| Literature DB >> 35295300 |
Shirin Sultana1,2, Md Nasir Khan2, Muhammad Shahdat Hossain2, Jingcheng Dai3, Mohammad Shamsur Rahman1, Md Salimullah4.
Abstract
The skin mucosa of fish serves as a primary barrier against pathogens. In lesion sites in diseased fish, the mucosal barrier is expected to be compromised, with a substantial presence of potential pathogens. An understanding of the skin microbiome and its functional repertoire would provide important insights into host-microbe interactions, which has important implications for prophylactic measures in aquaculture. This study revealed the skin microbiomes and their functional annotations from healthy and diseased stinging catfish (Heteropneustes fossilis) based on 16S rRNA metagenomics. The OTUs consisted of four major phyla, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidota, Actinobacteriota and Firmicutes. Among members of the predominant phyla, Proteobacteria were rich in healthy fishes, but Bacteroidota and Firmicutes were significantly differentiated in healthy and diseased fish. The diversified microbiome was high in the skin of healthy fishes and did not significantly differ from that of the diseased groups. At the genus level, Pseudomonas showed the highest abundance in healthy fish but was nearly absent in diseased fish, whereas Flavobacterium showed the highest abundance in diseased fish. Linear discriminant analysis identified two phyla (Bacteroidota, Firmicutes) and two genera (Flavobacterium, Allorhizobium) that were consistently identified in diseased fishes. Functional prediction analysis specified that the genes related to physiological functions such as metabolism, immune and digestive systems and environmental adaptations could be highly expressed in diseased fishes. The present study indicates that the compositions, richness and functions of the bacterial community could influence the health status of cultured stinging catfish. Aquaculture-associated pathogenic bacteria may be identified, and preventive measures can be taken for the surveillance of fish health.Entities:
Keywords: Heteropneustes fossilis; aquaculture; catfish; metagenomics; skin microbiota
Year: 2022 PMID: 35295300 PMCID: PMC8918984 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.856014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1(A) Healthy and (B) diseased H. fossilis. (C) The Neighbor-Joining phylogenetic tree of the 32 bacterial isolates based on partial 16S rRNA gene sequences constructed by MEGA X.
Sample information with collection time and sources.
| Sample collection date | Sources | Samples | Replications | Average length (cm) | |
| October, 2019 to January, 2020 | Dinajpur (D) | Healthy | ND11, ND12, ND13, | 15.52 | 13.88 |
| Diseased | DD11, DD12, DD13, | 14.30 | 13.12 | ||
| Narshingdi (N) | Healthy | NN11, NN12, NN13, | 14.81 | 12.62 | |
| Diseased | DN11, DN12, DN13, | 13.59 | 13.08 | ||
| Mymensingh (M) | Healthy | NM11, NM12, NM13, | 16.15 | 13.91 | |
| Diseased | DM11, DM12, DM13, | 14.92 | 13.39 |
FIGURE 2Relative abundance, richness, and diversity of microbiome community in healthy and diseased H. fossilis. (A) Heatmap of OTU at family level with relative abundance. Columns represent groups of samples, rows indicate family OTUs. The color with key scale represents intensity of OTUs from lower (blue) to higher (red). (B–E) Variation of alpha diversity is shown by Boxplots. Non-significant higher microbial diversity in healthy fishes represented in ACE (B), Chao1 (C), Shannon (D) and Simpson indices (E).
FIGURE 3Beta diversity analysis of healthy and diseased group of H. fossilis. (A) Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) of bacterial community based on Weighted UniFrac distance matrix. Each blue color dot represents infected fish and each red color dots indicate each healthy fish. (B) The heatmap of beta diversity index shows the distance values with lower distance (red) to higher (orange). The upper values represent the Weighted Unifrac distances, and the lower values represent the Unweighted Unifrac distances. (C) Intergroup and intragroup analysis of similarity (Anosim). R- value indicates dissimilarities between inter and intra groups and P value <0.003 shows that result was statistically significant.
FIGURE 4The difference between healthy and diseased of H. fossilis at phylum and genus level by network comparison and t-test. (A) The heatmap shows phyla abundance between groups. The key color scale showed the intensity range blue to red (lower to higher) of each phylum. Network comparison at genus level between diseased (B) and healthy (C). Each node represents each genus and node size indicates the abundance of the respective group. (D) The Boxplot showed the abundance and depletion of genera between groups. (E) The P values < 0.05 define a statistically significant variation at phylum and genus level.
FIGURE 5Most abundant bacterial communities that differentiate healthy and diseased H. fossilis. (A) The percentage similarity analysis (SIMPER) shows intensity of bacteria at the genus level. (B) Histogram based on Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) scores represents distinguishing bacterial communities. (C) Circular Cladogram showed taxonomic distribution of bacterial abundance between two groups. Increased abundance of OTUs in healthy group contributed by Proteobacteria, Runella and Rhodobacter, while diseased fishes had increased abundance of Flavobacteriales.
Percentages of top 10 genera in healthy and diseased stinging catfishes.
| Genus | Healthy | Diseased |
|
| 4.78% | 3.37% |
|
| 6.49% | 0.39% |
|
| 1.19% | 8.14% |
|
| 9.42% | 7.38% |
|
| 0.23% | 4.92% |
|
| 4.68% | 14.74% |
|
| 1.60% | 6.01% |
|
| 6.18% | 1.09% |
|
| 11.69% | 7.35% |
|
| 10.43% | 9.12% |
FIGURE 6Functional annotations predicted by KEGG pathway analysis of the microbiomes in healthy and infected fishes. (A) Heatmap shows the changes in KEGG level 1 due to microbial functions. (B) Comparisons of genes responsible for physiological functions between the groups analyzed by KEGG level 2. (C) The Welch’s t-test of the functional predictions generated by the KEGG level 2. P values (< 0.005) represents the statistically significant variation between the groups.