Literature DB >> 35302396

Timing and duration of antibiotic prophylaxis is associated with the risk of infection after hip and knee arthroplasty.

Helen Badge1,2,3,4, Timothy Churches2,3, Wei Xuan2,3, Justine M Naylor1,2,3,5, Ian A Harris1,2,3,5,6,7.   

Abstract

AIMS: Antibiotic prophylaxis involving timely administration of appropriately dosed antibiotic is considered effective to reduce the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) after total hip and total knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA). Cephalosporins provide effective prophylaxis, although evidence regarding the optimal timing and dosage of prophylactic antibiotics is inconclusive. The aim of this study is to examine the association between cephalosporin prophylaxis dose, timing, and duration, and the risk of SSI after THA/TKA.
METHODS: A prospective multicentre cohort study was undertaken in consenting adults with osteoarthritis undergoing elective primary TKA/THA at one of 19 high-volume Australian public/private hospitals. Data were collected prior to and for one-year post surgery. Logistic regression was undertaken to explore associations between dose, timing, and duration of cephalosporin prophylaxis and SSI. Data were analyzed for 1,838 participants. There were 264 SSI comprising 63 deep SSI (defined as requiring intravenous antibiotics, readmission, or reoperation) and 161 superficial SSI (defined as requiring oral antibiotics) experienced by 249 (13.6%) participants within 365 days of surgery.
RESULTS: In adjusted modelling, factors associated with a significant reduction in any SSI and deep SSI included: correct weight-adjusted dose (any SSI; adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.68 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47 to 0.99); p = 0.045); commencing preoperative cephalosporin within 60 minutes (any SSI, aOR 0.56 (95% CI 0.36 to 0.89); p = 0.012; deep SSI, aOR 0.29 (95% CI 0.15 to 0.59); p < 0.001) or 60 minutes or longer prior to skin incision (aOR 0.35 (95% CI 0.17 to 0.70); p = 0.004; deep SSI, AOR 0.27 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.83); p = 0.022), compared to at or after skin incision. Other factors significantly associated with an increased risk of any SSI, but not deep SSI alone, were receiving a non-cephalosporin antibiotic preoperatively (aOR 1.35 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.81); p = 0.044) and changing cephalosporin dose (aOR 1.76 (95% CI 1.22 to 2.57); p = 0.002). There was no difference in risk of any or deep SSI between the duration of prophylaxis less than or in excess of 24 hours.
CONCLUSION: Ensuring adequate, weight-adjusted dosing and early, preoperative delivery of prophylactic antibiotics may reduce the risk of SSI in THA/TKA, whereas the duration of prophylaxis beyond 24 hours is unnecessary. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(3):252-260.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibiotic prophylaxis; Arthroplasty; Cephalosporins; Clinical practice guidelines; Complications; Hip; Infection; Knee; Prophylaxis; Reoperation; Venous thromboembolism; antibiotics; infections; prophylactic antibiotics; prophylaxis; surgical site infection (SSI); total hip and total knee arthroplasty

Year:  2022        PMID: 35302396      PMCID: PMC8965789          DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.33.BJO-2021-0181.R1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Jt Open        ISSN: 2633-1462


Introduction

The burden and costs associated with surgical site infection (SSI) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee joint arthroplasty (TKA) continue to rise, with over half of SSIs considered preventable. Antibiotic prophylaxis, involving timely administration of appropriately dosed antibiotic, is considered effective to achieve adequate tissue concentration and reduce the risk of SSI after THA/TKA. Yet variation in antibiotic prophylaxis persists, with recent systematic reviews suggesting that low-quality evidence means there is a lack of clear evidence to inform care. Research to date has demonstrated no superior antibiotic agent for THA and TKA, with many proven to be effective. Clinical guidelines recommend first- and second-generation cephalosporins because they are effective, broad-spectrum, cheap, achieve tissue concentration quickly, and enable more powerful antibiotics to be saved for treatment. At the time the study commenced, clinical guidelines in Australia and the USA recommended cephazolin as the primary prophylactic antibiotic preoperatively and ceased within 24 hours; the recommended doses were 1 g cephazolin or 2 g for people over 80 kg in Australia and 3 g if over 120 kg in the USA. A single dose of 1 g to 2 g of cephalosporin is usually recommended, although evidence from heterogenous studies has yielded inconsistent results. Recommendations for commencing prophylaxis vary from any time preoperatively to within 60 minutes or 120 minutes prior to skin incision. Evidence is inconsistent regarding the need for weight-based dosing for obese patients, and an intraoperative second dose within two half-lives of first administration. Systematic reviews reported no benefit of multiple doses or prolonged duration, but potential for increased risk of adverse events including antimicrobial resistance. The persisting controversy regarding the evidence for antibiotic prophylaxis raises questions about current recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis in THA/TKA and may be contributing to widespread clinical variation and suboptimal outcomes. Using a prospective cohort of participants who underwent elective TKA or THA, this study aims to examine the association between cephalosporin prophylaxis dose, timing, and duration, and the risk of SSI in patients undergoing primary THA/TKA.

