Surafel Dereje1, Hedija Yenus2, Getasew Amare3, Tsegaw Amare3. 1. Maternal and child health office, Finfinnee special zone health department, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 2. Department of Reproductive Health, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia. 3. Department of Health Systems and Policy, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Maternity waiting home (MWH) is one of the strategies designed for improved access to comprehensive obstetric care for pregnant women living far from health facilities. Hence, it is vital to promote MWHs for pregnant women in Ethiopia, where most people reside in rural settings and have a high mortality rate. Therefore, this study aimed to assess MWHs utilization and associated factors among women who gave birth in the rural settings of Finfinnee special zone, central Ethiopia. METHODS: A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from 15th October to 20th November 2019 among women who gave birth in the last six months before data collection. Multistage random sampling was employed among 636 women from six rural kebeles to collect data through a face-to-face interview. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was fitted, and a 95% confidence level with a p-value <0.05 was used to determine the level and significance of the association. RESULTS: Overall, MWHs utilization was 34.0% (30.3% - 37.7%). The higher age (AOR: 4.77; 95% CI: 2.76-8.24), career women (AOR: 0.39 95% CI: 0.20-0.74), non-farmer husband (AOR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.14-0.55), rich women (AOR:1.84; 95% CI: 1.12-3.02), living greater than 60 minutes far from a health facility (AOR: 1.80; 95% CI: 1.16-2.80), and four and more livebirths (AOR: 5.72; 95% CI: 1.53-21.35) significantly associated with MWHs utilization. The common services provided were latrine, bedding, and health professional checkups with 98.2%, 96.8%, and 75.4%, respectively. Besides, feeding service was provided by 39.8%. The primary reason not to use MWHs was the absence of enough information on MWHs. CONCLUSION: One-third of the women who delivered within the last six months utilized MWHs in the Finfinnee special zone. Our results support the primary purpose of MWHs, that women far from the health facility are more likely to utilize MWHs, but lack of adequate information is the reason not to use MWHs. Therefore, it is better to promote MWHs to fill the information gap among women with geographical barriers to reach health facilities.
BACKGROUND: Maternity waiting home (MWH) is one of the strategies designed for improved access to comprehensive obstetric care for pregnant women living far from health facilities. Hence, it is vital to promote MWHs for pregnant women in Ethiopia, where most people reside in rural settings and have a high mortality rate. Therefore, this study aimed to assess MWHs utilization and associated factors among women who gave birth in the rural settings of Finfinnee special zone, central Ethiopia. METHODS: A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from 15th October to 20th November 2019 among women who gave birth in the last six months before data collection. Multistage random sampling was employed among 636 women from six rural kebeles to collect data through a face-to-face interview. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was fitted, and a 95% confidence level with a p-value <0.05 was used to determine the level and significance of the association. RESULTS: Overall, MWHs utilization was 34.0% (30.3% - 37.7%). The higher age (AOR: 4.77; 95% CI: 2.76-8.24), career women (AOR: 0.39 95% CI: 0.20-0.74), non-farmer husband (AOR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.14-0.55), rich women (AOR:1.84; 95% CI: 1.12-3.02), living greater than 60 minutes far from a health facility (AOR: 1.80; 95% CI: 1.16-2.80), and four and more livebirths (AOR: 5.72; 95% CI: 1.53-21.35) significantly associated with MWHs utilization. The common services provided were latrine, bedding, and health professional checkups with 98.2%, 96.8%, and 75.4%, respectively. Besides, feeding service was provided by 39.8%. The primary reason not to use MWHs was the absence of enough information on MWHs. CONCLUSION: One-third of the women who delivered within the last six months utilized MWHs in the Finfinnee special zone. Our results support the primary purpose of MWHs, that women far from the health facility are more likely to utilize MWHs, but lack of adequate information is the reason not to use MWHs. Therefore, it is better to promote MWHs to fill the information gap among women with geographical barriers to reach health facilities.
Authors: Tienke Vermeiden; Rita Schiffer; Jorine Langhorst; Neel Klappe; Wolde Asera; Gashaw Getnet; Jelle Stekelenburg; Thomas van den Akker Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2018-10-23 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Floris Braat; Tienke Vermeiden; Gashaw Getnet; Rita Schiffer; Thomas van den Akker; Jelle Stekelenburg Journal: Int Health Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 2.473
Authors: Cephas Sialubanje; Karlijn Massar; Marit S G van der Pijl; Elisa Maria Kirch; Davidson H Hamer; Robert A C Ruiter Journal: Reprod Health Date: 2015-07-08 Impact factor: 3.223
Authors: Anne K Erickson; Safa Abdalla; Alice Serenska; Bete Demeke; Gary L Darmstadt Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2021-07-03 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Taryn Vian; Jeanette L Kaiser; Thandiwe Ngoma; Allison Juntunen; Kaluba K Mataka; Misheck Bwalya; Viviane I R Sakanga; Peter C Rockers; Davidson H Hamer; Godfrey Biemba; Nancy A Scott Journal: Ann Glob Health Date: 2022-05-24 Impact factor: 3.640