Literature DB >> 35297221

Effect of polymerised type I collagen on hyperinflammation of adult outpatients with symptomatic COVID-19.

Silvia Méndez-Flores1, Ángel Priego-Ranero2, Daniel Azamar-Llamas2, Héctor Olvera-Prado3, Kenia Ilian Rivas-Redonda4, Eric Ochoa-Hein5, Andric Perez-Ortiz6,7, Mario E Rendón-Macías6, Estefano Rojas-Castañeda2, Said Urbina-Terán8, Luis Septién-Stute9, Thierry Hernández-Gilsoul8, Adrián Andrés Aguilar-Morgan4, Dheni A Fernández-Camargo10,11, Elizabeth Olivares-Martínez4, Diego F Hernández-Ramírez4, Gonzalo Torres-Villalobos12, Janette Furuzawa-Carballeda4,6.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35297221      PMCID: PMC8926898          DOI: 10.1002/ctm2.763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Med        ISSN: 2001-1326


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, Although dexamethasone is approved for the hyperinflammation treatment of hospitalised COVID‐19 patients, non‐hospitalised patients do not benefit from this therapy. A potential drug for treating COVID‐19 patients is polymerised type I collagen (PTIC). A downregulator of pro‐inflammatory cytokines, adhesion molecules (ELAM‐1, VCAM‐1, and ICAM‐1), cyclooxygenase (Cox)‐1 enzyme and the collagenases expression through the modulation of transcription of factor NF‐kB. , , , , The intramuscular or subcutaneous administration of PTIC to patients with active RA (Phase II studies) improved the count of swollen joints and morning stiffness; 57% of patients achieved an ACR score of 50, and 30% had disease remission with this therapeutic combination. PTIC was safe and well‐tolerated in long‐term treatment, without adverse effects. , , A double‐blind, randomised, placebo‐controlled clinical trial evaluated the PTIC intramuscular administration's safety and efficacy on hyperinflammation, oxygen saturation and symptom improvement in adult symptomatic COVID‐19 outpatients (https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.12.21257133v1). Eighty‐nine participants with a confirmed COVID‐19 diagnosis (mild to moderate disease) were included from August 31 to November 7, 2020, and followed for 12 weeks. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 1.5 ml of PTIC intramuscularly every 12 h for 3 days and then every 24 h for 4 days (n = 45) or a matching placebo (n = 44) (sample size is describe in Methodology S1). Demographics, clinical characteristics, coexisting conditions and symptoms are described in Table 1. Ninety‐eight per cent of patients in the PTIC group and 95.5% in the placebo group were analysed by the intention‐to‐treat principle (Figure S1). Of 89 patients at baseline, 64 (72%) were being treated with acetaminophen, 28 (31.5%) with acetylsalicylic acid, 5 (5.6%) with antivirals and 36 (40.4%) with antibiotics. The use of acetaminophen (71% vs. 73%), acetylsalicylic acid (27% vs. 39%), antivirals (7% vs. 5%) and antibiotics (40% vs. 41%) were similar in the PTIC and placebo groups, respectively. No patients were treated with anticoagulants or steroids.
TABLE 1

Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the trial population

CharacteristicAll subjects (N = 89)PTCI (N = 45)Placebo (N = 44) p Value
Comparability of randomised groups

Age (years), mean ± SD

Median

Range

48.5 ± 14.1

48.0

19.0–78.0

48.4 ± 14.4

47.0

19.0–77.0

48.6 ± 13.9

48.0

22.0–78.0

.9917
18–39 years, n (%)24 (27.0)13 (28.9)11 (25.0).7585
40–64 years, n (%)52 (58.4)25 (55.6)27 (61.4)
65+ years, n (%)13 (14.6)7 (16.3)6 (13.6)
Male sex, n (%)37 (41.6)18 (40.0)19 (44.2).9008

BMI (kg/m2), mean ±SD

Median

Range

28.0 ± 4.5

27.9

18.6–40.8

27.8 ± 4.5

27.9

18.6–40.3

28.2 ± 4.5

27.7

20.1–40.8

.7934
Overweight, n (%)39 (43.8)21 (46.7)18 (40.1).3847
Obesity, n (%)25 (28.1)11 (25.0)14 (32.5).4758

Baseline Guangzhou Severity Index,

mean ± SD

Median

Range

87.6 ± 25.9

90.1

29.4–137.5

87.9 ± 30.2

92.0

29.4–135.1

87.3 ± 20.8

88.7

35.5–137.5

.4362

Baseline Chest CT Score

<20%

≥20%

20–50%

>50%

53 (59.6)

20 (22.5)

27 (60.0)

8 (17.8)

5 (11.1)

3 (6.7)

26 (59.1)

12 (27.3)

12 (27.3)

0 (0.0)

.3353

Days from symptom onset to onset of treatment

(Median, IQR)

7.0 (4.0)