Methods

Registration and data collection

This is a secondary data analysis collected from a prospective observational cohort study of people undergoing elective primary THA/TKA for osteoarthritis (OA) to examine the relationship between non-compliance with infection and venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention guidelines, and patient outcomes. Eligible sites included 19 private and public Australian hospitals with high annual surgical volume (> 275 cases) of THA/TKA surgery. Inclusion criteria for participants in the study were: consenting adults (aged over 18 years) with a primary diagnosis of OA undergoing primary THA/TKA; sufficient English to comprehend the protocol; and available to participate in follow-up. The study protocol was registered prior to commencement and ethical approval was obtained from the nine relevant human research ethics committees. Data were collected prospectively between June 2013 and January 2015 prior to surgery, during the acute admission and via telephone follow-up at approximately 35, 90, and 365 days post-surgery. Participants provided sociodemographic information, past medical history, indications, and contraindications for antimicrobial prophylaxis. Details regarding prophylaxis SSI were obtained from sites and participants at follow-up. The primary outcome included any SSI, defined as requiring oral or intravenous (IV) antibiotics, readmission, or reoperation occurring within 365 days of surgery. The secondary outcome was deep SSI, defined as requiring IV antibiotics, readmission, or reoperation occurring within 365 days of surgery. Reoperation was defined as any unplanned return to theatre to address the SSI. The accuracy of antibiotic prophylaxis details, acute complications, and all SSIs requiring treatment with readmission or reoperation was verified by medical record audits at all sites and by contacting surgeons, primary care physicians, and other hospitals. Any reported SSIs were coded as a dichotomous variable to indicate whether the participant did or did not experience the complication.

Sample ascertainment

Overall, 77% (2,529/3,285) of all patients screened were eligible for participation (Figure 1). Of these, 2,143 provided consent preoperatively, and data were received for 1,905 (88.9%) consenting participants, as some did not proceed to surgery, or no acute data were received by investigators. After excluding 30 (1.6%) patients without any post-acute follow-up, and 37 who did not receive a cephalosporin, 1,838 patients were included in the analyses. Missing data for each variable was less than 2% for all variables except ASA grade (2.3%).
Fig. 1

Participant recruitment, eligibility, and participation results. F/U, follow-up; LTFU, lost to follow-up.

Participant recruitment, eligibility, and participation results. F/U, follow-up; LTFU, lost to follow-up.

Site, surgeon, and participant characteristics

Site, surgeon, and participant characteristics are provided in Table I. A total of 19 sites from five Australian states included ten public hospitals that completed 45.9% of surgical procedures. The number of procedures ranged from 1 to 125 per surgeon.
Table I.

Site, surgeon, and participant characteristics.

