| Literature DB >> 35300427 |
Yingjie Ai1,2, Xiaoquan Huang2, Wei Chen1, Ling Wu2, Siyu Jiang2, Ying Chen1, Shiyao Chen1,2.
Abstract
Background: Esophagogastric variceal bleeding (EVB) is a common and ominous complication of cirrhosis and represents the degree of portal hypertension progression and cirrhosis decompensation, desiderating the investigation into sensitive and specific markers for early detection and prediction. The purpose of this study is to characterize unique metabolites in serum of cirrhotic EVB patients and identify potential noninvasive biomarkers for detecting and assessing risk of variceal bleeding and cirrhosis progression through metabolomics-based approaches and explore possible pathophysiological mechanisms.Entities:
Keywords: UPLC-MS/MS; biomarker; cirrhosis; esophagogastric variceal bleeding; fatty acid; metabolomics
Year: 2022 PMID: 35300427 PMCID: PMC8922031 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.839781
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Dev Biol ISSN: 2296-634X
FIGURE 1Schematic flow chart for the identification of EVB biomarkers in patients with cirrhosis. (A) Metabolomics profiling of serum samples from three cohorts including 35 EVB and 35 nEVB cirrhotic patients was obtained through UPLC-MS/MS. (B) Thirteen metabolites were filtered by different statistical analyses in the discovery cohort and analyzed by expression level, functional enrichment, logistic regression, and Boruta analysis. (C) Validation cohorts were used to verify the change of metabolite expression derived from EVB and test their predictive accuracy to finally identify two biomarkers.
Demographics and clinical characteristics of EVB patients and nEVB controls in the discovery cohort.
| Characteristics | nEVB (n = 13) | EVB (n = 13) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, mean (SD), years | 66.08 (7.85) | 64.69 (13.86) | 0.757 |
| Gender, n (%) | 1.000 | ||
| Male | 7 (53.80) | 7 (53.80) | |
| Female | 6 (46.20) | 6 (46.20) | |
| Weight, mean (SD), kg | 63.19 (9.74) | 59.89 (7.91) | 0.351 |
| Height, mean (SD), cm | 160.31 (5.84) | 163.69 (6.25) | 0.166 |
| BMI, mean (SD), kg/m2 | 24.60 (3.58) | 22.28 (2.18) | 0.058 |
| Cirrhosis etiology, n (%) | 0.731 | ||
| Alcohol | 2 (15.40) | 3 (23.10) | |
| Hepatitis B | 5 (38.50) | 6 (46.2) | |
| Schistosomiasis | 3 (23.10) | 3 (23.10) | |
| Other | 3 (23.10) | 1 (7.70) | |
| CHILD score, mean (SD) | 7.46 (1.85) | 6.62 (1.19) | 0.182 |
| Albumin, mean (SD), g/L | 33.39 (4.96) | 33.69 (3.97) | 0.863 |
| Total bilirubin, median (range), mmol/L | 20.20 [10.65–44.35] | 21.10 [14.75–26.90] | 0.724 |
| PT, median (range), s | 13.70 [12.50–14.35] | 14.40 [13.30–15.80] | 0.169 |
| HDL-c, mean (SD), mmol/L | 0.99 (0.41) | 0.93 (0.45) | 0.754 |
| LDL, mean (SD), mmol/L | 1.81 (0.63) | 1.98 (0.97) | 0.610 |
| Fasting plasma glucose, mean (SD), mmol/L | 5.95 (1.77) | 5.57 (1.16) | 0.518 |
| TC, mean (SD), mmol/L | 3.56 (2.02) | 3.11 (1.11) | 0.490 |
| TG, mean (SD), mmol/L | 0.98 (0.37) | 0.99 (0.36) | 0.937 |
| Hepatic encephalopathy, n (%) | 0.480 | ||
| Yes | 2 (15.40) | 0 (0.00) | |
