Diane Qi1, Kamran Abri2, M Rani Mukherjee2, Amy Rosenwohl-Mack3, Lina Khoeur2, Lily Barnard4, Kelly Ray Knight2,5. 1. UCSF School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA. diane.qi@ucsf.edu. 2. UCSF School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA. 3. UCSF School of Nursing, San Francisco, CA, USA. 4. UCSF Department of Family Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA. 5. UCSF Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Homeless street sweeps are frequent operations in many cities in the USA in which government agencies move unhoused people living in public outdoor areas. Little research exists on the health impact of street sweeps operations. OBJECTIVE: This study was created at the request of community advocacy groups to investigate and document the health impacts of street sweeps from the perspective of healthcare providers. DESIGN: This is a qualitative study using data gathered from open-ended questions. PARTICIPANTS: We recruited 39 healthcare providers who provided health and wellness services in San Francisco for people experiencing homelessness (PEH) between January 2018 and January 2020. INTERVENTIONS: We administered a qualitative, open-ended questionnaire to healthcare providers using Qualtrics surveying their perspectives on the health impact of street sweeps. APPROACH: We conducted qualitative thematic analysis on questionnaire results. KEY RESULTS: Street sweeps may negatively impact health through two outcomes. The first outcome is material loss, including belongings and medical items. The second outcome is instability, including geographic displacement, community fragmentation, and loss to follow-up. These outcomes may contribute to less effective management of chronic health conditions, infectious diseases, and substance use disorders, and may increase physical injuries and worsen mental health. Providers also reported that sweeps may negatively impact the healthcare system by promoting increased usage of emergency departments and inpatient hospital care. CONCLUSIONS: Sweeps may have several negative consequences for the physical and mental health of the PEH community and for the healthcare system.
BACKGROUND: Homeless street sweeps are frequent operations in many cities in the USA in which government agencies move unhoused people living in public outdoor areas. Little research exists on the health impact of street sweeps operations. OBJECTIVE: This study was created at the request of community advocacy groups to investigate and document the health impacts of street sweeps from the perspective of healthcare providers. DESIGN: This is a qualitative study using data gathered from open-ended questions. PARTICIPANTS: We recruited 39 healthcare providers who provided health and wellness services in San Francisco for people experiencing homelessness (PEH) between January 2018 and January 2020. INTERVENTIONS: We administered a qualitative, open-ended questionnaire to healthcare providers using Qualtrics surveying their perspectives on the health impact of street sweeps. APPROACH: We conducted qualitative thematic analysis on questionnaire results. KEY RESULTS: Street sweeps may negatively impact health through two outcomes. The first outcome is material loss, including belongings and medical items. The second outcome is instability, including geographic displacement, community fragmentation, and loss to follow-up. These outcomes may contribute to less effective management of chronic health conditions, infectious diseases, and substance use disorders, and may increase physical injuries and worsen mental health. Providers also reported that sweeps may negatively impact the healthcare system by promoting increased usage of emergency departments and inpatient hospital care. CONCLUSIONS: Sweeps may have several negative consequences for the physical and mental health of the PEH community and for the healthcare system.
Authors: Debra J Rog; Tina Marshall; Richard H Dougherty; Preethy George; Allen S Daniels; Sushmita Shoma Ghose; Miriam E Delphin-Rittmon Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2014-03-01 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Joel C Cantor; Sujoy Chakravarty; Jose Nova; Taiisa Kelly; Derek Delia; Emmy Tiderington; Richard W Brown Journal: Milbank Q Date: 2020-01-22 Impact factor: 4.911
Authors: Jill S Roncarati; Travis P Baggett; James J O'Connell; Stephen W Hwang; E Francis Cook; Nancy Krieger; Glorian Sorensen Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Leslie E Roos; Natalie Mota; Tracie O Afifi; Laurence Y Katz; Jino Distasio; Jitender Sareen Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-10-22 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Ronald G Thompson; Melanie M Wall; Eliana Greenstein; Bridget F Grant; Deborah S Hasin Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-10-22 Impact factor: 9.308