Literature DB >> 35301674

Pain's Adverse Impact on Training-Induced Performance and Neuroplasticity: A Systematic Review.

Nikola Stanisic1, Birgitta Häggman-Henrikson2,3, Mohit Kothari4,5, Yuri Martins Costa6, Limor Avivi-Arber7, Peter Svensson2,3,8.   

Abstract

Motor training is a widely used therapy in many pain conditions. The brain's capacity to undergo functional and structural changes i.e., neuroplasticity is fundamental to training-induced motor improvement and can be assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The aim was to investigate the impact of pain on training-induced motor performance and neuroplasticity assessed by TMS. The review was carried out in accordance with the PRISMA-guidelines and a Prospero protocol (CRD42020168487). An electronic search in PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane until December 13, 2019, identified studies focused on training-induced neuroplasticity in the presence of experimentally-induced pain, 'acute pain' or in a chronic pain condition, 'chronic pain'. Included studies were assessed by two authors for methodological quality using the TMS Quality checklist, and for risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The literature search identified 231 studies. After removal of 71 duplicates, 160 abstracts were screened, and 24 articles were reviewed in full text. Of these, 17 studies on acute pain (n = 7) or chronic pain (n = 10), including a total of 258 patients with different pain conditions and 248 healthy participants met the inclusion criteria. The most common types of motor training were different finger tasks (n = 6). Motor training was associated with motor cortex functional neuroplasticity and six of seven acute pain studies and five of ten chronic pain studies showed that, compared to controls, pain can impede such trainings-induced neuroplasticity. These findings may have implications for motor learning and performance and with putative impact on rehabilitative procedures such as physiotherapy.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Exercise; Motor function; Neuronal plasticity; Nociception; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35301674      PMCID: PMC9581826          DOI: 10.1007/s11682-021-00621-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav        ISSN: 1931-7557            Impact factor:   3.224


  55 in total

Review 1.  Reorganization in motor cortex in amputees and in normal volunteers after ischemic limb deafferentation.

Authors:  M Hallett; R Chen; U Ziemann; L G Cohen
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl       Date:  1999

2.  Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses.

Authors:  Andreas Stang
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Chronic tension-type headache is associated with impaired motor learning.

Authors:  Ann-Maree Vallence; Ashleigh Smith; Abby Tabor; Paul E Rolan; Michael C Ridding
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 6.292

4.  Influence of paravertebral muscles training on brain plasticity and postural control in chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Hugo Massé-Alarie; Louis-David Beaulieu; Richard Preuss; Cyril Schneider
Journal:  Scand J Pain       Date:  2016-05-11

5.  The side of chronic low back pain matters: evidence from the primary motor cortex excitability and the postural adjustments of multifidi muscles.

Authors:  Hugo Massé-Alarie; Louis-David Beaulieu; Richard Preuss; Cyril Schneider
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Central mechanisms during fatiguing muscle exercise in muscular dystrophy and fibromyalgia syndrome: a study with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Peter Schwenkreis; Michael Voigt; Monika Hasenbring; Martin Tegenthoff; Matthias Vorgerd; Rudolf A Kley
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 3.217

7.  Experimental muscle hyperalgesia modulates sensorimotor cortical excitability, which is partially altered by unaccustomed exercise.

Authors:  Enrico De Martino; Matteo Zandalasini; Siobhan Schabrun; Laura Petrini; Thomas Graven-Nielsen
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Cerebellar Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation and Motor Control Training in Individuals with Cervical Dystonia.

Authors:  Lynley V Bradnam; Michelle N McDonnell; Michael C Ridding
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2016-11-23

9.  Does Resting Motor Threshold Predict Motor Hand Recovery After Stroke?

Authors:  Charlotte Rosso; Jean-Charles Lamy
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Subclinical recurrent neck pain and its treatment impacts motor training-induced plasticity of the cerebellum and motor cortex.

Authors:  Julianne K Baarbé; Paul Yielder; Heidi Haavik; Michael W R Holmes; Bernadette Ann Murphy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effect of standardized training in combination with masseter sensitization on corticomotor excitability in bruxer and control individuals: a proof of concept study.

Authors:  Noéli Boscato; Fernando G Exposto; Yuri M Costa; Peter Svensson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Exploring pain interference with motor skill learning in humans: A systematic review.

Authors:  David Matthews; Edith Elgueta Cancino; Deborah Falla; Ali Khatibi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 3.752

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.