| No | 11 (84.60) | 13 (100.00) | |
| PVT, n (%) | 1.000 | ||
| Yes | 2 (15.40) | 3 (23.10) | |
| No | 11 (84.60) | 10 (76.90) | |
| Splenectomy, n (%) | 1.000 | ||
| Yes | 2 (15.40) | 3 (23.10) | |
| No | 11 (84.60) | 10 (76.90) | |
| Ascites, n (%) | 0.691 | ||
| Yes | 7 (53.80) | 8 (61.50) | |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 6 (46.20) | 5 (38.50) | |
| Yes | 4 (30.80) | 6 (46.20) | |
| No | 9 (69.20) | 7 (53.80) | |
| Diabetes, n (%) | 1.000 | ||
| Yes | 7 (53.80) | 6 (46.20) | |
| No | 6 (46.20) | 7 (53.80) | |
| CAD, n (%) | 1.000 | ||
| Yes | 1 (7.70) | 0 (0.00) | |
| No | 12 (92.30) | 13 (100.00) |
FIGURE 2Metabolic profile of EVB patients is distinguished from that of nEVB controls. (A–B) PCA and OPLS-DA plot demonstrated metabolic difference between two groups. (C) Multivariate statistical analysis screened 67 metabolites with a VIP score of 1.0. (D) EVB group is characterized by seven increased and six decreased metabolites with a threshold of |log2FC|> 0.58 and p < 0.05. (E) Venn diagram exhibited the intersection of selected metabolites generated from multivariate and univariate statistical analyses.
Selected candidate biomarkers.
| HMDB | Metabolite | Class | VIP | log2FC |
| Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HMDB0000893 | Suberic acid | Fatty acids | 1.759 | 0.947 | 0.012 | Up |
| HMDB0003072 | Quinic acid | Organic acids | 1.770 | -3.074 | 0.019 | Down |
| HMDB0000237 | Propionic acid | SCFAs | 2.031 | -0.724 | 0.044 | Down |
| HMDB0000857 | Pimelic acid | Fatty acids | 1.652 | 0.607 | 0.045 | Up |
| HMDB0000048 | Melibiose | Carbohydrates | 1.627 | 0.586 | 0.044 | Up |
| HMDB0000703 | Mandelic acid | Benzenoids | 2.543 | -1.018 | 0.001 | Down |
| HMDB0000197 | Indoleacetic acid | Indoles | 1.220 | -1.267 | 0.044 | Down |
| HMDB0000904 | Citrulline | Amino acids | 2.602 | -0.842 | 0.001 | Down |
| HMDB0000452 | alpha-aminobutyric acid | Amino acids | 2.220 | 1.136 | 0.007 | Up |
| HMDB0000448 | Adipic acid | Fatty acids | 1.765 | 2.197 | 0.012 | Up |
| HMDB0000201 | Acetylcarnitine | Carnitines | 1.608 | 0.589 | 0.050 | Up |
| HMDB0000357 | 3-hydroxybutyric acid | Organic acids | 1.821 | 2.044 | 0.009 | Up |
| HMDB0001987 | 2-hydroxy-2-methylbutyric acid | Organic acids | 1.212 | -0.809 | 0.024 | Down |
FIGURE 3Thirteen candidate metabolites were aberrantly expressed in EVB samples compared with nEVB controls. (A) Expression of selected metabolites between EVB and nEVB groups. (B) Heatmap of differentially expressed metabolites. (C) Bubble pattern of top 25 metabolite sets with enrichment ratio and p value.
FIGURE 4Mandelic acid, citrulline and alpha-aminobutyric acid were identified as potential biomarkers. (A) The Boruta analysis certified 8 metabolites as confirmed candidates. (B) The logistic regression model of candidate metabolites. (C) Mandelic acid, citrulline and alpha-aminobutyric acid were selected with a threshold of AUC >0.80.
FIGURE 5Diagnostic value of potential biomarkers in both validation cohorts. (A–B) Expression of mandelic acid, citrulline, and alpha-aminobutyric acid between the two groups. (C) ROC plot for EVB occurrence.