Site and surgeon characteristicsResults
Site, n (%)
Public10 (54)
Private9 (46)
Surgeons, n118
Median participants, n (IQR)
Per surgeon7 (2 to 18)
Per site82 (51 to 139)
Median length of stay, days (IQR)5 (1.22 to 1.95)
Participant characteristics
Joint (all surgeries), n (%)
Hip802 (43.6)
Knee1,036 (56.4)
Bilateral joint arthroplasty, n90
Public hospital, n (%)844 (45.9)
Median duration of surgery, hrs (IQR) (n = 1,837)1.62 (1.2 to 2.0)
Median age, yrs (IQR)67.6 (61 to 74)
Female sex, n (%)994 (54.1)
Insurance status, n (%)
Public804 (43.7)
Private health insurance961 (52.3)
Self-funded (private)29 (1.6)
Other insurance/compensation15 (0.8)
Department of Veterans Affairs28 (1.5)
Post-school education status (n = 1,866), n (%)
Up to school completion874 (47.8)
Post school qualification955 (52.2)
Median BMI, kg/m2 (IQR)29.7 (26.3 to 34.2)
Current smoker at the time of recruitment (n = 1,829), n (%)
No1,678 (91.7)
Yes151 (8.3)
Comorbid conditions, n (%)
Heart disease459 (25.0)
History of stroke110 (6.0)
Bleeding disorder19 (1.0)
Previous VTE (n = 1,873)147 (8.0)
Diabetes295 (16.1)
Hypertension1,120 (60.9)
High cholesterol683 (37.2)
Kidney disease61 (3.3)
Liver disease46 (2.5)
Current cancer (any type)39 (2.1)
History of cancer (any type) (n = 1,873)214 (11.7)
Lung disease330 (18.0)
Anxiety/depression343 (18.7)
GORD477 (26.0)
Sleep apnoea128 (7.0)
Neurological conditions53 (2.9)
Musculoskeletal conditions (n = 1,873)887 (48.3)
Any other comorbid conditions710 (38.6)
Previous arthroplasty, n (%)
Hip239 (13.0)
Knee300 (16.3)
Medications taken for osteoarthritis, n (%) *
Paracetamol1,067 (58.1)
NSAIDs511 (27.8)
Opioids378 (20.6)
Antidepressant/antiepileptics26 (2.0)
Steroids5 (0.3)
Any indications or contraindication for antibiotics, n (%) 225 (12.4)
History of antibiotic resistant infection/swab MRSA82 (4.5)
Gram-negative infection1 (0.05)
Self-reported allergy to penicillin, cephalosporin, or all beta-lactam Abs194 (10.6)
Hospital admission with LOS > 5 days within 3 months of THA or TKA14 (0.8)
ASA grade (n = 1,833), n (%)
1 or 21,231 (68.5)
3 or 4656 (31.5)
Acute processes of care, n (%)
Routine doppler performed (n = 1,847)147 (8.0)
Cement fixation used (n = 1,837)1,178 (64.1)
Antibiotic cement1,113 (60.8)
Tranexamic acid (n = 1,831)1,107 (60.5)
Neuraxial anaesthesia (n = 1,837)1,160 (63.1)
Intra-articular drain (n = 18)809 (44.2)
Tourniquet (only used for TKA)887 (48.3)
Blood transfusion (n = 1,831)327 (17.9)
Indwelling catheter1,434 (78.1)
Skin incision, n (%)
Hip
Posterior/posterolateral494 (26.9)
Anterolateral/anterior175 (9.5)
Other129 (16.2)
Knee
Medial parapatellar939 (92.7)
Midvastus61 (6.0)
Minimally invasive6 (0.6)
Lateral7 (0.7)

Medications not exclusive, people may have been taking multiple medications for pain.

ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; GORD, gastrointestinal reflux disorder; IQR, interquartile range; LOS, length of stay; MRSA, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; NSAIDs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; THA, total hip arthroplasty; TKA, total knee arthroplasty; VTE, venous thromboembolism.

Site, surgeon, and participant characteristics. Medications not exclusive, people may have been taking multiple medications for pain. ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; GORD, gastrointestinal reflux disorder; IQR, interquartile range; LOS, length of stay; MRSA, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; NSAIDs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; THA, total hip arthroplasty; TKA, total knee arthroplasty; VTE, venous thromboembolism.

