Literature DB >> 35303128

[Effects of the Decision of the German Constitutional Court on mechanical restraint in 2018 : Coercive measures in the psychiatric hospitals in Baden-Wuerttemberg in 2019 compared to the years 2015-2017].

Tilman Steinert1,2,3,4, Sophie Hirsch5,6,7, Erich Flammer5,6.   

Abstract

On 23 July 2018 the German Constitutional Court decided that mechanical restraint in psychiatric patients with 5 or 7‑point mechanical restraint lasting longer than 30 min requires a judicial authorization. On the same day, the German Association for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (DGPPN) published guidelines on the prevention of coercion and violence. Together, this can be considered as the strongest intervention to reduce coercion on a national level worldwide. The registry for coercive measures in the Federal State of Baden-Wuerttemberg, available since 2015 and comprising all 32 hospitals licensed to admit involuntary patients, has made it possible to evaluate the effect of the legal change. We analyzed the mean percentage of patients subjected to coercive measures and the mean cumulative duration of these interventions in ICD-10 diagnostic groups in psychiatric hospitals from 2015 to 2017 compared to 2019 among a total of 438,003 admissions. The percentage of patients subjected to any kind of freedom-restricting coercion (restraint or seclusion) decreased from 6.7% (average 2015-2017) to 5.8% in 2019 (p < 0.001). Effects were strongest in patients with organic (F0) and schizophrenic disorders (F2). The percentage of patients subjected to mechanical restraint decreased from 4.8% to 3.6% in 2019, and the percentage of mechanical restraints less than 30 min increased from 1.8% to 10.5%. Vice versa, the percentage of patients subjected to seclusion increased from 2.9% to 3.3%. The median cumulated duration of restraint and seclusion per affected case decreased from 12.7h to 10.9 h (median). The intervention was probably responsible for a reduction of the percentage of cases subjected to coercive measures by about 13% and a reduction of the duration of these measures per affected case by about 14%.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Guideline; Intervention; Law; Rule; Seclusion

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35303128     DOI: 10.1007/s00115-022-01267-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nervenarzt        ISSN: 0028-2804            Impact factor:   1.297


  7 in total

1.  [Long-Term Tendencies in the Use of Seclusion and Restraint in Five Psychiatric Hospitals in Germany].

Authors:  Tilman Steinert; Martin Zinkler; Hans-Peter Elsässer-Gaißmaier; Axel Starrach; Sandra Hoppstock; Erich Flammer
Journal:  Psychiatr Prax       Date:  2014-07-28

2.  Measures to Avoid Coercion in Psychiatry and Their Efficacy.

Authors:  Sophie Hirsch; Tilman Steinert
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  [Use of restraints in a psychiatric department, Frederiksberg Hospital, before and after introduction of the new psychiatric law. Restraining devices].

Authors:  E S Schepelern; K H Aggernaes; A K Stender; H Raben
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  1993-12-13

4.  [Gender-Related Differences Regarding Aggressive Behaviour and Coercive Measures in Psychiatric Inpatients].

Authors:  Regina Ketelsen; Silvia Fernando; Martin Driessen
Journal:  Psychiatr Prax       Date:  2021-08-05

5.  Freedom Restrictive Coercive Measures in Forensic Psychiatry.

Authors:  Erich Flammer; Udo Frank; Tilman Steinert
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 4.157

6.  Reduction of coercive measures under routine conditions in psychiatric hospitals 2004-2019: Strong effects in old age psychiatry, much less in general psychiatry.

Authors:  Tilman Steinert; Sophie Hirsch; Rita Goebel; Brendan Snellgrove; Erich Flammer
Journal:  Eur Psychiatry       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 5.361

  7 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  [Monitoring of coercive measures and compulsory treatment in Germany].

Authors:  Tilman Steinert; Sophie Hirsch; Erich Flammer
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 1.297

2.  Law and psychiatry-current and future perspectives.

Authors:  Tilman Steinert; Tanja Henking
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-08-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.