| Literature DB >> 35302954 |
Kristin J Konnyu1, Louise M Thoma2, Wangnan Cao1, Roy K Aaron3, Orestis A Panagiotou1, Monika Reddy Bhuma1, Gaelen P Adam1, Dan Pinto4, Ethan M Balk1.
Abstract
ABSTRACT: We sought to systematically review the evidence on the benefits and harms of prehabilitation interventions for patients who are scheduled to undergo elective, unilateral TKA or THA surgery for the treatment of primary osteoarthritis. We searched PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov from January 1, 2005 through May 3, 2021. We selected for inclusion randomized controlled trials and adequately-adjusted nonrandomized comparative studies of prehabilitation programs reporting performance-based, patient-reported, or healthcare utilization outcomes. Three researchers extracted study data and assessed risk of bias, verified by an independent researcher. Experts in rehabilitation content and complex interventions independently coded rehabilitation interventions. The team assessed strength of evidence (SoE). While large heterogeneity across evaluated prehabilitation programs limited strong conclusions, evidence from 13 TKA RCTs suggest prehabilitation may result in increased strength and reduced length of stay and may not lead to increased harms, but may be comparable in terms of pain, range of motion and activities of daily living (all low SoE). There was no evidence or insufficient evidence for all other outcomes following TKA. Although there were 6 THA RCTs, there was no evidence or insufficient evidence for all THA outcomes.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35302954 PMCID: PMC9464791 DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil ISSN: 0894-9115 Impact factor: 3.412