Statistical analysis

This is a secondary data analysis, and the sample size was based on the expected event rates and effect size of the primary study. All data were entered into a REDCap database, and data analyses were undertaken using R environment for statistical computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Austria). Descriptive statistics were calculated to profile site-level and participant-level characteristics. Continuous variables are presented as median and interquartile range. Some variables (bilateral joint, smoking status, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, education, and neuraxial anaesthesia) were collapsed to allow for adequately sized and clinically meaningful groups to be included in analyses. The study population was restricted to cases where cephalosporin prophylaxis was used. Appropriate doses for weight included cephazolin (1 g if < 120 kg, 2 g if > 120 kg), cefotaxime (1 g), and ceftriaxone (2 g); as cephalothin is not recommended, no dosage was considered recommended. Due to low numbers of non-cephalosporin antibiotic use, the specific features of each non-cephalosporin prophylaxis were categorized into preoperative use, number of non-cephalosporin agents received, and duration longer than 24 hours. The duration for each cephalosporin agent from time of skin incision was calculated based on the actual duration minus number of preoperative minutes for cephalosporins given preoperatively, or the number of minutes calculated from the start time of the first antibiotic (for antibiotics commenced after skin incision) and surgical start time added to the actual antibiotic duration. Continuous data for time and duration were not normally distributed, so duration was categorized as less than or greater than 24 hours from the time of skin incision, and preoperative timing was categorized into within or longer than 60 minutes prior to skin incision, intraoperative or postoperative. The Fishers Exact test was used to analyze the association between categorical elements of cephalosporin prophylaxis and SSI. We conducted univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses to explore associations between the development of any postoperative SSI and features of cephalosporin prophylaxis including preoperative timing, first dose strength, and duration. Patient and care factors known to increase the risk of SSI were considered as potential confounders. Factors identified on univariate analysis with a p-value < 0.25 were entered into a backwards, stepwise multivariate logistic regression model using the Akaike information criterion (AIC) to identify independent risk factors associated with a higher risk of SSI. Factors included in the initial model included eligible antibiotic factors, and surgical, care, and patient factors (Supplementary Table i). A second logistic regression model was also run with deep infection as the outcome. Missing data were assessed and imputed using multivariate imputation by chained equations (MICE). Model selection was performed using one of the imputed datasets. The final model was run with each of the five imputed datasets. Effect estimates were taken from the pooled estimates using the five imputed datasets. We tested the model with two-way interaction terms with primary predictors. Sensitivity analyses were performed using complete case analysis and using Bayesian information criterion (BIC) instead of AIC. Analysis of variance was used to compare model results and differences in effect estimates, confidence intervals (CIs), and p-values calculated; p-values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Interaction terms for the main predictors retained in the final model (weight adjusted dose, dose changed, and preoperative timing) against each other variable were tested. The data and full R code for all analyses are available online.

Results

All infection outcomes up to one year

There were 264 SSI events experienced by 249 (13.6%) participants. The majority of SSIs occurred within 35 days of surgery (203 (11.0%)), although just over half (10/18) deep SSIs requiring reoperation occurred between 36 and 365 days (Table II and Supplementary Table ii).
Table II.

Surgical site infection outcomes and oozy wounds by follow-up timeframe.

Type of infectionParticipants(n = 1,838), n (%)SSIs for each follow-up timeframe, n (%)*
Day 0 - Acute D/CAcute D/C - 35 days36 to 90 days91 to 365 daysTotal
Superficial186 (10.12)70 (3.81)87 (4.73)40 (2.18)2 (0.11)199 (10.83)
Deep SSI: required IV AB or readmission45 (2.45)21 (1.14)16 (0.87)8 (0.44)1 (0.05)46 (2.50)
Deep SSI: required reoperation18 (0.98)3 (0.16)6 (0.33)5 (0.27)5 (0.27)19 (1.03)
Total SSIs249 (13.5)94 (5.11)109 (5.93)53 (2.88)8 (0.44)264 (14.36)
All oozy wounds (including with and without antibiotic treatment)165 (9.0)151 (8.2)15 (0.8)000
Experienced oozy wounds and any SSI68 (3.7)62 (2.1)7 (0.2)000

249 participants experienced 264 surgical site infections.

Percentage based on calculation for all participants (n = 1,838).

AB, antibiotics; D/C, discharge; IV, intravenous; SSI, surgical site infection.