7.0 (4.0)

7.0 (4.0)

.7257

Oxygen Saturation
pSO2 ≤ 92% (%)28 (31.5)13 (28.5)16 (36.4).325

pSO2; mean ± SD

Median

IQR

92 ± 2.5

92.0

–91 to 94

93 ± 2.0

93

–91 to 95

92 ± 2.9

92

–91 to 93

.252
Laboratory variables
Complete blood count

Leukocyte count (×103/μl), mean ± SD

Median

Range

5.87 ± 2.08

5.30

2.80–12.50

6.03 ± 2.04

5.60

2.80–12.40

5.70 ± 2.13

5.00

3.00–12.50

.240b

Haemoglobin (g/dl), mean ± SD

Median

Range

15.48 ± 1.72

15.30

10.50–20.10

15.50 ± 1.80

15.40

11.90–20.10

15.45 ± 1.66

15.15

10.50–18.70

.743a

Platelets (K/μl), mean ± SD

Median

Range

273.80 ± 116.16

249

73–910

283.18 ± 130.35

249

148–910

264.20 ± 100.21

250

73–568

.625b

Lymphocyte count (%), mean ± SD

Median

Range

30.13 ± 10.79

30.80

8–57

30.15 ± 10.99

31.40

8.1–57

30.13 ± 10.72

30.45

8–54

0.866a

Neutrophil count (%), mean ± SD

Median

Range

60.05 ± 11.23

58.70

31–82

59.89 ± 11.82

58.70

31–81

60.22 ± 10.73

58.85

39–82

.835a

Neutrophil‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR), mean ± SD

Median

Range

2.58 ± 1.91

1.88

0.54–10.25

2.62 ± 2.05

1.81

0.54–9.93

2.53 ± 1.78

1.91

0.72–10.25

.931b
Liver function test (LFT)

Total bilirubin (mg/dl), mean ± SD

Median

Range

0.62 ± 0.28

0.56

0.18–1.87

0.62 ± 0.24

0.54

0.26–1.34

0.62 ± 0.33

0.57

0.18–1.87

.709b

Direct bilirubin (mg/dl), mean ± SD

Median

Range

0.13 ± 0.07

0.11

0.03–0.44

0.13 ± 0.06

0.11

0.04–0.33

0.14 ± 0.08

0.12

0.03–0.44

.372b

Indirect bilirubin (mg/dl), mean ± SD

Median

Range

0.49 ± 0.22

0.45

0.15–1.56

0.49 ± 0.19

0.45

0.22–1.11

0.49 ± 0.26

0.46

0.15–1.56

.617b

Aminotransferase, serum aspartate (AST) (U/L), mean ± SD

Median

Range

31.09 ± 20.82

26

9–158

28.39 ± 15.60

22

11–83

33.87 ± 24.97

27.50

9 –1 58

.150b

Aminotransferase, serum alanine (ALT) (U/L), mean ± SD

Median

Range

37.42 ± 28.14

29.80

7–129.80

35.64 ±29.90

23

9–129.80

39.24 ± 26.43

31.50

7–120

.176b

Albumin (g/dl), mean ± SD

Median

Range

4.35 ± 0.44

4.34

2.55–5.71

4.40 ± 0.50

4.43

2.55–5.71

4.32 ± 0.38

4.30

3.52–5.45

.189b

Fasting glucose (mg/dl)

Mean ± SD

Median

Range

116.75 ± 61.85

98

66–386

119.31 ± 64.32

102

66–386

114.14 ± 59.86

96.50

72–354

.380b

Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (U/L)

Mean ± SD

Median

Range

166.70 ± 50.59

155

97–325

165.09 ± 60.76

150

97–325

168.34 ± 38.15

160

99–311

.500b

C‐reactive protein (high sensitivity) (mg/dl)

Mean ± SD

Median

Range

1.63 ± 2.58

0.73

0.02–16.47

1.32 ± 2.67

0.50

0.05–16.47

1.95 ± 2.49

0.97

0.02–11.49

.650b

Ferritin (ng/ml)

Mean ± SD

Median

Range

243.46 ± 285.20

161.70

4–1614.40

235.14 ± 293.70

161.70

4–1614.40

251.96 ± 279.39

161.45

5.60–1277

.599b

D‐dimer (ng/dl)

