Mari S Gades1, Aleksandra Alcheva2, Amy L Riegelman3, Dorothy K Hatsukami4. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 75 E. River Road, Minneapolis, MN, 55454, USA. 2. Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health and Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, 2231 6th Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. 3. Social Sciences Department, University of Minnesota Libraries, 309 19th Avenue S., Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA. 4. Masonic Cancer Center and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, 717 Delaware St. SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55414, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Many adult cigarette smokers use electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) to cut down on or quit smoking cigarettes. E-cigarettes with higher abuse potential and appeal might facilitate complete switching. E-liquid nicotine concentration and flavor are two of the characteristics that may affect the abuse potential and appeal of e-cigarettes. The objective of this systematic review was to compile results from survey, animal, human laboratory, and clinical studies to understand the possible effects of nicotine concentration and flavor on abuse potential and appeal of e-cigarettes in adult current and former cigarette and e-cigarette users. AIMS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in Ovid Medline and PsycINFO followed by citation tracking in Web of Science Core Collection. Peer-reviewed studies published in English between 2007 and August 2020 were selected that analyzed differences between e-liquid nicotine concentration and/or flavors, had outcome measures related to abuse potential and/or appeal, and included adult humans (18+) or animals. A total of 1624 studies were identified and screened. A qualitative synthesis of results was performed. RESULTS: Results from 104 studies included in this review suggest that higher nicotine concentration and access to a variety of flavors are likely to be associated with higher abuse potential and appeal of e-cigarettes for adult current and former cigarette and e-cigarette users. CONCLUSIONS: Higher nicotine concentrations and the availability of a variety of flavors in e-cigarettes might facilitate complete substitution for cigarettes. Future e-cigarette regulations should take into account their impact on smokers, for whom e-cigarettes may be a cessation tool or reduced-harm alternative. IMPLICATIONS: E-cigarettes may provide a reduced-harm alternative to cigarettes for smokers unwilling/unable to quit or serve as a path for quitting all nicotine products. Higher nicotine concentrations and flavor variety are associated with higher abuse potential and appeal of e-cigarettes. Higher abuse potential and appeal products may help facilitate complete switching from cigarettes to e-cigarettes. Regulation of nicotine concentration and flavors aimed at decreasing naïve uptake may inadvertently decrease uptake and complete switching among smokers, reducing the harm reduction potential of e-cigarettes. Evidence-based effects of regulating nicotine concentration and flavors must be considered for the population as a whole, including smokers.
INTRODUCTION: Many adult cigarette smokers use electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) to cut down on or quit smoking cigarettes. E-cigarettes with higher abuse potential and appeal might facilitate complete switching. E-liquid nicotine concentration and flavor are two of the characteristics that may affect the abuse potential and appeal of e-cigarettes. The objective of this systematic review was to compile results from survey, animal, human laboratory, and clinical studies to understand the possible effects of nicotine concentration and flavor on abuse potential and appeal of e-cigarettes in adult current and former cigarette and e-cigarette users. AIMS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in Ovid Medline and PsycINFO followed by citation tracking in Web of Science Core Collection. Peer-reviewed studies published in English between 2007 and August 2020 were selected that analyzed differences between e-liquid nicotine concentration and/or flavors, had outcome measures related to abuse potential and/or appeal, and included adult humans (18+) or animals. A total of 1624 studies were identified and screened. A qualitative synthesis of results was performed. RESULTS: Results from 104 studies included in this review suggest that higher nicotine concentration and access to a variety of flavors are likely to be associated with higher abuse potential and appeal of e-cigarettes for adult current and former cigarette and e-cigarette users. CONCLUSIONS: Higher nicotine concentrations and the availability of a variety of flavors in e-cigarettes might facilitate complete substitution for cigarettes. Future e-cigarette regulations should take into account their impact on smokers, for whom e-cigarettes may be a cessation tool or reduced-harm alternative. IMPLICATIONS: E-cigarettes may provide a reduced-harm alternative to cigarettes for smokers unwilling/unable to quit or serve as a path for quitting all nicotine products. Higher nicotine concentrations and flavor variety are associated with higher abuse potential and appeal of e-cigarettes. Higher abuse potential and appeal products may help facilitate complete switching from cigarettes to e-cigarettes. Regulation of nicotine concentration and flavors aimed at decreasing naïve uptake may inadvertently decrease uptake and complete switching among smokers, reducing the harm reduction potential of e-cigarettes. Evidence-based effects of regulating nicotine concentration and flavors must be considered for the population as a whole, including smokers.
Authors: Jie Lin; Kangmin Zhu; Paula K Hoang; Aida M Soliván-Ortiz; Stacy L Larsen; Scott P Irwin; Thomas R Schneid; Craig D Shriver; Sukhyung Lee Journal: Mil Med Date: 2020-03-02 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Alexa A Lopez; Marzena M Hiler; Eric K Soule; Carolina P Ramôa; Nareg V Karaoghlanian; Thokozeni Lipato; Alison B Breland; Alan L Shihadeh; Thomas Eissenberg Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-09-16 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Carolina P Ramôa; Marzena M Hiler; Tory R Spindle; Alexa A Lopez; Nareg Karaoghlanian; Thokozeni Lipato; Alison B Breland; Alan Shihadeh; Thomas Eissenberg Journal: Tob Control Date: 2015-08-31 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Nicholas I Goldenson; Matthew G Kirkpatrick; Jessica L Barrington-Trimis; Raina D Pang; Julia F McBeth; Mary Ann Pentz; Jonathan M Samet; Adam M Leventhal Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2016-09-22 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Adam M Leventhal; Tyler B Mason; Matthew G Kirkpatrick; Marissa K Anderson; Michael D Levine Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2020-03-19 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Caroline O Cobb; Alexa A Lopez; Eric K Soule; Miao-Shan Yen; Hannah Rumsey; Rebecca Lester Scholtes; Alyssa K Rudy; Thokozeni Lipato; Mignonne Guy; Thomas Eissenberg Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 4.852
Authors: Maciej L Goniewicz; Danielle M Smith; Kathryn C Edwards; Benjamin C Blount; Kathleen L Caldwell; Jun Feng; Lanqing Wang; Carol Christensen; Bridget Ambrose; Nicolette Borek; Dana van Bemmel; Karen Konkel; Gladys Erives; Cassandra A Stanton; Elizabeth Lambert; Heather L Kimmel; Dorothy Hatsukami; Stephen S Hecht; Raymond S Niaura; Mark Travers; Charles Lawrence; Andrew J Hyland Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2018-12-07