Surgical site infection outcomes and oozy wounds by follow-up timeframe. 249 participants experienced 264 surgical site infections. Percentage based on calculation for all participants (n = 1,838). AB, antibiotics; D/C, discharge; IV, intravenous; SSI, surgical site infection.

Cephalosporin prophylaxis

In unadjusted univariate analyses, the cephalosporin prophylaxis factors associated with an increased risk of any SSI included appropriate first dose for weight, (6.6% vs 6.9%; p = 0.013, Fisher’s exact test), dose change after the initial dose (7.1% vs 6.4%; p = 0.040, Fisher’s exact test), the number of additional non-cephalosporin prophylactic antibiotic agents received (at any time including preoperatively, intraoperatively, or postoperatively) (no additional antibiotic, vs one or two additional antibiotics, 7.8% vs 0.7%; p < 0.001, Fisher’s exact test) and receiving a preoperative non-cephalosporin antibiotic (6.8% vs 6.7%; p = 0.002, Fisher’s exact test) (Table III and Supplementary Table ii). There were no differences in outcomes based on the duration of cephalosporin prophylaxis, noting over half of the sample received antibiotic prophylaxis beyond 24 hours from the time of skin incision (56.5%, 1,039/1,838).
Table III.

Unadjusted association between joint and features of antibiotic prophylaxis and risk of any and deep surgical site infection at one year compared to no surgical site infection.

Cephalosporin prophylaxisTotal(n = 1,838)No SSI, n (%) (n = 1,589)SSI, n (%)(n = 249)p-value (Fisher’s Exact test)Deep SSI,n (%)(n = 63)p-value (Fisher’s Exact test)
Appropriate first dose for weight, n (%) 25 0.0130.242
Yes1,073 (58.4)946 (51.5)122 (6.6)32 (1.7)
No765 (41.6)643 (35.0)127 (6.9)31 (1.7)
Dose changed after first dose, n (%) 0.0400.247
Yes985 (53.6)722 (39.3)131 (7.1)34 (1.8)
No853 (46.4)867 (47.4)118 (6.4)29 (1.6)
Preoperative timing, n (%) 0.1470.050
Not received preoperatively201 (10.9)168 (9.1)33 (1.8)13 (0.7)
Received first dose within 60 mins prior to skin incision1,486 (80.8)1,284 (70.0)202 (11.1)45 (2.4)
Received first dose 60 mins or longer prior to skin incision151 (8.2)137 (7.5)14 (0.8)5 (0.3)
Duration from time of skin incision, n (%) 0.1310.301
< 24 hrs797 (43.4)700 (38.1)97 (5.3)23 (1.3)
≥ 24 hours1,039 (56.5)887 (48.3)152 (8.3)40 (2.2)
Cephalosporin prophylaxis ceased prior to end of surgery, n (%) 0.143N/A*
Yes51 (2.8)48 (2.6)3 (0.2)0
No1,784 (97.2)1,538 (83.8)246 (13.4)63 (3.4)
Joint and other antibiotic prophylaxis, n (%) < 0.001< 0.001
Hip802 (43.6)739 (40.2)63 (3.4)12 (0.7)
Knee1,036 (56.4)850 (46.2)186 (10.1)51 (2.8)
Non-cephalosporin prophylactic antibiotic agents received, n (%) < 0.001< 0.001
None900 (49.0)808 (40.4)92 (0.5)24 (1.3)
One835 (45.5)691 (37.6)144 (7.8)37 (2.0)
Two103 (5.6)90 (4.9)13 (0.7)2 (0.1)
Received a non-cephalosporin antibiotic preoperatively, n (%) 0.0020.795
Yes756 (41.1)631 (34.3)125 (6.8)27 (1.5)
No1,082 (58.9)958 (52.1)124 (6.7)36 (2.0)
Received a non-cephalosporin preoperatively, n (%) 0.7230.733
< 24 hrs71 (3.9)1,526 (83.0)241 (13.1)3 (0.2)
≥ 24 hrs1,767 (96.1%)63 (3.4%)8 (0.4%)60 (3.3%)
Received oral prophylactic antibiotics, n (%) 0.1160.805
Yes135 (7.3)123 (6.7)12 (0.7)5 (0.3)
No1,703 (92.7)1,466 (79.8)237 (12.9)58 (3.2)

No test of association completed due to cell count < 5.

