Literature DB >> 35296013

High Systemic Immune Inflammation Index Is Associated With Low Skeletal Muscle Quantity in Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Mohammad Hosein Aziz1, Jelle C van Dongen1, Lawlaw Saida2, Mustafa Suker1, Jeroen L A van Vugt1, Yordi van Putten1, Kostandinos Sideras3, Jesse V Groen4, J Sven D Mieog4, Claudia J Lucassen5, Anneke Droop5, Katya Mauff6, Shirin Shahbazi Feshtali7, Bas Groot Koerkamp1, Dana A M Mustafa2, Casper J van Eijck1,2.   

Abstract

Background and Aims: Failing immune surveillance in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is related to poor prognosis. PDAC is also characterized by its substantial alterations to patients' body composition. Therefore, we investigated associations between the host systemic immune inflammation response and body composition in patients with resected PDAC.
Methods: Patients who underwent a pancreatectomy for PDAC between 2004 and 2016 in two tertiary referral centers were included. Skeletal muscle mass quantity and muscle attenuation, as well as subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue at the time of diagnosis, were determined by CT imaging measured transversely at the third lumbar vertebra level. Baseline clinicopathological characteristics, laboratory values including the systemic immune inflammation index (SIII), postoperative, and survival outcomes were collected.
Results: A total of 415 patients were included, and low skeletal muscle mass quantity was found in 273 (65.7%) patients. Of the body composition indices, only low skeletal muscle mass quantity was independently associated with a high (≥900) SIII (OR 7.37, 95% CI 2.31-23.5, p=0.001). The SIII was independently associated with disease-free survival (HR 1.86, 95% CI 1.12-3.04), and cancer-specific survival (HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.33-3.67). None of the body composition indices were associated with survival outcomes.
Conclusion: This study showed a strong association between preoperative low skeletal muscle mass quantity and elevated host systemic immune inflammation in patients with resected PDAC. Understanding how systemic inflammation may contribute to changes in body composition or whether reversing these changes may affect the host systemic immune inflammation response could expose new therapeutic possibilities for improving patients' survival outcomes.
Copyright © 2022 Aziz, van Dongen, Saida, Suker, van Vugt, van Putten, Sideras, Groen, Mieog, Lucassen, Droop, Mauff, Shahbazi Feshtali, Groot Koerkamp, Mustafa and van Eijck.

Entities:  

Keywords:  body composition; pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; skeletal muscle mass; survival; systemic immune inflammation index

Year:  2022        PMID: 35296013      PMCID: PMC8919513          DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.827755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Oncol        ISSN: 2234-943X            Impact factor:   6.244


Introduction

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains highly lethal, with mortality rates being overlapped by its incidence rates (1). Only 10-15% of patients are amenable to curative intent resection at the time of presentation. Even in this select group of patients, the 5-year survival rate is a dismal 15-25% (2, 3). Improvement in prognostic factors are needed to identify which patients have poor outcomes after resection (4). The host systemic immune inflammation response (5), and alterations of the body composition (6) have received increasing attention in cancer prognostic studies, however, their combined associations in PDAC have not yet been considered. Obstructive jaundice, gastric outlet or duodenal obstruction, and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency are major causes for weight loss and subsequent cachexia in PDAC. Cancer cachexia has the highest incidence in PDAC patients (80%) (7), and remains a therapeutic challenge in clinical practice (8). In general, cancer cachexia is a multifactorial paraneoplastic phenomenon often characterized by chronic inflammation, and involuntary weight loss, partly because of muscle and adipose tissue loss (9, 10). Cancer cachexia is also known to affect a complex network of inflammatory mediators, such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukins (ILs) like IL-6 and IL-1, and C-reactive protein (11–14). These mediators in their turn can affect skeletal muscle through direct (receptor-mediated) and indirect mechanisms (cytokine-induced dysregulation of other organs and tissue systems) (15). In addition, adipose tissue can contribute to carcinogenesis and PDAC pathobiology, as this organ can alter the systemic release of adipokines, growth factors, and multiple cytokines (16). To our knowledge, no prior study has examined the associations between body composition characteristics and the host systemic immune inflammation response in PDAC patients. Therefore, we assessed these associations in a large cohort of patients with resected PDAC. In addition, we investigated whether they affected, postoperative and survival outcomes.

