Literature DB >> 3530447

Randomized comparison of tamoxifen versus diethylstilbestrol in estrogen receptor-positive or -unknown metastatic breast cancer: a Southeastern Cancer Study Group trial.

J P Gockerman, E N Spremulli, M Raney, T Logan.   

Abstract

In a randomized study 115 postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer who were estrogen receptor-unknown or -positive were treated initially with tamoxifen or diethylstilbestrol (DES). Their pretreatment characteristics showed no significant difference. The frequency of response was identical with tamoxifen and DES, showing a complete response rate of 2% versus 2% and a partial response rate of 4% versus 8%, respectively; stable disease was present in 78% versus 73% of the patients, respectively. The median time to disease progression (5 vs 6 months) and median survival depending on initial hormone therapy (34 vs 35 months) were identical for tamoxifen and DES, respectively. Gastrointestinal toxicity was more frequent and more severe with DES than tamoxifen. Responses were seen with withdrawal of each agent and on crossover to the alternative agent. Our conclusions are that: DES and tamoxifen are equally effective in treating metastatic breast cancer in the postmenopausal patient who is estrogen receptor-positive or -unknown; withdrawal and crossover responses are seen with both agents; side effects are minimal but more frequent with DES; and on the basis of cost-effectiveness DES is the preferable agent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3530447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep        ISSN: 0361-5960


  4 in total

1.  Tamoxifen and fluoxymesterone versus tamoxifen and danazol in metastatic breast cancer--a randomized study.

Authors:  S M Swain; S M Steinberg; C Bagley; M E Lippman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Antiandrogen withdrawal in castrate-refractory prostate cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group trial (SWOG 9426).

Authors:  A Oliver Sartor; Catherine M Tangen; Maha H A Hussain; Mario A Eisenberger; Minoti Parab; Joseph A Fontana; Robert A Chapman; Glenn M Mills; Derek Raghavan; E David Crawford
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Phase I trial of droloxifene in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  A U Buzdar; S Kau; G N Hortobagyi; R L Theriault; D Booser; F A Holmes; R Walters; I H Krakoff
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 4.  Targeting the androgen receptor in triple-negative breast cancer: current perspectives.

Authors:  Alain Mina; Rachel Yoder; Priyanka Sharma
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 4.147

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.