Thomas Yang Sun1, Andrew Hendifar2, Sukhmani K Padda3. 1. Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 875 Blake Wilbur Drive, Stanford, CA, USA. 2. Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 127 S San Vicente Blvd, 7th Floor, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 3. Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 127 S San Vicente Blvd, 7th Floor, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Sukhmani.Padda@cshs.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Lung neuroendocrine tumors (NETs)-typical carcinoids and atypical carcinoids-have unique molecular alterations that are distinct from neuroendocrine carcinomas of the lung and non-small cell lung cancers. Here, we review the role of molecular profiling in the prognosis and treatment of lung NETs. RECENT FINDINGS: There have been no recently identified molecular prognostic factors for lung NETs and none that have been routinely used to guide management of patients with lung NETs. Previous findings suggest that patients with loss of chromosome 11q may have a worse prognosis along with upregulation of anti-apoptotic pathways (e.g., loss of CD44 and OTP protein expression). Lung NETs rarely harbor driver mutations commonly found in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or TP53/RB1 mutations found universally in small cell lung cancer. Lung NETs also have low tumor mutation burden and low PD-L1 expression. Everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor and the only FDA approved therapy for unresectable lung NETs, is an effective treatment but the presence of a molecular alteration in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is not known to predict treatment response. The predominant mutations in lung NETs occur in genes regulating chromatin remodeling and histone modification, with potential targeted therapies emerging in clinical trials. Lung NETs have recurring alterations in genes that regulate the epigenome. Future targeted therapy interfering with epigenetic pathways may hold promise.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Lung neuroendocrine tumors (NETs)-typical carcinoids and atypical carcinoids-have unique molecular alterations that are distinct from neuroendocrine carcinomas of the lung and non-small cell lung cancers. Here, we review the role of molecular profiling in the prognosis and treatment of lung NETs. RECENT FINDINGS: There have been no recently identified molecular prognostic factors for lung NETs and none that have been routinely used to guide management of patients with lung NETs. Previous findings suggest that patients with loss of chromosome 11q may have a worse prognosis along with upregulation of anti-apoptotic pathways (e.g., loss of CD44 and OTP protein expression). Lung NETs rarely harbor driver mutations commonly found in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or TP53/RB1 mutations found universally in small cell lung cancer. Lung NETs also have low tumor mutation burden and low PD-L1 expression. Everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor and the only FDA approved therapy for unresectable lung NETs, is an effective treatment but the presence of a molecular alteration in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is not known to predict treatment response. The predominant mutations in lung NETs occur in genes regulating chromatin remodeling and histone modification, with potential targeted therapies emerging in clinical trials. Lung NETs have recurring alterations in genes that regulate the epigenome. Future targeted therapy interfering with epigenetic pathways may hold promise.
Authors: Dorian R A Swarts; Sandra M H Claessen; Yvonne M H Jonkers; Robert-Jan van Suylen; Anne-Marie C Dingemans; Wouter W de Herder; Ronald R de Krijger; Egbert F Smit; Frederik B J M Thunnissen; Cornelis A Seldenrijk; Aryan Vink; Aurel Perren; Frans C S Ramaekers; Ernst-Jan M Speel Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2011-07-16 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Oyvind Hauso; Bjorn I Gustafsson; Mark Kidd; Helge L Waldum; Ignat Drozdov; Anthony K C Chan; Irvin M Modlin Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-11-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Robert A Ramirez; David T Beyer; Anne E Diebold; Brianne A Voros; Maria M Chester; Yi-Zarn Wang; J Philip Boudreaux; Eugene A Woltering; Ann-Porter Uhlhorn; Pamela Ryan; Richard J Campeau; Lowell B Anthony Journal: Ochsner J Date: 2017
Authors: Arvind Dasari; Chan Shen; Daniel Halperin; Bo Zhao; Shouhao Zhou; Ying Xu; Tina Shih; James C Yao Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Ferdinandos Skoulidis; Bob T Li; Grace K Dy; Timothy J Price; Gerald S Falchook; Jürgen Wolf; Antoine Italiano; Martin Schuler; Hossein Borghaei; Fabrice Barlesi; Terufumi Kato; Alessandra Curioni-Fontecedro; Adrian Sacher; Alexander Spira; Suresh S Ramalingam; Toshiaki Takahashi; Benjamin Besse; Abraham Anderson; Agnes Ang; Qui Tran; Omar Mather; Haby Henary; Gataree Ngarmchamnanrith; Gregory Friberg; Vamsidhar Velcheti; Ramaswamy Govindan Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2021-06-04 Impact factor: 176.079