Material and Methods

Patients

All patients after pancreatic resection for histologically proven PDAC in two tertiary referral centers in the Netherlands [Erasmus MC University Medical Center (EMC), and Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)] between December 2004 and December 2016 were screened for eligibility. Treatment-naïve patients of whom a contrast-enhanced pre-operative abdominal computed tomography (CT) image with complete visibility of the third lumbar vertebra was available were considered eligible. Patients with ampullary, periampullary, or non-pancreatic carcinoma were excluded. The study protocol was approved by the Medical Ethical Committees of the participating institutions, which waived informed consent because of the retrospective nature of the study (MEC-2018-1200).

Data Collection

Clinical, histopathological, and treatment-related data were retrieved from the electronic medical records. Information obtained from pathology reports included: tumor grade (well, moderate, or poor), lymph nodes status, tumor location (head, body, or tail), tumor stage (according to the AJCC 8th edition), and margin status [radical (R0) vs non-radical (R1; ≤ 1mm)]. From the laboratory data, we collected baseline data on cancer antigen (CA) 19-9 (kU/L), C-reactive protein (CRP, mg/L), albumin levels (g/L), total serum bilirubin levels (μmol/L), and calculated the systemic immune inflammation index [SIII, platelet count x (absolute neutrophil count divided by absolute lymphocyte count)]. The SIII, rather than the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio or the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, was chosen as the representative of patients’ systemic immune response since the SIII previously showed greater prognostication in PDAC (5). The dichotomization of the laboratory data was determined as previously explained (5). The presence of obstructive jaundice was defined as serum bilirubin levels above 35 μmol/L (17).

CT Image Analysis for Body Composition Indices

CT images that had initially been obtained for clinical staging were used for quantifying body composition indices at the third lumbar vertebra (L3), as this anatomical location is strongly associated with whole-body volume (18). According to the standard Hounsfield Unit (HU) range (19), cross-sectional areas of skeletal muscle, skeletal muscle radiodensity (SMD) (i.e. muscle attenuation), visceral adipose tissue (VAT), and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) were quantified using the FatSeg software (20). Skeletal muscle tissue, including the psoas muscles, paraspinal muscles (erector spinae and quadratus lumborum), and abdominal wall muscles (transversus abdominis, external and internal obliques, and rectus abdominis) was manually selected and identified using HU thresholds ranging from -29 to +150 units ( ) (18, 21). SMD was generated by the software as the mean radiation attenuation value of the whole muscle area at the L3 level. SAT was defined as tissue lying outside the border of the defined muscle area with a radiodensity between -190 and -30 HU ( ), and VAT as tissue lying inside the border of the defined muscle area with the same radiodensity used for SAT ( ).
Figure 1

Abdominal CT images at the third lumbar vertebrae used to quantify body composition variables. (A) Skeletal muscles (blue) (B) Subcutaneous adipose tissue (yellow) (C) Visceral adipose tissue (yellow).

Abdominal CT images at the third lumbar vertebrae used to quantify body composition variables. (A) Skeletal muscles (blue) (B) Subcutaneous adipose tissue (yellow) (C) Visceral adipose tissue (yellow). Two investigators, who were blinded to patient characteristics and outcomes, independently analyzed the CT images. Interobserver agreement was assessed between these two investigators (YP and LS) in a random sample of 50 cases.

Definitions for Body Composition Indices

Skeletal muscle mass quantity was normalized for height, which resulted in the skeletal muscle index (SMI) (cm2/m2) = (skeletal muscle cross-sectional area at L3/(height2).22 Low SMI was defined as an SMI lower than 52.3 cm2/m2 for non-obese men (BMI <30), and SMI lower than 38.6 cm2/m2 for non-obese women, an SMI lower than 54.3 cm2/m2 for obese men (BMI ≥ 30), and an SMI lower than 46.6 cm2/m2 for obese women. Low SMD was defined as an SMD lower than 35.5 HU and lower than 32.5 HU for men and women, respectively (18, 22). VAT index (VATI) and SAT index (SATI) were also normalized for height. High VATI, and SATI were defined as above their median.