Mean ± SD

Median

Range

1106.74 ± 3537.99

456

185–29948

1732.33 ± 4916.88

491

185–29948

466.93 ± 225.22

417

210–1264

.226b

Summary of comorbidities
None, n (%)9 (10.1)6 (13.3)3 (6.8).3645
One, n (%)17 (19.1)7 (15.5)10 (22.7)
2 or More, n (%)63 (70.8)32 (71.1)31 (70.5)
Clinical Comorbidities
History or current tobacco use, n (%)15 (16.9)7 (15.5)8 (18.1).7762
Overweight, n (%)39 (43.8)21 (46.6)18 (40.1).3847
Obesity, n (%)25 (28.1)11 (24.4)14 (31.8).4758
Hypertension, n (%)18 (20.2)11 (24.4)7 (15.9).2640
Diabetes, n (%)15 (16.9)8 (17.7)7 (15.9).7393
Dyslipidaemia, n (%)15 (16.9)11 (24.4)4 (9.1).0418
Hypertriglyceridemia, n (%)43 (48.3)22 (48.8)21 (47.7).7486
Coronary artery disease, n (%)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Congestive heart failure, n (%)1 (1.1)0 (0.0)1 (2.3).3201
Chronic respiratory disease (emphysema), n (%)2 (2.3)1 (2.3)1 (2.3).9869
Asthma, n (%)4 (4.5)0 (0.0)4 (9.1).0429
Chronic liver disease (chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis), n (%)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Chronic kidney disease, n (%)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Cancer, n (%)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Immune deficiency (acquired or innate), n (%)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Symptoms
Dyspnoea, n (%)33 (37.1)18 (40)15 (34.1).564
Cough, n (%)67 (75.2)34 (75.6)33 (75.0).952
Chest pain, n (%)35 (39.3)19 (42.2)16 (36.4).572
Rhinorrhoea, n (%)39 (43.8)19 (42.2)20 (45.5).759
Headache, n (%)46 (51.7)22 (48.9)24 (54.5).593
Sore throat, n (%)41 (46.1)20 (44.4)21 (47.7).756
Malaise, n (%)54 (60.7)27 (60.0)27 (61.4).895
Arthralgia, n (%)44 (49.4)18 (40.0)26 (59.1).072
Myalgia, n (%)48 (53.9)23 (51.1)25 (56.8).589
Brain fog, n (%)43 (48.3)25 (55.6)18 (40.9).167
Ageusia, n (%)50 (56.2)28 (62.2)22 (50.0).8041
Anosmia, n (%)47 (52.8)27 (60.0)20 (45.5).7651
Diarrhoea, n (%)19 (21.3)11 (24.4)8 (18.2).471
Abdominal pain, n (%)22 (24.7)8 (17.8)14 (31.8).125
Jaundice, n (%)4 (4.5)3 (6.7)1 (2.3).317
Vomiting and nausea, n (%)5 (5.6)2 (4.4)3 (6.8).627
Conjunctivitis, n (%)20 (22.5)9 (20.0)11 (25.0).572
Cyanosis, n (%)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)

aT‐Student; bMann‐Whitney

BMI: body mass index; IQR: interquartile range; PTCI: polymerised type I collagen; pSO2: oxygen saturation; SD: standard deviation.

Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the trial population Age (years), mean ± SD Median Range 48.5 ± 14.1 48.0 19.0–78.0 48.4 ± 14.4 47.0 19.0–77.0 48.6 ± 13.9 48.0 22.0–78.0 BMI (kg/m2), mean ±SD Median Range 28.0 ± 4.5 27.9 18.6–40.8 27.8 ± 4.5 27.9 18.6–40.3 28.2 ± 4.5 27.7 20.1–40.8 Baseline Guangzhou Severity Index, mean ± SD Median Range 87.6 ± 25.9 90.1 29.4–137.5 87.9 ± 30.2 92.0 29.4–135.1 87.3 ± 20.8 88.7 35.5–137.5 .4362 Baseline Chest CT Score <20% ≥20% 20–50% >50% 53 (59.6) 20 (22.5) 27 (60.0) 8 (17.8) 5 (11.1) 3 (6.7) 26 (59.1) 12 (27.3) 12 (27.3) 0 (0.0) .3353 Days from symptom onset to onset of treatment (Median, IQR) 7.0 (4.0) 7.0 (4.0) 7.0 (4.0) .7257 pSO2; mean ± SD Median IQR 92 ± 2.5 92.0 –91 to 94 93 ± 2.0 93 –91 to 95 92 ± 2.9 92 –91 to 93 Leukocyte count (×103/μl), mean ± SD Median Range 5.87 ± 2.08 5.30 2.80–12.50 6.03 ± 2.04 5.60 2.80–12.40 5.70 ± 2.13 5.00 3.00–12.50 Haemoglobin (g/dl), mean ± SD Median Range 15.48 ± 1.72 15.30 10.50–20.10 15.50 ± 1.80 15.40 11.90–20.10 15.45 ± 1.66 15.15 10.50–18.70 Platelets (K/μl), mean ± SD Median Range 273.80 ± 116.16 249 73–910 283.18 ± 130.35 249 148–910 264.20 ± 100.21 250 73–568 Lymphocyte count (%), mean ± SD Median Range 30.13 ± 10.79 30.80 8–57 30.15 ± 10.99 31.40 8.1–57 30.13 ± 10.72 30.45 8–54 Neutrophil count (%), mean ± SD Median Range 60.05 ± 11.23 58.70 31–82 59.89 ± 11.82 58.70 31–81 60.22 ± 10.73 58.85 39–82 Neutrophil‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR), mean ± SD Median Range 2.58 ± 1.91 1.88 0.54–10.25 2.62 ± 2.05 1.81 0.54–9.93 2.53 ± 1.78 1.91 0.72–10.25 Total bilirubin (mg/dl), mean ± SD Median Range 0.62 ± 0.28 0.56 0.18–1.87 0.62 ± 0.24 0.54 0.26–1.34 0.62 ± 0.33 0.57 0.18–1.87 Direct bilirubin (mg/dl), mean ± SD Median Range 0.13 ± 0.07 0.11 0.03–0.44 0.13 ± 0.06 0.11 0.04–0.33 0.14 ± 0.08 0.12 0.03–0.44 Indirect bilirubin (mg/dl), mean ± SD Median Range 0.49 ± 0.22 0.45 0.15–1.56 0.49 ± 0.19 0.45 0.22–1.11 0.49 ± 0.26 0.46 0.15–1.56 Aminotransferase, serum aspartate (AST) (U/L), mean ± SD Median Range 31.09 ± 20.82 26 9–158 28.39 ± 15.60 22 11–83 33.87 ± 24.97 27.50 9 –1 58 Aminotransferase, serum alanine (ALT) (U/L), mean ± SD Median Range 37.42 ± 28.14 29.80 7–129.80 35.64 ±29.90 23 9–129.80 39.24 ± 26.43 31.50 7–120 Albumin (g/dl), mean ± SD Median Range 4.35 ± 0.44 4.34 2.55–5.71 4.40 ± 0.50 4.43 2.55–5.71 4.32 ± 0.38 4.30 3.52–5.45 Fasting glucose (mg/dl) Mean ± SD Median Range 116.75 ± 61.85 98 66–386 119.31 ± 64.32 102 66–386 114.14 ± 59.86 96.50 72–354 .380b Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (U/L) Mean ± SD Median Range 166.70 ± 50.59 155 97–325 165.09 ± 60.76 150 97–325 168.34 ± 38.15 160 99–311 .500b C‐reactive protein (high sensitivity) (mg/dl) Mean ± SD Median Range 1.63 ± 2.58 0.73 0.02–16.47 1.32 ± 2.67 0.50 0.05–16.47 1.95 ± 2.49 0.97 0.02–11.49 .650b Ferritin (ng/ml) Mean ± SD Median Range 243.46 ± 285.20 161.70 4–1614.40 235.14 ± 293.70 161.70 4–1614.40 251.96 ± 279.39 161.45 5.60–1277 .599b D‐dimer (ng/dl) Mean ± SD Median Range 1106.74 ± 3537.99 456 185–29948 1732.33 ± 4916.88 491 185–29948 466.93 ± 225.22 417 210–1264 .226b aT‐Student; bMann‐Whitney BMI: body mass index; IQR: interquartile range; PTCI: polymerised type I collagen; pSO2: oxygen saturation; SD: standard deviation. On day 1 after the last PTIC or placebo administration, the IP‐10 levels decreased 75% in the PTIC group (p < .001) and 40% in the placebo group (p = .015) vs. baseline; this reduction was greater in the former group than in the latter (p = .0047; Figure 1A and F). The IL‐8 (44%, p = .045), M‐CSF (25%, p = .041) and IL‐1Ra (36%, p = .05) levels were also decreased in PTIC group vs. baseline (Figure 1B–F). TRAIL levels were decreased in the placebo group (14%, p = .002) vs. baseline (Figures 1E and S2).
FIGURE 1

Serum cytokine and chemokine levels of SARS‐CoV2‐infected symptomatic outpatients at baseline and day 8 post‐treatment with PTIC or placebo. Data are expressed as median with 95% confidence. (A) IP‐10, IFN‐γ inducible protein‐10; (B) IL‐8, Interleukin‐8; (C) M‐CSF, Macrophage colony‐stimulating factor; (D) IL‐1Ra, IL‐1 receptor antagonist; (E) TRAIL, TNF‐related apoptosis inducing ligand; and (F) Forest plot (95% confidence intervals)

Serum cytokine and chemokine levels of SARS‐CoV2‐infected symptomatic outpatients at baseline and day 8 post‐treatment with PTIC or placebo. Data are expressed as median with 95% confidence. (A) IP‐10, IFN‐γ inducible protein‐10; (B) IL‐8, Interleukin‐8; (C) M‐CSF, Macrophage colony‐stimulating factor; (D) IL‐1Ra, IL‐1 receptor antagonist; (E) TRAIL, TNF‐related apoptosis inducing ligand; and (F) Forest plot (95% confidence intervals) On days 1, 8 and 90 after the last PTIC or placebo administration, the patient percentage with oxygen saturation readings ≥92% in the PTIC and placebo groups were 90% vs. 67% (p = .007; mean oxygen saturation: 94 ± 2.4 vs. 93 ± 3.3, p = .085), 98% vs. 80% (p = .009; mean oxygen saturation; 95 ± 1.7 vs. 93 ± 2.2, p = .003) and 100% vs. 89% (p = .033; mean oxygen saturation: 95 ± 2.1 vs. 95 ± 2.3, p = .429), respectively (Table 2).
TABLE 2

