Literature DB >> 35304654

Morphological and topographic evaluation of the mandibular canal and its relationship with the facial profile, skeletal class, and sex.

Gustavo Moraes Prado1, Rocharles Cavalcante Fontenele1, Eliana Dantas Costa1,2, Deborah Queiroz Freitas1, Matheus L Oliveira3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the morphology and topography of the mandibular canal in patients with different facial profiles, skeletal classes, and sexes.
METHODS: Cone-beam computed tomography volumes of 103 patients were classified according to facial profile and skeletal class. Two examiners classified the mandibular canal into a linear, spoon-shaped, elliptical arc, or turning curvature and measured four related linear distances. The most frequent mandibular canal curvature was identified and multi-way ANOVA with Tukey's test compared the linear measurements between facial types, skeletal class, and sexes (α = 0.05). Kappa and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to assess the reproducibility of qualitative and quantitative variables, respectively.
RESULTS: The examiners showed excellent reproducibility. The four curvatures of the mandibular canal were found, but the spoon-shaped and elliptical arch were the most frequent. No significant differences were observed for most of the linear measurements between the different facial profiles, skeletal classes, and sexes (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Spoon-shaped and elliptical arch are the most frequent curvatures of the mandibular canal; furthermore, its morphology and topography seem to be little influenced by the facial profile, skeletal class, and sex.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anatomy; Cone-beam computed tomography; Mandible; Mandibular nerve

Year:  2022        PMID: 35304654     DOI: 10.1007/s10006-022-01058-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1865-1550


  16 in total

1.  Inferior alveolar nerve laceration after implant site preparation: A case report.

Authors:  Massimo Galli; Carlo Barausse; Irene Masi; Giovanni Falisi; Marco Baffone; Lorenzo Tuci; Pietro Felice
Journal:  Eur J Oral Implantol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.123

2.  Inferior alveolar canal course: a radiographic study.

Authors:  Tie Liu; Bing Xia; Zhiyuan Gu
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2009-08-30       Impact factor: 5.977

3.  Age- and gender-related differences in the position of the inferior alveolar nerve by using cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Jay D Simonton; Bruno Azevedo; William G Schindler; Kenneth M Hargreaves
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.171

4.  Assessment of variations of the mandibular canal through cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Christiano de Oliveira-Santos; Paulo Henrique Couto Souza; Soraya de Azambuja Berti-Couto; Lien Stinkens; Kristin Moyaert; Izabel Regina Fischer Rubira-Bullen; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Analysis of the Course and Position of Mandibular Canal.

Authors:  Hooman Khorshidi; Saeed Raoofi; Janan Ghapanchi; Shoaleh Shahidi; Maryam Paknahad
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-09-09

6.  Mandibular Canal Location: Cone-beam Computed Tomography Examination.

Authors:  Tyler Koivisto; Daphne Chiona; Laura L Milroy; Scott B McClanahan; Mansur Ahmad; Walter R Bowles
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 4.171

7.  Proximity of the Mandibular Canal to Teeth and Cortical Bone.

Authors:  Yusuke Kawashima; Osamu Sakai; Dhurata Shosho; Takashi Kaneda; Anita Gohel
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 4.171

8.  Comparison between digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the identification of the mandibular canal as part of presurgical dental implant assessment.

Authors:  Christos Angelopoulos; Steven L Thomas; Stephen Thomas; Steven Hechler; Stephen Hechler; Nikos Parissis; Matt Hlavacek
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  The relative risk of neurosensory deficit following removal of mandibular third molar teeth: the influence of radiography and surgical technique.

Authors:  W P Smith
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol       Date:  2012-08-22

10.  Radiographic evaluation of the course and visibility of the mandibular canal.

Authors:  Yun-Hoa Jung; Bong-Hae Cho
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2014-11-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.