Statistical Analysis

Intergroup differences on continuous variables were compared using the unpaired t-test unless the data were not normally distributed (as assessed by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov’s test); in these instances, the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test was used. Categorical data were compared using the χ-test. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine independent associations with body composition characteristics. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were calculated. Interobserver agreement of the assessment for body composition was analyzed using Cohen’s K coefficient. The Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) with 95% confidence interval was calculated using a two-way mixed single measure model with the absolute agreement, for the cross-sectional skeletal muscle area. The ICCs and Cohen’s K coefficients were interpreted using the cut-offs poor (0.00-0.49), fair to good (0.50-0.74), and excellent (0.75-1.00) (23). Cancer-specific survival and disease-free survival were calculated from the date of surgery to the date of an event (death from cancer or recurrence of cancer). In case of no event, patients were censored at the date of the last follow-up. Follow-up was conducted as patients received CT-scans and serum CA19-9 examinations every six months during the first two years after surgery and yearly thereafter, or when recurrence was suspected. Patients who died from causes other than pancreatic cancer were censored as of the day of their death, and patients who had died from postoperative complications were excluded from the survival analysis. Postoperative mortality was defined as 90-day in-hospital mortality. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test was used to evaluate differences between survival and recurrence curves for different groups. For multivariate survival analysis, Cox proportional-hazard regression analysis was used. Patients with missing values for the covariates of interest were automatically excluded from the statistical analysis. Postoperative outcomes were analyzed in a limited cohort including patients who underwent a pancreatoduodenectomy between 2012 and December 2017 in the EMC cohort. Herein, the primary endpoint consisted of major complications defined as ≥ 3a complications according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification (i.e., requiring surgical, endoscopic or radiological intervention under regional-, general- or local anesthesia, life-threatening complications requiring intensive care management, single organ- or multi-organ failure and patients’ demise). The secondary endpoint was grade B/C pancreatic fistula (POPF) (24) In this analysis, body composition indicators were utilized as continuous variables for the measurement of adipose and muscle tissue ratios, and therefore postoperative outcomes were analyzed individually in men and women. All tests were two-sided and statistical significance was inferred at a p-value of <0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 24.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois, USA), and R version 4.1.1.

Results

Patient Characteristics

A total of 415 patients were included, of whom 53.3% were male. Many of the patients presented with clinically marked obstructive jaundice (57.3%) and most of them (91.6%) underwent preoperative biliary drainage. Pancreatoduodenectomy was the most performed surgical resection (83.4%). Fifty-seven (13.5%) patients underwent a distal-, and 13 (3.1%) a total-pancreatoduodenectomy. The median cancer-specific survival was 18.5 months, and the median disease-free survival was 13.4 months. Twenty-four patients (5.8%) died from postoperative complications. Any systemic (adjuvant-or palliative chemotherapy) was administered in 243 (58.6%) patients. Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy during the study period consisted of 6 cycles of gemcitabine 1000mg. Majority of the patients presented with recurrence at multiple sites; with liver and lung metastases in over 75% of the patients with recurrences. Palliative chemotherapy in case of tumor recurrence consisted of FOLFIRINOX (leucovorin and fluorouracil plus irinotecan and oxaliplatin) or Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel. Seventeen patients died from causes other than pancreatic cancer (13 treatment-related, 1 due to a cerebrovascular accident, 1 due to a myocardial infarction, and two from an unknown cause), and were excluded from survival analysis. Baseline clinicopathologic characteristics of the included patients are shown in .
Table 1

The included patients' demographics and clinical characteristics were divided into low and high skeletal muscle index (SMI).

