Literature DB >> 35298806

Machine Learning Prediction of Antimicrobial Peptides.

Guangshun Wang1, Iosif I Vaisman2, Monique L van Hoek3.   

Abstract

Antibiotic resistance constitutes a global threat and could lead to a future pandemic. One strategy is to develop a new generation of antimicrobials. Naturally occurring antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are recognized templates and some are already in clinical use. To accelerate the discovery of new antibiotics, it is useful to predict novel AMPs from the sequenced genomes of various organisms. The antimicrobial peptide database (APD) provided the first empirical peptide prediction program. It also facilitated the testing of the first machine-learning algorithms. This chapter provides an overview of machine-learning predictions of AMPs. Most of the predictors, such as AntiBP, CAMP, and iAMPpred, involve a single-label prediction of antimicrobial activity. This type of prediction has been expanded to antifungal, antiviral, antibiofilm, anti-TB, hemolytic, and anti-inflammatory peptides. The multiple functional roles of AMPs annotated in the APD also enabled multi-label predictions (iAMP-2L, MLAMP, and AMAP), which include antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal, antiparasitic, antibiofilm, anticancer, anti-HIV, antimalarial, insecticidal, antioxidant, chemotactic, spermicidal activities, and protease inhibiting activities. Also considered in predictions are peptide posttranslational modification, 3D structure, and microbial species-specific information. We compare important amino acids of AMPs implied from machine learning with the frequently occurring residues of the major classes of natural peptides. Finally, we discuss advances, limitations, and future directions of machine-learning predictions of antimicrobial peptides. Ultimately, we may assemble a pipeline of such predictions beyond antimicrobial activity to accelerate the discovery of novel AMP-based antimicrobials.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antimicrobial peptides; Database; Machine learning; Multidrug resistance; Peptide prediction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35298806      PMCID: PMC9126312          DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1855-4_1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  154 in total

1.  ANTIMIC: a database of antimicrobial sequences.

Authors:  M Brahmachary; S P T Krishnan; J L Y Koh; A M Khan; S H Seah; T W Tan; V Brusic; V B Bajic
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  APD: the Antimicrobial Peptide Database.

Authors:  Zhe Wang; Guangshun Wang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Acyl carrier protein is a bacterial cytoplasmic target of cationic antimicrobial peptide LL-37.

Authors:  Myung-Chul Chung; Scott N Dean; Monique L van Hoek
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.857

4.  Antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity of cathelicidins and short, synthetic peptides against Francisella.

Authors:  Lilian S Amer; Barney M Bishop; Monique L van Hoek
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  DBAASP v3: database of antimicrobial/cytotoxic activity and structure of peptides as a resource for development of new therapeutics.

Authors:  Malak Pirtskhalava; Anthony A Amstrong; Maia Grigolava; Mindia Chubinidze; Evgenia Alimbarashvili; Boris Vishnepolsky; Andrei Gabrielian; Alex Rosenthal; Darrell E Hurt; Michael Tartakovsky
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  iAMP-2L: a two-level multi-label classifier for identifying antimicrobial peptides and their functional types.

Authors:  Xuan Xiao; Pu Wang; Wei-Zhong Lin; Jian-Hua Jia; Kuo-Chen Chou
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.365

7.  Prediction of antimicrobial peptides based on the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system application.

Authors:  Fabiano C Fernandes; Daniel J Rigden; Octavio L Franco
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.505

8.  Mutagenesis by host antimicrobial peptides: insights into microbial evolution during chronic infections.

Authors:  Dominique H Limoli; Daniel J Wozniak
Journal:  Microb Cell       Date:  2014-06-29

9.  Prediction of Biofilm Inhibiting Peptides: An In silico Approach.

Authors:  Sudheer Gupta; Ashok K Sharma; Shubham K Jaiswal; Vineet K Sharma
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  PIP-EL: A New Ensemble Learning Method for Improved Proinflammatory Peptide Predictions.

Authors:  Balachandran Manavalan; Tae Hwan Shin; Myeong Ok Kim; Gwang Lee
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 7.561

View more
  4 in total

1.  PTPAMP: prediction tool for plant-derived antimicrobial peptides.

Authors:  Mohini Jaiswal; Ajeet Singh; Shailesh Kumar
Journal:  Amino Acids       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 3.789

2.  Linearized teixobactin is inactive and after sequence enhancement, kills methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus via a different mechanism.

Authors:  Qianhui Wu; Biswajit Mishra; Guangshun Wang
Journal:  Pept Sci (Hoboken)       Date:  2022-04-25

3.  Improved Database Filtering Technology Enables More Efficient Ab Initio Design of Potent Peptides against Ebola Viruses.

Authors:  Thomas Ripperda; Yangsheng Yu; Atul Verma; Elizabeth Klug; Michellie Thurman; St Patrick Reid; Guangshun Wang
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-24

4.  Smart therapies against global pandemics: A potential of short peptides.

Authors:  Vasso Apostolopoulos; Joanna Bojarska; Jack Feehan; John Matsoukas; Wojciech Wolf
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 5.988

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.