Study endpoints

Characteristic1 day post‐treatment with8 days post‐treatment with90 days post‐treatment with
PTIC (N = 44)Placebo (N = 43) p ValuePTIC (N = 42)Placebo (N = 39) p ValuePTIC (N = 40)Placebo (N = 37) p Value
SpO2 ≥ 92%, n (%)40 (90.1)29 (67.4).00741 (97.6)31 (79.5).00940 (100)33 (89.2).033

pSO2; mean ± SD

Median

IQR

94 ± 2.4

94

92–95

93 ± 3.3

93

91–95

.085

95 ± 1.7

95

93–96

93 ± 2.2

93

92–95

.003

95 ± 2.1

95

93–97

95 ± 2.3

95

93–97

.429
O2 supplementation, n (%)2 (4.5)4 (9.3).3811 (2.3)1 (2.6).9580 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Inpatient admissions0 (0.0)3 (7.0).0750 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Symptoms

Dyspnoea, n (%)

Δ (%)

6 (13.6)

–66.6

10 (25.6)

–33.3

.166

3 (7.1)

–83.3

9 (23.1)

–40

.044

6 (15)

–66.6

6 (16.2)

–60

.883

Cough, n (%)

Δ (%)

17 (38.6)

–50

22 (56.4)

–33.3

.105

11 (26.2)

–67.6

21 (53.8)

–36.3

.011

4 (10)

–88.2

6 (16.2)

–81.8

.418

Chest pain, n (%)

Δ (%)

8 (18.2)

–57.8

9 (23.1)

–43.7

.581

5 (11.9)

–73.6

6 (15.4)

–62.5

.648

7 (17.5)

–63.1

1 (2.7)

–93.7

.033

Rhinorrhoea, n (%)

Δ (%)

9 (20.5)

–52.6

9 (41)

–55.0

.772

6 (14.3)

–68.4

6 (15.4)

0.0

.889

5 (12.5)

–73.6

3 (8.1)

–85.0

.528

Headache, n (%)

Δ (%)

12 (27.3)

–45.4

16 (41)

–33.3

.186

9 (21.4)

–59.0

15 (38.5)

–37.5

.093

10 (25)

–54.5

14 (37.8)

–41.6

.224

Sore throat, n (%)

Δ (%)

9 (30.5)

–55.0

10 (25.6)

–52.3

.575

5 (11.9)

–75.0

6 (15.4)

–71.4

.648

6 (15)

–70.0

7 (18.9)

–66.6

.646

Malaise, n (%)

Δ (%)

16 (36.4)

–40.7

18 (46.2)

–33.3

.365

12 (28.6)

–55.5

11 (28.2)

–59.2

.971

11 (27.5)

–59.2

8 (21.6)

–70.3

.374

Arthralgia, n (%)

Δ (%)

8 (18.2)

–55.5

8 (20.5)

–69.2

.788

6 (14.3)

–66.6

6 (15.4)

–76.9

.889

7 (17.5)

–61.1

8 (21.6)

–69.2

.648

Myalgia, n (%)

Δ (%)

12 (27.3)

–47.8

11 (28.2)

–56.0

.925

5 (11.9)

–78.2

6 (15.4)

–76.0

.648

7 (17.5)

–69.5

3 (8.1)

–88.0

.221

Brain fog, n (%)

Δ (%)

7 (15.9)

–72.0

12 (30.8)

–33.3

.108

6 (14.3)

–76.0

7 (17.9)

–61.1

.654

9 (22.5)

–64.0

10 (27)

–44.4

.645

Ageusia, n (%)

Δ (%)

18 (40.9)

–37.9

13 (33.3)

–31.5

.476

11 (26.2)

–62.0

8 (20.5)

–57.8

.547

5 (12.5)

–82.7

4 (10.8)

–78.9

.818

Anosmia, n (%)

Δ (%)

23 (52.3)

23.33

13 (33.3)

35.0

.082

16 (38.1)

46.6

9 (23.1)

55

.144

6 (15)

80.0

2 (5.4)

90.0

.168

Diarrhoea, n (%)

Δ (%)

4 (9.1)

–63.63

6 (15.4)

–25

.379

3 (7.1)

–72.7

2 (5.1)

–75

.707

1 (2.5)

–90.9

0 (0.0)

–100.0

.333

Abdominal pain, n (%)

Δ (%)

5 (11.4)

–37.5

6 (15.4)