Variables(N=415)N (%) Skeletal muscle indexa P-value
Low (n=273)High (n=142)
Age at surgery, mean (SD), years 66.0 (9.90)67.4 (9.30)63.2 (10.4)<0.001
Sex <0.001
Male 222 (53.5)172 (63.0)50 (35.2)
Female 193 (46.5)101 (37.0)92 (64.8)
BMI, mean (SD) 25.0 (4.3)24.3 (3.7)26.5 (4.9)<0.001
Obstructive Jaundiceb 0.009
Yes 238 (57.3)170 (62.3)68 (47.9)
No 160 (38.6)94 (34.4)66 (46.5)
Unknown 17 (4.1)9 (3.3)8 (5.6)
ASA-classification score 0.016
1 53 (12.8)29 (10.6)24 (16.9)
2 256 (61.7)163 (59.7)93 (65.4)
3 80 (19.3)62 (22.7)18 (12.7)
4 4 (9.64)4 (1.50)0 (0.0)
Unknown 22 (5.3)15 (5.5)7 (4.9)
SMD <0.001
High 230 (55.4)135 (49.5)95 (66.9)
Low 177 (42.7)133 (48.7)44 (31.0)
Unknown 8 (1.93)5 (1.83)3 (2.11)
VATI 0.325
High 206 (49.6)141 (51.6)65 (45.8)
Low 199 (48.0)127 (46.5)72 (50.7)
Unknown 10 (1.20)5 (1.83)5 (3.52)
SATI 0.172
High 202 (48.7)127 (46.5)75 (52.8)
Low 202 (48.7)140 (51.3)62 (43.7)
Unknown 11 (2.65)6 (2.20)5 (3.52)
Tumor location 0.143
Head 353 (84.7)239 (87.5)114 (80.3)
Body 18 (4.34)10 (3.7)8 (5.6)
Tail 44 (11.0)24 (8.8)20 (14.1)
T-stagec 0.045
T1 90 (21.7)51 (18.7)39 (27.5)
T2 239 (57.6)158 (57.9)81 (57.0)
T3 86 (20.7)64 (23.4)22 (15.5)
Lymph node status 0.043
N0 120 (28.9)69 (25.3)51 (35.9)
N1 170 (41.0)116 (42.5)54 (38.0)
N2 123 (29.6)86 (31.5)37 (26.1)
Unknown 2 (0.48)2 (0.73)0 (0.0)
Tumor differentiation 0.097
Good 41 (9.91)21 (7.7)20 (14.1)
Moderate 203 (48.9)138 (50.5)65 (45.8)
Poor 157 (37.8)107 (39.2)50 (35.2)
Unknown 14 (3.37)7 (2.56)7 (4.93)
Margin status 0.011
R1 199 (48.0)143 (52.4)56 (39.4)
R0 215 (51.4)129 (47.3)86 (60.6)
Unknown 1 (0.24)1 (0.37)0 (0.0)
Postoperative mortality 24 (5.78)19 (7.0)5 (3.5)0.155
Preoperative serum markers available
SIII <0.001
>900 119 (28.7)96 (35.2)23 (16.2)
<900 126 (30.4)60 (22.0)66 (46.5)
Unknown 170 (41.0)117 (42.9)53 (37.3)
CRP (mg/L) 0.382
>10 mg/L 111 (26.7)76 (27.8)35 (24.6)
<10 mg/L 191 (46.0)120 (43.9)71 (50.0)
Unknown 113 (27.2)77 (28.2)36 (25.4)
Albumin (g/L) 0.690
>35 252 (60.7)168 (61.5)84 (59.2)
<35 31 (7.50)22 (8.1)9 (6.34)
Unknown 132 (31.8)83 (30.4)49 (34.5)
CA19-9 (kU/L) 0.002
>200 115 (27.7)89 (32.6)26 (18.3)
<200 187 (45.0)113 (41.4)74 (52.1)
Unknown 113 (27.2)71 (26.0)42 (29.6)

SMI, skeletal muscle index; BMI, body mass index; T-stage, tumor stage; CA19-9, Cancer antigen 19-9; VATI, visceral adipose tissue index; SATI, subcutaneous adipose tissue index.

aA median time of 30 days elapsed between CT-assessment and time of surgery. In 3 patients, data regarding length and weight was missing, therefore no indices could be calculated.

bSerum bilirubin levels at the time of CT-assessment for skeletal muscle loss. Biliary drainage was attempted primarily with placement of an endoprosthesis by means of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

cT-stage classification according to AJCC 8th edition.

The included patients' demographics and clinical characteristics were divided into low and high skeletal muscle index (SMI). SMI, skeletal muscle index; BMI, body mass index; T-stage, tumor stage; CA19-9, Cancer antigen 19-9; VATI, visceral adipose tissue index; SATI, subcutaneous adipose tissue index. aA median time of 30 days elapsed between CT-assessment and time of surgery. In 3 patients, data regarding length and weight was missing, therefore no indices could be calculated. bSerum bilirubin levels at the time of CT-assessment for skeletal muscle loss. Biliary drainage was attempted primarily with placement of an endoprosthesis by means of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. cT-stage classification according to AJCC 8th edition.