N/A, not applicable; SSI, surgical site infection.

Unadjusted association between joint and features of antibiotic prophylaxis and risk of any and deep surgical site infection at one year compared to no surgical site infection. No test of association completed due to cell count < 5. N/A, not applicable; SSI, surgical site infection.

Association between SSI and features of cephalosporin prophylaxis

In adjusted modelling exploring the association between antibiotic prophylaxis and risk of SSI, factors associated with a statistically significant reduction in risk of any SSI included receiving the correct dose for weight (aOR 0.68 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.99); p = 0.045, chi-squared test), commencing preoperative cephalosporin within 60 minutes (aOR 0.56 (95% CI 0.36 to 0.89); p = 0.003, chi-squared test), and commencing 60 minutes or longer prior to skin incision (aOR 0.35 (95% CI 0.17 to 0.70); p = 0.004, chi-squared test) compared to intraoperative or postoperative commencement (Table IV). Receiving a non-cephalosporin antibiotic preoperatively (aOR 1.35 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.81); p = 0.044, chi-squared test) and changing cephazolin dose after the initial dose (aOR 1.76 (95% CI 1.22 to 2.57); p = 0.002, chi-squared test) were associated with a higher risk of SSI. The dose was reduced for all but ten of the 853 participants who had a change in dose, and the initial dose was adequate for weight for 88% of people whose dose was subsequently changed (n = 748). The duration of cephalosporin was not retained in the final model as a significant factor associated with the risk of SSI.
Table IV.

Association between elements of cephalosporin prophylaxis and any surgical site infection outcome in adjusted modelling.

Variables in the final modelAdjusted OR (95% CI)p-value*
Preoperatively taking antidepressant/anticonvulsant (e.g. tricyclics, pregabalin) medication for arthritis pain2.42 (1.06 to 5.18)0.031
Total knee arthroplasty2.24 (1.64 to 3.09)< 0.001
Comorbid neurological conditions2.19 (1.08 to 4.19)0.025
Cephalosporin dose changed after initial dose1.76 (1.22 to 2.57)0.002
Longer surgical duration1.48 (1.14 to 1.92)0.003
Received a non-cephalosporin antibiotic preoperatively1.35 (1.01 to 1.81)0.044
Higher BMI1.05 (1.03 to 1.07)< 0.001
Received correct first dose of a cephalosporin for weight0.68 (0.47 to 0.99)0.045
Preoperative cephalosporin commenced within 60 mins of skin incision0.56 (0.36 to 0.89)0.003
Bilateral THA/TKA0.37 (0.15 to 0.80)0.018
Preoperative cephalosporin commenced 60 mins or longer prior to skin incision0.35 (0.17 to 0.70)0.004
Received rivaroxaban for VTE prophylaxis0.35 (0.14 to 0.72)0.009
History of stroke1.59 (0.93 to 2.62)0.081

Chi-squared test calculated during logistic regression modelling.

CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; THA, total hip arthroplasty; TKA, total knee arthroplasty; VTE, venous thromboembolism.

Association between elements of cephalosporin prophylaxis and any surgical site infection outcome in adjusted modelling. Chi-squared test calculated during logistic regression modelling. CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; THA, total hip arthroplasty; TKA, total knee arthroplasty; VTE, venous thromboembolism. A second regression model was completed with deep infection only as the outcome. Factors associated with a reduction in risk of deep SSI included preoperative cephalosporin commenced within 60 minutes of skin incision (OR 0.29 (95% CI 0.15 to 0.59); p < 0.001) and preoperative cephalosporin commenced 60 minutes or longer prior to skin incision (OR 0.27 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.83); p = 0.002) (Table V). Factors associated with an increased risk of deep SSI included total knee arthroplasty (OR 3.04 (95% CI 1.58 to 5.86); p < 0.001), current smoker (OR 2.73 (95% CI 1.36 to 5.49); p = 0.005), history of premorbid stroke (OR 2.41 (95% CI 1.03 to 5.60); p = 0.041), and higher BMI (OR 1.06 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.10); p < 0.001). Change in dose was not associated with the risk of deep SSI (aOR 1.53 (95% CI 0.88 to 2.67); p = 0.133).
Table V.