–57.1

.590

0 (0.0)

–100.0

3 (7.7)

–78.5

.067

1 (2.5)

–87.5

3 (8.1)

–78.5

.268

Jaundice, n (%)

Δ (%)

0 (0.0)

–100.0

2 (5.1)

100.0

.128

0 (0.0)

–100.0

0 (0.0)

–100.0

0 (0.0)

–100

1 (2.7)

0.0

.295

Vomiting and nausea, n (%)

Δ (%)

0 (0.0)

–100.0

0 (0.0)

–100.0

1 (2.4)

–50

0 (0.0)

–100.0

.332

0 (0.0)

–100.0

0 (0.0)

–100.0

Conjunctivitis, n (%)

Δ (%)

1 (2.3)

–88.88

1 (2.6)

–90.9

.931

1 (2.4)

–88.8

1 (2.6)

–90.9

.958

2 (5.0)

–77.7

1 (2.7)

–90.9

.603

Cyanosis, n (%)

Δ (%)

0 (0.0)

0.0

1 (2.6)

100.0

.285

0 (0.0)

0.0

0 (0.0)

0.0

0 (0.0)

0.0

0 (0.0)

0.0

Δ: Delta calculated by taking: [(baseline data – day 1, 8 or 97 of follow‐up)/baseline data from table 1]×100. p value: PTCI vs. placebo.

IQR: interquartile range; PTCI: polymerised type I collagen; pSO2: oxygen saturation; SD: standard deviation.

Study endpoints pSO2; mean ± SD Median IQR 94 ± 2.4 94 92–95 93 ± 3.3 93 91–95 95 ± 1.7 95 93–96 93 ± 2.2 93 92–95 95 ± 2.1 95 93–97 95 ± 2.3 95 93–97 Dyspnoea, n (%) Δ (%) 6 (13.6) –66.6 10 (25.6) –33.3 3 (7.1) –83.3 9 (23.1) –40 6 (15) –66.6 6 (16.2) –60 Cough, n (%) Δ (%) 17 (38.6) –50 22 (56.4) –33.3 11 (26.2) –67.6 21 (53.8) –36.3 4 (10) –88.2 6 (16.2) –81.8 Chest pain, n (%) Δ (%) 8 (18.2) –57.8 9 (23.1) –43.7 5 (11.9) –73.6 6 (15.4) –62.5 7 (17.5) –63.1 1 (2.7) –93.7 Rhinorrhoea, n (%) Δ (%) 9 (20.5) –52.6 9 (41) –55.0 6 (14.3) –68.4 6 (15.4) 0.0 5 (12.5) –73.6 3 (8.1) –85.0 Headache, n (%) Δ (%) 12 (27.3) –45.4 16 (41) –33.3 9 (21.4) –59.0 15 (38.5) –37.5 10 (25) –54.5 14 (37.8) –41.6 Sore throat, n (%) Δ (%) 9 (30.5) –55.0 10 (25.6) –52.3 5 (11.9) –75.0 6 (15.4) –71.4 6 (15) –70.0 7 (18.9) –66.6 Malaise, n (%) Δ (%) 16 (36.4) –40.7 18 (46.2) –33.3 12 (28.6) –55.5 11 (28.2) –59.2 11 (27.5) –59.2 8 (21.6) –70.3 Arthralgia, n (%) Δ (%) 8 (18.2) –55.5 8 (20.5) –69.2 6 (14.3) –66.6 6 (15.4) –76.9 7 (17.5) –61.1 8 (21.6) –69.2 Myalgia, n (%) Δ (%) 12 (27.3) –47.8 11 (28.2) –56.0 5 (11.9) –78.2 6 (15.4) –76.0 7 (17.5) –69.5 3 (8.1) –88.0 Brain fog, n (%) Δ (%) 7 (15.9) –72.0 12 (30.8) –33.3 6 (14.3) –76.0 7 (17.9) –61.1 9 (22.5) –64.0 10 (27) –44.4 Ageusia, n (%) Δ (%) 18 (40.9) –37.9 13 (33.3) –31.5 11 (26.2) –62.0 8 (20.5) –57.8 5 (12.5) –82.7 4 (10.8) –78.9 Anosmia, n (%) Δ (%) 23 (52.3) 23.33 13 (33.3) 35.0 16 (38.1) 46.6 9 (23.1) 55 6 (15) 80.0 2 (5.4) 90.0 Diarrhoea, n (%) Δ (%) 4 (9.1) –63.63 6 (15.4) –25 3 (7.1) –72.7 2 (5.1) –75 1 (2.5) –90.9 0 (0.0) –100.0 Abdominal pain, n (%) Δ (%) 5 (11.4) –37.5 6 (15.4) –57.1 0 (0.0) –100.0 3 (7.7) –78.5 1 (2.5) –87.5 3 (8.1) –78.5 Jaundice, n (%) Δ (%) 0 (0.0) –100.0 2 (5.1) 100.0 0 (0.0) –100.0 0 (0.0) –100.0 0 (0.0) –100 1 (2.7) 0.0 Vomiting and nausea, n (%) Δ (%) 0 (0.0) –100.0 0 (0.0) –100.0 1 (2.4) –50 0 (0.0) –100.0 0 (0.0) –100.0 0 (0.0) –100.0 Conjunctivitis, n (%) Δ (%) 1 (2.3) –88.88 1 (2.6) –90.9 1 (2.4) –88.8 1 (2.6) –90.9 2 (5.0) –77.7 1 (2.7) –90.9 Cyanosis, n (%) Δ (%) 0 (0.0) 0.0 1 (2.6) 100.0 0 (0.0) 0.0 0 (0.0) 0.0 0 (0.0) 0.0 0 (0.0) 0.0 Δ: Delta calculated by taking: [(baseline data – day 1, 8 or 97 of follow‐up)/baseline data from table 1]×100. p value: PTCI vs. placebo. IQR: interquartile range; PTCI: polymerised type I collagen; pSO2: oxygen saturation; SD: standard deviation. The Kaplan–Meier survival curve for oxygen saturations ≥92% while breathing ambient air was statistically different between groups (log‐rank p = .0109; Figure 2A). Since there were no significant differences between groups at baseline, we did not make any adjustments. The Cox regression model indicated that the hazard for meeting an oxygen saturation lower than 92% was significantly lower in the PTIC than in the placebo group (HR 0.25, Wald p value = .0384). When stratifying by age, no changes occurred. Based on the accelerated time failure model, subjects of the PTIC group reached oxygen saturations 92% or greater 2.7‐fold faster than the placebo group at 3 and 8 days (p < .001 in both cases). In terms of risk, this implied that the PTIC group had a 63% lower risk for mean oxygen saturations readings below 92% (p < .001; Figure 2B).
FIGURE 2