Skeletal Muscle and Clinicopathological Characteristics

There was a clear agreement between the judgment of the two observers regarding assessment for body composition on CT-scan image analysis, K=0.88 (95% CI: 0.64-1.11, p<0.005). The ICCs in these patients for the cross-sectional skeletal muscle area were also excellent (0.996, 95% CI 0.964-0.999, p<0.001). The prevalence of low SMI was 63.0% in males and 37.0% in females (p<0.001). Low SMI was associated with older age, sex, lower BMI, obstructive jaundice, high ASA-score, SMD, more advanced T stage, positive lymph node status, R1 margin status, high SIII, and CA19-9 ≥ 200 ( ). In multivariate analysis ( ), male gender, lower BMI, high SIII, and low SMD were associated with low SMI. The prevalence of low SMD was 41.7% in males and 45.5% in females (p=0.415). In univariate analysis, ( ), low SMD was associated with older age, higher BMI, high SIII, obstructive jaundice, tumor location, high ASA-score. In multivariate analysis ( ), low SMD was associated with older age, high ASA-score, and low SMI.

Adipose Tissue and Clinicopathological Characteristics

Median VATI was 59.7 and 38.1 for men and women, respectively. The prevalence of high VATI was 48.6% in males and 49.7% in females (p=0.824). In univariate analysis ( ), high VATI was associated with older age, higher BMI, low CRP, low T-stage, low ASA-score, and CA19-9 <200). In multivariate analysis ( ), high VATI was associated with lower BMI, T2 T-stage, and CA19-9 ≥ 200. Regarding SATI, median SATI was 41.7 and 70.4 for men and women, respectively. The prevalence of high SATI was 49.7% in males and 50.3% in females (p=9.21). In univariate analysis ( ), high SATI was associated with higher BMI. In multivariate analysis ( ), high SATI was associated with younger age, higher BMI, higher serum albumin levels, and high SMD.

Survival Analysis

In univariate Cox regression analysis, high SIII, low albumin levels, positive lymph node status, R1 margin status, higher T stage, poor tumor differentiation, tumor location, high ASA-score, and high CA19-9, were associated with shorter disease-free survival ( ). In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, alongside SIII, positive lymph node status, and higher T stage were associated with shorter disease-free survival. Despite the strong inverse association of the SIII with SMI, SMI was not associated with disease-free survival ( ). However, the SIII remained a strong predictor of disease-free survival ( ).
Table 2

Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis of patients’ disease-free, and cancer-specific survival.

