Literature DB >> 35305210

Lung Neuroendocrine Tumors: How Does Molecular Profiling Help?

Thomas Yang Sun1, Andrew Hendifar2, Sukhmani K Padda3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Lung neuroendocrine tumors (NETs)-typical carcinoids and atypical carcinoids-have unique molecular alterations that are distinct from neuroendocrine carcinomas of the lung and non-small cell lung cancers. Here, we review the role of molecular profiling in the prognosis and treatment of lung NETs. RECENT
FINDINGS: There have been no recently identified molecular prognostic factors for lung NETs and none that have been routinely used to guide management of patients with lung NETs. Previous findings suggest that patients with loss of chromosome 11q may have a worse prognosis along with upregulation of anti-apoptotic pathways (e.g., loss of CD44 and OTP protein expression). Lung NETs rarely harbor driver mutations commonly found in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or TP53/RB1 mutations found universally in small cell lung cancer. Lung NETs also have low tumor mutation burden and low PD-L1 expression. Everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor and the only FDA approved therapy for unresectable lung NETs, is an effective treatment but the presence of a molecular alteration in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is not known to predict treatment response. The predominant mutations in lung NETs occur in genes regulating chromatin remodeling and histone modification, with potential targeted therapies emerging in clinical trials. Lung NETs have recurring alterations in genes that regulate the epigenome. Future targeted therapy interfering with epigenetic pathways may hold promise.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atypical carcinoid; DIPNECH; Epigenetics; Everolimus; Genetics; Genomics; Histone; Lung neuroendocrine tumor; MEN1; Methylation; Molecular profiling; NETs; Neuroendocrine tumor; Prognosis; Sequencing; Targeted therapies; Treatment; Typical carcinoid; mTOR

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35305210     DOI: 10.1007/s11912-022-01253-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep        ISSN: 1523-3790            Impact factor:   5.945


  41 in total

1.  Deletions of 11q22.3-q25 are associated with atypical lung carcinoids and poor clinical outcome.

Authors:  Dorian R A Swarts; Sandra M H Claessen; Yvonne M H Jonkers; Robert-Jan van Suylen; Anne-Marie C Dingemans; Wouter W de Herder; Ronald R de Krijger; Egbert F Smit; Frederik B J M Thunnissen; Cornelis A Seldenrijk; Aryan Vink; Aurel Perren; Frans C S Ramaekers; Ernst-Jan M Speel
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  Incidence trends and risk factors of carcinoid tumors: a nationwide epidemiologic study from Sweden.

Authors:  K Hemminki; X Li
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Atypical carcinoid tumor of the lung: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database analysis.

Authors:  Conor E Steuer; Madhusmita Behera; Sungjin Kim; Zhengjia Chen; Nabil F Saba; Rathi N Pillai; Taofeek K Owonikoko; Fadlo R Khuri; Suresh S Ramalingam
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 15.609

4.  Apoptosis-related factors p53, Bcl2, and Bax in neuroendocrine lung tumors.

Authors:  E Brambilla; A Negoescu; S Gazzeri; S Lantuejoul; D Moro; C Brambilla; J L Coll
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.307

5.  Neuroendocrine tumor epidemiology: contrasting Norway and North America.

Authors:  Oyvind Hauso; Bjorn I Gustafsson; Mark Kidd; Helge L Waldum; Ignat Drozdov; Anthony K C Chan; Irvin M Modlin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  A 5-decade analysis of 13,715 carcinoid tumors.

Authors:  Irvin M Modlin; Kevin D Lye; Mark Kidd
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Prognostic Factors in Typical and Atypical Pulmonary Carcinoids.

Authors:  Robert A Ramirez; David T Beyer; Anne E Diebold; Brianne A Voros; Maria M Chester; Yi-Zarn Wang; J Philip Boudreaux; Eugene A Woltering; Ann-Porter Uhlhorn; Pamela Ryan; Richard J Campeau; Lowell B Anthony
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2017

8.  Trends in the Incidence, Prevalence, and Survival Outcomes in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors in the United States.

Authors:  Arvind Dasari; Chan Shen; Daniel Halperin; Bo Zhao; Shouhao Zhou; Ying Xu; Tina Shih; James C Yao
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 31.777

9.  Lung neuroendocrine tumours: deep sequencing of the four World Health Organization histotypes reveals chromatin-remodelling genes as major players and a prognostic role for TERT, RB1, MEN1 and KMT2D.

Authors:  Michele Simbolo; Andrea Mafficini; Katarzyna O Sikora; Matteo Fassan; Stefano Barbi; Vincenzo Corbo; Luca Mastracci; Borislav Rusev; Federica Grillo; Caterina Vicentini; Roberto Ferrara; Sara Pilotto; Federico Davini; Giuseppe Pelosi; Rita T Lawlor; Marco Chilosi; Giampaolo Tortora; Emilio Bria; Gabriella Fontanini; Marco Volante; Aldo Scarpa
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 7.996

10.  Sotorasib for Lung Cancers with KRAS p.G12C Mutation.

Authors:  Ferdinandos Skoulidis; Bob T Li; Grace K Dy; Timothy J Price; Gerald S Falchook; Jürgen Wolf; Antoine Italiano; Martin Schuler; Hossein Borghaei; Fabrice Barlesi; Terufumi Kato; Alessandra Curioni-Fontecedro; Adrian Sacher; Alexander Spira; Suresh S Ramalingam; Toshiaki Takahashi; Benjamin Besse; Abraham Anderson; Agnes Ang; Qui Tran; Omar Mather; Haby Henary; Gataree Ngarmchamnanrith; Gregory Friberg; Vamsidhar Velcheti; Ramaswamy Govindan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 176.079

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Metastatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of Unknown Primary: Clues from Pathology Workup.

Authors:  Carl Christofer Juhlin; Jan Zedenius; Anders Höög
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 6.575

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.