Literature DB >> 35296940

Improving Cardiovascular Disease Prediction Using Automated Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring from Existing Chest CTs.

Eldad Elnekave1, Ran Balicer2,3, Noam Barda4,5, Noa Dagan2,6, Amos Stemmer7, Janni Yuval2,8, Eitan Bachmat9.   

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) prediction models are widely used in modern medicine and are incorporated into prominent guidelines. Coronary artery calcium (CAC) is a marker of coronary atherosclerotic disease and has proven utility for predicting cardiovascular disease. Despite this, current guidelines recommend against including CAC scores in CVD prediction models due to the medical and financial costs of acquiring it, and the insufficient evidence concerning its ability to improve existing models. Modern machine learning models are capable of automatically extracting coronary calcium scores from existing chest computed tomography (CT) scans, negating these costs. To determine whether the inclusion of CAC scores, automatically extracted using a machine learning algorithm from chest CTs performed for any reason, improves the performance of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology 2013 pooled cohort equations (PCE). A retrospective cohort of patients with available chest CTs prior to an index date (2012) was used to compare the performance of the PCE model and an augmented-PCE model which utilizes the CT-based CAC scores on top of the existing model. The PCE and the augmented-PCE predictions were calculated as of an index date (2012) using data from the electronic health record and existing chest CTs. The performance of both models was evaluated by comparing their predictions to cardiovascular events that occurred during a 5-year follow-up period (until 2017). A total of 14,135 patients aged 40-79 years were included in the study, of whom 470 (3.3%) had documented CVD events during the follow-up. The augmented-PCE model showed a significant improvement in c-statistic (0.64 ≥ 0.69, Δ = 0.05, 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.06), sensitivity (53% ≥ 57%, Δ = 4.7%, 95% CI: 0-9.0%), specificity (67% ≥ 70%, Δ = 2.8%, 95% CI: 0.9-5.1%), in positive predictive value (5% ≥ 6%, Δ = 0.9%, 95% CI: 0.4 to 1.4%), negative predictive value (97.7% ≥ 97.9%, Δ = 0.3%, 95% CI: 0.1 to 0.5%), and in the categorical net reclassification index (7.4%, 95% CI: 2.4 to 12.1%). Automatically generated CAC scores from existing CTs can aid in CVD risk determination, improving model performance when used on top of existing predictors. Use of existing CTs avoids most pitfalls currently cited against the routine use of CAC in CVD predictions (e.g., additional radiation exposure), and thus affords a net gain in predictive accuracy.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular disease prediction; Coronary artery calcium; Machine learning; Neural network

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35296940      PMCID: PMC9485503          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-021-00575-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.903


  22 in total

1.  2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  David C Goff; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Glen Bennett; Sean Coady; Ralph B D'Agostino; Raymond Gibbons; Philip Greenland; Daniel T Lackland; Daniel Levy; Christopher J O'Donnell; Jennifer G Robinson; J Sanford Schwartz; Susan T Shero; Sidney C Smith; Paul Sorlie; Neil J Stone; Peter W F Wilson; Harmon S Jordan; Lev Nevo; Janusz Wnek; Jeffrey L Anderson; Jonathan L Halperin; Nancy M Albert; Biykem Bozkurt; Ralph G Brindis; Lesley H Curtis; David DeMets; Judith S Hochman; Richard J Kovacs; E Magnus Ohman; Susan J Pressler; Frank W Sellke; Win-Kuang Shen; Sidney C Smith; Gordon F Tomaselli
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Coronary artery calcium score and risk classification for coronary heart disease prediction.

Authors:  Tamar S Polonsky; Robyn L McClelland; Neal W Jorgensen; Diane E Bild; Gregory L Burke; Alan D Guerci; Philip Greenland
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Coronary artery and thoracic calcium on noncontrast thoracic CT scans: comparison of ungated and gated examinations in patients from the COPD Gene cohort.

Authors:  Matthew J Budoff; Khurram Nasir; Gregory L Kinney; John E Hokanson; R Graham Barr; Robert Steiner; Hrudaya Nath; Carmen Lopez-Garcia; Jennifer Black-Shinn; Richard Casaburi
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2010-11-22

4.  Machine learning of clinical variables and coronary artery calcium scoring for the prediction of obstructive coronary artery disease on coronary computed tomography angiography: analysis from the CONFIRM registry.

Authors:  Subhi J Al'Aref; Gabriel Maliakal; Gurpreet Singh; Alexander R van Rosendael; Xiaoyue Ma; Zhuoran Xu; Omar Al Hussein Alawamlh; Benjamin Lee; Mohit Pandey; Stephan Achenbach; Mouaz H Al-Mallah; Daniele Andreini; Jeroen J Bax; Daniel S Berman; Matthew J Budoff; Filippo Cademartiri; Tracy Q Callister; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Kavitha Chinnaiyan; Benjamin J W Chow; Ricardo C Cury; Augustin DeLago; Gudrun Feuchtner; Martin Hadamitzky; Joerg Hausleiter; Philipp A Kaufmann; Yong-Jin Kim; Jonathon A Leipsic; Erica Maffei; Hugo Marques; Pedro de Araújo Gonçalves; Gianluca Pontone; Gilbert L Raff; Ronen Rubinshtein; Todd C Villines; Heidi Gransar; Yao Lu; Erica C Jones; Jessica M Peña; Fay Y Lin; James K Min; Leslee J Shaw
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Quantification of coronary artery calcium in nongated CT to predict cardiovascular events in male lung cancer screening participants: results of the NELSON study.

Authors:  Richard A P Takx; Ivana Išgum; Martin J Willemink; Yolanda van der Graaf; Harry J de Koning; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Matthijs Oudkerk; Tim Leiner; Pim A de Jong
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2014-11-20

6.  Association of Coronary Artery Calcium Score vs Age With Cardiovascular Risk in Older Adults: An Analysis of Pooled Population-Based Studies.

Authors:  Yuichiro Yano; Christopher J O'Donnell; Lewis Kuller; Maryam Kavousi; Raimund Erbel; Hongyan Ning; Ralph D'Agostino; Anne B Newman; Khurram Nasir; Albert Hofman; Nils Lehmann; Klodian Dhana; Ron Blankstein; Udo Hoffmann; Stefan Möhlenkamp; Joseph M Massaro; Amir-Abbas Mahabadi; Joao A C Lima; M Arfan Ikram; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Oscar H Franco; Kiang Liu; Donald Lloyd-Jones; Philip Greenland
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 14.676

7.  Cost-effectiveness of coronary CT angiography in evaluation of patients without symptoms who have positive stress test results.

Authors:  Ethan J Halpern; Michael P Savage; David L Fischman; David C Levin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Automatic coronary calcium scoring in low-dose chest computed tomography.

Authors:  Ivana Isgum; Mathias Prokop; Meindert Niemeijer; Max A Viergever; Bram van Ginneken
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Observer variability in the assessment of CT coronary angiography and coronary artery calcium score: substudy of the Scottish COmputed Tomography of the HEART (SCOT-HEART) trial.

Authors:  Michelle C Williams; Saroj K Golay; Amanda Hunter; Jonathan R Weir-McCall; Lucja Mlynska; Marc R Dweck; Neal G Uren; John H Reid; Steff C Lewis; Colin Berry; Edwin J R van Beek; Giles Roditi; David E Newby; Saeed Mirsadraee
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2015-05-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.