Variables**Disease free survivalCancer specific survival
Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis* Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis*
HR (95% CI)P-valueHR (95% CI)P-valueHR (95% CI)P-valueHR (95% CI)P-value
Age (years) 1.00 (0.99-1.01)0.9010.99 (0.98-1.02)0.8401.00 (0.99-1.01)0.5951.00 (0.98-1.02)0.825
Gender Female vs. Male 0.83 (0.66-1.05)0.1161.01 (0.65-1.56)0.9760.86 (0.69-1.07)0.1671.09 (0.70-1.69)0.716
BMI 1.01 (0.98-1.04)0.4801.04 (0.96-1.12)0.3351.01 (0.99-1.04)0.2981.07 (0.99-1.15)0.052
SIII > 900 vs. ≤ 900 1.62 (1.57-2.13)0.0041.86 (1.13-3.04)0.0141.72 (1.28-2.31)<0.0012.21 (1.33-3.67)0.002
CRP >10 vs. ≤10 1.27 (0.97-1.66)0.0871.03 (0.64-1.66)0.8981.38 (1.06-1.80)0.0171.12 (0.68-1.85)0.646
Albumin <35 vs. ≥35 1.57 (1.02-2.41)0.0401.24 (0.57-2.72)0.5901.47 (0.98-2.22)0.0641.04 (0.49-2.21)0.917
Obstructive jaundice 1.22 (0.97-1.53)0.0900.87 (0.54-1.40)0.5591.19 (0.95-1.48)0.1260.70 (0.44-1.11)0.131
Lymph node status N1 vs. N0 1.94 (1.49-2.53)<0.0011.79 (1.10-2.90)0.0192.06 (1.60-2.65)<0.0012.41 (1.44-4.04)0.001
Margin status R1 v.s R0 1.54 (1.22-1.93)<0.0011.20 (0.77-1.87)0.4141.59 (1.28-1.99)<0.0011.33 (0.87-2.04)0.193
T-stage
T2 vs. T1 1.83 (1.36-2.46)<0.0012.37 (1.29-4.34)0.0051.57 (1.18-2.08)0.0022.20 (1.14-3.94)0.018
T3 vs. T1 1.57 (1.08-2.27)0.0171.34 (0.60-3.00)0.4751.66 (1.18-2.35)0.0041.24 (0.56-2.75)0.599
Tumor differentiation
Moderate vs. Well differentiated 1.40 (0.91-2.14)0.1250.86 (0.41-1.82)0.7001.37 (0.94-2.01)0.1040.73 (0.37-1.46)0.374
Poor vs. Well differentiated 1.89 (1.23-2.92)0.0041.16 (0.53-2.54)0.7101.72 (1.17-2.54)0.0060.92 (0.44-1.91)0.822
Tumor location
Body vs. Head 0.97 (0.57-1.71)0.09742.02 (0.71-5.76)0.1890.891 (0.52-1.53)0.6740.95 (0.31-2.90)0.933
Tail vs. Head 0.66 (0.45-0.98)0.0400.25 (0.03-2.02)0.1940.76 (0.54-1.09)0.1360.53 (0.12-2.42)0.414
ASA-classification 3-4 vs 12 1.32 (1.00-1.75)0.0481.53 (0.89-2.66)0.1281.38 (1.06-1.82)0.0191.42 (0.82-2.45)0.208
CA19-9 ≥200 vs <200 1.63 (1.24-2.14)<0.0011.10 (0.69-1.73)0.6971.66 (1.27-2.16)<0.0011.26 (0.81-1.97)0.306
SMI Low vs. High 1.10 (0.87-1.40)0.1540.96 (0.58-1.60)0.8841.15 (0.91-1.45)0.2381.14 (0.67-1.91)0.633
SMD Low vs. High 1.02 (0.80-1.28)0.8940.65 (0.41-1.03)0.0640.99 (0.79-1.24)0.9350.55 (0.34-1.91)0.110
VATI High vs. Low 0.87 (0.69-1.09)0.2200.96 (0.59-1.56)0.8680.90 (0.71-1.12)0.3401.34 (0.82-2.19)0.247
SATI High vs. Low 1.06 (0.84-1.34)0.6260.98 (0.57-1.69)0.9491.09 (0.87-1.36)0.4581.18 (0.70-2.00)0.538

*Proportional hazards assumption checked for the MV models.

**A total of 148 patients had complete data for the MV analysis.

Figure 2

(A) Disease-free survival of the total cohort. (B) Cancer-specific survival of the total cohort. (C) Disease-free survival of the total cohort. (D) Cancer-specific survival of the total cohort.

Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis of patients’ disease-free, and cancer-specific survival. *Proportional hazards assumption checked for the MV models. **A total of 148 patients had complete data for the MV analysis. (A) Disease-free survival of the total cohort. (B) Cancer-specific survival of the total cohort. (C) Disease-free survival of the total cohort. (D) Cancer-specific survival of the total cohort. In Cox regression univariate analysis high SIII, high CRP, positive lymph node status, R1 margin status, higher T stage, high tumor differentiation, high ASA-score, and high CA19-9 were associated with cancer-specific survival ( ). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, high SIII, positive lymph node status, and higher T stage were associated with cancer-specific survival. , show respectively the association of the SMI and SIII with cancer-specific survival. Subsequent to the SMI and SMD, the adipose tissue indices were also not associated with disease-free or cancer-specific survival ( ).

Body Composition Indices, SIII, and Postoperative Outcomes

The associations of the body composition indices with major complications and POPF is shown in . Lower BMI, lower VATI, and lower TATI (sum of SATI and VATI) were associated with major complications in male patients. The ratio of the total visceral adipose tissue area and the total muscle area, as well as the ratio of total adipose tissue area with total muscle area, were also associated with major complications in males. Furthermore, lower SMD, a higher ratio of visceral adipose tissue area and the total muscle area, as well as a higher ratio of total adipose tissue area and total muscle area were associated with postoperative mortality in males. In females, higher BMI, higher SATI, higher VATI, higher TATI, but also the ratio of SAT and the total muscle area, and the ratio of TAT and the total muscle area were associated with postoperative mortality. Regarding the SIII, no associations were found with major complications, POPF, and postoperative mortality ( ).