Association between elements of cephalosporin prophylaxis and deep surgical site infection outcome in adjusted modelling.

Variables in the final modelAdjusted OR (95% CI)p-value*
Preoperative cephalosporin commenced within 60 mins of skin incision0.29 (0.15 to 0.59)< 0.001
Preoperative cephalosporin commenced 60 mins or longer prior to skin incision0.27 (0.09 to 0.83)0.022
Total knee arthroplasty2.25 (1.58 to 5.86)< 0.001
Current smoker2.73 (1.36 to 5.49)0.005
History of stroke2.41 (1.03 to 5.60)0.041
Higher BMI1.06 (1.02 to 1.10)< 0.001
Cephalosporin dose changed after initial dose1.53 (0.88 to 2.67)0.133
Sleep apnoea1.83 (0.87 to 3.84)0.112
Preoperatively taking NSAIDs0.67 (0.40 to 1.12)0.126

Chi-squared test calculated during logistic regression modelling.

CI, confidence interval; NSAID, non-steroidal inflammatory drugs; OR, odds ratio.

Association between elements of cephalosporin prophylaxis and deep surgical site infection outcome in adjusted modelling. Chi-squared test calculated during logistic regression modelling. CI, confidence interval; NSAID, non-steroidal inflammatory drugs; OR, odds ratio.

Discussion

Cephalosporin prophylaxis commenced any time preoperatively was associated with a lower rate of any SSI and deep SSI than starting intraoperatively or postoperatively. Starting 60 minutes or more preoperatively was associated with a greater reduction in risk than starting within 60 minutes of skin incision. Previous research has supported the protective benefits of commencing antibiotic prophylaxis within 120 minutes of skin incision but found no difference in SSI risk between 0 and 60, and 60 to 120 minutes, or 0 and 30, and 30 to 60 minutes. However, clinical guideline recommendations vary, and this may contribute to variation; some recommend administration of the first dose within 60 minutes, and others within 120 minutes, of skin incision. Most of the participants received an adequate initial dose, although this was not associated with the risk of any SSI or deep SSI, despite this being considered crucial to achieving an adequate tissue concentration. Almost all (99% (975/985) changes in dose involved a dose reduction, and this was associated with a significant increase in the risk of any SSI in adjusted and unadjusted modelling, but was not associated with the risk of deep SSI. The initial dose was adequate for weight for 88% of people whose dose was subsequently changed. In contrast to current recommendations, over half of the sample received multiple different antibiotic agents and using additional antibiotic agents preoperatively was also associated with a statistically significant increased risk of any SSI. TKA was associated with a much higher risk of any SSI and deep SSI than THA, and it may be important to communicate this with prospective patients. Consistent with previous literature, there was no difference in the risk of SSI between duration of prophylaxis less than or greater than 24 hours, however the fact that duration of prophylaxis exceeded 24 hours for two-thirds of participants remains a concern, due to the increased risk of antimicrobial resistance. Our study reported an unexpectedly high level of clinical variation, despite inappropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis demonstrated to increase the risk of SSI and antimicrobial resistance. A strength of the study lies in the prospectively collected data in this large multicentre study, and the accurate recording of antimicrobial prophylaxis regimens and surgical complications through robust audit of medical records and verification processes. We collected more detailed data regarding the antibiotic prophylaxis, and surgical and acute care processes, than captured in administrative data. We explored multiple aspects of cephalosporin prophylaxis as clinical guidelines recommend that dose, timing, and duration are all important, and a recent systematic review reported that variation in the timing can influence the impact of different antibiotic durations. There are several limitations to this study. The study was observational, and while efforts were made to adjust for the variation in antibiotic prophylaxis and the impact of known patient and surgical risk factors, we may not have captured all confounding factors. Decisions to add or change antibiotic agents, dose, or duration may be based on patient-specific indications, although we did not have access to data regarding clinical reasoning. The majority of agent and dose changes happened after the initial dose was given in the operating theatre. Given the large variation in additional antibiotics used, data were insufficient to account for differences in all aspects of the antibiotic regimens. We defined SSI based on medical management, including reoperation, but were unable to access pathology or use more stringent criteria to identify infections. Although higher cost and burden are associated with deep SSI, most people who experienced superficial SSI had signs and symptoms of infection, and many of these people required intensive health service intervention, and possibly increased costs and poorer patient experience. The study may have been underpowered to detect association with deep SSI due to the low event rate. The timeframe for the primary outcome was longer than typically recommended, but the experience of complications affects patient satisfaction in the longer term. Further high-quality research is needed regarding the most efficacious timing for the first preoperative dose of antibiotics, given this study has highlighted potential inconsistencies between evidence and contemporaneous clinical guideline recommendations. A randomized clinical trial is underway to explore dual routine use of prophylactic cephazolin and vancomycin, given increasing concern about antibiotic-resistant SSI. Further research is recommended, including economic evaluation due to the high cost and burden of SSI, and to explore the reduction in SSI risk we observed with the use of rivaroxaban for VTE prophylaxis. This study has provided evidence of the association between cephalosporin dosing and timing, and the risk of SSI. While the event rate of deep SSI is low, higher-quality evidence addressing modifiable risk factors associated with the risk of SSI is needed to maximize the value and outcomes after THA and TKA. Take home message - Adequate weight-adjusted cephalosporin dosing reduces the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). - Commencing antibiotic prophylaxis longer than 60 minutes prior to skin incision was associated with a greater reduction in SSI risk than commencing within 60 minutes. Commencing any time preoperatively was associated with a reduced SSI risk, compared with commencing intraoperatively or postoperatively. - The duration of antibiotic prophylaxis does not appear to be associated with the risk of SSI after THA and TKA.
  29 in total

