.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dioecy; gametophyte; haploid selfing; iterative development; monoecy; pleogamy

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35306890      PMCID: PMC8935308          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  32 in total

1.  The Drosophila melanogaster sperm proteome-II (DmSP-II).

Authors:  Elizabeth R Wasbrough; Steve Dorus; Svenja Hester; Julie Howard-Murkin; Kathryn Lilley; Elaine Wilkin; Ashoka Polpitiya; Konstantinos Petritis; Timothy L Karr
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 4.044

2.  Inactivation of a DNA methylation pathway in maize reproductive organs results in apomixis-like phenotypes.

Authors:  Marcelina Garcia-Aguilar; Caroline Michaud; Olivier Leblanc; Daniel Grimanelli
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 11.277

3.  The evolution of haploidy and diploidy.

Authors:  Sarah P Otto; Aleeza C Gerstein
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 4.  Sex reversal: a fountain of youth for sex chromosomes?

Authors:  Nicolas Perrin
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 5.  Evolutionary models of extended phenotypes.

Authors:  Nathan W Bailey
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Conserved properties of Drosophila and human spermatozoal mRNA repertoires.

Authors:  Bettina E Fischer; Elizabeth Wasbrough; Lisa A Meadows; Owen Randlet; Steve Dorus; Timothy L Karr; Steven Russell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Pathways for making unisexual flowers and unisexual plants:Moving beyond the "two mutations linked on one chromosome" model.

Authors:  Susanne S Renner
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.844

8.  Does reproductive assurance explain the incidence of polyploidy in plants and animals?

Authors:  Jonathan P Spoelhof; Rachel Keeffe; Stuart F McDaniel
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2020-01-25       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 9.  Sex determination in Drosophila: The view from the top.

Authors:  Helen K Salz; James W Erickson
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 2.160

10.  Haploid selection, sex ratio bias, and transitions between sex-determining systems.

Authors:  Michael Francis Scott; Matthew Miles Osmond; Sarah Perin Otto
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The contributions of Nettie Stevens to the field of sex chromosome biology.

Authors:  Sarah B Carey; Laramie Aközbek; Alex Harkess
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Does polyploidy inhibit sex chromosome evolution in angiosperms?

Authors:  Li He; Elvira Hörandl
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 6.627

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.