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the association of body composition with the host systemic immune inflammation response in patients with resectable PDAC. Most patients had low skeletal muscle mass quantity (low SMI) at the time of diagnosis, which was independently associated with an elevated systemic immune inflammation response (high SIII). However, no association between SMI and overall survival was found, despite the relation between SIII and SMI. SMD and adipose tissue indices were not associated with SIII and survival outcomes. Systemic inflammation and skeletal muscle mass have been well studied in pancreatic cancer, however, mostly addressed separately (5, 25–27). Our data showed a strong association between elevated systemic inflammation and low skeletal muscle mass at the time of diagnosis, which is in line with the limited prior literature showing similar results in colorectal carcinoma (28), and esophageal carcinoma (29). Tumor-induced inflammation has been found to contribute to muscle depletion and dysregulation of skeletal muscle physiology with pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukins and TNF-α, as causative mediators (30–33). These cytokines can affect muscle tissue through several direct mechanisms, which rely mostly on the elevation of catabolic activity through the ubiquitin-proteasomal system (15) and autophagy, impairment of myogenesis, and inhibition of muscle protein synthesis (34). Furthermore, the concentrations of these cytokines have also been correlated with markers of systemic inflammation such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (35), which subsequently have been associated with activation of several catabolic pathways (36). To complete this vicious cycle, myokines secreted by the skeletal muscle itself in response to inflammation have been implicated as autocrine and endocrine mediators of cachexia, leading to further elevation of the systemic immune inflammation response (37). Given the observational nature of our study, we cannot state with certainty whether a bidirectional relationship exists between low skeletal muscle mass and the host’s systemic immune inflammation response, or if they are simply concurrent conditions. However, our data gives new insights into the importance of studying systemic immune dysregulation, and changes in body composition in PDAC. New targeted and personalized therapies are being investigated on how these two conditions will change when inflammation might be modified by for example anti-inflammatory drugs or promoting muscle growth by resistance training and additional supplements (15). The impact of muscle degradation by the host’s systemic immune inflammation response has been accentuated by recent trials using omega-3 fatty acid supplementations and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with end-stage disease (38). Furthermore, evidence is building regarding the advantages of neoadjuvant treatment for PDAC (39). Recent studies have shown that muscle tissue increase during neoadjuvant treatment was associated with resectability (40). The SIII could therefore be a useful biomarker of response in patients with PDAC receiving neoadjuvant therapy (41). Hence, we highlight the importance of investigating alterations of the SIII, and body composition indices during neoadjuvant treatment. Despite the association shown in our results between low skeletal muscle mass and elevated SIII, we did not observe an association between low skeletal muscle mass and cancer-specific or disease-free survival. Findings conflict with the few studies on the prognostic value of low skeletal muscle mass for cancer-specific or disease-free survival in PDAC patients, possibly due to the small sample sizes and the heterogeneity of the included patient groups in previous studies (42, 43). Furthermore, varying definitions and assessment methods for sarcopenia and skeletal muscle in cancer patients are used in the literature (44, 45). We found the method proposed by Caan et al. (22) the most suitable since it stratifies the skeletal muscle for both BMI and gender. It is important to note that we have used a purely radiographic definition of low skeletal muscle mass, not taking into account the functional tests (strength or performance) that are included in the current definition of sarcopenia (46). Nevertheless, the measurement of skeletal muscle mass with cross-sectional imaging is the best accessible for cancer patients. Prospective studies incorporating preoperative muscle functional tests may give better insight into the physical condition of pancreatic cancer patients, and perhaps its concurrent therapeutic consequences. Our study has some limitations, such as its retrospective nature, which was inextricably linked to the lack of laboratory values. This is due to the fact that not all patients had a differential blood count, which is essential for determining the SIII. While we believe this is the first and largest study to look into the association between systemic inflammation and body composition in this particular group of patients, more research is needed to confirm these findings, especially at different stages of PDAC. Furthermore, despite their association with disease-free survival and cancer-specific survival in univariate analysis, resection margin status, and CA19-9 were found not to be significant in the multivariate survival analysis. These results are in line with our previous results analyzing a larger cohort of patients with resected PDAC tumors (5). Nonetheless, our study emphasizes the critical need for carefully controlled, randomized trials to answer the relevance of for example the resection margin status in PDAC, as contradictory results have been reported previously (47, 48). Finally, we found interesting differences between males and females regarding postoperative outcomes. In males, lower adipose tissue seemed to be predictive for negative postoperative outcomes, whereas in females, higher adipose tissue indices were predictive for postoperative mortality. However, the ratio of adipose tissue and muscle tissue was predictive for postoperative death in both sexes. These results can be explained by the fact that both adipose tissue and skeletal muscle exhibits sexual dimorphism, function, and regeneration capacity, and in its sensitivity for circulating inflammatory cytokines (49, 50). Furthermore, as the muscle microenvironment and intrinsic signaling are different for males and females, future research should take into consideration gender differences for the etiology of inflammation-induced cancer cachexia, and its therapeutic possibilities (51).