Review 1.  Prevention of periprosthetic joint infection: new guidelines.

Authors:  J Parvizi; N Shohat; T Gehrke
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 5.082

2.  Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery.

Authors:  Dale W Bratzler; E Patchen Dellinger; Keith M Olsen; Trish M Perl; Paul G Auwaerter; Maureen K Bolon; Douglas N Fish; Lena M Napolitano; Robert G Sawyer; Douglas Slain; James P Steinberg; Robert A Weinstein
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 2.637

3.  Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Single Dose Is as Effective as Multiple Doses.

Authors:  Timothy L Tan; Noam Shohat; Alexander J Rondon; Carol Foltz; Karan Goswami; Sean P Ryan; Thorsten M Seyler; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Is There a Difference in Infection Risk Between Single and Multiple Doses of Prophylactic Antibiotics? A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sean P Ryan; Beau J Kildow; Timothy L Tan; Javad Parvizi; Michael P Bolognesi; Thorsten M Seyler
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Association of Duration and Type of Surgical Prophylaxis With Antimicrobial-Associated Adverse Events.

Authors:  Westyn Branch-Elliman; William O'Brien; Judith Strymish; Kamal Itani; Christina Wyatt; Kalpana Gupta
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 14.766

6.  Direct hospital cost determinants following hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  T N Peel; A C Cheng; D Liew; K L Buising; J Lisik; K A Carroll; P F M Choong; M M Dowsey
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.794

7.  The prevention of infection: 12 modifiable risk factors.

Authors:  V K Alamanda; B D Springer
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 5.082

8.  Validity of patient-reported complications after total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kinh Luan Thanh Dang; Helen Badge; Ian A Harris
Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)       Date:  2018 May-Aug       Impact factor: 1.118

9.  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 2017.

Authors:  Sandra I Berríos-Torres; Craig A Umscheid; Dale W Bratzler; Brian Leas; Erin C Stone; Rachel R Kelz; Caroline E Reinke; Sherry Morgan; Joseph S Solomkin; John E Mazuski; E Patchen Dellinger; Kamal M F Itani; Elie F Berbari; John Segreti; Javad Parvizi; Joan Blanchard; George Allen; Jan A J W Kluytmans; Rodney Donlan; William P Schecter
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 14.766

10.  Economic burden of surgical site infections within the episode of care following joint replacement.

Authors:  Ayoade Adeyemi; Paul Trueman
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.