Literature DB >> 35294272

Benefit of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Reducing Hypoglycemia Is Sustained Through 12 Months of Use Among Older Adults with Type 1 Diabetes.

Kellee M Miller1, Lauren G Kanapka1, Michael R Rickels2, Andrew J Ahmann3, Grazia Aleppo4, Lynn Ang5, Anuj Bhargava6, Bruce W Bode7, Anders Carlson8, Naomi S Chaytor9, Gail Gannon10, Robin Goland11, Irl B Hirsch12, Lisa Kiblinger7, Davida Kruger13, Yogish C Kudva14, Carol J Levy15, Janet B McGill16, Grenye O'Malley15, Anne L Peters17, Louis H Philipson10, Athena Philis-Tsimikas18, Rodica Pop-Busui5, Maamoun Salam16, Viral N Shah19, Michael J Thompson20, Francesco Vendrame21, Alandra Verdejo1, Ruth S Weinstock22, Laura Young23, Richard Pratley24.   

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate glycemic outcomes in the Wireless Innovation for Seniors with Diabetes Mellitus (WISDM) randomized clinical trial (RCT) participants during an observational extension phase. Research Design and
Methods: WISDM RCT was a 26-week RCT comparing continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) with blood glucose monitoring (BGM) in 203 adults aged ≥60 years with type 1 diabetes. Of the 198 participants who completed the RCT, 100 (98%) CGM group participants continued CGM (CGM-CGM cohort) and 94 (98%) BGM group participants initiated CGM (BGM-CGM cohort) for an additional 26 weeks.
Results: CGM was used a median of >90% of the time at 52 weeks in both cohorts. In the CGM-CGM cohort, median time <70 mg/dL decreased from 5.0% at baseline to 2.6% at 26 weeks and remained stable with a median of 2.8% at 52 weeks (P < 0.001 baseline to 52 weeks). Participants spent more time in range 70-180 mg/dL (TIR) (mean 56% vs. 64%; P < 0.001) and had lower hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (mean 7.6% [59 mmol/mol] vs. 7.4% [57 mmol/mol]; P = 0.01) from baseline to 52 weeks. In BGM-CGM, from 26 to 52 weeks median time <70 mg/dL decreased from 3.9% to 1.9% (P < 0.001), TIR increased from 56% to 60% (P = 0.006) and HbA1c decreased from 7.5% (58 mmol/mol) to 7.3% (57 mmol/mol) (P = 0.025). In BGM-CGM, a severe hypoglycemic event was reported for nine participants while using BGM during the RCT and for two participants during the extension phase with CGM (P = 0.02). Conclusions: CGM use reduced hypoglycemia without increasing hyperglycemia in older adults with type 1 diabetes. These data provide further evidence for fully integrating CGM into clinical practice. Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03240432).

Entities:  

Keywords:  CGM use; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Older adults

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35294272      PMCID: PMC9208859          DOI: 10.1089/dia.2021.0503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther        ISSN: 1520-9156            Impact factor:   7.337


  13 in total

1.  Development of a New Measure for Assessing Insulin Delivery Device Satisfaction in Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  William H Polonsky; Lawrence Fisher; Danielle Hessler; Steven V Edelman
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 6.118

2.  Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery Versus Sensor-Augmented Pump Therapy in Older Adults With Type 1 Diabetes (ORACL): A Randomized, Crossover Trial.

Authors:  Sybil A McAuley; Steven Trawley; Sara Vogrin; Glenn M Ward; Spiros Fourlanos; Charlotte A Grills; Melissa H Lee; Andisheh Mohammad Alipoor; David N O'Neal; Niamh A O'Regan; Vijaya Sundararajan; Peter G Colman; Richard J MacIsaac
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  D M Nathan; S Genuth; J Lachin; P Cleary; O Crofford; M Davis; L Rand; C Siebert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-09-30       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Hypoglycemia in Older Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Richard E Pratley; Lauren G Kanapka; Michael R Rickels; Andrew Ahmann; Grazia Aleppo; Roy Beck; Anuj Bhargava; Bruce W Bode; Anders Carlson; Naomi S Chaytor; D Steven Fox; Robin Goland; Irl B Hirsch; Davida Kruger; Yogish C Kudva; Carol Levy; Janet B McGill; Anne Peters; Louis Philipson; Athena Philis-Tsimikas; Rodica Pop-Busui; Viral N Shah; Michael Thompson; Francesco Vendrame; Alandra Verdejo; Ruth S Weinstock; Laura Young; Kellee M Miller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  National trends in US hospital admissions for hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia among Medicare beneficiaries, 1999 to 2011.

Authors:  Kasia J Lipska; Joseph S Ross; Yun Wang; Silvio E Inzucchi; Karl Minges; Andrew J Karter; Elbert S Huang; Mayur M Desai; Thomas M Gill; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 21.873

6.  Reduced awareness of hypoglycemia in adults with IDDM. A prospective study of hypoglycemic frequency and associated symptoms.

Authors:  W L Clarke; D J Cox; L A Gonder-Frederick; D Julian; D Schlundt; W Polonsky
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Closed-Loop Insulin Therapy in Older Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: Real-World Data.

Authors:  Elena Toschi; Astrid Atakov-Castillo; Christine Slyne; Medha Munshi
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 8.  Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range.

Authors:  Tadej Battelino; Thomas Danne; Richard M Bergenstal; Stephanie A Amiel; Roy Beck; Torben Biester; Emanuele Bosi; Bruce A Buckingham; William T Cefalu; Kelly L Close; Claudio Cobelli; Eyal Dassau; J Hans DeVries; Kim C Donaghue; Klemen Dovc; Francis J Doyle; Satish Garg; George Grunberger; Simon Heller; Lutz Heinemann; Irl B Hirsch; Roman Hovorka; Weiping Jia; Olga Kordonouri; Boris Kovatchev; Aaron Kowalski; Lori Laffel; Brian Levine; Alexander Mayorov; Chantal Mathieu; Helen R Murphy; Revital Nimri; Kirsten Nørgaard; Christopher G Parkin; Eric Renard; David Rodbard; Banshi Saboo; Desmond Schatz; Keaton Stoner; Tatsuiko Urakami; Stuart A Weinzimer; Moshe Phillip
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Sustainable Use of a Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System from 2018 to 2020.

Authors:  Joost van der Linden; John B Welsh; Tomas C Walker
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 10.  International Consensus on Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Authors:  Thomas Danne; Revital Nimri; Tadej Battelino; Richard M Bergenstal; Kelly L Close; J Hans DeVries; Satish Garg; Lutz Heinemann; Irl Hirsch; Stephanie A Amiel; Roy Beck; Emanuele Bosi; Bruce Buckingham; Claudio Cobelli; Eyal Dassau; Francis J Doyle; Simon Heller; Roman Hovorka; Weiping Jia; Tim Jones; Olga Kordonouri; Boris Kovatchev; Aaron Kowalski; Lori Laffel; David Maahs; Helen R Murphy; Kirsten Nørgaard; Christopher G Parkin; Eric Renard; Banshi Saboo; Mauro Scharf; William V Tamborlane; Stuart A Weinzimer; Moshe Phillip
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 19.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.