Conclusions

Low skeletal muscle mass quantity at diagnosis is associated with elevated host systemic immune-inflammatory response in PDAC patients with resectable tumors. This finding can open new therapeutic and prognostication possibilities, as the SIII, in turn, was independently associated with disease-free and cancer-specific survival.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by medical ethical committee of the Erasmus and Leiden University Medical center. Written informed consent for participation was not required for this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.

Authors Contribution

MHA, LS, and YP performed measurements of the CT scans. JVG, JSDM, CJL, AD, and SSF provided LUMC cohort samples. MHA, LS, JCD, and KM integrated and analyzed the data. MHA, MS, JLAV, and CJE conceived the project. DAM and CJE supervised the project. All authors wrote, revised, and corrected the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
  51 in total

1.  Influence of resection margins and treatment on survival in patients with pancreatic cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Giovanni Butturini; Deborah D Stocken; Moritz N Wente; Hans Jeekel; Johaness H G Klinkenbijl; Kåre E Bakkevold; Tadahiro Takada; Hirano Amano; Christos Dervenis; Claudio Bassi; Markus W Büchler; John P Neoptolemos
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2008-01

2.  Associations of Systemic Inflammation and Sarcopenia With Survival of Esophageal Carcinoma Patients.

Authors:  Kotaro Sugawara; Koichi Yagi; Yukari Uemura; Yasuhiro Okumura; Masato Nishida; Susumu Aikou; Hiroharu Yamashita; Yasuyuki Seto
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Cancer cachexia in the age of obesity: skeletal muscle depletion is a powerful prognostic factor, independent of body mass index.

Authors:  Lisa Martin; Laura Birdsell; Neil Macdonald; Tony Reiman; M Thomas Clandinin; Linda J McCargar; Rachel Murphy; Sunita Ghosh; Michael B Sawyer; Vickie E Baracos
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  A practical and precise approach to quantification of body composition in cancer patients using computed tomography images acquired during routine care.

Authors:  Marina Mourtzakis; Carla M M Prado; Jessica R Lieffers; Tony Reiman; Linda J McCargar; Vickie E Baracos
Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.665

5.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.

Authors:  Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 6.  Sarcopenia in pancreatic cancer - effects on surgical outcomes and chemotherapy.

Authors:  Miu Yee Chan; Kenneth Siu Ho Chok
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-07-15

Review 7.  Role of Inflammation in Muscle Homeostasis and Myogenesis.

Authors:  Domiziana Costamagna; Paola Costelli; Maurilio Sampaolesi; Fabio Penna
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 4.711

Review 8.  Protein breakdown in muscle wasting: role of autophagy-lysosome and ubiquitin-proteasome.

Authors:  Marco Sandri
Journal:  Int J Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 5.085

9.  The actual 5-year survivors of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma based on real-world data.

Authors:  Axel Bengtsson; Roland Andersson; Daniel Ansari
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Sex Differences in Cancer Cachexia.

Authors:  Xiaoling Zhong; Teresa A Zimmers
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 5.096

View more
  1 in total

1.  Association between SII and hepatic steatosis and liver fibrosis: A population-based study.

Authors:  Ruijie Xie; Mengde Xiao; Lihong Li; Nengqian Ma; Mingjiang Liu; Xiongjie Huang; Qianlong Liu; Ya Zhang
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 8.786

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.