| Literature DB >> 35295918 |
Rui Guo1, Min Chen2, Yangyang Ding2, Pengyao Yang1, Mengjiao Wang1, Haihui Zhang1, Yuanqing He1,2, Haile Ma1.
Abstract
Cancer, as one of the most life-threatening diseases, has attracted the attention of researchers to develop drugs with minimal side effects. The bioactive macromolecules, such as the polysaccharides, are considered the potential candidates against cancer due to their anti-tumor activities and non-toxic characteristics. The present review provides an overview on polysaccharides' extraction, isolation, purification, mechanisms for their anti-tumor activities, structure-activity relationships, absorption and metabolism of polysaccharides, and the applications of polysaccharides in anti-tumor therapy. Numerous research showed extraction methods of polysaccharides had a significant influence on their activities. Additionally, the anti-tumor activities of the polysaccharides are closely related to their structure, while molecular modification and high bioavailability may enhance the anti-tumor activity. Moreover, most of the polysaccharides exerted an anti-tumor activity mainly through the cell cycle arrest, anti-angiogenesis, apoptosis, and immunomodulation mechanisms. Also, recommendations were made to utilize the polysaccharides against cancer.Entities:
Keywords: anti-tumor activity; cancer; molecular mechanisms; polysaccharides; structure-activity relationship
Year: 2022 PMID: 35295918 PMCID: PMC8919066 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.838179
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Advantages and disadvantages of extraction methods of polysaccharides.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HWE | Most widely used; easy-to-operate. | Long extraction time; poor effect of improving activity | 90°C, 120 min | Suppress the growth of the sarcoma 180 tumor cells | ( | |
|
| 99.66°C, 113.81 min | Increased the several cancer cells growth inhibition | ( | |||
| SFE | High yield; hardly effects on the structure; less treatment time | High investment cost; low polarity of supercritical CO2; | 129.83°C, 16.71 min,1.12 Mpa | Anti-oxidant activities | ( | |
| UMAE | High yield; low cost; less treatment time | Structural damage; strict reaction conditions; |
| Microwave power of 570 W, a fixed ultrasonic power of 50 W, 20 min | Inhibition on multiple cancerous cells | ( |
|
| Microwave power of 90 W, ultrasonic power of 50 W, 40 kHz, 20 min | Anti-tumor activities | ( | |||
| EAE | Reaction conditions are mild; Degrad polysaccharides for desirable fragments | Usually combined with other extraction methods |
| First treating with cellulase at 50°C for 24 h and then with α-amylase at 90°C for 24 h, pH 4.5 | Immunostimulatory activity | ( |
|
| Pectinase, 50°C, 48 h, pH 4.5–5.0 | Immunostimulatory activity | ( |
Advantages and disadvantages of isolation and purification methods of polysaccharides.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solvent method | Respective solubility | Organic solvent | Simple operation; cost-effective | Co-precipitation; low reclamation; Solvent waste | ( |
| Salting-out method | |||||
| Column chromatography | Charger property | Anion exchange column chromatography. | High separation efficiency; simple operation | Small loading amount; slow flow rate | ( |
| Different molecular sizes and shapes | Gel Column Chromatography | High separation efficiency; widely used | Small loading amount; unsuitable for the separation of mucopolysaccharides | ( | |
| Molecule affinity property | Affinity chromatography | High separation efficiency; Easily for low-content polysaccharide | Difficult to find suitable ligands | ( | |
| Membrane technology | Molecular weight distribution | Microfiltration | Simple operation; reaction conditions are mild | Low yield; long time-consuming; membrane fouling | ( |
Figure 1Summary of anti-tumor mechanisms of polysaccharides.
Types and structural diversity of polysaccharides.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Homopolysaccharide | Arabinose; | D- | α- | α-(1 → 2); α-(1 → 3); α-(1 → 4); α-(1 → 5); α-(1 → 6); | Single-helix; triple helix; random coil | Sulfate group; acetyl group; phosphate group; methyl group; | |
| Heteropolysaccharide | Rhamnose; | L- | β- | β-(1 → 3); β-(1 → 4); β-(1 → 6) | |||
The different modifications of polysaccharides.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical modification | Ultrasound | Cavitation effect induced the solute component structure changes. | Molecular degradation; the degree of polymerization and molecular weight were decreased; anti-virus, an-titumor and anti-oxidation activities were improved. | ( |
| Chemical modification | Sulfuration | Replace hydroxyl group by sulfuric acid groups on the residues of polysaccharides. | Molecular weight was changed; solubility, anti-virus, anti-tumor and anti-oxidation activities were improved. | ( |
| Carboxymethylation | Replace hydroxyl group by carboxymethyl group on the residues of polysaccharides. | Water-solubility, anti-virus, and anti-tumor activities were improved. | ( | |
| Acetylation | Replace hydroxyl group by acetyl group on the residues of polysaccharides. | Water-solubility and immunostimulation effects were improved. | ( | |
| Phosphorylation | Replace hydroxyl group by phosphate groups on the residues of polysaccharides | Water-solubility, anti-virus and anti-oxidation activities were improved. | ( | |
| Biological modification | Enzymic method | Enzyme-catalyzed | Molecular degradation; the degree of polymerization and molecular weight were decreased; anti-oxidation activities was improved. | ( |
Methods for improving the bioavailability of polysaccharides.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Carriers | Nanoparticles (NPs) | NPs are endowed with a relatively large (functional) surface which is able to bind, adsorb and carry other compounds. | ( |
| Absorption promoters | Chitosan (CS) | CS has the mucoadhesive feature which increase the paracellular permeability. | ( |
| Trimethyl chitosan chloride (TMC) | TMC forms complexes with anionic macromolecules and gels or solutions with cationic or neutral compounds | ( |