Literature DB >> 3530407

How are we to determine whether dietary interventions do more good than harm to hypertensive patients?

D L Sackett.   

Abstract

This paper categorizes studies of dietary interventions in hypertensive patients into five categories based on the levels of evidence: level I, randomized trials with low false-positive (alpha) and low false-negative (beta) errors (high power); level II, randomized trials with high false-positive (alpha) and (or) high false-negative (beta) errors (low power); level III, nonrandomized concurrent cohort comparisons between contemporaneous patients who did and did not receive a nutritional intervention; level IV, nonrandomized historical cohort comparisons between current patients who did receive a nutritional intervention and former patients (from the same institution or from the literature) who did not; level V, case series without controls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3530407     DOI: 10.1139/y86-133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0008-4212            Impact factor:   2.273


  2 in total

Review 1.  A combination of systematic review and clinicians' beliefs in interventions for subacromial pain.

Authors:  Kajsa Johansson; Birgitta Oberg; Lars Adolfsson; Mats Foldevi
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Conservative surgery for chronic diabetic foot osteomyelitis: Procedures and recommendations.

Authors:  José Luis Lázaro-Martínez; Marta García-Madrid; Yolanda García-Álvarez; Francisco Javier Álvaro-Afonso; Irene Sanz-Corbalán; Esther García-Morales
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-12-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.