| Literature DB >> 35305176 |
Younjung Kim1,2,3, Wei Xu4, Vanessa Barrs5,6, Julia Beatty5,6, Ákos Kenéz7.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Our understanding of the urine metabolome and its association with urinary tract disease is limited in cats.Entities:
Keywords: Chronic kidney disease; Essential amino acids; Feline idiopathic cystitis; Feline urine metabolome; LC–MS; Metabolomics
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35305176 PMCID: PMC8934335 DOI: 10.1007/s11306-022-01877-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Metabolomics ISSN: 1573-3882 Impact factor: 4.747
Case and control definitions and selection criteria
| Case and control definitions | ||
|---|---|---|
Stage 2 Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) • Urine specific gravity (USG) less than 1.035 • And serum creatinine concentration greater than 140 and less than 250 µmol/ml (International Renal Interest Society, • And no dietary intervention for CKD | Feline idiopathic cystitis • Presented for one or more of lower urinary tract signs (LUTS), including pollakiuria, stranguria, periuria, dysuria, or haematuria • And diagnostic investigation, including, in all cases, physical examination, urinalysis, urine culture, and abdominal ultrasonography, failed to identify a specific cause of LUTS | Control • Presented for reasons other than CKD or LUTS • And no history of LUTS in the last 3 months • And no evidence of CKD and FIC by diagnostic test results |
Fig. 1Pathway over-representation analysis of the urine metabolome of cats (n = 45). A list of Tier 1 and Tier 2 compounds was analysed by the MetaboAnalyst pathway analysis module to identify metabolic pathways associated with those compounds. The x-axis represents the pathway impact of a given metabolic pathway computed by the sum of relative-betweenness centrality of the matched metabolites, and the y-axis represents the log-transformed p-value from the hypergeometric test, with the circles with higher statistical significance expressed with more reddish colours
Fig. 2Multidimensional scaling (MDS) of the urine metabolome of control cats (n = 23). Percentages on the MDS axes represent variance explained. Symbols represent individual cats, and colours represent their household (a), diet type (b), age group (c) and sex (d). In A, cats from different households (i.e. only one cat was sampled in the given household) were labelled as “other households”. In C, numbers next to symbols represent ages in years. Cats were coloured differently using the age of 9 as the threshold given that cats are considered to enter senior years and have increasing risk of CKD at around this age (Conroy et al., 2019). The p values were obtained by the permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) test. Only cats from households A, B, and C were included in the PERMANOVA test for the association between the urine metabolome composition and household since only one cat was sampled per household for cats in “other households”. Age was provided as a continuous variable in the PERMANOVA test
Fig. 3Pathway enrichment (a) and qualitative enrichment (b) analyses comparing urine metabolome of cats from household A (n = 7) and other households (n = 16). In A, the x-axis, ‘pathway impact’, represents the sum of relative betweenness centrality of the metabolites matched to each metabolic pathway. For each circle, its size is proportional to its pathway impact. In B, the x-axis, ‘enrichment ratio’, represents the observed Q statistic over the expected Q statistic. The Q statistic was obtained by averaging the squared covariance between compound concentration changes and the outcome (i.e. household A vs other households) over all compounds. In both Figures, pathways with higher statistical significance expressed with more reddish colours. The FDR-adjusted p-values are provided in Table S6
Fig. 4Multidimensional scaling (MDS) of the urine metabolome of control cats (n = 23), CKD (n = 16), and FIC cases (n = 6)
Fig. 5Procrustes analysis of the association between the urine metabolome and microbiome composition of cats. Only samples that passed the rarefaction curve analysis of microbiome data (i.e. > 500 16S rRNA sequences retained) were included (n = 12). The MDS ordination of metabolome data was based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity, and the ordination of microbiome data was based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity (a), unweighted Unifrac (b), and weighted Unifrac (c). One of the two ordinations were uniformly scaled and rotated until the squared differences between them were minimized, followed by the procrustean randomization test to assess the correlation between the two ordinations. Samples from the same cats are connected by a line, with orange triangles and blue circles representing samples positioned by metabolome and microbiome composition, respectively. The result of this analysis suggested no statistical evidence for the association between metabolome and microbiome composition