(A) Probability of oxygen saturation 92% or greater while breathing ambient air. (B) Accelerated time failure model for oxygen saturation 92% or greater while breathing ambient air among polymerised type I collagen and placebo

(A) Probability of oxygen saturation 92% or greater while breathing ambient air. (B) Accelerated time failure model for oxygen saturation 92% or greater while breathing ambient air among polymerised type I collagen and placebo Symptom improvement was reported daily by every patient and compared with baseline. Symptom duration in the PTIC group was reduced by 6.1 ± 3.2 days vs. placebo (Figure S3 and Table 2). At day 1 post‐treatment, 6/87 patients (7%) received supplemental oxygen via nasal cannula: 2/44 (4.5%) of the PTIC group (one patient received 2 L/min and another one received 3 L/min) and 4/43 (9.3%) of the placebo group (4–10 L/min). At day 8 post‐treatment, 2 of 81 patients (2.5%) received supplemental oxygen via nasal cannula: 1/42 (2.3%) of the PTIC group (one patient received 2 L/min) and 1/39 (2.6) of the placebo group (4 L/min). At day 90 post‐treatment, none of the patients required supplemental oxygen (Table 2). At 1 day post‐treatment, 3/43 subjects (7%) of the placebo group were hospitalised for 5–21 days (Table 2). All patients were discharged alive, and no deaths occurred. On days 1 and 8 post‐treatment with PTIC, serum levels of LDH and high sensitivity CRP (hs‐CRP) decreased (52% and 73%, respectively) vs. baseline levels (p = .002 and p < .001). In the placebo group, hsCRP levels were 3% and 67% lower at 1 and 8 days compared with baseline levels (Figure S4 and Table S3). At days 1 and 8 post‐treatment, D‐dimer levels in PTIC subjects decreased (55% and 61%, respectively); in the placebo group, D‐dimer increased 42% and 32%, respectively Figure S4 and Table S3). No differences were detected in the other laboratory variables compared to the baseline. No serious adverse events were detected (Table S1 and S2). PTIC was safe and well‐tolerated. In summary, it has been demonstrated that intramuscular PTIC treatment of symptomatic COVID‐19 outpatients was useful for decreasing IP‐10, IL‐8 and M‐CSF, all of them biomarkers of severe disease, during the first week of treatment. It was associated with better oxygen saturation values when compared to placebo. Also, PTIC shortened symptom duration. On days 1 and 8 post‐treatment with PTIC, a higher mean oxygen saturation value and a higher proportion of patients retaining oxygen saturation values ≥92% were observed. This could be related to decreased dyspnoea, chest pain and cough. Regarding systemic inflammation, treatment with PTIC, statistically significant lower levels of hsCRP, D‐dimer and LDH, all of them identified as important biomarkers for the activity and severity of the disease, were observed. The benefit was evident in the early stage of the infection (7 days after symptom onset). PTIC was safe and well‐tolerated. It did not induce liver damage, impairment of haematopoiesis or alterations in blood count. We think that treating outpatients with PTIC could potentially avoid visits to the Emergency Department and hospitalisations. As judged by symptom improvement, it could aid in preventing sequelae, such as persistent dyspnoea.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

