| Literature DB >> 35300055 |
Gloria Pokuaa Manu1, Catherine Segbefia2, Benoit Banga N'guessan1, Shadrack Asiedu Coffie3, George Obeng Adjei4.
Abstract
Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a group of genetic disorders affecting the structure and function of haemoglobin. Hydroxyurea (HU) stimulates fetal haemoglobin (HbF) and reduces sickle erythrocyte-endothelial cell interaction. However, the degree of HbF response to HU varies, with HbF expression-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in quantitative trait loci (QTL) been implicated. We investigated the relationship between four SNPs (rs11886868, rs6706648, rs7606173 and 158C/T Xmn1) in two QTL (B-cell lymphoma 11A (BCL11A) and Xmn1) and HbF levels in children with SCD in Accra, Ghana.Entities:
Keywords: haemoglobin F; hydroxyurea; sickle cell disease; single nucleotide polymorphism
Year: 2022 PMID: 35300055 PMCID: PMC8922234 DOI: 10.2147/PGPM.S351599
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmgenomics Pers Med ISSN: 1178-7066
Demographic and Haematological Parameters of HU+ and HU- Patients at Recruitment
| Parameter | HU+ (N=64) | HU- (N=46) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 8.10 ± 2.90 | 7.80 ± 3.60 | 0.698 |
| Weight (kg) | 25.5 ± 7.9 | 24.50 ± 7.20 | 0.540 |
| Height (cm) | 129.40 ± 15.90 | 123.50 ± 22.90 | 0.135 |
| HbSS (N=96) | 61 | 35 | |
| HbSC (N=14) | 3 | 11 | |
| HbF (%) | 15.05 ± 11.49 | 9.06 ± 7.67 | 0.001 |
| Hb (g/dL) | 8.46 ± 1.99 | 8.74 ± 1.55 | 0.438 |
| RBC (x10^12/L) | 2.65 ± 0.66 | 3.17 ± 0.76 | 0.000 |
| WBC (x10^9/L) | 9.78 ± 3.52 | 11.48 ± 4.12 | 0.030 |
| MCH (pg) | 32.81 ± 4.5 | 28.09 ± 3.22 | 0.000 |
| MCV (fL) | 91.84 ± 10.15 | 78.31 ± 7.63 | 0.000 |
| PLT (10^9/L) | 335.59 ± 113.49 | 374.36 ± 115.47 | 0.087 |
| HCT (%) | 24.48 ± 4.43 | 24.40 ± 4.28 | 0.934 |
Abbreviations: RBC, red blood cell; WBC, white blood cells; MCH, mean corpuscular haemoglobin; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; MCHC, mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration; Hb, haemoglobin; HbF, foetal haemoglobin; PLT, platelets; HCT, haematocrit; HU+, participants receiving hydroxyurea therapy; HU-, participants with no history of hydroxyurea therapy.
Figure 1Boxplots showing the distribution of HbF levels (log-transformed) among HU+ (n = 64) and HU- (n = 46) groups. Data were compared using Mann–Whitney U-test.
Description of the SNPs Studied
| SNP | Position | ObsHET | PredHET | Hwpval | MAF | Alleles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xmn1 | −158 | 0.380 | 0.308 | 0.0179 | 0.190 | C:T |
| rs 11886868 | 60493111 | 0.370 | 0.324 | 0.2505 | 0.204 | C:T |
| rs6706648 | 60494905 | 0.523 | 0.499 | 0.7910 | 0.477 | C:T |
| rs7606173 | 60498316 | 0.287 | 0.284 | 1.0000 | 0.171 | C:G |
Note: SNPs with HWpval > 0.001 were included for next step analyses.
Abbreviations: HWpval, Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium expectations P values; MAF, minor allele frequency; ObsHET, SNPs’ observed heterozygosity; PredHET, SNPs’ predicted heterozygosity.
Genotype Frequencies for SNPs in HU+ and HU- Populations
| HU+ | HU- | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNP | Genotype | OF | EF | OF | EF | |||
| rs11886868 | CC | 41 | 37.7 | 24 | 27.3 | |||
| CT | 20 | 23.2 | 20 | 16.8 | ||||
| TT | 1 | 1.2 | 1 | 8 | ||||
| 1.790 | ||||||||
| P value | 0.409 | |||||||
| rs6706648 | CC | 21 | 16.2 | 7 | 11.8 | |||
| CT | 28 | 32.4 | 28 | 23.6 | ||||
| TT | 13 | 13.3 | 10 | 9.7 | ||||
| 4.812 | ||||||||
| P value | 0.090 | |||||||
| rs7606173 | CC | 38 | 42.5 | 36 | 31.5 | |||
| CG | 23 | 17.8 | 8 | 13.2 | ||||
| GG | 1 | 1.7 | 2 | 1.3 | ||||
| 5.393 | ||||||||
| P value | 0.067 | |||||||
| Xmn1 | CC | 14.88 | 39 | 38.5 | 9.94 | 28 | 28.5 | |
| CT | 15.23 | 23 | 23.5 | 7.73 | 18 | 17.5 | ||
| 0.046 | ||||||||
| P value | 0.829 | |||||||
Distribution of HbF According to SNP Genotypes in HU+ and HU–
| HU+ | HU- | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNP | Mean HbF | U-test | P-value | Mean HbF | U-test | P-value |
| 11886868 | ||||||
| CC | 15.30 | 397.0 | 0.624 | 8.33 | 239.0 | 0.953 |
| CT + TT | 14.30 | 8.76 | ||||
| 6706648 | ||||||
| CC | 19.43 | 295.5 | 0.045 | 9.12 | 92.0 | 0.452 |
| CT + TT | 12.74 | 8.92 | ||||
| 7606173 | ||||||
| CC | 14.05 | 344.5 | 0.107 | 9.19 | 160.0 | 0.682 |
| CG + GG | 16.52 | 8.57 | ||||
| Xmnl | ||||||
| CC | 14.88 | 438.5 | 0.884 | 9.94 | 198.0 | 0.297 |
| CT | 15.22 | 7.73 | ||||
Figure 2Box plots distribution of HbF levels (log-transformed) within the SNP genotypes for HU- group. Data were compared with Mann–Whitney U-test using a dominant model (ie, homozygous genotypes for the wild type allele versus homozygous and heterozygous for the mutant allele).
Figure 3Box plots distribution of HbF levels (log-transformed) within the SNP genotypes for HU+ group. Data were compared with Mann–Whitney U-test using a dominant model (ie, homozygous genotypes for the wild type allele versus homozygous and heterozygous for the mutant allele).
Multiple Linear Regression Models of Genetic Polymorphisms for Analysis of Association Between SNPs and HbF Levels for HU+ and HU- Participants
| HbF | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HU+ | HU- | |||||||
| SNP | β | p-value | R2 | Model p-value | β | p-value | R2 | Model p-value |
| rs11886868 | 0.313 | 0.039 | 0.155 | 0.044 | 0.076 | 0.644 | 0.051 | 0.726 |
| rs6706648 | −0.377 | 0.014 | −0.206 | 0.207 | ||||
| rs7606173 | 0.181 | 0.146 | −0.004 | 0.980 | ||||
| xmn1 | −0.556 | 0.217 | −0.097 | 0.556 | ||||
Notes: β is the beta coefficient that represents the average change in % HbF per allele copy of each individual SNP (effect size). Dependent variable: log transformed HbF, predictors (constant): rs118866868, rs6706648, rs7606173 and xmn1 SNP. Data were compared using multiple linear regression method.