ROLE OF THE FOUNDING SOURCE

The funder of the study had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. The corresponding authors had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Click here for additional data file.
  10 in total

1.  Polymerized-type I collagen for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Effect of intramuscular administration in a double blind placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  J Furuzawa-Carballeda; R Fenutria-Ausmequet; V Gil-Espinosa; F Lozano-Soto; M A Teliz-Meneses; C Romero-Trejo; J Alcocer-Varela
Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.473

2.  Mediators of inflammation are down-regulated while apoptosis is up-regulated in rheumatoid arthritis synovial tissue by polymerized collagen.

Authors:  J Furuzawa-Carballeda; R Rodríquez-Calderón; L Díaz de León; J Alcocer-Varela
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Long-Term Effectiveness of Polymerized-Type I Collagen Intra-Articular Injections in Patients with Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis: Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation in a Cohort Study.

Authors:  Adrián Borja-Flores; Salvador I Macías-Hernández; Gabriela Hernández-Molina; Andric Perez-Ortiz; Eloy Reyes-Martínez; José Belzazar-Castillo de la Torre; Laura Ávila-Jiménez; María Cristina Vázquez-Bello; Marco Antonio León-Mazón; Janette Furuzawa-Carballeda; Gonzalo Torres-Villalobos; Fernanda Romero-Hernández; Cidronio Albavera-Hernández; Jesús Pérez-Correa; Hilda A Castro-Rocha
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2020-07-22

4.  Effect of polymerized-type I collagen in knee osteoarthritis. I. In vitro study.

Authors:  J Furuzawa-Carballeda; O A Muñoz-Chablé; J Barrios-Payán; R Hernández-Pando
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.686

5.  Effect of polymerized-type I collagen in knee osteoarthritis. II. In vivo study.

Authors:  J Furuzawa-Carballeda; O A Muñoz-Chablé; S I Macías-Hernández; A Agualimpia-Janning
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 4.686

6.  Subcutaneous administration of polymerized-type I collagen for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. An open-label pilot trial.

Authors:  Janette Furuzawa-Carballeda; Antonio R Cabral; Martín Zapata-Zuñiga; Jorge Alcocer-Varela
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.666

7.  Polymerized-type I collagen induces upregulation of Foxp3-expressing CD4 regulatory T cells and downregulation of IL-17-producing CD4⁺ T cells (Th17) cells in collagen-induced arthritis.

Authors:  Janette Furuzawa-Carballeda; Perla Macip-Rodríguez; Angeles S Galindo-Feria; David Cruz-Robles; Virgina Soto-Abraham; Sergio Escobar-Hernández; Diana Aguilar; Deshiré Alpizar-Rodríguez; Karen Férez-Blando; Luis Llorente
Journal:  Clin Dev Immunol       Date:  2011-10-19

8.  Polymerized-type I collagen downregulates inflammation and improves clinical outcomes in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis following arthroscopic lavage: a randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Janette Furuzawa-Carballeda; Guadalupe Lima; Luis Llorente; Carlos Nuñez-Álvarez; Blanca H Ruiz-Ordaz; Santiago Echevarría-Zuno; Virgilio Hernández-Cuevas
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-04-01

9.  Plasma IP-10 and MCP-3 levels are highly associated with disease severity and predict the progression of COVID-19.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Chenguang Shen; Jinxiu Li; Jing Yuan; Jinli Wei; Fengmin Huang; Fuxiang Wang; Guobao Li; Yanjie Li; Li Xing; Ling Peng; Minghui Yang; Mengli Cao; Haixia Zheng; Weibo Wu; Rongrong Zou; Delin Li; Zhixiang Xu; Haiyan Wang; Mingxia Zhang; Zheng Zhang; George F Gao; Chengyu Jiang; Lei Liu; Yingxia Liu
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 14.290

10.  Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19.

Authors:  Peter Horby; Wei Shen Lim; Jonathan R Emberson; Marion Mafham; Jennifer L Bell; Louise Linsell; Natalie Staplin; Christopher Brightling; Andrew Ustianowski; Einas Elmahi; Benjamin Prudon; Christopher Green; Timothy Felton; David Chadwick; Kanchan Rege; Christopher Fegan; Lucy C Chappell; Saul N Faust; Thomas Jaki; Katie Jeffery; Alan Montgomery; Kathryn Rowan; Edmund Juszczak; J Kenneth Baillie; Richard Haynes; Martin J Landray
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 91.245

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Targeting inflammation with collagen.

Authors:  Dennis Schwarz; Marie Lipoldová; Holger Reinecke; Yahya Sohrabi
Journal:  Clin Transl Med       Date:  2022-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.